What if Trump had won

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell


In a post dated January 26, 2015, long before Donald Trump became a candidate for president, we described how the Tea/Republican Party had become the party of hatred.

It encouraged its followers to despise:

–The poor and middle income
–The unemployed
–The elderly
–Those wanting to save the environment
–Science and scientists
–Blacks, browns, yellows, reds
–The “establishment”

Trump is the logical outcome of the hatreds instilled in conservatives by Republican leaders. You only can shake your head in wonder at the “shock” those leaders now feign at Trump’s rise.

Like someone who wanted a vicious dog, the conservatives created and nurtured Trump and all his hatreds. Now that he has come back to bite them, they complain about the very thing they asked for.

In a post dated July 11, 2015, we made the first of our many comparisons of Trump with Adolf Hitler.

Just as Hitler did, Trump appeals to the lowest instincts of humanity. He appeals to hatred and xenophobia.

His unapologetic “birther” campaign against President Obama, was a disguised appeal to haters of blacks.

Trump is our modern-day Hitler, and you will see that haters will be his core constituency, just as the haters were Hitler’s.

Most dictators have gained power via hatred of some group. It happened in Hitler’s Germany. It happened in Stalin’s Russia (Jews and Bolsheviks). It happened in Mao’s China (the rich, the educated, the clergy).

Always, there was some group at which hatred was directed — some group falsely blamed. And the result always has been disaster, for that is where hatred always leads.

As Trump’s popularity rises, it is happening here. He is forcing us onto a well-traveled path.

Though other nations were already at war, World War II is generally is considered to have begun when Germany invaded Poland in 1939.

At that time, Germany was relatively modest in size — about 80 million people — and still was recovering, not just from the Great Depression, but also by the onerous conditions the Allies had exacted as a result of World War I (War Guilt Clause of the Treaty of Versailles).

Germany’s military and wealth had been greatly reduced, but:

(Wikipedia): After the Nazi takeover of power in January 1933, the Nazis pursued a greatly enlarged and more aggressive version of rearmament.

During its struggle for power, the National Socialist party promised to recover Germany’s lost national pride.

Dictators often recruit followers on the basis of restoring the nation’s power (i. e. “Make America great, again.”)

By 1941, “little, weak” Germany conquered most of continental Europe. Hitler ruled Europe in just two years of warfare, but later lost only because he “knew more than the generals.” (Does this sound familiar?)

Ignoring the warnings from those generals, he over-estimated his army’s ability to defeat Russia and the United States.

Until Hitler was defeated, his ruthless rampage cost the world fifty million lives and unimaginable  devastation and human suffering.

Now consider what might have happened had Hitler clone, Donald Trump, won the Presidential election. He would have had, at his command, a huge nation, 330 million strong, and the mightiest military the world has ever known.

Trump’s xenophobia and willingness to employ atomic weapons would have unleashed a human extinction event, leaving the world poisoned for centuries.

Just this past September, we published, Astounding similarities: Of whom does this remind you? It’s happening now.”

If you read it, you will see that the parallels between Hitler and Trump cannot be denied. The evil of one is mirrored in the other.

Fortunately for America and the world, we have escaped what could have been the greatest disaster in human history — an apocalyptic war and a permanent dictatorship over what was left of the world.

We were lucky this time, for clearly the closeness of the election shows that Americans have not learned from history.

Far too many of us still are willing to follow a Hitlerian leader, whose power is based on hatred.

There have been many predictions about what will end human life as we know it — global warming, a huge meteor, an unstoppable virus, an invasion by aliens.

I suspect the most likely event will be the rise of another Hitlerian/Trumpian dictator in a powerful nation like America.

It could have happened. It almost happened.

Unless we learn from history, it will happen.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty



The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.


One thought on “What if Trump had won

  1. More on Trump:

    Of whom does Donald Trump remind you?

    Donald Trump “says what he thinks.” The picture is frightening.

    If Trump is the symptom, what is the disease?

    Scroll down the titles on the left to see other Trump articles.


    A political historian explains why Trump’s tape could destroy the GOP
    By Heather Cox Richardson, October 11th, 2016

    For a generation, the Republican party had been held together by a simple story that activists laid out in the 1950s. President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Republican Party backed government policies that promoted equality of opportunity—projects such as education, infrastructure, government regulation, and social welfare.

    But wealthy men loathed government regulation and taxes. Calling themselves conservatives, they started a movement to undermine the idea that promoting equality of opportunity was the proper role for the American government.

    To push their agenda, movement conservatives rejected fact-based evidence and instead advanced a very simple narrative: hard-working white American men were under siege by minorities, women, organized workers, and “special interests” who wanted government handouts.

    If only the government could be purged from the influence of black people, minorities, lazy workers, and unfeminine women who demanded that the government help them get equal access to schools and jobs, good American men could get back to their traditional role: taking care of their children and their loving, homemaking wives.

    Richard Nixon welcomed this narrative into the Republican Party when he won voters by embracing the Southern Strategy and rallying the “Silent Majority” of hardworking white men who were trying to support their families while shiftless protesters mobbed in the streets.

    Ronald Reagan warned voters against the mythical “welfare queen”—a lazy black woman who stole tax dollars to live in luxury—and promised to defend regular, hardworking Americans against such leeches.

    This image has fired up poor and working-class Republican voters even as conservatives passed legislation that undermined working American’s security by sucking wealth upward.

    It was this narrative that enabled extremists to capture the GOP in the 1990s, dismissing traditional Republicans as RINOs—Republicans in Name Only.

    And so when Trump called Mexicans criminals and rapists, he simply took the movement conservative narrative to its next logical step.

    When he mocked the disabled, attacked Muslims, and called working women pigs and sluts, he was simply stripping the genteel veneer from the same story that conservatives had long advanced.

    But Trump’s tape about forcing himself on women affronts the men who could back his attacks on people of color, minorities, and organized workers as necessary to safeguard their wives and daughters.

    A sexual predator who sees women as his prey is a direct threat to the traditional image of a man whose role is to cherish and protect.

    And so the release of the Access Hollywood tape was the turning point for many Republican men because it undercut their image of what their ideology meant all along.

    Trump wasn’t about respecting and defending the traditional family after all; he was a rich thug who felt entitled to grab whatever he wanted.

    Trump’s continued free fall, suggests that the conservative narrative may finally be dying.

    The release of the tape may force regular Republican voters to face the reality that the conservatives’ demonization of minorities, organized workers, and women who demanded equality was never really about protecting hardworking American families.

    It was about creating a ruling class whose members could commit crimes against less powerful Americans with impunity.

    And so the vulgar boasting of a criminal thug may finally force the GOP to confront the ugly fantasy that has dominated its politics for a generation, and shock American politics back to decency.


    Following in Hitler’s footsteps, a Trump supporter (a sheriff, no less) calls for armed rebellion if Trump loses:

    Sheriff openly calls for riots as Trump says election is ‘rigged’
    David Clarke tweeted that it’s “pitchforks and torches time.”

    Trump’s campaign is currently floundering under the weight of numerous new allegations by women accusing Trump of sexual assault and harassment.

    In response, Trump has smeared the women, threatened to sue the media, and promoted conspiracy theories about the election being rigged against him by the media, the government, and the political establishment.

    Trump has made similar allegations before, encouraging his supporters to watch the polls on election day to “make sure it’s on the up and up.”

    His comments seemed specifically aimed at sending his (overwhelmingly white) supporters to “watch” polls in inner-city areas, which have a higher population of black and Hispanic Americans. Trump is actively recruiting poll watchers at rallies and on social media.

    At a recent rally in Cincinnati, Trump supporters told a reporter for the Boston Globe that they intended to head to local polling stations and watch for illegal immigrants, and that they suspected Hillary Clinton’s campaign was stuffing ballot boxes. They also floated ideas of armed rebellion and assassination.

    “If she’s in office, I hope we can start a coup. She should be in prison or shot.

    That’s how I feel about it,” Dan Bowman, a 50-year-old contractor, told the reporters of Clinton.

    “We’re going to have a revolution and take them out of office if that’s what it takes. There’s going to be a lot of bloodshed. But that’s what it’s going to take… I would do whatever I can for my country.”

    All it takes is a Hitler/Trump to bring the armed crazies out of the woodwork. That’s what they call “patriotism.”

    There are laws against inciting to riot, and I hope they are applied vigorously to Trump, a man who clearly cares nothing for America and our laws.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s