Who is our Most Dangerous Enemy? And who is to blame?

By definition, our Most Dangerous Enemy is the one person who can do more damage to America than anyone in the world.

America’s Most Dangerous Enemy (MDE) is the person who wants to “get tough” with our friends, “get tough” with our enemies, and “get tough” with those who may be neutral.

Our MDE is the person who acts like an impulsive, trigger-happy loose cannon, with the spoiled brat temperament of a teenager, using Twitter to insult all who disagree.

To qualify as our MDE, make rash proposals, then deny they were proposals, but “only suggestions.

Our MDE exudes bravado and feigns great courage from the safety of a podium, yet is frightened off by a female newscaster who asked a “hard” question about calling women “fat pigs,” “slobs,” animals, and “dogs.”

Our MDE hardly can wait to send American troops into battle, though he himself was a draft dodger who demeans captured GIs.

Our MDE would make enemies of Japan, Mexico, and South Korea, while also insulting everyone in Congress.

Our Most Dangerous Enemy claims America once was great, but no longer is great, but can become great by deporting millions of men, women and children (called “criminals” and “rapists”), by allowing everyone to carry guns, by walling ourselves in, and by cheating creditors in “negotiations.”

Having no experience in international politics and no experience in domestic politics, our MDE claims the single most important job in the world requires no experience, if one has “a good brain.”

The combination of ignorance, bravado, and rash impulsiveness, when added to a President’s power to destroy all life on the planet, would unleash our Most Dangerous Enemy upon us.

Our Most Dangerous Enemy fires back at ex-Sec. of Defense Gates

Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Bob Gates found himself on the receiving end our MDE’s Man’s barbed tongue Friday.

Gates had publicly criticized (our MDE’s) foreign policy proposals and temperament several times the day before.

He said some statements — such as making Japan and South Korea pay more for U.S. military resources — could spur others to take steps that would undermine cooperation with our allies.

Mika Brzezinski, co-host of “Morning Joe,” asked MDE to respond to this criticism during a Friday interview.

Our MDE replied. “I’m not a big fan of his, by the way. … Look at where our country is with years of him being involved. We are a mess. I know he has a great reputation and all of that. All of these guys have a great reputation. They’ve been doing this stuff for 15 years. Look where our country is, OK?”

Is America really “a mess” as our MDE claims? (Other nations wish they were so “messy.”)

Does Bob Gates get the blame — or the credit — for this “messiness”?

Our Most Dangerous Enemy criticizes often, but seldom provides specifics or solutions. And who cares about someone who has a great reputation; they aren’t as smart as our MDE.

(Our MDE) also defended the argument that the U.S. cannot afford to protect other nations without being reimbursed.

“And Bob Gates, who I don’t know at all, but Bob Gates has no idea. See, they are misrepresenting and he’s misrepresenting.”

Ah, the endless generalities with no specifics. No experience needed. No knowledge needed. The job is “only” the Presidency of the United States. Just hire someone with self-proclaimed greatness.

Brzezinski, who described Gates as “one of the greatest foreign policy minds in history,” said part of Gates’ concern is over the way (our Most Dangerous Enemy might express himself as commander-in-chief.

She cited a recent tweet about the EgyptAir flight that disappeared Thursday over the Mediterranean Sea as an example that )our MDE) may be “too trigger-happy with his words.”

MDE’s tweet: “Looks like yet another terrorist attack. Airplane departed from Paris. When will we get tough, smart and vigilant? Great hate and sickness!”

Gates said that people with responsibility learn quickly that early reports of a situation often turn out to be inaccurate.

“I think it prejudges the outcome, and let’s just suppose that it turns out not to be a terrorist event. Then what do you say having made these allegations and so on? So it’s always better to wait until you actually know what the facts are before you open up.”

Brzezinski asked (the MDE) if there was any validity to the concern that tweets like the one about the EgyptAir flight might generate panic and anger.

The MDE responded with a typical non sequitur: “I’m thinking of the future. “We cannot continue to let things like this happen. We are being taken advantage of by radical Islamic terrorists, and this world is changing.”

“Thinking of the future?” “Can’t continue to let these things happen?” “This world is changing?” Those are the MDE’s “reasons” for speaking without knowing the facts?

The Bottom Line:
One human being, our Most Dangerous Enemy, incorporates all these attributes:

*Inexperienced and ignorant about the most important job in the world
*Dismissive about those who do have such knowledge and experience.
*Unwilling to learn (“I consult myself”)
*Immature: Teenager’s Twitter name calling, speaks and acts on impulse
*Braggart and liar
*Dishonest: Cheated on wife. Cheats creditors. Uses fake names to call media
*Refuses to accept blame
*Bully: Repeatedly proposes forcing other nations to bend to our will
*Coward: Draft dodger; frightened by “hard questions”
*Bigot: Muslims, Mexicans/Latinos, gays, tried to ingratiate with KKK
*Hate monger, fear monger
*Will not take specific positions. Criticizes with generalities. Claims all proposals were “only suggestions” Claims to be “flexible on everything”

And this, our Most Dangerous Enemy, might be elected President of the United States.

Who is to blame for that?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-tranferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be an good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt


Recessions begin an average of 2 years after the blue line first dips below zero. A common phenomenon is for the line briefly to dip below zero, then rise above zero, before falling dramatically below zero. There was a brief dip below zero in 2015, followed by another dip – the familiar pre-recession pattern.
Recessions are cured by a rising red line.

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.


Mitchell’s laws:
•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.
•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes..

•No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth.
•Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
•A growing economy requires a growing supply of money (GDP = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
•Deficit spending grows the supply of money
•The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
•The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.

•The single most important problem in economics is the Gap between rich and the rest..
•Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..


9 thoughts on “Who is our Most Dangerous Enemy? And who is to blame?

  1. Intimidator: perceives any criticism or disagreement, no matter how trivial, as justification for vindictiveness.

    Caution Rodger, if Trump reads your blog, expect hit back.


    1. If he hits back, his tweet will be something like this:

      Not impressed with him. Not very rich. Never divorced even once. Wife only 5′ tall. Never bankrupt. Cares about the poor. Doesn’t carry a gun. Doesn’t call women names. Loser.


  2. Perfect example of Donald Trump’s “thinking”:

    “I don’t want to have guns in classrooms, although in some cases teachers should have guns in classrooms frankly. Because teachers are — you know — things that are going on in our schools are unbelievable.”

    He doesn’t want guns in the classroom . . . except in some cases.

    The reason: Teachers are . . . you know

    And, things are unbelievable.

    And this is the man millions of brain-dead Americans will vote for.


    1. It’s quite remarkable what people infer from a speech or interview, but transcribes to little more than gibberish. I guess it’s like hearing your horoscope; it means whatever you want it to mean.

      I don’t know if Trump does this from a finely honed craft, or he’s just an idiot. Of course, we’ve seen this all before with Sarah Palin – and she has a degree in journalism.


  3. If you read the transcript of of any Trump speech, you will see it’s all inference and denial.

    Everything I say is now a suggestion

    Calling into “Fox & Friends,” his final television hit of the morning, Trump was asked by co-host Brian Kilmeade about the response to his comment that his Muslim ban was “just a suggestion.”

    “Yeah. It was a suggestion. Look, anything I say right now, I’m not the president,” Trump said. “Everything is a suggestion, no matter what you say, it’s a suggestion.”

    “I feel strongly we have to do something about when you look at radical Islamic terrorism, we have a president that as you folks know very well, we have a president who won’t use the term for the World Trade Center, he won’t use the term.

    And we have to do something.

    And you’re not going to do something about it until you know what the problem is,” Trump said.

    So what exactly does Trump propose doing?

    Hello? Hello? Anyone?


    Obama admin adds to counter-terrorism record, kills Taliban chief

    Among Republicans, it’s simply assumed that President Obama and his administration are passive and indifferent when it comes to counter-terrorism.

    In recent months, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), for example, has said the White House’s approach to defeating terrorists is simply “rhetorical,” and barely exists in practice.

    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) added in November, “I recognize that Barack Obama does not wish to defend this country.”

    And yet, reality keeps getting in the way of ridiculous conservative talking points.

    The leader of the Taliban has been killed in a U.S. airstrike, officials in Afghanistan said Sunday.

    The fact remains that the Obama administration is responsible for ordering a lot of strikes on prominent terrorist leaders – well beyond the high-profile raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

    It wasn’t long ago that the Obama administration confirmed “the death of the Islamic State’s senior leader in Libya, known as Abu Nabil, who was targeted in a Nov. 13 U.S. air strike carried out by F-15 aircraft on a compound in the city of Derna.”

    And shortly after that, the Obama administration said a U.S. military strike also killed a senior leader of al-Shabaab in Somalia.

    Those strikes came on the heels of U.S. forces killing the al Qaeda operative “in charge of suicide bombings and operations involving explosives,” which followed U.S. forces also killing the top official in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

    Finding Osama bin Laden’s successor in al Qaeda has been made difficult because President Obama has ordered strikes that have taken out “seven potential candidates” slated to lead the terrorist network.

    And this doesn’t even get to the administration’s success in killing the leader of al Qaeda in Yemen or the perpetrator of the Benghazi attack, both of which Obama mentioned Tuesday night.

    Jeffrey Goldberg, hardly a liberal, wrote, “Obama has become the greatest terrorist hunter in the history of the presidency.”

    And yet, bizarre perceptions linger – most of the public still believes the president hasn’t been “tough enough” – probably because Obama’s conservative critics simply overlook the record, and the discourse plays along.

    Will the death of the Taliban leader challenge stale assumptions? Recent history suggests it’s unlikely.

    And what will “tough-guy” Trump do? He’s too frightened to say.


    Donald Trump calls global warming a ‘hoax,’ until his golf course is threatened

    In January 2014, he publicly wondered how the United States could be spending money to combat what, in his words, was a “GLOBAL WARMING HOAX.” Last October, he told The Washington Post editorial board in March that he is “not a great believer in man-made climate change.”

    The Trump Organization has submitted a permit to build a sea wall, which cites rising sea levels from climate change as a threat.

    “If the predictions of an increase in sea level rise as a result of global warming prove correct, however, it is likely that there will be a corresponding increase in coastal erosion rates not just in Doughmore Bay but around much of the coastline of Ireland,” the application notes.

    “In our view, it could reasonably be expected that the rate of sea level rise might become twice of that presently occurring.

    “I think there is concern about where he stands because he hasn’t come out strongly one way or another,” one anonymous aide told the Times.


    Mr. Innuendo at his best (i.e. worst)

    In an interview with the Washington Post published on Monday, Trump was asked about Vincent Foster, the former White House aide whose 1993 death was ruled a suicide by both police and federal investigators.

    Trump called the circumstances surrounding Foster’s death “very fishy.”

    “He had intimate knowledge of what was going on [with the Clintons],” Trump said. “He knew everything that was going on, and then all of a sudden he committed suicide.”

    Trump continued: “I don’t bring [Foster’s death] up, because I don’t know enough to really discuss it. I will say there are people who continue to bring it up because they think it was absolutely a murder. I don’t do that because I don’t think it’s fair.”

    “It’s the one thing with her, whether it’s Whitewater or whether it’s Vince or whether it’s Benghazi. It’s always a mess with Hillary,” Trump said.

    So Mr. Innuendo, first mentions a death that has been extensively investigated and found to be suicide. Mr.Innuendo calls it “fishy.” Why “fishy”? He has no idea.

    Then he claims he’s not bringing it up, but “other people are bringing it up“. Which other people? Trump’s cowardly pseudonym, John Miller, perhaps?

    Then he says he won’t talk about it, because that’s not fair, but he’s the only one talking about it.

    Finally, he ends with the vague innuendo, “It’s always a mess with Hillary.”

    A perfect example of a cowardly candidate, afraid to be definite about anything. He refuses to make proposals, and weasels out by saying, everything is just a suggestion. Even his infamous wall and deportation of immigrants, now only are “suggestions.”

    Republicans, how does it feel to be led by a coward?


  4. I’m sure what ever he does will make America great again, and don’t forget he’s really, really rich, and has a trophy wife.

    Who are these morons who are following this Pied Piper?

    I don’t know why I bother. My head is ready to explode!


  5. Who controls the federal reserve?

    Who controls the printing of money?

    Do Jews control the federal reserve?


    1. Yes, of course. As you know, the 12 million Jews Hitler left in the world, control all 6 billion non-Jews. How? I don’t know. Maybe magic.

      You may not realize it, but Barack Obama and Joe Biden are a secret Jews, as are Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House and Kevin McCarthy, the majority leader.

      And did I mention that Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader actually is a rabbi, as is the Pope?

      Seriously, (and this will infuriate you and your fellow bigots) Donald Trump’s son-in-law is an Orthodox Jew and Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, has converted to Judaism (her Jewish name is Yael.)

      Oh, but it gets worse for you haters. Hillary Clinton’s son-in-law, Marc Mezvinsky, is Jewish.

      So eat your heart out. No matter who wins — Trump, Clinton, or Sanders — there will be Jew in the White House.

      How awful. What would the Lord God Jesus say about this?

      Oops, I forgot. He, too.

      Remember that the next time you go to church.

      Oh, you’re Muslim? Then you know about Abraham, the Jew.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s