Yet another example of why all banks should be federally owned Thursday, Sep 29 2016 

Visualize this: You go into a bank with a mask and a gun, and you announce, “This is a holdup. All you tellers empty your cash drawers into this bag.”

Then you walk out of the bank, having stolen $3,000.

Later, you are caught, and your sole punishment is that you must give back $500.

See anything wrong with that?

That question occurred to me when I read the following:

Political Pressure Forces Wells Fargo Executives to Give Back $60 Million As Punishment

Wells Fargo was first exposed three years ago by journalists and it has taken this long to finally see some repercussions.

In a first-of-its kind banking scandal punishment, Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf and banking unit executive Carrie Tolstedt will have to give back a total of $60 million.

Although Stumpf initially tried to blame the scandal on his low-level employees, recent political pressure is forcing him to take additional steps.

Wells Fargo is facing enormous scrutiny over routinely opening unauthorized accounts for clients in order to make sales goals. The bank  already has been fined $185 million.

Wells Fargo also fired 5,300 employees, all at lower levels.

The executive in charge of the branch that was responsible for pushing for and implementing the fraudulent accounts, Carrie Tolstedt, was set to retire later this year with a payout of $124.6 million.

But now, after pressure from senators such as Elizabeth Warren, Wells Fargo’s board is forcing the top executives to pay up out of their own pocket.

John Stumpf will have to forfeit $41 million in past compensation and Carrie Tolstedt, who has already resigned, will have to give back $19 million of her own.

Get it? For years, the Chief of Fraud earned millions of dollars and left with $124.6 million extra.  Her “punishment”: $19 million.

The boss, Stumpf, who earned massive yearly salaries and bonuses, will give back the comparative pittance, $41 million.

If that’s punishment, I volunteer. Punish me, PLEASE.

Clawbacks are an important concept for banking regulation. Normally banking executives aren’t affected if their company gets caught bending, or breaking, finance rules to help company stock rise.

Actually, clawbacks are an important part of conning you, the public, into believing banksters are being dealt with harshly.

Are you suitably conned?

I can just visualize the Wells Fargo boardroom: “Well, we got caught, but let’s not kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

“We stole hundreds of millions, so let’s give back a few million and hope this all goes away. Then it’s back to business as usual.”

Stumpf may claim that he “knew nothing, nothing I tell you,” which is obvious BS.

But let’s take him at his word, and assume he did know nothing. If the president of the bank doesn’t know about systematic criminality in his own bank, how could  regulatory agencies do what the president can’t?

Clearly, the bank president, who works full time at the bank, and is paid hundreds  of millions to know what’s going on in his own bank, is in a far better position to uncover wrongdoing than is some underpaid FDIC accountant, who visits the bank once a month, if that.

Bottom line: If the full-time, bank president doesn’t know his own bank, and the little FDIC accountant surely doesn’t, regulation of privately owned banks is impossible, especially with laughable “punishments” for crimes.

Stumpf, Tolstedt et al were motivated by bank profits and personal greed.

A federally owned bank would be run by salaried federal employees. Our Monetarily Sovereign government has no need for profits. So, it won’t pay outrageous bonuses (i.e. crime motivators) to obtain what it doesn’t need.

Wells Fargo is the poster child for Step #9 of the Ten Steps To Prosperity (below): Federal ownership of all banks.

Now if only we could wean Congress off the bribes they receive from the banks.

Is it too late to ask Elizabeth Warren to run for President?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

===================================================================================

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.
========================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Why all banks should be federally owned Monday, Sep 26 2016 

Step #9 of the Ten Steps To Prosperity reads:

FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click: The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)

Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts.

This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.

Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.

The above-referenced link, “The end of private banking” (written in 2012) ends with the following,  prophetic words:

(Banks) cannot be trusted to work in the best interests of the public.  Their motive is profits, not service to the public.

Their misdeeds have caused the recession, damage to the economy and the growing gap between those people with high income (1%) and the rest (99%).

Congressional conservatives will not supervise the bank’s insatiable thirst for profits, which motivates all bank activities. Damage control by the federal government has become an increasing need.

All bank problems boil down to the profit motive. Rather than breaking up the TBTF banks into smaller, (hopefully) more controllable pieces, we should eliminate their fundamental problem, the profit motive.

And, what better way to eliminate the profit motive, than to put banks under total government control, i.e. ownership?

All of the above came to mind when I read an article in Time Magazine. Here are a few excerpts:

Wells Fargo Customer Fraud Deals Political Setback to Banks
Massimo Calabresi @calabresim Sept. 22, 2016

For the enemies of big banks, it was a dream come true. John Stumpf, the CEO of what until recently had been the most valuable bank in the world, Wells Fargo, sat alone under the bright lights of a Senate hearing on Sept. 20, meekly receiving a three-hour public flogging–from industry-friendly Republicans, no less.

Pennsylvania’s Pat Toomey, who is up for re-election, called the bank’s behavior “unbelievable” and “deeply disturbing.”

The committee’s GOP chair, Richard Shelby of Alabama, broke out Watergate language: What did Stumpf know, and when did he know it?

The outrage was real.

Actually, the outrage was phony — a bit of Broadway showmanship to calm the public. If the outrage were real, laws would be passed and  Stumpf would be on his way to prison.

Soon, the GOP will be back to cutting supervision of the TBTF banks, in return for nice, juicy bribes  . . . er, ah . . . campaign contributions and promises of lucrative employment later.

On Sept. 8, government officials revealed that Wells had opened more than 2 million bank and credit-card accounts for customers without their permission from 2011 through 2015, resulting in $2.6 million in unwarranted fees for tens of thousands of unsuspecting clients.

If you pass one bad check, you will go to jail. When Stumpf supervises the opening of 2 million fake accounts, he receives a bonus.

Massachusetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren offered her opinion to a visibly uncomfortable Stumpf: “The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds.”

Yes, the fines mean nothing. They are pocket change to the banks, and have zero impact on bank management — virtually an invitation to future corruption. (“Steal millions, and we’ll fine the bank and give you a tongue-lashing.”)

Stumpf had built the bank’s much admired success on a business strategy that fostered such fraud. “Cross-selling,” or pushing account holders to open new accounts with Wells, was his pride and joy.

Stumpf touted his company’s success with the tactic. The value of Stumpf’s personal holdings jumped by $200 million.

The man made an extra $200 million based on criminality. Give me one reason why he would want to be honest in the future.

Regional bosses set daily quotas for tellers and personal bankers, requiring them to stay late and work weekends or risk being fired.

In a criminal enterprise, the least criminal (or heaven forbid, honest) workers will be punished.

Wells’ management learned of the problem in 2011, but when the city of Los Angeles raised concerns in 2013, Wells said it didn’t give customers any accounts or services they didn’t need.

Stumpf was being paid an extra $200 million to do what? Claim ignorance of complaints? Claim ignorance of malfeasance? What exactly was he being paid to do, if not to condone criminality?

In the world of private banking, the Sergeant Schultz defense (“I know nothing; I see nothing”) not only works, but is rewarded handsomely.

Over time, Wells fired some 5,300 employees and claimed to be rooting out the problem. “This type of activity has no place in our culture,” Stumpf testified.

But the cross-selling push continued until the day of the settlement in early September.

Worse, even as talks were under way, Stumpf and the bank’s board gave a lavish retirement package to the executive in charge of community banking, Carrie Tolstedt, who walked away with $124.6 million in stock and options.

Employees were fired for doing exactly what their bosses told them to do. The little guys always are expendable. Foot soldiers die so generals can receive promotions.

The Justice Department has reportedly issued subpoenas and begun a criminal probe.

U.S. federal prosecutors are vying for the right to go after the bank, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is weighing penalties for managers.

Criminal probe? Hah! No executives will go to jail.  At most, some mid-level chumps will be fined and fired. The top dogs will receive the Carrie Tolstedt bonus treatment.

Democratic staffers on the Hill have discussed the unlikely prospect that special powers could be triggered, allowing regulators to break up Wells.

It won’t happen, but even if it did, it would mean nothing. The result would be smaller, even more crooked banks, rule by additional crooked executives.

And by the way, no “special powers” are needed. The RICO statutes provide ample power and punishments for members of criminal enterprises, which the big, privately-owned banks have proven to be.

Meanwhile, GOP staffers and their allies at other banks are as angry at Wells as anyone.

They say the revelations, coming amid the current populist atmosphere, have at least temporarily derailed efforts to roll back the Dodd-Frank act, which imposed new oversight rules on Wall Street.

Yes, the GOP thinks the rules are too strict, and are angry at Stumpf, not for stealing from the public, but for getting caught.

As for rolling back bad behavior there, says Richard Cordray, head of the powerful but politically embattled Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which imposed $100 million of the federal fine on Wells, “it’s a big project to change the culture at the banks.”

Fines mean nothing. They are treated as a cost of doing business. The only way — the ONLY way — to change the culture is jail the top executives.

Unfortunately, that will require a President and a Congress who actually care more about protecting the public than about protecting the banksters.

GOP attempts to cut Dodd-Frank are not a good omen.

If money is the root of evil, the profit motive is the path to the root of evil. Federal ownership of banks eliminates the profit motive.

There is no consumer value provided by private ownership of banks.  None.

Crooked bankers should be fired and jailed. Their replacements should be federal employees, paid a reasonable salary, based not on any measure of profitability, but rather on providing efficient, honest service to the American public.

Banks, being the primary creators of America’s sovereign currency, should be federal agencies, not private money troughs for the bankster pigs.

And the criminals should be jailed.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

===================================================================================

The most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

The Trump/Clinton debate results. Here is what will happen: Friday, Sep 23 2016 

What people have done in the past is the best predictor of what they will do in the future.

So, here is what will happen at the Clinton/Trump debate:

  1. The debate will open with the biggest debate audience in history, but it will dissipate.
  2. You will shout “Liar! Liar!” at your TV following each candidate’s statement.
  3. Clinton will lie twice, exaggerate seven times  and will dodge two questions.
  4. Trump will lie 57 times, will exaggerate every answer, claim everything he ever has done is “fantastic,” and will deny saying things he previously has said.
  5. Clinton will list the specific instances of Trump lying in the past and during the debate.
  6. Trump will claim that his lies actually are Clinton’s fault, and use the “She started it” excuse.
  7. Trump repeatedly will dodge questions by using the digression that “Clinton is a liar, Obama is weak, America is powerless, and he (Trump) is incredible.”
  8. Breitbart and Fox will ignore Trump’s lies or deny they were lies, or claim the lies were examples of his strength.
  9. CNBC will mention Clinton’s lies, but will focus on Trump’s, and express amazement that anyone believes him.
  10. Trump will demonstrate ignorance about foreign matters, and offer no rational solutions for domestic problems, but instead will blame Clinton for Obama, and blame Obama for everything — and vice-versa.
  11. Clinton will give wonky, boring, forgettable answers to most questions, demonstrate deep knowledge of foreign matters, deny blame for things that went wrong, and claim credit for what went right, even the things in which she was not involved.
  12. Clinton supporters will claim Trump’s lies “prove” he is unfit for office.
  13. Trump supporters will claim Clinton’s lies “prove” she is unfit for office.
  14. Trump will sneer at the Clinton Foundation, Benghazi, Emails, her health, Mexicans, “thugs,” Muslims, gays, and Bill Clinton, but offer no specific data to back any of his claims.
  15. Trump’s generalized “solutions” will involve cracking down on the poor and the powerless, while rewarding the rich.
  16. Clinton will decry the Trump Foundation self-dealing, lack of his tax releases, Trump University, bankruptcies, lawsuits, failure to pay his debts, Putin, the wall, bigotry, Trump’s doctor, and the lack of a plan.
  17. Her detailed solutions will benefit the poor, but no one will believe her.
  18. Neither candidate will promise to put crooked bankers in jail.
  19. Neither candidate will mention cheating on spouses.
  20. Trump is expected to be overbearing, unprepared, lying, braggadocio, and bigoted, so if he is slightly less overbearing, unprepared, lying, braggadocio, or bigoted, he will be considered “Presidential.”
  21. Clinton will try to appear factual and logical, but will be accused of being “Nixonesque” deceptive, no matter what she says. She suffers from the “Dr. Fell” syndrome.
  22. Trump will claim the debate was rigged and that he was treated unfairly. He will refuse to participate in future debates.
  23. The followers of both candidates will criticize the moderator for asking “gotcha” questions of their candidate, for asking “softball” questions of the other candidate, and for not challenging the lies of the other candidate.
  24. Clinton supporters will say she “won” and will say they plan to vote for her, but many will not actually vote.
  25. Trump supporters will say he “won,” but not wanting to look stupid, they will claim they don’t support either candidate. Secretly, they intend to vote for Trump, because they hate the same people he hates.
  26. The twenty-five people in America, who really had not made up their minds before the debate, will not make up their minds after the debate.

There it is. Now, you don’t even need to watch. You know exactly what will happen, the most important question being the winner — i.e. the winner of the Falcons / Saints game.

Long term prediction: If Trump wins the Presidency, within three months, no one will admit to having voted for him.  If Clinton wins, within three years, no one will admit to having voted for her or him.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

===================================================================================

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

How the rich justify stealing our Social Security Wednesday, Sep 21 2016 

Here is an Email I received just today, telling me how the rich justify stealing our Social Security:

Friends,

The House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Social Security will hold a hearing tomorrow on the solvency of the Social Security program where Stephen Goss, Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration and Keith Hall, Director of the Congressional Budget Office, will testify.

In light of this hearing, I wanted to share a new paper from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Sizing Up Social Security’s Solvency Challenge, which explains the significant differences between CBO and the Social Security Trustees.

While both estimators warn that Social Security faces serious financial challenges and is on the fast track to insolvency, CBO has concluded that the problem is much worse and the date of trust fund depletion much sooner than the Trustees believe.

The full paper is available on our website, and for your convenience I’ve also pasted it below.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Marc Goldwein
Senior Vice President, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

We’ve written about the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget before.  They are the folks who want you to believe that the federal government can run out of its own sovereign currency and so can become insolvent.

The fact that for almost two and a half centuries of existence, through wars, recessions, depressions, inflations, and stagflations, the U.S. government never has run out of dollars, and indeed cannot run out of dollars — that fact never is revealed by the CRFB

To the CRFB, any federal deficit is a looming disaster and any federal debt is a ticking time bomb. They are prime disseminators of The Big Lie.

Here are excerpts from their paper:

Social Security faces a large shortfall between scheduled benefits and dedicated revenue, and the program is currently on a path toward insolvency. However, official estimators disagree on the extent of the program’s financial woes.

The Social Security Trustees project the program’s trust funds face a 75-year gap equal to 2.7 percent of payroll (1.0 percent of GDP) and will be depleted by 2034, on a (theoretical) combined basis. Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects a trust fund gap equal to 4.7 percent of payroll (1.6 percent of GDP) and a depletion date of 2029.

The path to insolvency is a gigantic con job, based on deceiving math and factual error.

But fear not. The CRFB offers us a solution:

To avoid these cuts, policymakers should enact a thoughtful mix of revenue and benefit changes that begin soon, phase in slowly, strengthen retirement security for those who rely on benefits, promote economic growth, and secure Social Security’s long-term finances.

This “thoughtful mix of revenue and benefit changes” is the CRFB’s sneaky way of telling us our taxes will be increased and our benefits will be decreased.

But of course, they don’t want to come right out and say it, because we might object to being screwed.  The CRFB hopes we’ll be too stupid to realize what is being done to us, so long as we’re told it’s “thoughtful,” and these are just “changes,” not cuts.

“Why?” you may ask, “does the CRFB publish such tripe, and why does Congress go along with it?”

Follow the link below to see the CRFB Board Members. Notice anything special about them?

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget Board Members

They all are highly paid and they all are white.  These are people of privilege, white society people who enjoy the lush benefits of a wide and ever-widening Gap between the rich and the rest.

No middle- or lower-class people allowed, no minorities need attend.

To bolster their phony argument, the CRFB must, of course, supply statistics.

The above chart supposedly shows you the onrushing insolvency of Social Security. After all, projected Revenue is less than projected Spending, so that means disaster, doesn’t it?

But wait. Couldn’t that graph also refer to the White House?  No FICA, or any other taxes, support the White House, so clearly, projected Revenue is far less than projected Spending.

With zero dedicated revenue, the minute Mrs. Obama throws a party for an ambassador, won’t the White House be insolvent?

And couldn’t the graph also refer to Congress?  No FICA taxes, no dedicated revenue, support Congress, so the instant a Senator goes on an investigative winter tour of the Virgin Islands, Congress will be insolvent. Right?

And what about the Supreme Court? No FICA there either. Have just one of those black robes cleaned, and already Spending exceeds Revenue. Hello, insolvency.

The same is true for the FBI, CIA, FAA, the Army, the Navy, and all the other 1000 agencies of the federal government. No dedicated revenue.

But yet, here we are, running along without insolvency. Why? How?

The federal government, absolutely, positively cannot run short of U.S. dollars. It created the original laws that created the original dollars — as many laws and as many dollars as they wished.

So why do we hear repeated cries of “Insolvency! Insolvency! when discussing the Social Security and Medicare federal agencies?

Because those are the two agencies most responsible for closing the Gap between the rich and the rest.

The rich run America and they love the Gap.  

Without the Gap, no one would be rich. (We all would be the same.) And the wider the Gap, the richer they are.

So the rich fund organizations like CRFB to sell us The Big Lie. That way, when Congress decides to take dollars from our pockets by raising our taxes and cutting our benefits, we’ll agree without making a fuss.

And the rich fund Congress, now in unlimited amounts thanks to a right-wing Supreme Court.  So Congress is only too happy to go along.

And us, like docile little puppies, we’ll eat the crap they feed us, and even wag our tails in appreciation.

Now repeat after me: “Bow wow, thank you, master. Please cut my Social Security, again.”

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

===================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-tranferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be an good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Next Page »