Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor, which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.
======================================================================================================================================================================================
Do we need some form of gun control? Today’s headline in the Washington Times was, Colorado voters deal blow to gun control with stunning recall of 2 Democrats, By Valerie Richardson-The Washington Times.
Read some of the comments by those who have read the article. Then, ask yourself, “Are these the people we should trust carrying loaded, semi-automatic guns with large clips?”
• Bloomberg is crying tonight.
He should stick to his idiotic holy war against large sodas and table salt because Americans still love their constitutional rights.• Yeah, the COURTS decided they did not care for his NAZI tactics, all Radical Dems are nothing but Commies, and potential terrorists,count on them to always TAKE away your rights, always.
Just look at what we have for an excuse for a POTUS.A freaking Socialist Radical.• Though he is a socialist radical, and that can’t be denied — it’s becoming apparent that he’s even more ominous. According to the now betrayed Egyptian faction of the Muslim Brotherhood – Obama is a member of the Islamic Brotherhood. When you consider his policies it gives credence to that.
In Egypt he ousts our ally and invites in the Brotherhood. When the people of Egypt threw out Morsi, Obama didn’t applaud. He brooded quietly to see if he could help the deposed faction return to power. He took out the neutered, reformed, terrified-into-behaving-well Kadaffi and let the Muslim Brotherhood have Libya.
All these middle eastern leaders are tyrants, Assad no less so — but here again he wants to help the Brotherhood and its coalition of terrorist groups. The tyrants are the only option in nations infested with Islamic extremism. He knows that. He knows that removing dictators brings a new member to the coalition that will form the Caliphate. We are dealing with evil of monumental proportions. Have you heard one single syllable of regret or alarm that Christians are being killed. No, you haven’t. Obama posed as a Christian for political advantage. He’s a cold-blooded liar, which is why his lies are not visible to most. He killed Osama, he likes to say. That proves nothing. When one Mafia don kills another it isn’t proof that he’s not a mafiosa — it’s proof that he is.
When O was first elected the O’Reillys of the world said they “weren’t buyin’ it,” that he was a socialist. Now communist is a more appropriate term and Islamic radical is gaining plausibility.
• Obama had two moslem Fathers. What were they Sheite or Sunni. What group is the Brotherhood… just asking.
• Its what propagandists and Democrats do, they twist words and deny, they go by their god Alinsky the Communist.
• Thanks to Bloomberg and Democrats like these two freshly recalled, I buy one box of my favorite ammo less every month and donate the amount to the NRA instead so they can keep up the good fight.
There were four million of us prior to 2012 elections. There are five million of us now. There are 95 million as yet unaffiliated gun-owners and altogether we legally own 300 million guns (and growing).
You guys are doing a bang-up job motivating us to safeguard our rights.
• It was the will of the people against big out of state government and going against the Constitution of the United States. Unless the Democrats roll back Senator Feinstein’s and Janet Reno’s Gun Free Zone that has drawn kid killers out of the woodwork there will be more elections like this. Get rid of “Gun Free Zone’s” before there is another massacre of innocents, what does the Democrats want, more bodies? Democrats are still making schools targets for the deranged.
• YOU got it, WHERE have all the heinous attacks happened?,in GUN FREE ZONES.
What cities and states have the higjest murder rates,the one’s with the toughest gun control laws.• If you think the 2nd Amendment is evil, you probably don’t have much respect for the 1st Amendment either, and in your case, it shows!
• I have never said the Second Amendment is evil. I think the second amendment is a valuable one, however, I think some gun-toting nuts are too extreme with their guns. We have guns in our home – both handguns and rifles -but, I don’t feel I need a 50 bullet clip to shoot. If I did, I would need to go back to the shooting range.
• If you don’t want those fine. I do. So mind your own freakin business!
Bottom line, gun control laws are bad because:
1. Bloomberg is against salt and soft drinks
2. Bloomberg uses NAZI tactics. People who want gun control are Radical Dems, commies and potential terrorists and Obama is a Socialist, Islamic Radical
3. Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, a communist and a socialist – and he had two moslem Fathers.
4. Propagandists and Democrats go by their god, Alinsky the Communist
5. GUN FREE zones draw kid killers out of the woodwork
6. The cities and states with the highest murder rates have the toughest gun laws.
Who could deny such impeccable logic?
Visualize these folks carrying guns. Visualize getting into an argument with them, perhaps in a bar or while driving. Visualize them being really, really angry at you.
Pray the Supreme Court would step in to protect you.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
====================================================================================================================================================
Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)
10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt
No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports
THE RECESSION CLOCK

As the lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the lines rise.
#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY
Who’s going to protect me when the criminal gets his hand on a weapon (be it gun, machete, bat, hammer)?
Will I have to wait for a cop to show up after my gray matter is spread over the pavement?
Pray the judges in the supreme court have some gray matter left. Banning guns is not going to make us an ounce safer. Criminals have one thing in common, the BREAK the law. Make another law and you will make them MORE powerful. Is that logic sufficient for you Mr Mitchell?
LikeLike
How do Canadians, the British, Australians, Japanese and all Europeans protect themselves from criminals?
Oh, that’s right. Their criminals have less access to guns.
LikeLike
I agree with you partially on this. For instance, background checks, fines on straw purchases, assault weapons, armor piercing bullets, and magazines over 10 rounds.
I disagree on banning hand guns.
LikeLike
yet another study which makes the exact same point:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/18/gun-ownership-gun-deaths-study
LikeLike
what i meant was the “exact same point” you were making, rodger.
LikeLike
I think the sane points of gun control, as shown by most legislation, is to try to prevent guns from being in the hands of crazies, unstable individuals, criminals, and people who are on the verge of becoming homicide convicts .. or fugitives.
One writer mentioned “gun-free zone” you note that most bars, restaurants, stores, etc. are “gun-free zones” posted on their door. Odds are that’s not Govt. That’s management and insurance.
Check out an article on the Journey into a Libertarian Future on Naked Capitalism. The “interview” is pretend, but the quotes are culled from an actual published libertarian book, anti-democracy, by Hans Hermann-Hoppe, who is both Austrian and Austrian Econ. He’s not under a rock, he’s a professor at U. Nevada.
By part 3, you can see that individuals will have practically NO RIGHTS. It’s like “totalitarian libertarianism”. But there won’t be any “big govt” there to restrict rights, no govt at all. What there will be is private GLOs, Govt-Like-Organizations, an amalgam of private insurance, private police, and private owners. Basically a Police State, in private hands, and completely unaccountable by “voting” or other such quaint notions.
Do you think the private housing authority will allow its residents to randomly own guns? Maybe if ideologically owned by gun nuts, but capitalist owners will be too smart and too cautious for that. Even if they didn’t care personally, insurance costs make gun rights prohibitively expensive.
So ONLY private police would be armed, and indemnified.
Heck, Hoppe said owners won’t even permit decadent pot smokers, gay residents, or even people TALKING about democracy. Those people would be evicted and sent into “exile”. That’s verbatim from this godfather of libertarian “freedom”.
LikeLike
Ahh, the progress of United States of America:
1. Birth of a Nation (with Griffith’s KKK)
2. Cherokee Nation ( a high point)
3. Queer Nation and finally
4. Idiot Nation
I’ve never needed to pack heat in 40 years as an adult (and working for the railroad in less than perfect urban locales) but I guess I’ll need to protect myself against my fellow citizens…
LikeLike
You want to put your faith in the amerikan voting public to pressure their representatives into working for public purpose and implementing the ideas presented within MS? You’ve often times stated that citizens can work within the present system? Give me a break. In reality the only terrorists and gun wielders I fear are those wearing uniforms or working under cover or in plain clothes for the institutions supposedly charged with protecting the public. And before you comment, I do not believe in gun ownership by the public simply for personal protection or pleasure.
LikeLike