How to protect your child in shooting-gallery America

The right-wing Supreme Court has decided that everyone in America — you, your neighbors, strangers in the street, the angry guy in the car tailgating you who just flipped you the bird — everyone is entitled to carry a  gun “for protection.”

So, you may wonder how you will protect your children.

Yes, you pack heat everywhere you go, and some of you give your children guns, because they seem mature for their years.

But for the rest of you who worry that your children might be shot when you’re not around, here are some solutions you might consider.

(The following also is for you folks who wisely will run away when the shooting starts, like those Dallas folks did.)

Send your kid to school with this bullet-proof backpack:

monetary sovereignty


Or, consider this bullet-proof blanket in stylish orange:
Believe me, no one will laugh when your kid is the only one left alive.

monetary sovereignty

For the youngest members of your family, we offer this stroller in both black and blood red:

monetary sovereignty

Don’t wait for the country to come to its senses and pass gun control legislation. That could take decades. And you don’t believe in it, anyway. We all need guns to protect ourselves against the government, or something.

Hey, look at that guy walking toward your little daughter’s school, with a rifle slung over his shoulder.

Hmmm . . . that’s an awfully big magazine on his gun. Why does he need such a big magazine on a semi-automatic, high-powered weapon? He must have a good reason. Maybe, he’s hunting a whole herd of deer.

Sure, he’s just exercising his Constitutional rights. (And if there is one thing you know about the Constitution, it’s the second half of the 2nd Amendment.)

But what do you know about that guy? Is he a “good guy” or a “bad guy”? How can you tell?

Gee, wasn’t that Dallas killer a “good guy” before he became a “bad guy”?

Well, you can’t hang around here. You have to go to work now. But you’re not worried. You bought your daughter a bullet-proof backpack.

She’ll be O.K., because you’re a good parent.

shooting-gallery america

You’ve done all you can to protect your children in shooting gallery America.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-tranferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be an good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

 

8 thoughts on “How to protect your child in shooting-gallery America

    1. You can always take your family to paradise chicago, home of the toughest gun laws in the country.

      Make sure you are good at spotting drive buys and are fast at rolling. It comes in handy when those thugs pull out those guns…

      Oops i said thugs again

      Like

      1. Danny,

        Got it. “Tough” gun laws increase shooting. Sounds logical to me.

        Specifically, which laws do you repeatedly refer to?

        You have no idea, do you?

        Apparently, someone once told you “Chicago has tough gun laws,” and now you believe it, but you are totally ignorant of any such laws.

        Maybe you heard it from the NRA or some other gun pushers? Perhaps they are your “reliable” source.

        Since you keep babbling about tough gun laws, be sure and let me know which Chicago laws are “tough,” and I’ll publish them for all to see.

        Until then, you won’t be published.

        See how having facts helps? If you have the facts, you’ll see your name in print, and if you don’t have the facts, you won’t.

        Bye.

        Like

  1. No ad hominem there. It’s good you have a sense of humor. You make really good points both of you that’s why it’s so controversial.
    In your back and forth with Danny I get this sense that you don’t believe the government will turn waaaayy right wing and just become outright fascist. Maybe even instead of killing Jews they might start out with the African American people in our nation and than go from there to the next race they don’t like. I get you just don’t see that as a possibility do you? If that’s the case I can certainly understand your stance on gun control. After all if you can’t settle a dispute with your neighbor with your cuffs than what kind of man are you right? Knowing what you know about economic policy and the extent of the unfairness abound in our politics, and the impact it has on our social lives it seems to me you would believe tyranny is in fact right around the corner. If this is the case than allow me a question; If you were a Jew during the holocaust and had a gun in hand to protect your family against the Nazi’s would you shoot and kill your adversary knowing darn well you and all of your family would perish? If the law permitted you a gun would you have used it?
    You seem to think that’s impossible or at the very least improbable, Tyranny I mean. If you were right, about the improbability of tyranny I would agree society has no business carrying guns in public. But if the threat of tyranny exist than it’s up to society to educate it’s citizens why they carry guns.
    It seems to me that if the oligarchs knowing darn well they might not be able to count on the soldier to protect themselves from the common folk (after they find out what modern money theory and public purpose is all about) It would behoove them to arm another force to protect them like the police force maybe. But that will not suffice will it? Because they will still have a citizenry that might fight back. Now if the oligarchs can create a social environment where the population is begging to take their arms away they would have accomplished their goal. What is their goal? to enslave us all. You don’t think this is what they are doing? You think maybe I give them to much credit? That they can’t actually engineer such a society? History tells us different. In the meantime before the revolution starts people will get killed by idiots that walk around and don’t understand why they should have a gun.

    Like

  2. Think:

    1. You have a far, far greater chance of being killed by some fool with a gun than by the U.S. government going on a Nazi-style killing rampage. Just look at the statistics.

    2. You and your gun would have no chance against the might of the U.S. Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force.

    So get real, and stop reading those right-wing conspiracy magazines. Your gun is not going to protect you from the “oligarchs.”

    Statistically, just the fact that you have a gun in your house means your chances of being shot are increased.

    Like

  3. So you don’t in fact believe we are very close to becoming a fascist state. You believe the wealthy people that control our economy wouldn’t go that far. And you say owning a gun has nothing to do with a fascist state.
    You overlook the “principle” of defending you and your loved ones. You might reason if you can’t shoot and win the battle then there is no sense in trying maybe? Even if you were to agree to the above statements you believe that this attitude about the “principle” of defending your believe with force against the tyrants is not worth the life of innocent bystanders in society.
    The fact that innocent people will die, not because they are fighting back and defending themselves but because idiots will own guns and do stupid things is not an easy thing to accept. Would it be reasonable to say than that because you don’t feel that way, (because you didn’t answer the question) I’m assuming you would “not” shoot your adversary to defend your “principled” belief of liberty and freedom you would put us who do believe in this “principle” of defending you and yours at a disadvantage?
    I read no such right wing propagandist. I read you, Michael Hudson, L Randal Wray, Stephanie Kelton, and the writings of Cornelius Van Til

    Like

  4. My advice to you: Stay away from the booze.

    And please don’t go running into the street to attack the U.S. Army, the most powerful military force on earth.

    You might get hurt and they might die — laughing.

    Like

Leave a reply to Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Cancel reply