Why does the world’s richest man want you to have less money?

For many rich people, acquiring wealth has become so ingrained in their lives that they don’t feel comfortable unless they are searching for ways to acquire more. I have acquaintances like that. They already have far more than they ever will spend in their remaining years, yet they are frugal to the point of absurdity.

They tip at the lower end of the scale. They give only minimally to charity. They search grocery ads for sales.

For the ultra-wealthy, the top 0.1%, the easiest path to growing their fortunes is to create distance from those beneath them, often by pushing for the government to spend less on supporting people with fewer resources.

Elon Musk is a classic example, as this article demonstrates:

America’s debt bill has grown so large that even the world’s richest man, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, sounded less like a tech mogul and more like someone warning the country its financial engine was starting to smoke.

“A country is no different from a person,” Musk said during a Fox News interview in 2025. “If a country overspends and doesn’t spend wisely, just like a person, the country will go bankrupt.”

Musk understands that the finances of a Monetarily Sovereign nation like the U.S. work differently from those of an individual.

The U.S. has the unlimited capacity to create dollars, so if it needed to pay a ten trillion or even a hundred trillion-dollar invoice, it could do so effortlessly with just a few keystrokes.

In practical terms, the federal government cannot go bankrupt, and it doesn’t even need to collect taxes.

He said corruption, waste, and unchecked spending were pushing the country toward dangerous territory.

“The reason I’m here is because I’m very worried about America going bankrupt due to the corruption and waste,” Musk told Fox News. “And if we don’t do something about it, the ship of America is going to sink. And we’re all on that ship.”

Musk confuses corruption and waste, which are two distinct issues. Corruption means breaking the law, like what the Trump family does routinely. Waste, on the other hand, is about unnecessary spending, such as Musk’s claims regarding underpaid federal workers he let go in large numbers without recognizing their contributions.

So why the lies? To confuse.

By presenting the situation in widely accepted, though inaccurate, terms, he attempts to persuade Americans that the government should cut spending on major programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other initiatives that help those with fewer resources.

This allows him to increase his wealth by further widening the gap in income, wealth, and power between himself and those below him.

When Musk made the comments last year, the federal government was already running deficits near $1.8 trillion annually. Fiscal year 2025 ultimately closed with a deficit of roughly $1.8 trillion, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates.

The numbers now are not much better.

The CBO and other fiscal watchdog groups project fiscal year 2026 deficits to land around $1.9 trillion, with some estimates climbing above $2 trillion. In just the first six months of fiscal year 2026, the federal government had already borrowed about $1.2 trillion.

The public does not understand two key facts:

  1. The federal government can run deficits indefinitely by simply creating money electronically, so it can never run out of dollars.
  2. Deficits are crucial for economic growth, as every depression in U.S. history has followed periods of government surpluses, and nearly every recession has been caused by deficits that were too small.

The formula for economic growth is: Gross Domestic Product (GDP) = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports. A drop in Federal Spending also impacts Non-federal Spending and results in reduced GDP. Simple algebra.

Interest payments are becoming an even bigger issue. Recent projections show annual interest costs on the national debt topping $1 trillion, meaning more taxpayer money is being spent servicing existing debt instead of funding government programs or infrastructure.

Federal interest payments stimulate economic growth by channeling money from the government, which has unlimited funds, to businesses and individuals who then spend it.

America’s debt bill has grown so large that even the world’s richest man, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, sounded less like a tech mogul and more like someone warning the country its financial engine was starting to smoke.

No, he sounded more like a rich Trump appointee, parroting the party line that the rich are America’s honest heroes, while the rest of us are lazy slackers, responsible for “corruption and waste.”

Musk framed the debt problem in terms most households already understand.

Long ago, sailors were cautioned not to venture too far, for fear they might fall off the edge of the world—a warning framed in terms everyone could grasp.

Similarly, by equating corruption with waste and falsely claiming the federal government is going bankrupt, Musk exploited the public’s misunderstanding of how federal finances actually work.

When Musk made the comments last year, the federal government was already running deficits near $1.8 trillion annually. Fiscal year 2025 ultimately closed with a deficit of roughly $1.8 trillion, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates.

The numbers now are not much better.

Pumping less money into the economy isn’t “better” — it’s actually much worse. If not from the federal government, where else can the economy get the growth dollars it needs?

The CBO and other fiscal watchdog groups project fiscal year 2026 deficits to land around $1.9 trillion, with some estimates climbing above $2 trillion. In just the first six months of fiscal year 2026, the federal government had already borrowed about $1.2 trillion.

More than a year after the Fox News interview, the central issue Musk raised remains largely unchanged. Deficits are still approaching $2 trillion, debt interest costs continue climbing, and Washington still has not found a clear path to slow either one down.

These warnings are nothing new. In fact, the post, “Historical BULLSHIT Claims the Federal Debt Is a ‘Ticking Time Bomb’”: From Sept. 26, 1940 to April 20, 2026, highlights that the same false claims have been repeated for the past 86 years. Yet, despite their consistent inaccuracy, many people still believe them.

Interest payments are becoming an even bigger issue. Recent projections show annual interest costs on the national debt topping $1 trillion, meaning more taxpayer money is being spent servicing existing debt instead of funding government programs or infrastructure.

This is where inconsistency turns from ignorance to comedy. First, they gripe about deficits; then, they gripe about taxpayer money. But the two are opposites—deficits mean there isn’t enough taxpayer money.

In short, the federal government can’t run out of dollars, and the more it puts into the economy, the more it fuels economic growth. The wealthy spread falsehoods about our economy to cut back the benefits we get from the government, ultimately making themselves even richer.

The result is a litany of lies, including:

  1. The federal government “can’t afford” to pay for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps and other social benefits.
  2. Taxes supporting social benefits must be increased, especially the taxes paid by the lower 90% income groups.
  3. When the government spends, that is “socialism,” which is bad for the economy.

Folks, it simply is not true. These believing those claims are the suckers the rich believe them to be.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

One of my favorite magazines — WIRED — gets it wrong.

WIRED is one of the best magazines these days — interesting, comprehensive articles about technical subjects. There is nothing like it. But they sure blew it this time.

An article in the May edition makes two main points: A gas tax holiday won’t lower gas prices much (true), and the gas tax supports road maintenance (false).

Here are some excerpts and comments:

Why a Federal Gas Tax Holiday Is a Terrible Idea, By Molly Taft, May 15, 2026

Reducing the fee will have only a marginal impact on prices while depriving the government of revenue to maintain roads.

Immediately, the misunderstanding rears its head.

The finances of the U.S. federal government are not like state and local government finances, or business finances, or your personal finances.

The federal government uniquely is Monetarily Sovereign. It has the infinite ability to create dollars at the touch of a computer key.

It is impossible to “deprive the government of revenue.”

As gas prices stay stubbornly high across the country, President Donald Trump mused this week about suspending the fuel tax US consumers pay.

The idea is also picking up steam in Congress, with Democratic and Republican lawmakers pushing for a gas tax holiday.

But experts tell WIRED that it’s unlikely that any rollback—even temporary—of the fee will save consumers much as the unofficial start to summer travel season nears.

“It’s unlikely that oil prices, gasoline prices, diesel prices are going to fall back to where they were in February any time in the next couple months,” says Clark Williams-Derry, an analyst at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.

The average price of gasoline across the country was $4.53 per gallon as of Thursday, up from $4.12 a month ago, and $3.18 last year, according to AAA. That includes the federal gas tax, which is a little over 18 cents a gallon.

Trump can’t suspend the gas tax on his own—it would take an act of Congress. (Taylor Rogers, a White House spokesperson, noted the 18-cent savings in WIRED’s request for comment, and added that this move “would be a temporary measure.”)

The tax, which was created in 1932, has never been suspended. But politicians from both sides of the aisle have put forward a variety of bills this year that would temporarily lift the federal tax.

The date is important. Back in 1932, the federal government was less Monetarily Sovereign because it was hampered by a gold standard. It restricted its own money-creation ability by requiring itself to store gold, the value of which supposedly supported the value of the dollar.

It was all a self-crippling charade, of course, because the only thing that ever has supported the value of the dollar is the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

President Nixon demonstrated the folly of gold and silver standards by simply ending them in 1971. At the stroke of a pen, the fictional “backing” for the dollar disappeared, and only the real backing remained.

Even if the tax is suspended for the summer, drivers wouldn’t necessarily see much in the way of savings. Prices at the pump are decided by a number of different factors, from refining costs to the costs to operate gas stations.

And inflation driven by high fuel prices and a shortage in commodities that rely on oil as a key input, like fertilizer, around the world is also making life more expensive for Americans. In April, the consumer price index—used to measure inflation—was up 3.8 percent year over year.

With the costs of everything from food and rent to airfare ticking up, an 18-cent savings doesn’t add up to much over the long run.

“When you take away the retail gas tax, it’s not going to have a dramatic effect [for consumers],” says Tyson Slocum, the director of the energy program at the progressive think tank Public Citizen. “But what would be dramatic is the loss in federal revenues.”

Wrong. Congress could supply all the needed revenues just by voting. That is the same way Congress provides revenues to the military branches, the White House, the Supreme Court and to Congress itself, as well as all other federal projects.

The federal gas tax funds the Highway Trust Fund, which was formed to support highway maintenance and mass transit projects.

Wrong. The tax funds nothing. It’s not even a trust fund (See: The Phony Trust Fund Controversy) It’s just a line item in a federal balance sheet — which Congress can add to or reduce at whim.

That fund was already facing severe insolvency issues even before proposals to lift the federal gas tax.

No federal program can become insolvent unless Congress and the President want it to.

Williams-Derry points out that many of the roads in the US are “literally crumbling:” Nearly 40 percent of the country’s highways and roadways are in need of repair, a 2025 survey found. The already low taxes are a big driver of poor infrastructure, he says.

No, Congress’s and the President’s unwillingness to allocate sufficient funds is the problem.

Cutting off revenue, even temporarily, would only exacerbate the problem.

Congress and the President created the problem, and they also can fix it. The tax is just an excuse to do nothing, much like how the FICA tax is used as an excuse to cut Social Security and Medicare.

There’s also a possibility that a temporary break could be extended indefinitely, given the political risks of reinstating it, particularly as midterms near.

“The loss of federal revenues available to ensure that our transportation infrastructure remains sound, it’s just not a good deal for consumers,” Slocum says.

The loss of federal revenues is entirely in the hands of Congress and the President. No tax is necessary or even helpful.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

This is insane. Where are the Democrats in this?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ghislaine-guard-goes-public-with-claims-that-rattle-trump-allies/vi-AA23gtRZ?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=6a073f0c24304456a2b22fcd6c1ee625&ei=16#details

Do you have any thoughts?
And what about this: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzQgLrstMMwpZNPPSPmpPmWVMxNx
It just gets crazier and crazier.
And under the title, “There’s a (MAGA) sucker born every minute” we have this: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/trump-phone-buyers-confront-59-million-refund-fine-print-as-company-promises-to-start-deliveries/ar-AA23fqfU?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=6a078c830da549c79390b20d9b0a4fa2&ei=34 These fools never learn

An especially pointed article by Robert Reich

Robert Reich (robertreich@substack.com) published an especially pointed article, today. Here it is in its entirety.

MAGAs may neither read nor understand it, but those who aren’t easily swayed by con artists, personal greed or bigotry may find the following helpful when responding to a MAGA rant.

—————————-

How to Describe this Catastrophe?
We must use words that accurately describe who Trump and his lackeys really are — and what they are actually doing to America
Robert Reich, May 15, 2026

Friends,

Words matter. When describing a government, they inevitably carry moral weight.

Over the last 16 months, Trump and his appointees have so profoundly undermined the United States government that we should use different words to describe these people than we’ve used to describe all previous administrations.

To begin with, they shouldn’t be called an “administration” at all. They should be referred to as a regime.

The Trump regime has flagrantly defied court orders. In February 2026, a federal judge (appointed by President George W. Bush) identified approximately 200 orders from the District of Minnesota alone that ICE had ignored since the start of the year, concluding that ICE had “likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.”

The regime has also vilified judges who rule against it and demanded their impeachment.

The regime has usurped Congress’s powers to declare war, issue tariffs, and appropriate public funds. It is using tariffs as cudgels for Trump’s political aims. The regime is seeking to stifle speech and silence criticism — in universities, law firms, and the media.

Secondly, this regime is not headed by a “president,” as the Constitution of the United States and our laws and history have designated the head of the executive branch of the U.S. government. To put the term “President” before Trump’s name defiles the Constitution. He is an authoritarian.

Trump has illegally fired more than 300,000 career civil servants. He has fired inspectors general who are charged with holding political appointees accountable. He punishes whistleblowers who protest abuses.

He attacks marginalized groups and foments bigotry. He is openly persecuting political opponents.

He has given out pardons to convicted felons who are political supporters or financial contributors — including nursing home fraudsters, a Honduran president who smuggled 400 tons of cocaine into the United States, and January 6 seditionists.

He has sent federal troops into states and cities headed by Democratic officials.

Thirdly, Trump has no interest in governing. He wants only to impose his will and make money from his office. His regime’s disregard for law is so monumental that it negates what we have come to understand as a “government of laws.” A better word for it is lawless.

During the first 16 months of Trump’s lawless regime, immigration agents have shot or killed 16 people, including three U.S. citizens. More people died last year in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement — a total of 32 — than in the preceding 20 years.

People only suspected of being in the U.S. illegally have been detained or deported by masked and armed immigration agents, without a hearing. People only suspected of smuggling drugs have been murdered by the U.S. military in international waters, in violation of international law.

Meanwhile, Trump is accepting gifts from foreign powers. He blatantly promotes his family’s crypto business and implements policies favorable to it.

He has sued the Internal Revenue Service for $10 billion and is now in settlement negotiations with his own Justice Department, which reportedly has offered to drop any future IRS audits of Trump, his family, or his businesses.

Finally, the true test of a successful president of the United States and his (eventually her) administration is not how much power he accumulates or how much he gets done. The real test is how much better off are the American people and how much stronger is our democracy. By these measures, Trump and his regime are not just lawless. They are a catastrophe.

—————————–

There are only three types of people still backing Trump and the mental midgets of his compliant Republican Party:

  1. the wealthiest 5%, who care little for the other 95% so long as they can personally profit (They are the ones who joined Trump on his trip to China or who now claim his actions in Iran and supplication to Xi Jinping were successful);
  2. the haters and bigots, who claim to be good religious patriots while they take pleasure in seeing anyone different from them punished (They are the ones who six days a week relish the suffering of the powerless, then visit church one day a week to demand God’s support);
  3. the gullible, who believe whatever an obvious con artist tells them (They are the ones who sent billionaire Trump money for his Trump-branded water, playing cards and steaks).

You know them. Some are your long-time friends. Sad to say, some are my long-time friends, too.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell