Wall Street Journal gets it wrong, again. Do they have a learning disability?

20 Easy Things That Will Make You the Next Millionaire | Inc.com
Being Monetarily Sovereign, the U.S. government owns infinite dollars.
You reasonably might expect that, of all the newspapers in the world, the Wall Street Journal surely would print articles by only writers who understand federal finances. Ah, would that it were so. Unfortunately, some writers published by WSJ either are as ignorant as the general populace or as intentionally ignorant as the bribed-by-the-rich politicians and university economists. Here is an example saw in a recent WSJ edition (OK, the article printed in several papers, but I read in WSJ, which should know better):
U.S. National Debt Tops $30 Trillion as Borrowing Surged Amid Pandemic The record red ink, fueled by spending to combat the coronavirus, comes as interest rates are expected to rise, which could add to America’s costs. After a protracted standoff last year, Congress agreed in December to raise the nation’s borrowing cap to $31.4 trillion. By Alan Rappeport, Feb. 1, 2022
We can’t even get past the headline and subheads without being subjected to WSJ ignorance.
Safe Deposit Box: What You Should (And Shouldn't) Store | Bankrate
Federal “debt” is deposits into accounts similar to safe deposit boxes. The federal government never touches those deposits except to return them to the owners.
The so-called “national debt” neither is “red ink,” nor is it debt. It is the total of deposits into Treasury Security accounts. When you invest in a T-bill, T-note, or T-bond, you do not lend the federal government money. You merely deposit your dollars into your T-security account. It’s an account similar to an interest-paying, safe-deposit box. As with a safe deposit box, the federal government does not touch your dollars. It merely stores them for you, and allows you to accumulate interest. Upon the maturity of your account, the government “pays it off” simply by returning to you, the dollars in your account. Since the dollars already exist in your account, and remain yours, this payoff is no burden on you, on the government, or on taxpayers. It’s merely a transfer of your dollars. If the national “debt” were a real governemnt debt, it would go something like this:

The government needs dollars to pay its bills. Federal taxes are insufficient to pay all the creditors, so the government must borrow dollars, and in return it gives the lenders its IOUs in the form of T-securities (T-bills, T-notes, T-bonds).

Later, to obtain the dollars to pay off the T-securities, the government levies more taxes. This means we taxpayers ultimately are liable for the government’s debts.

You have just read what the Wall Street Journal and the vast majority of Americans believe about the federal debt. And it is 100% wrong. Back in the late 1770s, the federal government created the U.S. dollar from thin air. The government simply passed laws (from thin air) that created as many dollars as it wished, and gave those dollars whatever value it wished.

The first U.S. silver dollars were coined on Oct 15,1794. On that day, 1,758 of them were produced, but no more the rest of the year.

In 1794, a new coin called the Draped Bust Dollar, featuring a matronly Liberty of considerable endowment wearing a draped blouse. Over 40,000 Draped Bust dollars were minted in 1795.

Why 1,158 and 40,000? Because the government arbitrarily based its coin on silver. Each coin contained 0.7737 oz of silver. Why 0.7737? Because the government arbitrarily made its dollar similar in weight to the Spanish dollar. Note the word “arbitrarily.” The government could have produced any number of dollars, and could have made them equivalent to anything it wished. The base could have been gold, lead, tin, or nothing at all. Because we were a new country, we tried to create demand for the dollar by making it equivalent to an existing coin. But it was all arbitrary. The federal government arbitrarily has changed the metal content of all U.S. coins many, many times over the years. Today, the vast majority of dollars are nothing more than numbers on spreadsheets, and have no physical existence. The federal government retains the infinite ability to create laws from thin air, and those laws have the infinite ability to create dollars from thin air.

Alan Greenspan: “A government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency.”

Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

Quote from Ben Bernanke when, as Fed chief, he was on 60 Minutes: Scott Pelley: Is that tax money that the Fed is spending? Ben Bernanke: It’s not tax money… We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.

Statement from the St. Louis Fed: “As the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e., unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.”

Read the above quotes carefully, then ask, what is Alan Rappeport talking about when he refers to the federal “debt” (i.e. deposits) as “red ink?” How can accepting deposits into T-security accounts be considered “borrowing,” when, as Greenspan, Bernanke, and the St. Louis Fed say the federal government has the infinite ability to create dollars? Why would the government ever need to borrow? It wouldn’t and it doesn’t.
WASHINGTON — America’s gross national debt topped $30 trillion for the first time on Tuesday, an ominous fiscal milestone that underscores the fragile nature of the country’s long-term economic health as it grapples with soaring prices and the prospect of higher interest rates.
It’s not “ominous.” On the contrary, it’s a sign of a growing economy. It would be “ominous” if the misnamed national “debt” were declining. That would demonstrate we are in a recession or depression. In fact, the so-called”debt” isn’t even debt or borrowing. It’s the total of investments in T-securities (T-bills, T-notes, T-bonds). The government never touches the dollars invested in these securities, and the government pays them off every day, simply by returning the balances in the accounts. No tax dollars are involved. This is not a burden on the government or on taxpayers. The sole purpose of T-securities is not to provide the federal government with its own dollars, but rather to provide a safe “parking place” for unused dollars. This stabilizes the dollar. It is not borrowing in any sense of the term.
The breach of that threshold, which was revealed in new Treasury Department figures, arrived years earlier than previously projected as a result of trillions in federal spending that the United States has deployed to combat the pandemic. That $5 trillion, which funded expanded jobless benefits, financial support for  small businesses and stimulus payments, was financed with borrowed money.
No, no, no. It was NOT financed with borrowed money. Every penny the government pays for anything is created, ad hoc, with the press of a computer key. The federal government never borrows the currency it has the infinite ability to create from thin air. Here is how:

To pay a creditor, the federal government creates instructions. These instructions tell the creditor’s bank to increase the balance in the creditor’s checking account.

At the instant the instructions are obeyed, new dollars are created and added to the money supply measure called “M1.”

That is how the federal government creates money: By using its infinite ability to create instructions telling banks to increase checking account balances. Why would the federal government borrow, when as Chairman Ben Bernanke said, it can “produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”
The borrowing binge, which many economists viewed as necessary to help the United States recover from the pandemic, has left the nation with a debt burden so large that the government would need to spend an amount larger than America’s entire annual economy in order to pay it off.
Utter nonsense. The so-called “debt” (that isn’t a debt) is not a debt “burden.” The government pays off all T-securities simply by returning the dollars in T-security accounts. It does this every day. And the phrase, “entire annual economy” is a non-sequitur based on ignorance. The size of the U.S. economy (i.e. the Gross Domestic Product) does not pay for any part of the “debt.” That comparison of the so-called “debt” vs. the US. economy — known as the “debt/GDP ratio — often is quoted as a way to shock the reader, though it is a meaningless comparison.

Here are a few similar comparisons.

Country Debt To GDP Ratio  2022 Population
Japan 237.00% 125,584,838
Greece 177.00% 10,316,637
Lebanon 151.00% 6,684,849
Italy 135.00% 60,262,770
Singapore 126.00% 5,943,546
Cape Verde 125.00% 567,678
Portugal 117.00% 10,140,570
Angola 111.00% 35,027,343
Mozambique 109.00% 33,089,461
United States 107.00% 334,805,269
Djibouti 104.00% 1,016,097
Jamaica 103.00% 2,985,094
. . .
Guinea 18.00% 13,865,691
Nigeria 17.50% 216,746,934
Libya 16.50% 7,040,745
Palestine 16.40% 5,345,541
Republic of the Congo 15.70% 5,797,805
Burundi 15.20% 12,624,840
Kuwait 14.80% 4,380,326
Russia 12.20% 145,805,947
Bhutan 11.00% 787,941
Eswatini 10.75% 1,184,817
Egypt 9.00% 106,156,692
Estonia 8.40% 1,321,910
Afghanistan 7.10% 40,754,388
Cayman Islands 5.70% 67,277
. . . . . . . . . . Do you see any relationship between the Debt/GDP ratio and the economic strength of the nation? Of course not, because there is no such relationship. The Debt/GDP relationship is meaningless. So why does Rappeport refer to it? Either he doesn’t understand federal finance or he is trying to scare you.  (The Wall Street Journal is designed for the rich, and the rich want to convince the populace that the government cannot afford to give benefits to the not-rich.)
Some economists contend that the nation’s large debt load is not unhealthy given that the economy is growing, interest rates are low and investors are still willing to buy U.S. Treasury securities, which gives them safe assets to help manage their financial risk. Those securities allow the government to borrow money relatively cheaply and use it to invest in the economy.
More nonsense. The so-called “debt load” is not unhealthy, and low interest rates are not a factor. The federal government, having the unlimited ability to create dollars, has no difficulty paying any amount of interest. Totally painless. And the federal government doesn’t need investors to buy Treasury securities. These are offered as a benefit to investors, not to the government. And in any event, any unsold T-securities are purchased by the Federal Reserve.
For years, presidents have promised to limit federal borrowing and bring down the nation’s budget deficit, which is the gap between what the nation spends and what it takes in. Under President Bill Clinton, the United States actually ran a budget surplus between 1998 and 2001.
Yes, Presidents have made this promise, and every time they actually kept the promise, we had depression or a recession. Mr. Rappeport fails to mention that Clinton’s surplus led to the recession of 2001.

1804-1812: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 48%. Depression began 1807. 1817-1821: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 29%. Depression began 1819. 1823-1836: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 99%. Depression began 1837. 1852-1857: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 59%. Depression began 1857. 1867-1873: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 27%. Depression began 1873. 1880-1893: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 57%. Depression began 1893. 1920-1930: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 36%. Depression began 1929. 1997-2001: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 15%. Recession began 2001.

But taming deficits had fallen out of fashion in recent years, including during the Trump administration, when lawmakers blew through budget caps and borrowed money to fund tax cuts and other federal spending.
Deficits don’t need to be “tamed.” Remember what Greenspan, Bernanke, and the St. Louis Fed said about the government’s infinite ability to pay its bills. Further, the federal government does not borrow its own sovereign dollars, the dollars it has the unlimited ability to create from thin air. And all federal spending is funded, not by taxes, but by ad hoc creation of new dollars. Why does the federal government levy taxes? To control the economy. It taxes what it wishes to discourage, and it gives tax breaks to what it wishes to encourage. Further, taxes give the impression that federal benefits must be limited. The rich, who control Congress and the President, want the Gap between the rich and not-rich to widen. The wider the Gap, the richer are the rich. It’s called “Gap Psychology“, the human desire to widen the Gap below and to narrow the Gap above.
“Hitting the $30 trillion mark is clearly an important milestone in our dangerous fiscal trajectory,” said Michael A. Peterson, the chief executive officer of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, which promotes deficit reduction. “For many years before Covid, America had an unsustainable structural fiscal path because the programs we’ve designed are not sufficiently funded by the revenue we take in.”
The Peter G. Peterson Foundation is notorious for crying “wolf” about the deficit and predicting calamity that never happens — until we actually do reduce the deficit, at which time we have the aforementioned depressions or recessions. Until then, it’s all warnings and hand wringing about the “ticking time bomb of debt.” It’s a “time bomb” that has been ticking since 1940 and still no explosion.
The gross national debt represents debt held by the public, such as individuals, businesses and pension funds, as well as liabilities that one part of the federal government owes to another part.
Right, the so-called debt (T-bills et al) are assets of the private sector. When you own a T-bill, that is one of your assets. Alan Rappeport doesn’t want you to have that asset. He wants the government, which has infinite assets, to take that asset from you. Smart?
While Republican lawmakers helped run up the nation’s debt load, they have since blamed Mr. Biden for putting the nation on a rocky fiscal path by funding his agenda. After a protracted standoff in which Republicans refused to raise America’s borrowing cap, threatening a first-ever federal default, Congress finally agreed in December to raise the nation’s debt limit to about $31.4 trillion.
It was all political theater — cynical politicians trying to convince the innocent public that they are fiscally prudent. But if they really were prudent, they would spend more on global warming, poverty, healthcare, education, transportation, infrastructure, science, ecology, etc. — not debating about how to spend less.
In January 2020, before the pandemic spread across the United States, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the gross national debt would reach $30 trillion by around the end of 2025. The total debt held by the public outpaced the size of the American economy last year, a decade faster than forecasters projected.
Yes, as usual, the economic forecasters were wrong about the meaningless Debt/GDP ratio. So?
The nonpartisan office warned last year that rising interest costs and growing health spending as the population aged would increase the risk of a “fiscal crisis” and higher inflation, a situation that could undermine confidence in the U.S. dollar.
By “fiscal crisis,” we assume Rappeport means the federal government would be unable to pay its debts — which as we know is impossible for our Monetarily Sovereign government. (It can happen to state/local government, which are monetarily non-sovereign.) And inflation always is caused by shortages, never by federal deficit spending. In fact, federal deficit spending is one of the best methods for curing inflation, if the spending is for curing the shortages. Todays inflation is caused by shortages of oil, food, computer chips, labor, and other needs. The federal government could stop inflation by spending more to support oil drilling, efficient farming, and chip manufacture, and by eliminating FICA (FICA lowers the net income of workers and makes them less willing to accept jobs).
Trillions in federal spending has left the United States approaching levels of red ink not seen since World War II.
Actually, the so-called “debt” is much higher than it was during WWII. And when spending for WWII ended, we had recessions.
The Biden administration has said the $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package the Democrats passed last year was a necessary measure to protect the economy from further damage. Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen has argued that such large federal investments are affordable because interest costs as a share of gross domestic product are at historically low levels thanks to persistently low interest rates.
Yes, the $1.9 Trillion in deficit spending did protect the economy, just as cuts to federal spending will injure the economy. So why cut? Interest costs as a share of GDP are irrelevant, as are low interest rates. In fact, higher interest rates have one advantage: They force the federal government to pump more stimulus dollars into the economy.
What is inflation? Inflation is a loss of purchasing power over time, meaning your dollar will not go as far tomorrow as it did today. It is typically expressed as the annual change in prices for everyday goods and services such as food, furniture, apparel, transportation and toys. What causes inflation? It can be the result of rising consumer demand. But inflation can also rise and fall based on developments that have little to do with economic conditions, such as limited oil production and supply chain problems.
Inflation always is caused by shortages and always is cured by curing the shortages, which the federal government can do by federal deficit spending.
Esther L. George, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, suggested during a speech this week that the Fed’s big bond holdings might be lowering longer-term interest rates by as much as 1.5 percentage points — nearly cutting the interest rate on 10-year government debt in half.  As rates rise, so does the amount that the United States owes to investors who buy its debt. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that if interest rates rise in line with their own forecasts, net interest costs will reach 8.6 percent of gross domestic product in 2051. That would amount to about $60 trillion in total interest payments over three decades.
That’s 60 trillion stimulus dollars pumped into the economy — dollars the federal government easily can create with the touch of a computer key, and dollars the economy uses for growth.
“A larger amount of debt makes the United States’ fiscal position more vulnerable to an increase in interest rates,” the C.B.O. said in its long-term budget outlook.
What does he mean by “vulnerable”? Is he saying that our Monetarily Sovereign government, which has the infinite ability to create dollars, will not be able to pay interest? Nonsensical.
Biden administration officials insist that they view fiscal responsibility as a priority. They have pledged that their economic agenda will be fully paid for through tax increases on wealthy Americans and corporations and by more rigorous enforcement of the tax code.
Biden wants you to believe that federal taxes fund federal spending. It is a lie. Federal taxes are destroyed upon receipt by the Treasury. Taxes come out of checking accounts that are part of the M1 money-supply measure. When they reach the Treasury, they cease to be part of any money-supply measure. They effectively disappear. There is no money supply measure that includes the federal government, because the government has infinite money. No one can answer the question, “How much money does the federal government have?” The only answer is, “Infinite.”
In recent months, the budget deficit has started to shrink as a stronger economy has boosted tax receipts and as government payments of pandemic relief money have slowed.
And this means economic growth will slow. If federal deficits fall enough, we will have a recession or depression.
And some economists argue that a more recent economic phenomenon — inflation — may have a silver lining in that it could chip away at the nation’s debt burden.
The federal “debt” is not a burden on the federal government or on taxpayers or on anyone else. It’s not debt, and even if it were, the federal government has the unlimited ability to pay.
Kenneth Rogoff, a Harvard University economist, said “You would rather have no debt, of course, but compared to other issues at the moment that’s not the principal problem.”
He’s a Harvard economist and he thinks that having no debt (which would require removing $30 trillion from the economy) is something we “would rather have”?? Is this the nonsense they teach at Harvard? In summary:

A federal deficit is necessary for economic growth. The federal Debt/GDP ratio is meaningless as a measure of economic health.

The federal government creates dollars, ad hoc, by paying creditors, which it can do endlessly.

Unlike state/local governments, the federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. It has the unlimited ability to create its sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar, and instantly can pay any obligation based on dollars.

The government never unintentionally can run short of dollars.

Federal taxes are destroyed upon receipt and do not fund federal spending.

The federal debt is nothing more than the total of deposits in T-security accounts, which are “paid off” by returning the dollars in them. This is not a burden on the federal government or taxpayers.

Federal deficit spending does not cause inflation; shortages cause inflation. A prime way to combat inflation is with federal deficit spending to cure shortages.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:
  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics. Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: Ten Steps To Prosperity:
  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 
The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

A brief summary of how Trump tried (and still is trying) to destroy U.S. democracy.

The irony of Donald Trump’s quasi-patriotic “Make America Great, Again” is that he may be the least patriotic American in history. He has done everything in his power to destroy the basis of American government, our free elections.the Kremlin endorses Donald Trump - Imgflip Some may have forgotten his sucking up to our enemy, Vladimir Putin (whose efforts got Trump elected) so as to get approval for a Trump Tower Moscow. And they may have forgotten Trump’s attempts to extort the President of Ukraine into providing damaging information about Joe Biden’s son. And many self-proclaimed “religious” followers seem to have forgotten Trump admitted to groping women while cheating on all three of his wives. And others may have forgotten Trump’s 30,000+ lies, including his phony doctor’s report, and the hurricane that never hit Alabama (“Sharpiegate“). And still others may have forgotten the crimes of Trump University and Trump Foundation, crimes that would have resulted in the incarceration of any other person. And then there was his promise to reveal his tax returns as every other President has done, a promise that, like so many other promises, he broke.Trump facing multiple lawsuits upon leaving office And unless you live on Mars, you surely remember that his denial of COVID’s seriousness, and his delays in addressing it (hydroxychloroquine, light, and bleach), cost hundreds of thousands of American lives. And he has poisoned the Republican party to such an extent that once-honorable people now are trying to evict any of their members who dare to speak the truth. And, of course, he is the only President to have been impeached not just once, but twice. Any of these should have been a red flag to anyone with the eyes to see and the brain to think. But his latest (and ongoing) treason is too obvious and beyond the pale, even for a psychopath. He has cast doubt among his followers, on the very foundations of our government, and continues to do so. He even promises more traitorous activity if he is re-elected in 2024. In case you have forgotten, here is an excellent summary of Trump’s ongoing, attempted coup, which under normal circumstances would have been punishable by death:
The Washington Post The 5-Minute Fix

By Amber Phillips

He didn’t try to hide his desire to steal the election. But President Donald Trump’s efforts to stay in power in 2020 can be hard to grasp, because they were such a shock to the system and because they happened on so many levels. More than a year later, we keep learning more about how he tried. To put all the news in context, let’s step back to review what we know about Trump and his allies’ efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
  • He laid the groundwork months ahead of time: Trump claimed early that widespread voting by mail would undoubtedly lead to voter fraud. A BBC review found he started doing this as far back as April. “RIGGED 2020 ELECTION: MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WILL BE PRINTED BY FOREIGN COUNTRIES, AND OTHERS,” he tweeted in June. “IT WILL BE THE SCANDAL OF OUR TIMES!”
    Dominion Says It Won't Settle With Giuliani, Lindell, or Powell Over  Conspiracy Theories
    Three of Trump’s many conspirators: Guilliani, Lindell, Powell
  • He set out a legal army to challenge his losses: Trump and his allies lost in the courts resoundingly, including at the Supreme Court. Eighty-six judges across the country and across the political spectrum rather easily batted those cases away. But Republicans still think they have cover to claim there were “questions” about the election.
  • He pressured state legislators to change the results: Trump urged top Republican legislators in states he lost to somehow vote to void or change the results so that he would have their electoral votes.
  • He called the governor of Arizona as he was in the middle of certifying results, notes The Post’s Philip Bump. (The governor sent Trump to voice mail.)
  • He attacked the governor of Georgia.
  • He hosted top Michigan Republicans at the White House.
  • He urged local election officials to deny certification of results: The closest he got was in Detroit, where two Republicans initially refused to approve of county election results.
  • He pressured Georgia’s secretary of state: Specifically in an hour-long phone call to “find” just enough votes so that he would win, long after state officials had certified results for Joe Biden’s win.
  • His allies set up fake electors in states: And they in some cases baselessly claimed they were the real electors. Counterfeit ballots even were printed to support Trump’s fraudulent claims.
  • He cheered on Republicans who asked the Supreme Court to overturn his loss: It was a baseless request led by Texas, yet more than half of House Republicans signed on to support it.Hardcover Peril Book
  • He pressured his vice president to overturn the results: We know from the book “Peril” that Mike Pence considered it.
  • He encouraged his backers to march to the Capitol on Jan. 6 and he waited hours to call off the mob in the ensuing attack: He even called them “special people.”
  • This weekend he mused about pardoning some of those convicted in the attack if he were president again, something the top Senate Republican didn’t object to outright.
  • He considered seizing states’ voting machines: The New York Times just reported he was personally involved in asking several federal agencies to do it, with some in his orbit even suggesting the military swoop in to do it.
  • He entertained people proposing martial law: Specifically MyPillow’s Mike Lindell, who was photographed entering the White House in January with a document that referred to “martial law if necessary.”
  • He continues to push Republicans to lead audits of election results: And in states as red as Idaho. election officials say these efforts serve only to undermine legitimate results.
It seems as if Trump pulled on every lever that was possibly available to him. His efforts were largely ham-handed, but they were unrelenting.
We could learn much more in the coming months, when the congressional Jan. 6 committee hopes to release a full report on its investigation. Why everyone’s talking about Pence and Jan. 6 all of a sudden: Trump supporters breached the building, some looking for him and threatening his life.
“He could have overturned the Election!” Trump said this weekend of his former vice president — in a statement he kind of tried to walk back today. Trump’s talking so much about this now because Congress is talking about closing any loophole in federal law when it comes to what role the vice president plays in counting up election results.
Actually, there isn’t a loophole — a bipartisan group of senators is just considering making that extra clear with specific changes to the 1880s Electoral Count Act. Senators are talking about that now because Democrats’ efforts to create federal standards for elections failed.
But a year after the attack on the U.S. Capitol, there has been precisely zero legislation in Congress to prevent it from happening again. So, Congress seems open to at least legislating its own role in certifying the elections. “It is flawed and does need to be fixed,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said today of the stodgy law.
A likely factor in Republicans’ endorsement of this idea: As Congress certifies the winner of the 2024 election, it will be Vice President Harris presiding over things.
If all of this doesn’t add up to traitorous activity, nothing does. Trump did more to overthrow the U.S government than did convicted traitors Aldrich Ames (life sentence), Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (executed), Robert Hanssen (life sentence without parole), Adam Yahiye Gadahn (killed in an airstrike), John Walker, Jr. (life sentence), and Benedict Arnold (fled the country). The question is not whether Donald Trump is a traitor. He clearly is. The sole questions are:
  1. Will he be convicted or will right-wing politics prevail?
  2. When convicted, what should his punishment be? Life in prison or execution?
In his never-ending efforts to be America’s dictator, Trump did not reach the levels of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao. Not that he hasn’t been trying. He just doesn’t have the brains or the temperament. But America has had plenty of time to evaluate this inferior and dangerous man, so there is no excuse for not seeing what he is: A traitor to America. Convict! Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:
  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics. Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: Ten Steps To Prosperity:
  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 
The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:
  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics. Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: Ten Steps To Prosperity:
  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 
The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

What you pay for ignorance of federal financing. Part II

Let’s quickly review the facts:
  1. The U.S. federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. Even if all federal tax collections fell to $0, and expenses tripled, the government would not unintentionally run short of dollars.
  2. The government unnecessarily charges you for such services as Social Security and Medicare.
  3. Socialism is ownership and control, not spending.
Here are excerpts from an article that ran online today, 1/129/2022: Medicare Isn’t Free
Contrary to popular opinion, Medicare isn’t entirely free. In a video interview, Dana Anspach, the founder and president of Sensible Money, explained the components of Medicare and the costs associated with Part B and Part D. Medicare Part A, often referred to as hospital insurance, is free if you worked enough years in the U.S. to qualify. “Typically, if you’re eligible for Social Security benefits, you’re also eligible for Medicare Part A at no cost,” said Anspach.
This would be true if the federal government hadn’t socked you and your employer for FICA taxes, which purportedly fund Medicare and Social Security. In reality, these taxes fund nothing. The federal government creates new dollars ad hoc, every time it pays an invoice.

Quote from Ben Bernanke when, as Fed chief, he was on 60 Minutes: Scott Pelley: Is that tax money that the Fed is spending? Ben Bernanke: It’s not tax money… We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.

Medicare Part B covers other services and supplies, and it has a monthly cost that varies depending on your income.
The money deducted for Part B, like all other payments to the federal government, pay for nothing. All dollars received by the federal government are destroyed upon receipt.

When you pay federal taxes, dollars come out of your checking account. These dollars come from an money-supply measuren called “M1.”

When the Treasury receives your M1 dollars, they cease to be part of any money-supply measure. The reason: It is impossible to measure the amount of money the Treasury “has,” given that the government has the infinite ability to create its own sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar.

So those M1 dollars effectively are destroyed upon receipt.

And there is Part D, for prescriptions, and it is free if your income is low enough, but it has a cost once your income exceeds various threshold amounts.
The following chart outlines the payments — the unnecessary payments — you are forced to make in order to receive medical benefits from the federal government. The Four Parts of Medicare You have been brainwashed into believing the federal government, which created the U.S. dollar from thin air, now somehow can short of the dollars it created. So, you are led to believe it financially is necessary for the federal government to receive your dollars, to pay for services. It isn’t. The federal government has neither the need nor the use for your dollars. It has the infinite ability to create new dollars. That is how it is able to sustain a debt of $25 trillion with no worries at all. You are swayed by reasonable-sounding complexity:
“Like so many things associated with retirement, it’s more complicated than you may think “First, the Social Security office references your tax return data from two years prior to determine your premium level, so if 2022 is your first year enrolling in Medicare, they will use data from your 2020 tax return.” “Let’s assume you are turning 65 in 2022, and your MAGI from 2020 is below $91,000 if single/$182,000 if married filing jointly; in this case, your Part B premiums are $170 per month and Part D will be free. (Your MAGI is calculated by adding back any tax-exempt interest income to your adjusted gross income (AGI).) ‘Now, if your MAGI exceeds additional threshold amounts, your premiums will be higher. ‘This is referred to as means testing and is technically called the IRMAA. You are notified of your premium amounts via a letter from the Social Security office called your Initial Determination Letter, said Anspach. The largest premiums of $578 for Part B and $78 for Part D apply to MAGI greater than $500,000 for singles and $750,000 for marrieds. Now if you are not yet enrolled in Social Security, you will receive a quarterly invoice for these premiums, said Anspach. But if you are enrolled in Social Security, the premiums are deducted from your monthly Social Security payment.
So many caveats; so many details. And it’s all a lie. The federal government destroys your FICA dollars and deductions from Social Security the moment they are received. The federal government easily could and should pay for Medicare Part A, Part B, and Part D without charging you anything.
So why does the government force you to send it dollars that it destroys? The following chart, from the aforementioned article, contains a hidden clue: Part B premiums Did you see the clue? Look at the last line. There is a ceiling on payments above a certain amount of income. That is, the person who makes a half million, or a million, or a  hundred million dollars a year pays the same. The increases in payments stop at a certain level. This is the same trick the government uses when calculating FICA payments. In 2021, employees pay a 6.2% Social Security tax (with their employer matching that payment) on income up to $142,800. Any earnings above that amount are not subject to FICA tax. 

The very rich are never satisfied. They always want to be richer.

“Rich” is a comparative. There are two ways to become richer: Obtain more for yourself or widen the income/wealth/power Gap between you and those below you by forcing them to receive less.

Because the very rich control the U.S. government, Congress and the President are only too happy to oblige by setting a ceiling on payments to the government.

As a share of disposable income, the rich pay far less than do you.

This effectively widens the Gap, thus making the rich richer.

2. It collects an unnecessary and huge FICA tax from salaried employees and their employers, not from dollars earned in non-salaried remunerations — more representative of the rich.
3. Employers count the FICA they pay as being part of salaries, thus reducing paid salaries.
4. Despite the fact that Social Security is quasi-insurance, ostensibly paid for by FICA, the government collects proportionately more taxes from lower-income people.
5. Lower-income people generally work for salaries that are taxed at the highest rates. Other forms of income, more usual for the rich, are taxed at lower rates or not taxed at all.
6. Wealth generally is not taxed.
7. Tax loopholes available primarily to the rich.
7. Tax complexity is intentional. It allows the rich, who can afford expensive tax accountants and lawyers, to take advantage of arcane tax laws, not understood by the general public.
8. Student loans. The rich can pay tuition. The not-rich are burdened by loans.
Keep in mind that all of the above taxation and fees, together with limits on federal benefits, are unnecessary. The federal government neither needs nor uses tax dollars, and its spending is not financially limited.
The rich want you to believe that federal finances, which are Monetarily Sovereign, are the same as state/local government finances, which are monetarily non-sovereign.
The fundamental difference is that the spending by state and local governments is limited by income from tax receipts and borrowing. Federal spending is not limited by any form of income.
The Federal government doesn’t need your hard-earned dollars. Ignorance is expensive.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:
  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics. Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: Ten Steps To Prosperity:
  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 
The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Does the Republican Party really exist anymore?

Accredited Cockroach Pest Control & Removal in Melbourne
No more, my favorite
Imagine walking into your favorite restaurant — a restaurant you have frequented for many years — only to discover it’s under new management, and the tables are covered with flies, roaches, and filth. Will you still eat there just because you always have? I had to answer that question five years ago. Before that, I mostly had voted Republican. But then my favorite political party came under new management, and indeed it has become covered with flies, roaches, and filth. The new Republicans claim to be “conservatives,” with the word “conserve” being in opposition to the word “change.” What are conservatives? The are many opinions about this. One opinion comes from The Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI).
It is a nonprofit educational organization that promotes conservative thought on college campuses. It lists the following six as its core beliefs: limited government, individual liberty, personal responsibility, the rule of law, free-market economics, and traditional Judeo-Christian values. ISI was founded in 1953 by Frank Chodorov with William F. Buckley Jr. as its first president.
Yet, does that Republican Party, led by William Buckley, still exist? The following article, from Scientific American, describes one aspect of the new Republican Party:
Elected officials who campaigned against critical race theory (CRT) (the study of how social structures perpetuate racial inequality and injustice), are being sworn into office all over the U.S. These candidates captured voters’ attention by vilifying CRT, which has become a catch-all to describe any teaching about racial injustice. Lessons about the genocide of Native Americans, slavery, segregation and systemic racism would harm children, these candidates argued. Calling its inclusion divisive, some states have enacted legislation banning CRT from school curricula altogether. This regressive agenda threatens children’s education by propagating a falsified view of reality in which American history and culture are outcomes of white virtue. It is part of a larger program of avoiding any truths that make some people uncomfortable, which sometimes allows active disinformation, such as creationism. Children are especially susceptible to disinformationas Melinda Wenner Moyer writes in “Schooled in Lies.” Removing conversations around race and society removes truth and reality from education. This political interference is nothing new—political and cultural ideologues have fought for years to remove subjects such as evolution, Earth history and sex education from classrooms and textbooks.
That is today’s Republican party, preaching “limited government, individual liberty, and personal responsibility“, but voting for government book-burning with regard to racial history. “Limited government”? “Individual liberty”? Is that today’s Republican Party? Or does the following better describe today’s Republican Party?:
Many of the school districts that brought in anti-CRT board members are the same ones that refuse to mandate masks, despite the evidence that masks can prevent the spread of COVID. These school officials also rail against vaccine mandates as a violation of personal choice. It is the same prioritization of individuals over community and a discomfort with hard truths that characterize the movement against the teaching of true history.
Or, perhaps this is the real Republican Party: Newt Gingrich, a former House speaker and candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, stoked outrage on Sunday by predicting members of the House committee investigating the Capitol attack will be imprisoned if Republicans retake the chamber this year.
One of two Republicans on the committee, Liz Cheney, said, A former speaker of the House is threatening jail time for members of Congress who are investigating the violent attack on our Capitol and our constitution. This is what it looks like when the rule of law unravels.”
The rule of law” once was a cornerstone of Republican politics. But no more. That rule is gone. Now, it is “the rule of Trump.” Or perhaps more accurately, the cornerstone of the Republican party now is, the rule of Trump’s lies.” Some of his doozies, according to Updated 9:28 AM ET, Sat January 16, 2021, were:
  1. It never rained on his inauguration. (It poured)
  2. The coronavirus is under control. (Never was)
  3. Sharpiegate (Alabama never was threatened)
  4. “The head of the Boy Scouts called him “to say my address to the Scouts’ National Jamboree was “the greatest speech that was ever made to them.”  (No such call ever was made._
  5. Rep. Ilhan Omar supports al Qaeda. (Ugly, bigoted lie.)
  6. The US for years had a $500 billion annual trade deficit. (Never even reached $400.)
  7. Big, burly men repeatedly came up to him crying tears of gratitude. (No record of it ever happening).
  8. He didn’t know anything about a $130,000 payment to porn performer Stormy Daniels. (He personally reimbursed Cohen, who made the payment.)
  9. He claimed to end family separation at the border. (He ended his own policy of family separation after the public uproar.
  10. Claimed Biden would destroy protections for people with pre-existing health conditions. (This was part of Obamacare that Trump tried for years, to destroy.)
  11. Claimed got the Veterans Choice program passed after other presidents tried and failed for years. (It was a lie. When asked about it,  he left the room).
  12. “They say” the noise from windmills “causes cancer.” (This was just one of his many, many “they say” or “people tell me” lies.)
  13. Trump’s big health care plan was eternally coming in “two weeks.” (It never arrived, just as his many other plans and announcement never arrived.)
  14. Claimed he was named “Michigan Man of the Year.” (Never happened, though he claimed it more than 100 times.
  15. And the winner is: “I won the election.” (It didn’t happen. Fifty judges, many Republican, said it didn’t happen. Recounts said it didn’t happen. Republican election officials said it didn’t happen. And he lost the popular vote by 7 million, a huge difference.)
St. John's Church: Trump photo op at DC church has bishop furious - Vox
Trump being religious
And remind me, wasn’t it Trump who promised to show his tax returns and to put his holdings into a blind trust? He lied, of course, as he always does. He’s still fighting to preserve as much of that secrecy as he can. And, you may have thought bearing false witness was a violation of Republicans’ “traditional Judeo-Christian values.”  Apparently, those religious values are limited to his holding up a bible for a photo op, (after gassing protesters to make way for him.) Today’s Republican Party makes excuses when they resort to “whataboutism” to justify Trump’s firehose of lies.  Getting back to the Republican claim of “individual liberty,” it doesn’t apply to women, particularly poor women, who want an abortion. Rich women always can get abortions, but poor women must resort to coat hangers, because the new Republican Supreme Court denies them individual liberty. And then there is the conservative desire for “free-market economics,” which really means, free-market economics for the rich. That’s why during the Trump administration, the rich received monster tax cuts while the poor and middle classes received next to nothing. And finally, we come to “personal responsibility.” It’s the Republican excuse for trying to destroy Obamacare and for voting against, Medicare for All and the Build Back Better plan. This is an example of what 100% of Republican Congresspeople oppose:
  • Free preschool for 3-4-year-olds
  • Child-care financial aid
  • Financial aid to care for the elderly or disabled
  • Increased child tax credits
  • Clean energy tax credits and investment
  • Investment in coastal renovation, forest management, soil conservation
  • Cost reduction for prescription drugs
  • Reduced premiums for Obamacare
  • Close the Medicaid coverage gap
  • Medicaid hearing benefits
  • Investment in affordable housing
  • Expanded Earned Income Tax Credit for low-wage employees
  • Funds education beyond high school
  • Expands funding for low-income children’s meals
  • Funds reduced immigration backlog
Not only do 100% of Republicans oppose these programs you could have had, but 0% of Republicans offer nothing of their own. The Republicans have no plans. They even failed to come up with a platform ahead of the past election. What was once the “party of ideas” has become the “brain-dead party,” the party whose sole objective is to oppose anything that could benefit America’s working class. Republicans now firmly are the party of the rich, the party of the cruel, the party of the bigot, the party of the lie, the traitor party, the fear-mongering party, the xenophobe party, the paranoid party, the party that forged election documents in order to destroy our democracy, the traitor party of Donald Trump. Any opposed to this new Republicanism are censured, ostracized, “primaried,” and removed from committee positions. Astoundingly, virtually all Republican politicians and many Republican voters continue to support Trump’s lies. They continue to eat at their once-favorite restaurant because they always have. Trump has convinced the naive that the poor, the middle-classes, the black, the brown, the yellow, women, and the gay are a danger to America. This, from the traitor who encouraged a coup, and continues to resist America’s peaceful transfer of power. If you traditionally have voted Republican, know this. The party that now calls itself “Republican” is no more. The ideas and ideals for which you once voted have been destroyed. Your vote no longer means “Republican.” It no longer means “conservative.” It now means “Trump.”Food | Food and Wine | Food and Restaurants | Daily Telegraph Vote Republican and you are patronizing that restaurant you once loved but now is filled with vermin — the restaurant that no longer exists as you remember it. . . Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:
  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics. Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: Ten Steps To Prosperity:
  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 
The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY