No, Social Security cannot run short of money unless that is exactly what Congress and the President want.

These are the lies you are being told: 

“Social Security is facing a serious long-term funding shortfall, with projections showing its Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund could be depleted by 2032 if Congress takes no action.

“The crisis is driven by demographic changes: fewer workers are supporting more retirees. In 1950, there were 16.5 workers for every beneficiary; today, fewer than three workers support each retiree, and by 2040 the ratio is projected to drop to about two workers per beneficiary govfacts.org govfacts.org .

“Longer life expectancy and lower birth rates have also increased the number of people drawing benefits.”

That was written by the AI called Copilot. So I went on Copilot and asked, “Do you agree with what you said, here?

Here is the Copilot response:

I checked the link you provided. The search results include articles from: CNBC, The Hill, AARP, CRFB (Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget), Various news outlets.

These articles generally say: “The Social Security trust fund is projected to ‘run out’ in the 2030s. If Congress does nothing, benefits would be reduced. The cause is demographic: fewer workers per retiree. Congress could fix it through tax changes or benefit changes.”

These are mainstream policy narratives. They do not describe how federal finance actually works.

Here is the core point: The Social Security trust fund is not a pile of money. It is an accounting ledger. It cannot run out of dollars.

This is not a political opinion. It is a description of federal monetary operations. Operational facts (non‑political, non‑ideological): The U.S. Treasury pays Social Security benefits by crediting bank accounts.

The Federal Reserve clears those payments. Neither the Treasury nor the Fed uses “trust fund dollars” to do this.

The trust fund balance is a legal constraint, not a financial one. Congress can change the legal constraint at any time. Social Security cannot become insolvent in any financial sense. Only Congress can stop payments, not “lack of money.”

So there you have it. The notion that the Social Security trust fund is a legal fiction created by Congress and Congress can changed it at any it chooses — not by cutting benefits, not by raising taxes — simply by changing  the law.

How? By funding Social Security (and Medicare) the same way it funds the military, the White House, Congressional salaries and benefits, the Supreme Court, and virtually every other federal program: By voting.

The lie equates federal finances with household finances. 

Alan Greenspan, Former Federal Reserve Chairman: “A government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency. There is nothing to prevent the federal government from creating as much money as it wants and paying it to somebody. The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print the money to do that.”

Ben Bernanke, Former Federal Reserve Chairman: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. It’s not tax money… We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.”

Beardsley Ruml, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York . “The necessity for a government to tax in order to maintain both its independence and its solvency is true for state and local governments, but it is not true for a national government. All federal taxes must meet the test of public policy and practical effect. The public purpose which is served should never be obscured in a tax program under the mask of raising revenue.”

Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell: “As a central bank, we have the ability to create money digitally.”: There’s an infinite amount of cash in the Federal Reserve. We will do whatever we need to do to make sure there’s enough cash in the banking system.” 60 Minutes in March 2020

Statement from the St. Louis Fed: “As the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e., unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.”

Paul O’Neill, “I come to you as a managing trustee of Social Security. Today we have no assets in the trust fund. We have promises of the good faith and credit of the United States government that benefits will flow.”

Paul Krugman, Nobel Prize–winning economist: “The U.S. government is not like a household. It literally prints money, and it can’t run out.” “The government can always finance its spending by creating money.”

Why are you being lied to?

The very rich run America.

“Rich” is a comparative term.  A person having $10,000 is rich if everyone else has only $1,000, but that same person is poor if everyone else has $100,000.

To be rich requires that there be an income/wealth/power Gap between you and those below you. The wider the Gap, the richer you are. So be be richer, you must make more for yourself and/or you must make sure those below you have less.

The rich have chosen both routes. They get more for themselves by bribing politicians to rig the tax code, so the loopholes benefit the rich but not the rest.

And they bribe the politicians to lie that Social Security, Medicare, food, and shelter benefits are “unsustainable,” and “unaffordable,” and that FICA taxes must be increased.

To keep you from protesting, the rich bribe the main sources of your information:

1. They bribe the politicians with campaign contributions and promises of lucrative employment later.
2. They bribe the media with advertising dollars and with outright ownership of the media.
3. They bribe the university economics professors with research grants and endowments.

The bottom line: There is no Social Security crisis. The Congress and the President could eliminate FICA and still double or triple Social Security benefits merely by voting. Period.

And do not believe the lies about the federal government being “in debt,” or that spending is “unsustainable,” or that federal support will “cause inflation.” 

The rich want you to believe those lies so you won’t object while they steal you blind.

The only way to end the lies, and to receive fairness is to protest, loud and clear. Have you phoned your Senator or Representative lately. Or is it too much trouble so you’d rather have your  Social Security and Medicare taken from you.?

Here are a few more facts, in case you’re interested:

—————///—————

1. It’s not really federal “debt” as commonly understood. It’s deposits into T-security accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank, similar to deposits into your private bank savings accounts, but safer.
2. Those deposits pose no threat to the federal government’s solvency. As a monetarily sovereign entity, its ability to pay its bills is infinite.
3. Those deposits also pose no threat to taxpayers. Neither the deposits nor the interest are funded by taxes. The government creates new dollars to fund interest and all other federal spending.
4. The federal government has the power to pay off the entire “debt” (deposits) today, if it chose to, merely by returning all the dollars in those T-security accounts.
5. Federal deficits are in lockstep with T-security issuance legally, but not financially. As a monetarily sovereign government, the federal government never borrows dollars. It creates all the dollars it needs by pressing computer keys.
6. Even if the federal government collected $0 taxes, it could fund spending forever.
7. T-securities do not provide spending money to the government. The purposes of T-securities are:
   A. To provide a safe, interest-paying place to store unused dollars and
   B. To help the Fed control interest rates by providing a base rate
8. The federal government can control T-security market interest rates by changing its laws and/or by increasing or decreasing the supply of T-securities.
9. The federal government has the infinite ability to pay interest, simply by pressing computer keys. No taxes are involved.
10. Just as T-securities do not provide the government with spending money, federal taxes also do not provide the government with spending money. The purposes of federal taxes are:
    A. To control the economy by taxing what the government wishes to discourage and by giving tax breaks to what the government wishes to reward, and
    B. To assure demand for the U.S. dollar by requiring that taxes be paid in dollars.
11. Federal interest payments add dollars and income to the private sector and stimulate demand and economic growth.
12. Federal deficits add net dollars to the economy; federal surpluses take net dollars out. Historically, every U.S. depression has been preceded by federal surpluses/debt reduction. The Clinton surpluses were followed by the 2001 recession. When deficits resumed, federal dollars again flowed into the economy..The federal government’s red ink is the economy’s black ink.
13. Recessions tend to be cured by increased deficit spending.
14. FICA does not fund Social Security or Medicare. The so-called “trust funds” are not real trust funds. Federal money creation funds those programs (and all other federal programs). The “trust funds” are line items tracking payments and disbursements, nothing at all like trust funds.
15. One of the greatest threats to the U.S. economy is the false belief that federal deficits and debt resemble private sector deficits and debt, and that the economy can grow without federal deficit spending. It has not. It will not. It cannot.
16. In real-world economies, inflation begins with shortages of crucial goods and services, not with excessive federal spending. Federal spending can worsen inflation after it has begun, but historically the initiating cause has been shortages—most often of energy and food.
17. Inflation begins with shortages. The cure is to cure the shortages. Federal spending to increase the production and distribution of scarce goods and services fights inflation rather than causing it.
18. Federal spending cuts make people poorer, which doesn’t produce another barrel of oil, bushel of wheat, house, or semiconductor. Increasing supply does.
19. Gap Psychology — the human desire to widen the income/wealth/power gap below and to narrow it above — is the psychological basis for economics.

Rodger Malcolm  Mitchell

 

 

OK. Take a look at https://mythfighter.com/2026/09/01/heres-my-plan-to-destroy-america-and-democracy/

Here’s my plan to destroy America and democracy in just two years:

1. Start a war I promised not to start.
2. Fire my most experienced generals.
3. Fire the blacks, women, and gays in the military, no matter how effective they are as soldiers.
4. Hire an incompetent, inexperienced Fox News announcer to run the military.
5. Create a Gestapo and call it “ICE,” to terrorize people who are not white Christian Republicans.
6. Lose the war because I have no experienced and competent people to run it. Blame Biden and Obama for the loss, while I repeatedly claim we have won.
7. Make sure the Republican Party has no voice other than mine.
8. Hire bootlickers for the Supreme Court, and have them give me kingly powers
9. Force the schools to say good things about me. Call any criticism of bigotry “woke.”
10. Weaponize my Justice Department to attack everyone who disagrees with me.
11. Penalize all the media who tell the truth about me.
12. Then, when the voters realize what I have done and want to vote me out, have the postal service stop mailing ballots and use gerrymandering wherever it’s most damaging.

What do you think, Mr.  Putin?

Pretty good, but you forgot a couple of things:

1. Free the criminals who attacked Congress and tried to overthrow your government.
2. Make enemies of America’s former Allies.
3. Claim all your enemies are communists. Get cozy with Kim and me.
4. Don’t defend any country I attack.
5. Don’t listen to doctors, Hire a fool to block vaccines, medical research, and health care insurance. Promote fake cures like hydroxychloroquine.
6. Split up that damn NATO thing.
7. Start inflation by instituting high tariff taxes on your own consumers.
8. Give tax breaks to your rich pals. Raise taxes on everyone else.
9. You and your family steal as much as your Supreme Court, and your Republican Party will justify.
10. If it’s good, claim you did it. If it’s bad, blame anyone else.
11. Claim that climate change is a “con job” and that wind turbines cause cancer, so your coal pals can make profits while the world heats up and floods.
12. Never keep your word. Cheat and lie about everything. Admit nothing. Deny everything.

    

13. Name everything — streets, monuments, symphony halls, buildings, etc. — after you.
14. To prove you are a patriot, hug and kiss the American flag. Do the same with unwilling women.

Just keep saying to yourself, “What would Kim Jong Un, Vlad, and Adolf do, and you’ll be OK.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Fifty years ago, we put humans on the moon. They stayed a short time and left. Now, the goal is more ambitious and considerably more complicated — far too complicated for any person or even group of people to visualize completely.

For your interest, here is a brief thought on how that visualization might be accomplished. We call it:

THE UNIVERSAL ENGINEER
An Artificial Intelligence System in Which Everything Communicates With Everything Else

The Question: How can separate intelligences communicate well enough that their collective activity becomes capable of solving problems no individual intelligence could solve?

The Assignment: Establish 50 humans on the Moon and create a self-sustaining civilization capable of persisting for thousands of years without essential support from Earth.

I. THE PROBLEM

Human beings solve complicated problems by breaking them down. Medicine is divided into specialties. Engineering is divided into specialties. Science is divided into disciplines. Governments are divided into departments.

A lunar settlement similarly would have specialists in propulsion, structures, radiation, agriculture, medicine, psychology, energy, communications, manufacturing, genetics, education, and thousands of other subjects.

Division makes complicated problems intellectually manageable. It also creates a fundamental weakness. Specialization divides a reality that is not divided. The food specialist may discover the best way to grow food without knowing that the solution creates a problem for the water specialist. The water specialist solves that problem but increases power requirements, which creates huge problems for the power specialist. Etc.

Today, AI data centers are creating huge power, labor, construction, political and other economic problems, with each sector vying for dominance. But what is best for the future of America? How will we determine that?

For the Moon mission, each response changes cost, reliability, energy consumption, manufacturing requirements, and available cargo capacity. And somewhere far down the chain, a solution to a food problem may have changed the psychological environment of a child who will be born on the Moon 40 years later.

Every solution becomes a new system stimulus. Every stimulus produces responses. Those responses become new stimuli. The consequences propagate. Human brains can follow only a tiny fraction of those interactions.

We suggest that a system we call “The Universal Engineer” would be designed specifically to track and solve such complex problems.

II. NATURE ALREADY HAS SOLVED A SIMILAR PROBLEM

A human body contains trillions of cells performing an extraordinary variety of specialized functions. No central intelligence consciously directs all of them. The kidneys regulate their domain. The lungs regulate theirs. So do the heart, liver, digestive system, skin, endocrine system, nervous system, immune system, muscles, bones, and blood vessels.

They are specialized without being isolated. They continually communicate. The brain does not calculate every heartbeat or decide how much sodium every nephron should reclaim. In effect, the architecture says: “Do what you do. Sense what is happening. Respond locally when appropriate. Tell the rest of the organism what has changed. Escalate what requires broader attention.”

That is the model for the Universal Engineer.

It would not be one gigantic artificial intelligence attempting consciously to think about everything. It would be a society of specialized intelligences joined by a universal communication system.

The intelligence of the Universal Engineer would reside not merely in its individual specialists, but in each of their ability to weigh options and to communicate with all other specialists and ultimately with a decision central.

III. THE FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIVE

Everything begins with one objective: Maximize the probability that an initial population of 50 humans can establish a self-sustaining lunar civilization capable of surviving for thousands of years without essential support from Earth.

That is the trunk of the decision tree. Everything else is subordinate. Cost, safety, comfort, food production, energy, genetics, psychological stability, and political stability all matter. But none is independently the objective. Each matters because of its effect upon the probability of long-term survival.

The Universal Engineer therefore does not ask merely, “Which habitat is safest?” It asks, “How does this degree of safety, including everything required to produce it and every consequence produced by it, affect the overall probability of long-term survival?

IV. THE ORGANS OF THE UNIVERSAL ENGINEER

The lunar-survival problem initially might be divided into major domains such as:

1. Transportation and logistics;
2. Habitat and physical protection;
3. Atmosphere and environmental control;
4. Water, food and biological cycling; e
5. Energy and physical resources;
6. Human biology and medicine;
7. Reproduction, population and genetics;
8. Psychology, society and governance;
9. Knowledge, education and communication;
10. Manufacturing, maintenance and technological adaptation.

These divisions are provisional. Reality does not contain departments. Humans invented departments because human minds require them. The Universal Engineer should be free to redraw those boundaries whenever another organization better represents reality.

More importantly, the domains must never become informational islands. Every part of the Universal Engineer (UE) must be capable of receiving information generated by every other part. That is how nature created humans, with every organ communicating to and from the entire body

For a living creature, the above might correspond to kidneys, heart, intestines, bones, etc. each of which communicates with all the others, to a greater or lesser degree, via nerves, blood, etc. For example, a pain in your toe might be felt in your knee via what is called “referred” pain.” No part of the human body is isolated from the rest.

Thus, though, for instance, the kidneys can be seen as a blood cleansing computer system, the results of its work are communicated to every part of the body. That is the system used by the Universal Engineer.

V. THE UE  COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

The UE should be designed around a principle that living organisms demonstrate extraordinarily well: Specialize locally. Communicate globally.

Information should travel through many physical channels because different physical phenomena reveal different aspects of reality. The UE therefore should possess the technological equivalents of multiple biological communication systems.

Optical “bloodstream.” High-capacity optical networks would carry enormous quantities of general information throughout the system. This is the informational circulation system: observations, measurements, models, hypotheses, predictions, warnings, failures, uncertainties, decisions, and changes of state continually flowing through the UE.

Electronic nervous system. Electronic communication would provide extremely rapid local sensing, signaling, and control. Where milliseconds or microseconds matter, information should not wait for higher-level deliberation. Local systems should respond locally while simultaneously reporting what occurred.

Radio system. Wireless communication would connect mobile machinery, astronauts, sensors, vehicles, satellites, robots, remote installations, and components for which physical connections are impractical.

Acoustic and vibration system. Structures and machinery constantly communicate their physical condition through vibration. Bearings, pumps, pressure vessels, habitats, excavation equipment, rotating machinery, and structural members all possess physical signatures. Changes in those signatures may reveal deterioration long before conventional failure alarms occur. The UE should listen.

Thermal system. Temperature itself carries information. Every machine, habitat, organism, battery, chemical process, agricultural system, and electronic component produces a changing thermal signature. The UE should perceive the lunar settlement not merely as objects, but as a continuously changing three-dimensional thermal field.

Mechanical system. Pressure, strain, acceleration, load, torque, displacement, vibration, and movement continually reveal the physical state of structures and machines. These are not merely engineering measurements. They are communications from physical reality.

Chemical system. The atmosphere, water supply, soil or growth media, waste streams, human bodies, plants, microorganisms, industrial processes, and medical systems continually communicate through chemistry. Oxygen, carbon dioxide, trace gases, hormones, metabolites, nutrients, contaminants, pathogens, salts, proteins, and thousands of other substances are information. The chemistry itself is part of the communication network.

Radiation system. The radiation environment must become another continuously sensed information field. Solar activity, cosmic radiation, shielding performance, accumulated biological exposure, electronic degradation, material changes, and local variations would become part of the Universal Engineer’s continuously updated understanding of the colony.

And these categories should not be considered exhaustive. The UE should continually ask, “What physical phenomenon exists from which useful information can be extracted?”

Magnetic fields, electromagnetic emissions, gravity, electrical resistance, capacitance, optical changes, chemical gradients, microscopic deformation, sound, radiation, heat, pressure, and phenomena not initially recognized as useful communication channels all become candidates.

Nothing should be dismissed merely because humans traditionally have not called it a communications system.

VI. EVERYONE HEARS; EACH LISTENER DECIDES WHAT MATTERS

This may be the most important architectural principle of the Universal Engineer. Ordinary communication systems often require the sender to determine who should receive a message. That creates the dangerous assumption that the sender must know who needs to know.

But in an enormously complicated system, the sender frequently cannot know. A microscopic change in atmospheric chemistry might matter to medicine, agriculture, corrosion, manufacturing, psychology, fire protection, water processing, or some specialty whose relevance nobody anticipated.

Therefore, information should not be restricted only to recipients whom the sender believes will need it. All relevant information will enter the common circulation. Every function can receive it. This is a corollary the human bloodstream, where every function receives blood, and each function uses the information it needs. The kidneys use different information from the blood vs. the lungs, bones, nose, etc.

The intelligence lies in the receiving filters. Each specialist AI continuously asks, “Does this matter to me?” At each level, most information will be ignored. Some will cause minor adjustments. Some will be retained because they might become significant when combined with later information. A tiny fraction will trigger immediate attention.

The filters themselves will learn. An agricultural AI that previously ignored a particular vibration frequency might discover that the frequency predicts a pump condition affecting nutrient delivery. From then on, its filter changes.

Thus communication becomes not only Universal, but evolutionary. The system, as a whole, learns not only what information means, but who needs to hear it.

VII. NO SINGLE COMMUNICATION CHANNEL IS AUTHORITATIVE

This redundancy is essential. A pump might report electronically that it is operating normally, but its vibration signature might say otherwise. Its electrical consumption might have changed, or its temperature might be increasing. The UE should not merely ask what the pump’s electronic controller reports, but what does everything we can observe about this pump collectively tell us?

The same principle applies to humans, plants, buildings, machines, ecosystems, and eventually the entire lunar civilization. Different channels provide partially independent descriptions of the same reality. Disagreement among them is information.

VIII. THE UNIVERSAL MODEL

At the center of the UE system would be a continuously changing computational representation of the entire lunar community. It would be a dynamic network containing entities, relationships, histories, constraints, probabilities, assumptions, uncertainties, and competing explanations.

Every significant communication changes that model. Every proposed action enters it as a new stimulus. The UE then propagates the consequences.

A proposed agricultural change affects water which affects energy, which affects heat in an ongoing cascade of information.

The process continues until additional consequences become sufficiently improbable or sufficiently insignificant that computational resources are better used elsewhere. The Universal Engineer continually decides what deserves further thought.

IX. WEIGHTING

The UE must weight possibilities.

Every significant predicted consequence would be evaluated according to such considerations as probability, magnitude, reversibility, uncertainty, time horizon, detectability, repairability, resource requirement, and effect upon the fundamental survival objective.

A one-in-a-thousand possibility capable of destroying the colony may deserve more attention than a near certainty of minor inconvenience. The weights themselves remain provisional. The system must be capable of saying, “Our recommendation depends heavily upon Assumption X. If X is wrong, Recommendation B becomes preferable to Recommendation A.”

X. HISTORY IS PART OF THE MACHINE

Every observation, prediction, experiment, failure, successful adaptation, mistaken assumption, and unexpected interaction changes what the Universal Engineer knows. The system therefore must possess persistent, shared history.

Today’s response becomes part of tomorrow’s starting condition. A failure is not merely a failure, but information that changes future possibilities.

The UE consequently becomes more capable through use because every significant interaction changes the filters, models, probabilities, relationships, and assumptions with which the next problem is approached. This information is promulgated throughout the system.

XI. THE SURPRISE SYSTEM

One major part of the Universal Engineer should have no responsibility for producing food, generating energy, maintaining atmosphere, protecting health, or accomplishing any other conventional mission. Its assignment should be to learn what else has been missed.

It continually asks, “What if?” “What assumptions are being shared?” “What systems thought to be independent actually interact?” “What low-probability events would become catastrophic when they occur together?” “What measurements disagree?” “What information is everyone filtering out?”

This is the UE’s intellectual “immune system.”

XII. THE HUMAN ROLE

Humans retain authority over major decisions, but the Universal Engineer should provide more than recommendations. It should explain:

1. We considered these alternatives.
2. These are the most probable outcomes.
3. These are the consequences we traced.
4. These are the weights we used.
5. These are the major uncertainties.
6. These assumptions most strongly affect our conclusion.
7. Change this assumption or this weight, and the preferred solution changes.

The comparison is artificial intelligence with incomplete information versus humans possessing considerably less information and considerably less ability to integrate it. Ignorance and difficulty are not show-stoppers.; they are show starters.

XIII. WHAT CAN BE BUILT NOW

Much of the foundation already exists.

We already possess distributed computing, enormous data storage, fiber-optic communication, wireless networking, specialized AI processors, scientific simulation, machine learning, optimization, digital twins, knowledge graphs, sensor networks, model-based systems engineering, and multimodal artificial intelligence.

We already can measure vibration, chemistry, temperature, radiation, strain, movement, electrical activity, electromagnetic fields, biological activity, and thousands of other physical variables.

The missing invention is not any one of these components. The missing invention is their integration into a system in which information communicated everywhere can become useful anywhere.

XIV. WHAT MUST BE DEVELOPED

The first research program should concentrate upon communication.

It must develop a common informational language capable of translating among physics, chemistry, medicine, biology, psychology, agriculture, engineering, economics, and disciplines that do not yet exist.

It must develop persistent shared memory so that discoveries, failures, decisions, assumptions, and uncertainties remain available throughout the system.

It must develop universal information circulation in which relevant state changes enter common streams accessible throughout the Universal Engineer.

It must develop intelligent receiving filters capable of deciding which tiny fraction of that information matters to each specialist.

It must develop cross-channel correlation so that electronic, optical, thermal, mechanical, chemical, acoustic, magnetic, biological, and radiation observations can be recognized as different descriptions of the same event.

It must develop dynamic weighting so that computational attention flows toward consequences whose probability, uncertainty, magnitude, or irreversibility justify additional thought.

And it must develop the ability to discover new communication channels.

XV. LET THE UNIVERSAL ENGINEER DESIGN THE UNIVERSAL ENGINEER

Humans should not attempt to specify the final architecture. First, build the best preliminary Universal Engineer present technology permits. Then give assign it to design a better UE. Version 0.1 proposes Version 0.2.

The proposed architecture is simulated and tested. Version 0.2 inherits what worked and changes what did not. Then Version 0.2 helps design Version 0.3. Every generation inherits the accumulated history of the generations preceding it.

The system evolves — not through random biological mutation, but through deliberate proposal, testing, selection, and retention. Eventually its architecture may bear little resemblance to what its human designers originally imagined.

XVII. THE FIRST DEMONSTRATION

Give the Universal Engineer the lunar-survival problem from its first day, not because it immediately can solve it, but every failure exposes a weakness.

The lunar civilization therefore serves two purposes simultaneously.

It is the first great problem the UE attempts to solve.

And it is the instrument used to create Universal Engineering itself.

THE LARGER PURPOSE

Climate systems, human disease, cities, economies, ecosystems, spacecraft, energy systems, biological organisms, and civilizations share a fundamental characteristic: Everything affects everything else.

Human civilization has accumulated specialized knowledge while retaining a limited ability to combine that knowledge. The Universal Engineer is an attempt to overcome that limitation.

Its fundamental principle is borrowed from life itself. Filter locally. Integrate everywhere. Specialize locally. Communicate globally.

UE’s purpose is not to know everything. Its purpose is to make it increasingly difficult for something important to remain unknown merely because nobody thought to tell the right specialist.

The UE requires no new laws of physics in order to begin. The computers exist. The sensors exist. The communication technologies exist. The artificial intelligences are beginning to exist.

What does not yet exist is the architecture that allows all of them to function as parts of one communicating organism. We should build that architecture first.

Complex problems are not difficult merely because they contain many parts. They are difficult because the parts affect one another. And its solution: Divide the work, not the information.

Consider budgeting, i.e.  the question: On what should we best spend our dollars? That is a UE question.

The introductory question was: How can separate intelligences communicate well enough that their collective activity becomes capable of solving problems no individual intelligence could solve?

The moon is but one of many objectives that Universal Engineering can help us reach

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell