If you are part of the 1/3 “no vax” America. . .

Uncategorized 4 Minutes

If you are part of the 1/3 “no vax” America:

  1. You don’t need me to call you “stupid.” You already may be starting to understand that.
  2. I won’t call you “selfish” for helping to spread a fatal disease to others. You almost surely know that, and simply don’t give a rat’s behind.
  3. You may claim your religion requires you to abstain from vaccination. It doesn’t. Your God doesn’t long for your death or for the deaths of your loved ones or of strangers you meet, unless your God’s name is Trump, in which case he doesn’t give a rat’s behind.
  4. You may say you won’t vax because you don’t want the government telling you what to do, but that would be stubbornly stupid, in which case you are proud of it.
  5. You may say you don’t trust that the vax is harmless, but hundreds of millions have been given out, and all reliable sources (“reliable” means not including QAnon, Tucker Carlson, and Donald Trump) say the possibility of fatal adverse effect is almost non-existent.
  6. You may say you prefer to do your own research, in which case, let me know when you have set up your lab and/or your test subjects because that’s what research involves, unless your research is limited to listening to the aforementioned loonies.
  7. You may say you can’t afford to take off work, but oh, c’mon, isn’t your life worth an hour?
  8. Or finally, you may say it’s because you are a Republican, and you prefer to take ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or Trump Water. If so:

TUCKER CARLSON WANTS TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE KNOW HE’S AN ANTI-SCIENCE IGNORAMUS

The Fox News host proudly announced at a church event this month that he’s unvaccinated against COVID-19. BY BESS LEVIN, APRIL 12, 2022

As one of Fox News’ most committed purveyors of bullshit, Tucker Carlson has been a reliable source of anti-vax misinformation since the COVID-19 vaccines became available.

He’s claimed they simply don’t work, used unverified data to suggest an inordinate number of people have been killed by them, likened mandates to Nazi experiments, and warned viewers the government is using the shots as a form a “social control.”

Yet for some reason, Carlson would steadfastly refuse to reveal whether he himself was vaccinated.

The Fox News host apparently had a change of heart this month, bragging about choosing not to get any of the jabs available to him. “I skipped the first three, I’m not getting that one either,” he told the crowd.

Last year, amidst Carlson’s tirades against vaccine requirements, MSNBC host Chris Hayes called out the ridiculous hypocrisy of Carlson dubbing Joe Biden’s mandates “irrational” and “a form of sadomasochism” while working for a company with stricter rules than the government.

“If you truly believe you are suffering under the sadomasochistic heel of a tyrannical employer,” Hayes said, “even if they are paying you lots and lots of money, even if you don’t want people to think you’re a total fraud, then you have got to have the guts to call out Fox News or resign in protest.”

Obviously, Tuck did neither of those things.

If, instead of believing a fool like Tuck, you prefer facts, and you are interested in knowing the odds you face against living without a shot, check out this graph.

If you are unvaccinated, you are 20 times more likely to win a *Darwin Award than is a fully vaccinated (with booster) person.

*A Darwin Award is given to someone who dies because he/she does something really stupid. His death improves the human gene pool by precluding him from fathering (or mothering) more stupid people.

Believing what you hear on Fox News, especially Tucker Carlson will move you into Award contention.

So a great big “Thank you” to all who trust Fox News and/or reject vaccination for the above-mentioned reasons, and in doing so, manage to win Darwin Awards.Alfred E Neuman Mad Magazine What Me Worry Black Text T Shirt

We, who care about the future intelligence of the human species, are grateful for your selfless contributions.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics. Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Published by Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

MBA Northwestern, business turnaround expert, economist

Published

42 thoughts on “If you are part of the 1/3 “no vax” America. . .”

  1. Ok, so… you allowed The gub’mint to convince you that you need to take a shot of VAIDS to “protect others around you.”

    The very same government that designed this snake oil and pushed it out of CHY-NA, (in order to blame China) is now the very same Government that wants you to put the same snake oil into your veins, to “protect” against “catching it” which we know, NOW, doesn’t work as advertised.

    So… How much is Pfizer paying you to squeeze all this grape juice out?

    Like

    Reply

    1. Yup, as an indepedent autonomous man who built his own home, and makes 15,000 dollars a year in solitude, I’ll never take their mRNA gene therapy injection for three reasons. I don’t need it, I don’t want it, and I had one relative get very sick from it and another friend who died of brain aneurism 10 hrs after receiving it.

      One size does not fit all and when profits outweigh safety, tread lightly, and don’t be the dumbie using reductio ad absurdums and examples for a myopic for-profit political party (corp) base, to somehow discredit the real rift that exists between big pharma and the people.

      Like

      Reply

      1. So you had ONE friend who got sick after taking it and another friend who got an aneurism after taking it (not necessarily FROM it). So TWO people outweigh the millions of people who DIDN’T DIE FROM it and were prevented from getting COVID?

        Your math needs some work.

        Every medicine has side effects. Do you take ANY medicines, or do you refuse them all? Further, every doctor loses patients, so I assume you never will go to a doctor?

        Some people die from the food they eat.

        Do you have any acquaintances who were injured in car accidents? Now you refuse to drive? Some people have died in plane accidents, so no planes for you.

        And Mr. Independent Autonomous, where did you get the lumber, pipes, concrete, copper, etc. to independently build your house. Did you mine it all? If you bought it, where did you get your independent money? The point is, NO ONE IS INDEPENDENT AND AUTONOMOUS.

        We live in a society. We depend on each other. People depend on you not to clog up the hospitals, and take time from nurses and doctors because you were too stubbornly foolish and selfish to get a vaccination. Did you refuse to wear a mask, so you more easily could transmit the disease to others?

        Now, after you finish your angry response, think about your responsibilities to society — your friends and loved ones — and don’t act like a Dumb Trumper.

        Like

        Reply

    1. Actually, I believe the Darwin Awards winners do serve the valuable purpose of improving the human gene pool. My thanks to them for sacrificing their lives on behalf of humanity.

      My concern is with those people who don’t really know the facts, but are influenced by the likes of Tucker Carlson, Donald Trump, et al.

      Consider the children who must live with conspiracy theory believers, and will suffer their own loss of life or the lives of those who are supposed to protect them.

      Think of it this way: Suppose you knew of a father who liked to drive 130 mph with his wife and kids in the car, would be concerned?

      Does that answer your question?

      Like

      Reply

      1. Historically speaking, conspiracies have been the rule as opposed to the exception since well before Julius Ceasar. The sposition that government is impervious to the mechanations and designs of the rich and powerful is every bit as dangerous and stupid as any crackpot on 4chan could ever possibly hope to be. Democide, death by one’s own government is, again, not a crazed theory, but yet another exhaustively documented fact.
        Think of it this way, there are speed limits, and child protective services for the imaginary father I’m supposed to think about, what restrains government? And in the event that it’s not this benevolent sugar daddy liberals always fantasize it to be, what recourse does a target population have? Well for one, we Americans have the God given (not government given if you can imagine) right to free speech, expression and with that, we are free to speculate. Often these speculations propose that maybe the entity known as government, the one that demands total monopoly on the use of force, the minting of currency and so many other powerful functions of civilization might be seeking for its own power and not some grand benevolence. Crazy huh? Thank you for reading through this 3rd grade level civics lesson.

        Like

        Reply

        1. So, because the government is imperfect, all laws are bad, and you’re not going to believe anything the government tells you (but you will believe Tucker Carlson). Understood.

          Thank you for your service to the human genome.

          Like

          Reply

          1. Umm…. no I’m pretty sure my point is that I’m not interested in getting injected with drugs made by infamously corrupt international corporations to protect myself from a weak sauce virus I’ve already long since contracted and easily survived. Further, there is nothing about these companies or governments that would inspire my trust to the point of being injected with a literal gene therapy that cannot ever be reversed. I don’t really understand what Tucker Carlson has to do with that decision.

            Like

          2. The “weak sauce” has killed 1 million Americans. But, I’m sure you have better sources of information. Fox News or some other conspiracy theorists.

            You are well on your way to a Darwin Award, if not from today’s COVID then from something else you, in your superior knowledge, will deny.

            Like

    1. Umm… the 99.7% survival rate isn’t a conspiracy theory, it’s an exhaustively documented fact. Just sayin’ ya know… maybe taking an expiremental mRNA therapy that doesn’t seem to work very well doesn’t seem too attractive for young or otherwise healthy people who are almost garunteed to survive a commonly circulating respiratory virus that almost identicaly matches something called a cold. Crazy huh?

      Like

      Reply

        1. That’s all you can answer? The 99.7% CDC figure isn’t science? Who’s ignoring facts? That pretty much says it all. You choose to get the experimental vax with no accompanying data that’s your right. I’m all for it. But to scrutinize someone for freely choosing not to get the vax, what’s the difference between your freedom of choice and someone else’s freedom of choice? ESPECIALLY WHEN THE CDC SAID IT HAS A 99.7% SURVIVAL RATE. I’m glad you made your personal choice. And you should be glad I’m not vaxxed since you believe I’m going to die anyway and save the gene pool. Isn’t that a win-win situation for you? I could give a squat if you’re vaxx’d or not. Besides, according to your science you’ve now got a less of a chance of getting infected. So quit your griping. Whinning just to whine. Crybaby.

          Like

          Reply

  4. Yeah, so how exactly am I closer to a Darwin award again? As much as I love being congratulated, some logical explanation would nice.

    Like

    Reply

      1. Yeah, okay, average age of covid death is like, 80 something. If I live through my life of drinking, driving too fast and having unprotected sex (with multiple partners) I will consider the vax if I hit 78 or something. In the meantime I’m going to worry more about oncoming lorries or HIV or liver failure. You know, things that kill people who aren’t in nursing home with heart failure.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

    2. The darwin award can go both ways depending on your physiology. One size does not fit all, unless it’s blacks being injected with syphilis or Ethiopians in Israel being injected with sterilized agents… right?

      Like

      Reply

  5. This has to be the most tone-deaf article on the internet at the moment, and that’s saying a lot. lol. Don’t forget your booster!

    Like

    Reply

  7. This propaganda piece is apparently written by an ignorant member of herd stupidity.

    With Corona-Covid-19 it all comes down to this…… “When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth, they will either cease being mistaken, or cease being honest!” (Anonymous)

    Throughout your entire life you continually DECIDE to either stop being mistaken –or stop being honest– when learning the truth. Which one of the two true answers applies to YOU in terms of the Covid-19 truth? Read “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”” … https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html

    “The inhumane abominations, issued by the highly credentialed professional class of psychopaths-in-control and their lauded sycophantic minions, of “No Jews Allowed” and “No Colored People Allowed” of yesterday is the “No Unvaccinated People Allowed” of today.” (from cited article)

    ACTIVE resistance against the criminal establishments around the world will greatly increase the sooner someone TRULY understands that the ruling cabal and their minions, anywhere around the globe, are PSYCHOPATHS (see referenced article above for totally irrefutable evidence).

    By “TRULY understands” I mean that Hollywood flicks and the entertainment industry at large have presented a deliberately erroneous picture of psychopaths which keeps the public misinformed about what and who psychopaths really are (eg most psychopaths are not overtly violent) but they are ALWAYS exploiters, deceivers, liars, manipulators, and destroyers (the Highly Destructive Fake Covid “Pandemic” is ONE fitting example out of countless others) and therefore they are NOT people to ever respect, listen to, admire, vote for, follow and obey BUT to ACTIVELY fight and jail for life (see cited source above).

    ““We’re all in this together” is a tribal maxim. Even there, it’s a con, because the tribal leaders use it to enforce loyalty and submission. … The unity of compliance.” — Jon Rappoport, Investigative Journalist

    Like

    Reply

  8. There’s always things that kill and maim. There is rarely freedom or liberty. How much of others liberty do you demand to feel safe? How is it that one can demand others surrender their body’s autonomy to poorly tested mystery injections with already awful results in terms of efficacy and safety and still see themselves virtuous? It’s ridiculous! The simple truth, some low effort thinking here admittedly, is that freedom isn’t perfect, but it’s always the best option. To hell with the cowards who screech for their harebrained collectivist fairy tales! Grovling bootlickers every last one of them!

    Like

    Reply

          3. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell, if genetic testing was done to help determine the right vaccine for the right person, maybe there would be reduction in the risk of error.

            Like

          4. Did you get genetic testing regarding the dangers of NOT having a vaccination? There are many, you know, far more than the dangers of having a vaccination. Your genes may make you at particular risk of death from one of the COVID variants.

            What medicines do you take? Do you get genetic testing before you use any of them?

            Like

          7. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell, I already have. If my MDs believe that there is no risk to me, I might be willing to consider it. Unless and until then, I am not going to play the equivalent of Russian Roulette with my health by taking a vaccine that contains unknown substances in it.

            Like

          8. IF?
            IF your MDs believe??

            You haven’t asked? You do realize you already are playing Russian roulette. A million Americans have lost that game. How many Americans have been killed by the COVID vax?

            Like

          10. There are two kinds of people. Those who admit and then learn from their errors and those who refuse to admit error, continue the argument, and feel they somehow have won something.

            Your claim that in America, more than 2 million people have died from the COVID vaccine puts you into the second group.

            Additionally, your negative reference to “mainstream media” tells me you get your information from such nutty sources as QAnon, white supremacist sites, and Tucker Carlson, which marks you as uneducable.

            The purpose of this site is education. I have published your comments, not because I felt you were ready to learn something, but rather to demonstrate the abject, purposeful ignorance that abounds in certain groups.

            You now have fulfilled your purpose, so no more of your comments will be published. Good luck in your efforts to win a Darwin Awards, which so many of your fellow believers already have won.

            Like

Leave a reply to Dr. Catfarmer Cancel reply