The sole purpose of government

The sole purpose of government is to improve and protect the lives of the people.

We give the government our money, our time, and some of our freedom, expecting in return safety, stability, opportunity, and a better life. But when a government focuses more on protecting itself than its people, it has failed.

Government is not an end. It is a tool.  Tools must serve the maker. A tool that primarily serves itself is broken.

When I owned several businesses, I went to bed each night asking myself four questions:

  1. What can go wrong?
  2. How do we prevent it?
  3. How do we fix it if it happens?
  4. What can we do better?

That is exactly how our political leaders should run our nation. Unfortunately, the current leadership asks these questions:

  1. What’s in it for me?
  2. How can I stay in power?
  3. How can I get away with it?
  4. How can I do harm to my political enemies?

What Can Go Wrong? Every economic problem falls into one of three categories:

    1. Demand Failure–People don’t have enough income, so spending collapses, and the economy falls into recession
    2. Supply Failure–Not enough goods, i.e. shortages, which lead to inflation and recession
    3. Structural Failure–The system itself breaks down, leading to inequality, stagnation, social instability

Monetary Sovereignty: There are two repeated, false objections to the federal spending that benefits the people.

I. The “who will pay?” objection. The federal government, uniquely being Monetarily Sovereign, has the unlimited ability to create U.S. dollars at the touch of a computer key. (See: Monetary Sovereignty: Who says so?)

Our Monetarily Sovereign federal government does not need or use taxes to pay its obligations. The government pays all its bills the same way:

  • Congress votes
  • The President approves
  • The Treasury creates the money at the touch of a computer key

Thus, with just those three steps, the federal government can fund any program of any size, without collecting a penny in taxes.

II. The “but that will cause inflation” objection. Federal spending is not a primary cause of inflation. (See: The inflation myths debunked. It’s never “money-printing.” It’s always shortages.)

In fact, inflations are prevented and cured by government spending that addresses shortages. Reduced spending in the face of inflation does nothing to solve the primary problem — shortages — and can exacerbate the problem by causing more shortages.

That is why austerity, aka “belt tightening,” fails as a solution to any economic problem. It is popular among the elite, however, because it tends to widen the income/wealth gap between the rich and the rest.

State and local taxes pay for state and local government expenses, but federal taxes do not fund federal spending. That is the difference between monetary non-sovereignty and Monetary Sovereignty. The states (and business and individuals) primarily are money users, while the federal government primarily is a money creator.

So, why does the federal government collect taxes? Two reasons:

  • To control the economy by taxing what the government wishes to discourage and by giving tax breaks to what the government wishes to reward.
  • To assure demand for the U.S. dollar by requiring that taxes be paid in dollars

Federal spending is not funded by federal taxing.

Here are some steps to Prevent and Cure Common Economic Problems While Improving and Protecting the Lives of the People

I. Eliminate the FICA tax. FICA pays for nothing. Neither FICA nor trust funds (See: “The Phony Trust Fund Controversy“) support federal spending. Ending the FICA tax would:

  • Increase take-home pay for workers in the lower 95% income bracket
  • Reduce employment costs for businesses
  • Increase job availability
  • Narrow the income/wealth gap between the rich and the rest
  • Add billions of growth dollars to the economy

II. Fund Medicare for All. Provide free, comprehensive, no deductible health care insurance for every man, woman, and child in America. Employer-based healthcare traps workers, and creates job lock, fear-based employment inefficiency.

Universal healthcare would:

  • Improve health and health care in America
  • Allow for labor movement based on economic need rather than medical need
  • Increase American longevity
  • Increase productivity by reducing the number of sick workers and sick days off 
  • Add growth dollars to the economy (Gross Domestic Product =Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports

Related programs would:

  • Pay schools to educate more medical professionals and workers — doctors, nurses, ancillary workers
  • Fund the construction and profitability of more hospitals and rehabilitation centers, especially in rural areas
  • Fund the research and development of pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

III. Fund Social Security for All, regardless of age or income. Income security is not charity. SS for all would:

  • Help prevent poverty and reduce the need for other welfare services
  • Narrow the gap between the rich and the rest
  • Benefit business by increasing the demand for products and services
  • Add growth dollars to the economy

IV Fund Grades K-16 + Advanced Education for All Who Want It. This would:

  • Help increase worker productivity
  • Increase scientific advances
  • Help make America more competitive vs. other nations

Some intelligent students can’t even afford free college because their families need them as workers, so we suggest:

  • Funding salaries for college students to assure America makes use of its best minds.

V Fund All Forms of Science Education, Research, & Development. R&D is future supply. Without it there would have been no innovation, no growth, no leadership, and America would have fallen behind, becoming more dependent on others.

VI Fund Infrastructure: Roads, bridges, rail, ports, airports, power grids, water systems, local mobility systems. 

VII Fund Renewable Energy: This includes R&D and infrastructure for:

  • Electric vehicles and charging stations of all kinds — Trains, cars, trucks, boats, planes, people movers, busses, 
  • Batteries
  • Solar panels
  • Nuclear
  • Geothermal
  • Wind
  • Hydro
  • Wave

VIII Fund Advanced Food Production

  • Farming Methods Education, R&D
  • Develop more productive, weather and insect resistant, nourishing crops that require less water and fertilizer
  • Advanced planting, harvesting, storage, shipping, and delivery methods

IX Fund Affordable Housing

  • R&D to reduce the costs of housing (building materials, methods, and locations)
  • Tax breaks for home ownership and renting
  • Fund trade schools for carpenters, electricians, roofers,  etc.
  • Fund R&D for alternative building materials.

X Financially support State and Local Governments. Every state, county, city, and local government faces its own unique challenges they know best, along with issues similar to those of others. However, they all share the common struggle of having limited funds to tackle these problems.

  • Fund inter-government educational schools and meetings so government representatives can compare notes on problem solving
  • Fund the execution of solutions to those problems
  • Pay each state a per capita annual award to be used for any specified public purpose. 

IN SUMMARY

The federal government, having unlimited access to funds., is best at paying for things, which it can do infinitely. The federal government also is good at addressing inter-state problems that might be intractable for individual states. 

By contrast, state and local governments may understand local problems best, but often finds solutions unaffordable.

The recommendation is to combine the strengths of the federal government (paying, mediating interstate problems) with what state and local governments do best (understand local needs and solutions).

The proper combination of federal and state/local strengths and understanding will grow and enrich America while improving and protecting the lives of the people.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Research cancelled: The invisible loss

 

Only a nation of fools gives tax breaks to religion while discouraging science and education.

Ten years ago, I told you Donald Trump is a proven psychopath. (See “Will Our Next President Be A Psychopath?” and “A Psychopath Slipped Into the White House.“). A psychopath is someone who is callous, unemotional, and morally depraved,

Trump scored almost “perfectly” on the Hare Text for Psychopathy. Although this test should be administered by clinical psychologists, the fact that every measure seems to apply to Trump is telling.

Trump as a caveman looking puzzled at a stone wheel. He is sitting on a rock.
What’s the good of this thing?

The criteria for psychopathy suggest that Trump has no emotional constraints. In short, he does not give a damn about people, and he especially doesn’t give a damn about the very people who support him most, the pitiful MAGAs who unknowingly voted against their own well-being.

The Hare Test for Psychopathy

            1. glibness
            2. superficial charm
            3. grandiose sense of self-worth
            4. need for stimulation
            5. proneness to boredom
            6. pathological lying
            7. conning/manipulation
            8. lack of remorse
            9. lack of guilt
            10. Shallow emotions 
            11. callousness
            12. lack of empathy
            13. parasitic lifestyle
            14. promiscuous sexual behavior
            15. early behavior problems
            16. lack of realistic, long-term goals
            17. impulsivity
            18. failure to accept responsibility
            19. many short-term marital relationships
            20. juvenile delinquency and criminal versatility

It is sad that too many Americans either didn’t believe me or didn’t care, because Trumpist America has become much worse than even I imagined.

But being a psychopath may be the least of Trump’s faults. Specifically, he is:

          1. Amoral
          2. Anti-science
          3. Anti-education
          4. Anti-gay
          5. Anti-black, brown, red, and yellow
          6. Pro-authoritarian
          7. Anti-democracy
          8. Un-Christian and anti-non-Christian
          9. Anti-immigrant
          10. Anti-law and justice
          11. Pro-rich and anti-poor
          12. Anti-truth

=============================================

In this post, we’ll discuss Trump’s “anti-science” and the real effects on our lives. Science begins with research. Without research, there can be no science, and without science, there can be no human progress. 

Because Trump is completely self-absorbed and is concerned only with immediate effects, he has no comprehension of the importance of research. He acts as though saving federal money today is far more important than saving the future.

Sadly, MAGAs agree, though saving money for a Monetarily Sovereign government has zero value (our Monetarily Sovereign government has infinite dollars), while cutting scientific research is disastrous.

Trump is aware that he is likely to live no more than another decade or two, and he seems largely unconcerned about what will happen after that—except perhaps for his legacy.

This attitude may explain why someone with limited intelligence, who is often dismissive of art, culture, history, and intellectual values, has attached his name to the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts (even as he destroys funding from public radio, a primary broadcaster of the performing arts).

It’s an irony of which he appears ignorant.

Additionally, the administration also put Trump’s name on the United States Institute of Peace building in Washington, another federal institution originally established by Congress. It is not known if this was in anticipation of his illegal bombing of Venezuelan boats on the international high seas, without Congressional approval.

While he cuts research because it’s an invisible loss — no one knows or can prove what will be lost — he cuddles up to right-wing, poorly educated, because they have the votes. Trump’s mindless cuts will impact your life, and as he is a psychopath, he doesn’t care.

Trump’s Research Cuts & Cancellations by Subject Area

(Mainly in 2025)

I.  Health & Biomedical Research

  1. Health disparities research
  2. Alzheimer’s disease in Black and Latino populations
  3. Maternal mortality
  4. Sickle-cell disease studies
  5. HIV/AIDS research (200+ HIV-related grants, including prevention and treatment trials)
  6. LGBTQ+ health research
  7. Mental health, suicide prevention, and substance-use studies
  8. Community-based opioid and alcohol-use interventions
  9. Behavioral & social determinants of health
  10. Nutrition access, housing instability, stress-related disease
  11. CDC surveillance programs
  12. Disease-tracking capacity
  13. Data publication and advisory committee activity
  14. COVID-19 research, long-COVID studies defunded or paused
  15. Vaccine-effectiveness follow-ups canceled
  16. Cancer-incidence studies
  17. Respiratory-disease monitoring
  18. Neurological effects of toxic exposure

II. Climate & Environmental Science

  1. Climate Assessment (6th National Climate Assessment is mandated by law, making this especially controversial).
  2. Funding for the assessment was eliminated
  3. Website temporarily removed
  4. Research coordination halted
  5. EPA & NOAA Research
  6. Climate-modeling programs scaled back
  7. Air-quality and pollution-impact studies defunded
  8. Environmental justice research eliminated
  9. Sea-level-rise modeling and coastal-resilience projects paused

III. Social Science & Education Research
NSF — Social, Behavioral, Economic Sciences, 400+ grants frozen or canceled, including:

  1. Misinformation and disinformation research
  2. Voting behavior and democratic resilience
  3. Online extremism studies
  4. Social media impact on youth mental health
  5. STEM-education equity research–Universities reported dozens of active grants terminated mid-project
  6. Education Research — Department of Education:
    • Longitudinal student-outcome studies
    • Special-education effectiveness research
    • Teacher-training program evaluations

IV. Global Health & International Research

  1. USAID & Global Trials
  2. Malaria Vaccine Development Program — Clinical trials halted, Field sites shut down
  3. HIV prevention research abroad
  4. PEPFAR-linked (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) research was disrupted
  5. Maternal health and nutrition trials
  6. Africa and Southeast Asia projects frozen

V. Basic Science & High-Risk Research
(NIH & NSF) Cuts to:

  1. High-risk / high-reward exploratory grants
  2. Early-career investigator programs
  3. Interdisciplinary research initiatives

VI. Institutional & Structural Research Impacts
(University Research Systems). Federal funding freezes at:

  1. Harvard
  2. University of Maryland
  3. University of Arizona
  4. Labs shut down mid-experiment
  5. Graduate students and postdocs laid of
  6. Tens to hundreds of millions in frozen funding per institution
  7. Cuts disproportionately targeted research that is:
    • Population-based rather than molecular
    • Preventive rather than curative
    • Climate- or environment-related
    • Social, behavioral, or systemic
    • International or cooperative
    • Equity-focused or demographic-specific

VII. Basic Science & High-Risk Research — 
Reductions in High-Risk / High-Reward Studies

  1. NIH “high-risk, high-reward” grants decreased from 406 in 2024 to 364 in 2025 due to shifts in NIH funding priorities and changing award patterns. These grants aim to support innovative, potentially groundbreaking research rather than incremental studies.
  2. Fewer cancer, Alzheimer’s, and HIV research projects are being funded
  3. NASA: Proposed cuts of roughly 24% overall, with science programs facing nearly 50% reductions and the cancellation of major missions, jeopardizing U.S. leadership in space science.
  4. Fewer grants for exploratory, foundational science are being issued. Because such “blue sky” work often lacks immediate commercial payoff, private sources rarely fill the gap. Consequently, cutting these awards effectively ends many programs.
  5. Less diversity in the range of scientific questions supported.
  6. Cuts to Early-Career and Training Funding: The NIH awarded 896 fewer new early-career grants (for undergraduates, PhD students, and postdoctoral researchers) in the first nine months of 2025 compared to the previous period. This represents a significant reduction in support for the next generation of researchers.
  7. The number of NIH transition grants awarded to postdoctoral researchers decreased by 172 during the same period, representing a reduction of about 10%. This decline is significant because early-career and training awards are crucial for nurturing new scientific talent, supporting innovative ideas, and strengthening the future research workforce. Reducing these grants not only withdraws funding from individual laboratories but also creates structural barriers to entering scientific careers.
  8. Department of Health & Human Services: A structural overhaul of HHS that would merge agencies into a newly created Administration for a Healthy America, while seeking to reduce the workforce by tens of thousands and divert programs.

The official excuse given for all these harmful cuts is to “eliminate waste, fraud and abuse.” This lie should be obvious to anyone who favors democracy over authoritarianism. 

Among the earliest of the dismissals, Trump fired at least 17 inspectors general from across federal agencies just days into his second term. 

These independent watchdogs oversee waste, fraud, and abuse. Under the Inspector General Act of 1978, which former President Jimmy Carter signed into law following the Watergate scandal, the President is required to notify Congress at least 30 days before dismissing an inspector general with “substantive, case-specific” reasons for removing them.

The last thing Trump cares about is federal waste, fraud, and abuse. He cares solely about Trump. So he fires inspectors who could impede his personal aspirations.

Case in point:

“A Treasury Inspector General report found that 11,443 IRS workers either received probationary termination notices or voluntarily accepted separation programs in early 2025 — about 11% of the agency’s total workforce at that point.”

It seems Trump and his affluent associates prefer a limited IRS workforce to avoid uncovering any potential tax evasion that might have been managed by their high-powered accountants.

Overall, Trump’s cuts follow this pattern: 

  1. Target science, research, and public health agencies
  2. Reduce oversight and watchdog functions
  3. Shrink the education, cultural, and civic support
  4. Undermine preparedness and emergency response

In summary, Trump has cut research and science agencies, public health, regulatory enforcement, independent oversight bodies, climate research, NIH, NSF, CDC, education federal offices, and many social programs. 

True to his dictatorial tendencies, he has strengthened national security, increased military power, and fostered anti-immigration sentiments, including those law enforcement actions that fail to address his family’s illegal activities while imprisoning the rest of us.

Thus, Trump and his MAGA base are turning America into a police state of ignorance, where no one has the power or even the understanding to oppose him. Unfortunately, research doesn’t vote, but a lack of research votes against the future.

 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Does education benefit America? You might think the answer is obvious.

In 1647, the Massachusetts “Old Deluder Satan Act” required towns in colonial New England to hire teachers. The schools were funded by local taxes to promote literacy, so people could read the Bible.

This is widely regarded as the first law that mandated publicly funded education in what would later become the United States. By the early 1800s, this idea had spread, with other New England states adopting similar town-funded schools, although southern states did not follow suit.

In the 1830s to 1850s, modern free public schooling took shape. In Massachusetts in 1837, Horace Mann championed free, universal education funded by taxes and implemented by professional teachers.

By around 1850, most Northern states had established free public elementary schools funded by property taxes. These schools were accessible to most white children, as racial equality was achieved much later.

High schools came in 1821. The Boston English High School became the first free public high school in the U.S.

Wealthy men throw books into a bonfire, while impoverished children watch.
If we give them a college education, they won’t work in our factories.

By the late 1800s to early 1900s, free public high schools became widespread. Compulsory attendance laws began in 1880–1918, and segregation ended (legally): 1954, Brown v. Board of Education. Truly universal access began in the mid-20th century.

Why was free schooling mandated in the past, while free advanced education is often discouraged today? The answer, as usual, involves Monetary Sovereignty and Gap Psychology

Our Monetarily Sovereign federal government has an unlimited ability to create dollars with just a keystroke. It never can go bankrupt or run out of money. However, it often chooses to fund tax breaks for the wealthy rather than allocate resources to education for those who are less fortunate.

Gap Psychology describes a common, almost universal desire to distance oneself from those lower on the income, wealth, and power scale while trying to associate more with those above. This mindset is the primary way the wealthy maintain and increase their wealth. It also ensures that people continue to work even after they receive higher pay.

NEWS BRIEFING Borrowers in default on student loans may see wages garnished

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration said Tuesday that it will begin garnishing the wages of student loan borrowers who are in default early next year.

The department said it will send notices to about 1,000 borrowers the week of Jan. 7, with more notices to come at an increasing scale each month.

Millions of borrowers are considered in default, meaning they are 270 days past due on their payments. The department must give borrowers 30 days’ notice before garnishing their wages.

The department said it will begin collection activities, “only after student and parent borrowers have been provided sufficient notice and opportunity to repay their loans.”

In May, the Trump administration ended the pandemic-era pause on student loan payments and began collecting on defaulted debt by withholding tax refunds and other federal payments from borrowers.

The move ended a period of leniency for student loan borrowers. Payments resumed in October 2023, but the Biden administration extended a one-year grace period. Since March 2020, no federal student loans had been referred for collection, including those in default, until the Trump administration’s changes earlier this year.

The Biden administration tried multiple times to offer broad student loan forgiveness, but those efforts were eventually halted by courts.

Persis Yu, deputy executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center, criticized the decision to begin wage garnishment and said the department had failed to sufficiently help borrowers find affordable payment options.

Given that:
  1. Educated young people are vital for America’s advancement and security.
  2. The federal government does not need or even use any form of income.
  3. The federal government has the infinite ability to create dollars and fund anything it wishes.

Why does the government fund free elementary and high school — in fact, make attendance compulsory — but garnish the wages of our single most valuable future resource, college students?

Free basic schooling still reinforces the social hierarchy. It still supports the Gap. Early public education has been sold as moral and obedience training, workforce preparation, and national cohesion.

It teaches punctuality, deference to authority, and literacy sufficient for labor, not power.

Even in our early days, basic schooling did not threaten the Gap. Elites benefit because it make for more productive workers, fewer unruly poor, and cultural conformity

But college education for the poor is exactly what the rich do not want.

  1. It reduces the fear of losing one’s job, thus:
  2. It increases labor’s bargaining power (which is why the rich hate unions), and
  3. It puts “the rabble” on a par with the rich and weakens employers’ control.

Free college would narrow the Gap.

In this context, a federally sponsored, comprehensive, no-deductible Medicare program that covers every man, woman, and child in America would help close the healthcare Gap.

In contrast, business-sponsored healthcare insurance for workers tends to reinforce this Gap. Millions of workers fear leaving their jobs or making demands of their employers because they worry about losing their healthcare coverage.

The federal government easily could afford to provide healthcare insurance to everyone. However, instead of doing this, it offers businesses tax incentives to provide less comprehensive coverage—just enough to keep employees dependent on their jobs for healthcare.

Finally, the same would hold for federally sponsored, living-wage Social Security for everyone, of all ages. The rich make three false excuses:

  1. It would require tax increases (aka “Who would pay for it”?)
  2. It would cause inflation by adding growth dollars to the economy (Federal spending isn’t inflationary.)
  3. If given a bare minimum stipend, no one would work because the poor have no ambition. (aka, “Keep ’em poor so they have to accept low-pay jobs and bad working conditions.:”)

And things will have to get much worse before the populace begins to understand how Monetary Sovereignty and Gap Psychology are used against them.

 

Only a nation of fools would give a tax break to religion but not to science and education.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Is the trade deficit a problem? Not for the U.S.

Is this good news or bad news?

Country’s trade deficit narrows to a 5-year low. By Ana Swanson, The New York Times.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. trade deficit in goods and services narrowed more than 10% from August to September, as the Trump administration’s tariffs continued to weigh on trade,

data from the Commerce Department showed.

Imports grew just 0.6% from August to $342.1 billion, while exports rose 3% in the month, to $289.3 billion, according to data released Thursday.

Because exports grew more than imports, the U.S. trade deficit shrank, in line with the Trump administration’s goals.

At $52.8 billion, the trade deficit in goods and services hit its lowest level in September since June 2020, when the United States was in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trade experts have cautioned against drawing too many conclusions from a few months of Data and said that trade patterns have recently been distorted by businesses’ efforts to avoid paying tariffs.

President Donald Trump has long seen the trade deficit as a sign of economic weakness.

Trump repeats a standard error: treating the trade deficit as a report card on national health. His reason: The word “deficit” confuses people.

If we send more money to foreigners than they send us, that’s a money deficit. If they send us more goods and services than we send them, that’s our goods and services surplus.

A trade is an exchange of presumed equals (“I’ll send you ‘A’ if you send me ‘B.'”)

So why is it called a trade “deficit”? Isn’t it also a trade “surplus”?

Further, the U.S. creates dollars at will by pressing a few computer keys. Virtually no labor or raw materials are required, and we can make dollars endlessly.

The goods and services we receive rely on labor and raw materials, which are limited resources. We offer something that costs us nothing to create, and in return, we receive valuable items; yet, we refer to this as a “deficit.”

It’s quite strange. I would gladly accept that kind of “trade” any day of the year.

It feels more like stealing than trading. Each year, I experience what some might call a “deficit” with my grocer, my favorite restaurants, my gas station, and others. I exchange dollars—currency that my government can produce at no cost—for valuable food and gasoline.

I don’t feel cheated. While I worked for some of my income, as a retiree, most of my current earnings come to me effortlessly. Despite that, I can still exchange those dollars for valuable goods and services.

And still, by the current definition, I’m running a “trade deficit.” It’s nuts.

I wouldn’t have had to work as much if my government had given me dollars for health care, food, housing, education, etc., which it easily could have done at virtually no effort, just by punching a few more computer keys.

The sweeping tariffs Trump has imposed on imports from countries around the world this year, including on automobiles, metals and furniture, have led to big swings in trade.

Before tariffs went into effect, many U.S. businesses brought in a surge of products to avoid paying import taxes.

After Trump’s global tariffs took effect on August 7, imports slowed sharply, then recovered somewhat in September.

On August 29, the Trump administration also ended the “de minimis” exemption, which allowed foreign shipments valued at less than $800 to come into the United States tariff-free.

Opponents criticized the rule as a loophole that penalized U.S. manufacturers in favor of foreign competitors.

That’s another way of saying, “Make imports more expensive to consumers, so American manufacturers can charge consumers more and/or deliver inferior products.

That might help a few American manufacturers, but do you want higher prices and inferior quality?

Is this good news or bad news? If Americans are buying fewer goods because they are more expensive or harder to obtain, the deficit will decrease. However, this also means a reduction in consumer welfare, which is essentially what inflation and recessions mean.

Currently, we are trading inflation for a shrinking trade deficit—a lousy trade by any definition.

In short, Trump has made trade worse to make the “trade deficit” numbers look better.  

SUMMARY

The term “trade deficit” is often misunderstood; it can actually be considered a trade surplus by logical standards. We receive valuable and often scarce goods and services in exchange for dollars, which our government can produce in unlimited quantities at virtually no cost or effort.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY