–Red state disaster. Right wing newspaper blasts Republicans

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive,
and the motive is the gap.
======================================================================================================================================================================================

The Affordable Care Act, so-called Obamacare, is a complex, convoluted, Byzantine mess. It’s based on the “Big Lie” that the federal government could run out of dollars and that deficits are to be avoided.

Every American, rich or poor, old or young, Democrat or Republican, is entitled to the best health care medical science can provide.

Rather than Obamacare, America would be much better served with a fully funded (by the federal government), comprehensive Medicare program for every man, woman and child.

That said, Obamacare is better than what it replaced, an even more complex, more convoluted, more Byzantine mess that excluded millions of people. And that is why I find these articles in the Chicago Tribune, a right-wing newspaper, so compelling:

Chicago Tribune, 8/6/14
Pushing Obmacare Helps States Cut Rate Of Uninisured

States that have aggressively put the Affordable Care Act into practice have cut the number of uninsured residents sharply — in some cases in half or better — while those that balked have improved little if at all.

All 10 states with the largest percentages of uninsured adults now have Republican governors and legislatures. The states that still have the highest percentages of uninsured residents all declined to expand Medicaid and refused to participate in creating online exchanges.

Some states went further this year and actively impeded the exchanges, forbidding state employees to provide information about them.

Last year, 14 states had one-fifth or more of the adult population lacking insurance. As of midyear, only three states remained in that group, Georgia, Mississippi joining Texas, with Florida and Louisiana close behind.

Nice going “red” state voters, your Republican leaders care about you.

All five of those states are among the 21 that have ruled out expansion of Medicaid to adults at or near the poverty level. The law provides for the federal government to pick up the entire cost for the first several years, and the lion’s share thereafter.

But to spite the Democrats, the Republican governors decided to forego billions in free dollars from the federal government, dollars that not only would have helped pay for their citizens health care, but also would have stimulated their local economies.

It’s pitiful.

(The pity is not that politicians intentionally harm their own constituents. They are politicians, after all. The pity is that people actually vote for them.)

Chicago Tribune, 8/6/14
Mississippi Hurts The Poor, Blames Obama

Like most Republicans, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant rejected the Medicaid expansion, refused to build an exchange and won’t encourage Mississippians to enroll.

This is why the number of uninsured in Mississippi has grown since last year, to more than 21%.

By contrast, West Virginia — a similarly poor state that took the opposite approach — has seen its uninsured rate decline to about 7%.

Bryant set a new standard for chutzpah: “If the statistics show that the ill-conceived and so-called Affordable Care Act is resulting in higher rates of uninsured people in Mississippi, that’s yet another example of a broken promise from Barack Obama.”

Translation: “I refused to expand Medicaid, because I am a Republican, but now I need someone to blame for the health care disaster I caused. Fortunately, my people are stupid enough to believe anything I tell them, so I’ll blame Obama.”

The simple fact is that some states aren’t interested in running a social safety net.

Conservative readers might argue, “a relentless expansion of federal power has replaced the laboratories of democracy with heavy-handed, one-size-fits-all solutions, turning the states into mere field offices of the federal government.”

This is the phony “big government” argument, which boils down to this: “I don’t want to be ruled by a big government. I’d rather be ruled by a smaller (but still big) government, because as everyone knows, state governments are more honest and caring than the federal government.”

Oh, really? State governments are more honest and caring? Think closely about your state’s government and see if you really believe that.

A family of three in Alabama has to earn less than $4,500 a year to become eligible for Medicaid. Louisiana, Kansas, Texas and Virginia have similar requirements. (This is) designed to keep as few people on Medicaid as practical, despite the obvious costs of low-income families and communities having no insurance.

Yes, nothing like those honest and caring state governments. California and Washington provide cash assistance to those making less than about $1,200 a month. Florida and Texas residents require you to earn less than about $400 a month (!), before you receive assistance.

California and Washington provide actual safety nets, versus programs in Texas and Florida, which seek to remove recipients as quickly as possible by providing as little as possible. Our so-called “laboratories of democracy” weren’t there when people needed them most.

The more autonomy you grant to individual states in anti-poverty programs, the less coverage there is for low-income Americans.

Remember, these articles came from a right-wing newspaper, that has not been a fan of Obamacare, but recognizes the realities of poverty in America.

The purpose of government is to do for people what people are unable to do for themselves. The rich need less help than do the middle-income groups, which in turn, need less help than do the poor.

The “red” state voters have been brainwashed that the poor are lazy, worthless and deserving of their poverty. So the poor are denied voting rights under the flimsy excuse of election security, and are denied poverty assistance because . . . well, just because.

When even a Republican newspaper finds the Republican states’ governors and legislatures disgusting, you know the right-wing has sunk to new lows.

That right-wing, as it currently is operated, is a disaster for the “red” states.

It’s a disaster for America.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)

9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)


10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

—–

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY

8 thoughts on “–Red state disaster. Right wing newspaper blasts Republicans

  1. Texas is Borderline Crazy

    Texas has poorly funded schools and more citizens without basic health insurance than any other state, but it has spent $500 million on border operations since 2005.

    The border now has little to do with the millions of undocumented immigrants who have been settled in the U.S. for years and await resolution of their status from Congress. It has little to do with the current influx of children from Central America, who are appealing for sanctuary on humanitarian grounds.

    Mostly, it’s about politics — and the politicians who just can’t help exploiting it.

    . . . and about exploiting the people who suffer the nonsense being spewed by the bought-and-paid-for pols and the media.

    Like

    1. So are politicians in states like Texas that do not condone public spending stupid, or is the Federal government that pushes for dependency on them – the fraudsters?

      This is a perfect example of what fraud looks like, the folks on states that do not rely on Federal deficits have to labor for their dollars – those in the states that do simply have to show up to the line to get some. The folks on the states not receiving government money have to pay for their goods and services with labor, a large part of those in the states getting government “help” pay with government money.

      This is what we as a nation have to deal with today, if you are in a state like Texas and do not take money from the Federal government, than yes – you are essentially not stealing what will be stolen from your state. If you take, you are taking what will be taking from your state anyway. At a personal level, if you work and don’t receive government “help” (the middle class), you are helping finance those who don’t work. It’s unethical, it’s evil, it’s the most heinous thing a human can do to another.

      And to act like this is the right thing to do? You are asking people to become fraudsters Rodger – and you are calling laborers stupid for working. This is truly amazing – I’m sure you either have or will realize the stupidity behind your statements soon.

      Like

  2. The Milton Friedman libertarian bullshit of demonizing the federal government has brought about this disastrous pass and fueled the false opinion that anything the gov’t does is, per Ayn Rand dictum, an encroachment on individual freedom and thus must be restrained.

    I propose a toast to the health and freedom of red state citizens! May they be forever blessed by the wisdom of Mr. Friedman.

    Like

    1. Strangely, only the federal government is considered the “Leviathan” (their word). Not the state and local governments, which if anything, are far more oppressive, and far less beneficial.

      Anyway, the “Leviathan” is just peachy when it provides tax benefits to the rich, and those grazing rights on federal land, not to mention water projects. And, of course, the U.S. Army.

      The libertarian movement is phony. No one likes the government except when we need the government, which is virtually all the time. The rich want “freedom” — to screw the rest. They really want anarchy, in which they make their own laws.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s