You are on your way to living in a jail of your own making.

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

In case you have wondered how it was possible for the German people voluntarily to surrender their freedoms and to accept and even cheer for an obviously lying, bigoted, preening, egomaniacal dictator like Adolf Hitler, wonder no more.

Many Americans are following that familiar, Hitleresque script.

Back in 6/24/13, during the Obama administration, the Chicago Tribune published my letter about dictatorships:

The war on terrorism cannot be won. There always will be people who hate the U.S. So every day, the government will “have to” create some new restriction on our freedoms, justified by the never-ending war.

Today, the government tracks your Emails.
Tomorrow, the government reads your Emails.
The next day, the government reads your snail mail.
The next day, the government censors your snail mail.
The next day, the government plants listening devices in your office.
The next day, the government plants listening devices in your home.
The next day, the government bans criticism.
The next day, the government bans trials for accused critics.

Where does it end? It doesn’t. Each step is justified by “national security.” Each day, the populace approves it because “I have nothing to hide.”

And that is how all dictatorships are built — step by step, with the acceptance of the populace.

To the above list of how the people encourage self-imprisonment, I could have added Donald Trump’s desire to disembowel the media with his incessant refrain of “Fake news” and his desire to sue the media for any criticisms of his greatness.

Image result for president for life trump
Will he be President-for-Life?

 

Dictators hate a free media because the media expose the dictator’s excesses and incompetence.

Trump would love to have the media control Kim Jong Un has.

Two years later, an Aug 19. 2015 post titled, “Perhaps Germany still has some cattle cars you can use,” included these paragraphs:

Bill O’Reilly confronts Donald Trump: You can’t ‘deport people who have American citizenship’

Trump called for ending birthright citizenship, or the right of anyone born in the US to American citizenship.

“That’s not going to happen because the 14th Amendment says if you’re born here, you’re an American,” O’Reilly said. “And you can’t kick Americans out. The courts would block you at every turn. You must know all that.”

Trump insisted that the Constitution did not grant citizenship to “anchor babies,” a pejorative term used to describe the children of people who enter the country illegally with the purpose of having a son or daughter who would then be granted US citizenship.

“I can quote it!” O’Reilly exclaimed. “You want me to quote you the amendment? If you’re born here, you’re an American — period! Period!

“You are not going to be able to deport people who have American citizenship now. And the federal courts will never allow mass deportations without due process for each and every one.

“And do you envision federal police kicking in the doors in barrios around the country, dragging families out?”

The above was followed by the comment: “Hmmm . . . An amoral politician, basing his popularity on fomenting hatred against a minority. Government police kicking in doors, dragging families out and deporting them. Does that remind you of anything?”

This all was written in 2015, well before Trump became a serious candidate. The post was one of many that likened Trump to Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Castro, Kim, Mao and other despicable dictators.

For instance, in September 2016, we posted:

Astounding similarities: Of whom does this remind you? It’s happening now.

Click the above link and you will be treated to a frightening list of parallels between Trump and Hitler.

Actually, they were not just parallels between Trump and Hitler. More importantly, they were parallels between Trump’s followers and Hitlers’ followers, for it is the followers who first give any dictator his power.

That post was published in 2106. Now, we have arrived at August of 2017.

More than half of Republicans would back extending Trump’s first term due to fears of voter fraud, poll finds The Washington Post

Hillary Clinton got more than 2.8 million more votes than President Trump in the 2016 election, and there is zero evidence of any significant amount of voter fraud, despite Trump’s false claims about millions of illegal Clinton voters and the staunch numerical agnosticism of the voter-fraud commission he ordered into being.

Still, a new survey from researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and Yeshiva University found that 47 percent of Republicans said they believe Trump won the popular vote, 68 percent believe that millions of illegal immigrants voted in 2016.

They also may believe Trump did not grope the women who accuse him, Obama tapped Trump’s phones, and Trump University was a legitimate university.

The dictator-in-waiting first must find a willing cadre of gullible followers, who will believe anything the leader tells them, no matter how outrageous or easily-disproved it may be.

Clearly, Trump has found those followers.

Researchers, Ariel Malka and Yphtach Lelkes, asked respondents:

“If Donald Trump were to say that the 2020 presidential election should be postponed until the country can make sure that only eligible American citizens can vote, would you support or oppose postponing the election?”

Then they asked the same question with the addition that Trump and Republicans in Congress proposed postponing the election together.

More than half of Republicans, 52 percent, supported postponing the vote, and 56 said the same thing if the GOP offered the proposal alongside Trump.

Think about it for a moment:

More than half of the people who self-identified as Republicans, would, in essence, make Trump “President-for-life.”

(That would be the reality of an election delay, for there always would be “good reasons” to delay further elections, once the precedent has been set.)

Malka and Lelkes said: “The data show a substantial number of Republicans are amenable to violations of democratic norms that are more flagrant than what is typically proposed.

If you are one of the majority of voters who are alarmed at Trump’s job performance, you might understand the devilish allure of saying yes to postponing an election.

Dictators, in themselves, are just individuals, each with no more power than any other individual.  Their power comes not from themselves, but from their followers.

If Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Castro, Kim, Mao, et al, had not begun with cadres of willing, citizen followers, they never could have been able to rule their nations.

Sometimes, if the dictator’s hold on the people ends, the dictators can be overthrown (as witness what happened to Mussolini).

But far more often, the dictator gathers strength via his rule-by-terror of the politicians, the military, the police, and the courts. The people lose their power and are left to rue the day they ever backed him.

Today, Trump retains his power over a majority of Republicans. Despite Trump’s obvious shortcomings, the Republican politicians — even those he has insulted and demeaned — are cowardly and afraid not to back him, lest he turn the voters against them.

And by law, he is Commander-in-Chief of the military, and he even holds a majority in the Supreme Court.

So today, Trump is close to having all the tools he needs: The military, the courts, and a willing populace.

He still can be stopped — it’s early — if the people come to their senses. The people still have the power.

Later, it will be too late, and America will turn into Russia, China, North Korea, and Cuba, all of which became instruments of slavery because, from ignorance, the people allowed it to happen.

Note to Trump’s followers: You are well on your way to living in a jail of your own making. 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE A MONTHLY ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA (similar to Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB (Economic Bonus)) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONE Five reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE FEDERAL TAXES ON BUSINESS
Businesses are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the federal government (the later having no use for those dollars). Any tax on businesses reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all business taxes reduce your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and business taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

If you accept your daily serving of BS, you will continue to be fed BS.

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Think of Congress as being a fast food joint that serves moldy slices of BS. As long as suckers are willing to slurp down moldy BS, Congress will continue to serve it.

Image result for moldy restaurant food
A serving from the Congressional moldy BS restaurant. Enjoy!

Why serve the truth, when the public not only accepts, but demands, lies?

Clean’ debt ceiling bill unlikely to pass House of Representatives : lawmaker
Reuters, August 8, 2017 (Writing by Susan Heavey; Editing by Frances Kerry and David Gregorio)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. House of Representatives is unlikely to raise the country’s debt ceiling without conditions to rein in spending, a Republican lawmaker said on Tuesday, raising the specter of another potential clash even as Republicans control both Congress and the White House.

Image result for applying leeches
Cutting deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia

Each party wishes to hold America’s credit hostage, in order to cut economic growth.

Reductions in deficit growth lead to recessions and depressions, because spending cuts deprive the economy of dollars.

(Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports) By formula, cuts to Federal Spending reduce GDP growth.)

Cutting deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.

Year to year percentage change:
Red line = Growth in Federal Debt Held by the Public; Blue line = Growth in GDP

The close parallels between debt growth and GDP growth
1. Q1 ’74 Debt & GDP growth turn up
2. Q4 ’75 Debt growth turns down; two years later GDP growth turns down.
3. Q1 ’80 Debt & GDP growth turn up.
4. Q1 ’81 Debt & GDP growth turn down.
5. Q1 ’81 Debt & GDP growth turn up.
6. Q2 ’83 Debt growth turns down; 9 months later, GDP turns down.
7. Q3 ’89 Debt growth turns up; 1 year later, GDP turns up.
8. Q4 ’90-’92 Debt growth levels then falls; ’92-’00 GDP levels then falls.
9. Q4 ’00 Debt growth turns up; ’02 GDP turns up.
10. Q1 ’04 Debt & GDP growth turn down.
11. Q2 ’07 Debt growth turns up; ’09 GDP turns up.
12. Q2 ’09 Debt growth turns down; GDP growth trends slightly down.

GDP = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports.

Because Federal spending (G) is only a small fraction of total GDP, the parallels between Federal Spending and GDP are especially impressive.

These parallels indicate that not just Federal Spending, but increases in Federal Spending are necessary for economic growth. 

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Why does Congress want to cut economic growth? Because most federal spending benefits the 99% far more than it helps the 1%, and the rich don’t like it.

The rich want the rest of us to beg them for money and for jobs. They want a desperate servant class who will work for low wages.

If the government provides such benefits as are shown in the Ten Steps to Prosperity (below), we won’t have to beg, and the rich will lose their desperate servant class.

So the rich bribe the politicians (via campaign contributions and promises of lucrative employment later) to vote against deficit spending that would narrow the Gap between the rich and the rest.

“Most Republicans want to do something to lower the trajectory of the debt,” said U.S. Representative Tom Cole, a GOP member of the House Appropriations and Budget committees.

Being more the “party of the rich,” the GOP works harder to widen the Gap between the rich and the rest.

Disagreements over the country’s borrowing capacity have prompted skirmishes for years.

  1. The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, and having the unlimited ability to create its own sovereign currency, has no need to borrow, and in fact, it does not borrow. The federal government never can run short of dollars. It creates brand new dollars, every time it pays a bill.
  2. Because there is no federal borrowing, there is no federal “borrowing capacity.”
  3. What erroneously is termed “borrowing,” actually is deposits in Treasury security accounts at the Federal Reserve bank, similar to savings accounts at your local bank.
  4. The FRB has the unlimited ability to accept and pay back deposits.

The Treasury is expected to fully exhaust its remaining borrowing capacity in October.

Since the Treasury has no need to borrow, and in fact does not borrow, it cannot exhaust its “borrowing capacity.” However, Congress has the power to limit the FRB’s ability to accept deposits in Treasury security accounts, and by obsolete law, the total of such deposits must equal or exceed the total of deficits.

(The law was applicable to gold standards, which were eliminated by President Nixon on August 15, 1971. Today, the law serves no purpose, but remains on the books.)

Representative Mark Walker, who chairs the conservative Republican Study Committee, recommended two conservative measures.

Both measures would require the government to issue new bonds to pay principal and interest on debt held by the public and by two Social Security trusts.

The “principal and interest on debt” is the amount of money deposited in all T-security accounts at any given moment.

The government pays off the principal and interest simply by transferring existing dollars from those T-security accounts back the the checking accounts of the T-security holders. No new dollars required.

The transfer is similar to your bank transferring your savings account deposit back to your checking account deposit — a simple money transfer of existing dollars.

Rep. Waller has been bribed to pretend that this simple money transfer is a burden on the federal government or on federal taxpayers. It is no burden on anyone, and the entire debt — principal and interest — could be paid off tomorrow, if the government wished.

One would also allow the president to rescind budget authority over unobligated funds and to order the sale of government assets.

For reasons already discussed, Rep. Waller, apparently a tool of the rich, wants the President arbitrarily to cut federal spending that would benefit the economy.

Because the federal government has the unlimited ability to create dollars, it has no need to sell assets. So why does Rep. Waller want this? The rich want it.

It is known a “privatizing” which the rich claim benefits the public because for-profit private industry “”always is more efficient than the government.

Never mind that the federal government invented the Internet, created the federal highway system, built the Hoover dam, created atomic energy, flew men to the moon, runs the military, funds most pharmaceutical discoveries, and created the best health-care insurance program in America, Medicare, which would be even better if not for the phony debt ceiling BS.

Privatizing invariably gives the rich a lucrative monopoly business that provides poorer service while taking profits from the pockets of the public. It is a gigantic scam, the sole purpose of which is to make the rich richer and you poorer.

Republican leader Mitch McConnell has said debate over the issue could stretch into September, when lawmakers must also pass separate legislation to fund day-to-day government activities before the fiscal year ends later that month.

Watch for your Representative and your Senators to engage in crocodile-teared hand-wringing about how difficult it is to spread a “limited” budget over federal spending needs.

There are lies. There are rotten lies. And then, there is the debt ceiling.

Anyone who tells you the deficit or the debt are too high is feeding you a huge portion of moldy BS.

Are you willing to keep eating at that moldy BS restaurant? If not, tell your Representative and Senators.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE A MONTHLY ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA (similar to Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB (Economic Bonus)) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONE Five reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE FEDERAL TAXES ON BUSINESS
Businesses are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the federal government (the later having no use for those dollars). Any tax on businesses reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all business taxes reduce your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and business taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

In our society, are you a self-reliant person?

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Are you a self-reliant person?

A fundamental difference between conservatism and progressivism is:

Conservatives believe you are or should be self-reliant, while progressives believe you are not, and cannot be, self-reliant.

Evolution tells you that you are the result of a many-million year, unbroken chain of victories. Your ancestors battled nature again and again, for millions of generations, and not one of them lost before giving birth to a descendant.

Related image
You are the result of an unbroken chain of victories.

They fought every sort of weather. They fought every sort of enemy, from microscopic germs to giant predators.

There were volcanoes, meteors, floods, landslides, accidents. Your ancestors survived them all.

There were other humans, competing and warring for food, shelter, and companionship.

In a “dog-eat-dog,” “survival-of-the-fittest” world, in which many billions of life forms began and died, your ancestors repeatedly survived. What are the chances of that?

Consider the physical and emotional strength of the few who survived the dangers of the birth ordeal, followed by the ongoing dangers of the maturation period required to produce descendants, repeating again and again.

Every one of your ancestors survived long enough, and they each have passed that physical and emotional strength down to you.

Given your endless history of personal victories, are you a self-reliant person?

Humans are primates, and most primates are social species.

From Palomar.edu:

An important advantage that primates have in the competition for survival is their practice of living in societies which have a constant close association of young and old through a long life duration.

The young learn survival skills from experienced, knowledgeable adults. The result is that by the time primates are grown, they are usually proficient in dealing with each other and the environment.

Social advantage #1: Educating the young and educating each other by communicating experiences.

While primate instinctive survival skills are minimal, their social skills are unusually effective. Acting together in groups, they often can avoid or intimidate predators.

Social advantage #2: The group protects the individual, particularly the weaker in the group, those most in need of protection.

Groups of primates also have a greater opportunity in discovering and controlling food sources.

Social advantage #3. Finding, creating, defending and sharing of resources.

The rare species in which most individuals live solitary lives are, of course, exceptions.

Few scientists would argue with the notion that social grouping and networking has been a large part of the human species’s survival and success. Yet the very existence of a society implies that we cannot be completely self-reliant. 

We need the cooperation of the others with whom we compete.

We have evolved from the internal competition among individual members, that strengthens our genetic line. and the social group that protects our genetic line.

Image result for yin yang
Self-reliant individuals or dependent on society?

We are the product of two opposing forces, the yin and the yang of self-reliance and of group-reliance.

The conservatives tend to believe that people should be self-reliant, and that those who are not — particularly the poor and the infirm– are lazy and weak and a drag on society.

Any government benefits that are given to the weak are thought to encourage sloth and to breed future generations of unproductive “takers.”

The poor are said to be at fault for their misery, and if only they would “shape up” they wouldn’t need to beg the rest of us for help. That is the conservative faith.

The progressives, by contrast, believe that the very reason humans are a social species is to protect individual members of the group, particularly those least able to protect themselves — the poor, the sick, the weak.

Progressives hold that the more a society protects its most vulnerable, the stronger are the bonds that create the society.  It is this protection-of-all that measures the durability of a society. A group that does not protect its weakest, will decay, break down and disappear.

Recently, we have seen the different philosophies with regard to health care. The conservatives believe everyone — rich and poor, sick and healthy, old and young — should do whatever is necessary to provide for their own health care.

The progressives believe society owes health care to everyone in the society, and that none should be excluded by virtue of their social weaknesses.

So the conservatives proposed health-care plans that exclude millions whose finances preclude them from paying doctors, hospitals, other health-care workers and pharmaceutical companies.

Progressives proposed complex plans that benefit the poor, the sick, the young and the aged while taxing the healthy and robust.

None of the plans, the conservative’s or the progressive’s, would need to be paid for by taxpayers, (In our Monetarily Sovereign nation, taxpayers do not fund federal spending).

So the question becomes: How does it benefit a society to exclude some members because of poverty, illness, or age?

Remember, there is no financial cost to the American taxpayer for providing health care to all, though for similar plans there would be costs to such monetarily non-sovereign entities as states, counties, cities, businesses, and euro nations.

Some might argue that though there is no financial cost, there are other costs: A potential shortage of health-care providers and drugs. However:

  1. History shows that when there are sufficient (government) dollars to pay for goods and services, the economy will provide those goods and services. And more importantly:
  2. Rationing health care on the basis of ability to pay, rather than on intelligence, creativity, character, and other assets that benefit society, is not a good evolutionary criterion.  And:
  3. Denying health care is tantamount to creating sickness, which would diminish the productivity and strength of the entire group. Thus rationing any survival asset — food, clothing, housing, education, and healthcare — weakens the entire social group.

For example, Islam suffers from its treatment of women, which denies entire nations of the intelligence, creativity, and productivity half their population could offer.

Elizabeth Warren proclaimed the progressive theory when she said:

“There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody. You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for.

“You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police-forces and fire-forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory — and hire someone to protect against this — because of the work the rest of us did.

“Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless — keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”

Barack Obama pronounced the same progressive idea:

“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges.

“If you’ve got a business – you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”

Shortly after, Mitt Romney gave the conservative viewpoint:

“To say that Steve Jobs didn’t build Apple, that Henry Ford didn’t build Ford Motors, that Papa John didn’t build Papa John Pizza … To say something like that, it’s not just foolishness. It’s insulting to every entrepreneur, every innovator in America.”

To complete the circle, both the yin and the yang must be present. Both the steel fist of the warrior builder and the open hand of the benevolent contributor.

We need the soldier, the fire fighter and the police officer; we need the food pantry server, the teacher, and nurse all of whom give their lives to protect our society.  We need the immigrant picking in the field and washing dishes in the restaurant.

Dooming the lower income classes to inferior public services weakens all of America.

Image result for helping up olympic
We compete; we help. That is a social species.

In summary, the conservatives are wrong to claim that lack of income and wealth are good criteria for denying health care.

The progressives are wrong  to propose complex, convoluted plans to avoid using federal dollars — and both parties are wrong to claim that taxpayers fund federal spending.

We are not alone. We are not self-reliant. We all rely on society.

With charity, we give to ourselves. We are what we do for ourselves and what we do for others — the yin and the yang.

Those bonds are the strength of our society.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE A MONTHLY ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA (similar to Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB (Economic Bonus)) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONE Five reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE FEDERAL TAXES ON BUSINESS
Businesses are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the federal government (the later having no use for those dollars). Any tax on businesses reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all business taxes reduce your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and business taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Fifty lies you have been told about our economy. Do you believe any?

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

I like lists. Not only do they help to organize thought, but by their length, they can demonstrate quantity better than can mere paragraphs.Image result for list

Here is a long list of lies you have been told about our economy. Most first were published back in 2011, but they even are more relevant today.

Following each lie is a quick truth in parentheses. If you don’t understand why any are lies, or don’t understand the truths, feel free to ask via the comment section.

  1. There is no difference between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty. (The former cannot run short of its own sovereign currency; the latter can.)
  2. Like us, the federal government should live within its means. (Unlike you and me, and state and local governments, the federal government has unlimited “means.”)
  3. Money and debt are two different things. (Every form of money is a form of debt, though all debt is not money.)
  4. A growing economy does not need a growing supply of money. (GDP measures money spent; a greater money supply allows more to be spent.)
  5. Federal surpluses help the economy grow. (Federal surpluses are the economy’s deficits. Taking dollars from the economy, surpluses cause recessions and depressions.)
  6. Some federal spending must be cut to allow room for other spending. (The federal government’s ability to spend is unlimited. Federal spending adds dollars to the economy, which stimulates private spending.)
  7. The federal debt is too large. (The so-called “debt,” unlike personal debt, consists of deposits in T-security accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank, neither too large nor too small.)
  8. The federal debt is caused by federal deficits. (The federal debt is the total of deposits in T-security accounts, which resemble bank savings accounts. Deficits are the difference between taxes and spending. We could have deficits without a “debt” [simply stop allowing deposits in T-security accounts]. And we could have a “debt” without deficits [allow deposits in T-security accounts, even if the federal government runs a surplus.])
  9. The federal debt ceiling has a beneficial function. (The “debt ceiling” is 100% harmful with no redeeming qualities. The debt ceiling doesn’t limit federal spending; it limits the government from paying what it already owes.)
  10. The current level of deficits is unsustainable. (The deficit is the difference between taxing and spending. There is nothing about it that needs to be “sustained.” The U.S. can “sustain” unlimited deficits, forever.)
  11. The current federal debt is unsustainable. (The so-called “debt” is the total of deposits in T-security accounts. The government can accept deposits in T-security accounts, forever and can repay all those deposits instantly.)
  12. Federal taxes help pay for federal spending. (As soon as a federal tax dollar is received, it disappears from the money supply. Thus, unlike state and local governments, the federal government destroys tax dollars upon receipt; it does not use them for anything.)
  13. The federal government cannot create money; only the Fed can. (The federal government causes new dollars to come into existence by paying bills, i.e. by instructing creditors’ banks to increase the numbers in creditors’ checking accounts.)
  14. State, county, and city finances are similar to federal finances. (States et al are monetarily non-sovereign, and so can run short of dollars. The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign cannot run short of its own sovereign currency.)
  15. Federal borrowing helps pay for federal spending. (Federal “borrowing” pays for nothing. So-called “borrowing” is just deposits in T-security accounts, dollars which are not used by the federal government.)
  16. The federal government spends taxpayers’ money. (The federal government destroys tax dollars upon receipt and creates brand new dollars each time it pays a bill. Dollars received by the federal government are not part of any money supply measure.)
  17. Our children and grandchildren will pay for today’s federal deficits. (No one pays for deficits. They are just an arithmetic calculation — the difference between taxes and spending — not a financial obligation for anyone.)
  18. Each of us is liable for a share of the federal debt. (No one is liable for the federal debt [i.e. deposits in T-security accounts]. Taxpayers do not pay for the federal debt. These deposits are an obligation of the Federal Reserve Bank, not of taxpayers.)
  19. A balanced federal budget is more prudent than running federal deficits. (Deficits, which add dollars to the economy, are more prudent. They grow the economy. Balanced budgets shrink the economy by removing dollars from the economy.)
  20. The federal debt/GDP ratio measures the government’s ability to service its debts. (The federal government always has the unlimited ability to service any debts, no matter what GDP may be. The government does not service its debts with GDP.)
  21. The federal debt/GDP ratio measures the health of the economy. (GDP growth is one of the economic health measures. The federal “debt” is irrelevant to economic health.)
  22. Federal earmarks, pork barrel spending and unnecessary spending hurt the economy. (All federal spending, even “wasteful” spending, adds dollars to the economy, and so, is beneficial.)
  23. The single biggest cause of inflation is excessive federal deficit spending. (Inflation is a function of the Supply & Demand for dollars and goods. Federal spending, in of itself, does not cause inflation.)
  24. Inflation is too much money chasing too few goods. (Inflation = Supply/Demand for money vs. Demand/Supply for goods and services.)
  25. Consumer saving helps the economy grow. (Consumer spending helps the economy grow.)
  26. In fractional reserve banking, banks keep a fraction of deposits and lend the rest. (Bank lending is not constrained by reserves, but rather by the amount of bank capital. Banks do not lend deposits or their own assets. Banks lend by increasing the balances in borrowers checking accounts.)
  27. The best way to cure inflation is to increase taxes and/or to cut federal spending. (Tax increases and spending decreases cause depress the economy. Interest rate increases, which increase the Demand for money, are the fastest, most incremental, least political way to cure inflation.)
  28. FICA taxes pay for Medicare and Social Security. (Federal taxes do not pay for any federal spending. Even if FICA were $0, the federal government could pay Medicare and Social Security benefits, forever.)
  29. The Medicare and Social Security Trust funds are running short of money. (These so-called “Trust Funds” are accounting fiction, and do not fund anything. Government agencies do not pay their bills from trust funds.)
  30. The government cannot afford to fund Medicare or Social Security. (The federal government’s ability to pay for anything is unlimited.)
  31. The U.S., like the euro nations, can go bankrupt. (The Monetarily Sovereign federal government never can run short of dollars. The euro nations, being monetarily NON-sovereign, can run short of euros.)
  32. Without increased taxes or decreased spending, Medicare and Social Security will go bankrupt. (Neither the federal government, nor any of its agencies, can go bankrupt unless Congress wills it.)
  33. Gold is safer and more prudent than “paper” (fiat) money. (Unlike fiat money, gold pays no interest and is costly to store, and costly to ship, buy, sell, and insure. “Fiat” money is backed by the government, whereas gold is not backed by any authority.)
  34. The federal government needs to borrow to pay for deficit spending. (The federal government needs and uses no income — taxes or borrowing. It creates dollars ad hoc by paying bills.)
  35. Federal borrowing reduces the availability of lending funds. (Federal “borrowing” results from federal deficit spending, which increases the availability of lending funds.)
  36. The main causes of the 2008 economic collapse were low interest rates and excessive bank regulation. (The main cause of the “Great Recession” was inadequate bank regulation and supervision, leading to bad lending practices.)
  37. Low interest rates stimulate the economy; high rates slow it. (Historically, high rates have not slowed the economy. High rates stimulate economic growth by forcing the government to pay more interest, which increases the money supply. )
  38. Taxing the rich does not hurt the poor. (Federal taxes remove dollars from the economy, which depresses the economy, which in turn, hurts the poor more than the rich.)
  39. Cutting payments to doctors and/or taxing “Cadillac” health insurance plans, is one good way to help pay for improved health care. (The former cuts medical care; the latter hurts the economy by cutting the money supply. The government can help improve health care by paying doctors more and by funding Medicare for every man, woman, and child in America.)
  40. America should try to export more and import less, i.e. achieve a positive balance of payments. (America does not need a positive balance of payments; the federal government creates dollars at will. Importing helps prevent inflation by lowering prices on goods and services.)
  41. The U.S. states, counties and cities should be self-supporting via local taxes, and not rely on federal assistance. (Being monetarily non-sovereign, local governments need net outside income to survive. This can come from net exports, tourism, and/or federal deficit spending.)
  42. Rather than being a net borrower, the federal government should be a net lender. (The government does not need to receive repayment of loans. Loan repayment to the federal government, like federal taxes, reduces the money supply.)
  43. Greece, Ireland, and the other troubled euro nations need to exercise spending restraint and austerity. (Austerity drains an economy of money. These monetarily non-sovereign nations are like American states, in needing to run a positive money balance vai exports, tourism, and/or euro infusions frome the EU.)
  44. Without tax increases, the federal government cannot afford to increase support for education, infrastructure improvements, bailouts for states, counties and cities, the military, research and local police. (The federal government can afford anything; it never can run short of dollars. Deficit spending stimulates the economy. Unlike state and local governments, the federal govenment does not spend tax revenue.)
  45. Immigrants hurt the economy by taking jobs from Americans. (Immigrants are consumers and producers, who stimulate the economy via their spending and their labor. Even non-working immigrants, who receive federal benefits, are an economic because of their spending.)
  46. The poor are lazy “takers,” who won’t work if they receive federal benefits. (This never has been shown to be true. Even people receiving benefits work for more income than benefits alone can provide.)
  47. Privatization is good because private for-profit organizations are more efficient, honest, creative, and hard working than are government agencies. (The opposite often is true. The basic motive of for-profit organizations is profit. The basic motive of government organizations to do a job. History is replete with examples of privatization that has been costly, inefficient, and often criminal.)
  48. Federal regulations are bad for the public because they destroy businesses and jobs. (Federal regulations mostly deter illegal businesses, while protecting the jobs in legal businesses and protecting the public.)
  49. If the people ever realized the federal government’s spending is not limited by taxes, they would make incessant demands for more and more benefits, leading to excessive spending and inflation. (The demands would help close the Gap between the rich and the rest. The federal government has absolute control over inflation via interest rate control, taxes, and the power to revalue the dollar.)
  50. The biggest problem in economics is the debt, or the deficit, or unemployment, or health care, or crime, or immigration . . . etc. (Actually, there are two “biggest” problems: The wide and widening Gap between the rich and the rest, and the ignorance of Monetary Sovereignty).

If you would like to debate or question any, or add lies, feel free.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE A MONTHLY ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA (similar to Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB (Economic Bonus)) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONE Five reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE FEDERAL TAXES ON BUSINESS
Businesses are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the federal government (the later having no use for those dollars). Any tax on businesses reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all business taxes reduce your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and business taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY