I just received an advertisement for Trumpcare. Should I join?

I just received an advertisement for Trumpcare. Should I join?

The advertisement was in the form of an Email. It came with a nice logo, featuring a symbolic American flag, and looked quite official.

It resembles what I might receive from a federal agency:

Trumpcare logo.png

Alas, like all things associated with Donald Trump, Trumpcare is mostly BS, a non-existent “program” designed and named solely to stroke the endlessly needy ego of Donald J. Trump and his fact-blind followers.

There is no Trumpcare. There only is a group of proposed modifications to Obamacare (ACA) that provide less care, and cost more than the original.

One of the most important features of Obamacare is the ban on discrimination against pre-existing conditions.

Here is what the site “TrumpCare and Pre-Existing Conditions” says:

TrumpCare weakens (not eliminates) key protections for women, seniors, low-income Americans, and those with pre-existing conditions, which could result in tens of millions (including those with pre-existing conditions) being excluded to from the market or placed in a high-risk pool due to cost.

If one wants to speak truthfully without diving into the whole explainer above, they can simply say, “TrumpCare/ The American Healthcare Act weakens pre-existing conditions protections.”

Or more generally, “TrumpCare/ The American Healthcare Act weakens protections for women, seniors, low-income Americans, and those with pre-existing conditions.”

If one wants to add more detail they can say, “The state waivers, paired with reduced cost assistance, a fee for re-entering the market, less employers offering health plans, and the freezing of Medicaid expansion could lead to many being effectively excluded from insurance due to having a pre-existing condition (the effect is indirect, not direct).”

FACT: As many as 1 in 2 Americans have a condition that could count as a pre-existing condition and, although not every possible pre-existing condition would be excluded, a portion of those 50% with pre-existing conditions could see new hurdles under TrumpCare.

FACT: The plan (before the Amendments) had a price tag that came in under the ACA according to the Congressional Budget Office, saving $337 billion (for the federal government) over the decade (according to their first report).

However, it did this by leaving 52 million without coverage by 2026 (it increases the uninsured by 24 million by 2026 for a total of 52 million).

The cost and uninsured rate are subject to change based on changes to the bill.

Much like Trump University and Trump Foundation, Trumpcare is a bit of sleight-of-hand that seems to promise much, but in reality, it is a figment of Trump’s imagination.

The changes from Obamacare mostly involve turning over to the states, decisions about benefits.

Those of you who live in “red” states know what that means: If you’re middle- or lower-income, you’re about to be cheated by right-wing, “states rights” bologna.

Continuing with the article:

Very simply, TrumpCare/ The American Healthcare Act weakens pre-existing conditions protections.”

Or more generally, “TrumpCare/ The American Healthcare Act weakens protections for women, seniors, low-income Americans, and those with pre-existing conditions.”

If one wants to add more detail they can say, “The state waivers, paired with reduced cost assistance, a fee for re-entering the market, fewer employers offering health plans, and the freezing of Medicaid expansion could lead to many being effectively excluded from insurance due to having a pre-existing condition (the effect is indirect, not direct).”

FACT: As many as 1 in 2 Americans have a condition that could count as a pre-existing condition and, although not every possible pre-existing condition would be excluded, a portion of those 50% with pre-existing conditions could see new hurdles under TrumpCare.

FACT: The plan (before the Amendments) had a price tag that came in under the ACA according to the Congressional Budget Office, saving (the federal government) $337 billion over the decade (according to their first report).

However, it did this by leaving 52 million without coverage by 2026 (it increases the uninsured by 24 million by 2026 for a total of 52 million).

The cost and uninsured rate are subject to change based on changes to the bill.

In summary, so-called “Trumpcare,” if it ever existed, would save money for the Monetarily Sovereign U.S. government (which can afford anything and never run short of dollars), while shifting a massive health burden to the middle- and lower-income people.

By the way, as a lark, I went through that website advertising the non-existent “Trumpcare,” and came to this page  ———————->

Trumpcare Obamacare.png
“Here’s Trumpcare.”

Apparently, “Trumpcare is Obamacare. Surprised?

If you liked Trump University, Trump Foundation, Trump Steaks, Trump Airlines, Trump Vodka, the Trump Casinos, Trump Mortgage, Trump Magazine, Trump Tower Panama, GoTrump.com, Trump: the game, and my very favorite,  Donald Trump, the fragrance (for those of you who wish to smell like Trump), all of which were failures (and some illegal), perhaps you also will enjoy Trumpcare — if it ever passes.

But as with all things Trump, hang on to your wallet.

And by the way, none of the business failures was Trump’s fault. Ask him.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve:

  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Knowing nothing about the role of the Federal Reserve, Trump hires a wrong-headed sycophant.

Trump’s knowledge of the Federal Reserve approximates his knowledge of men’s hairstyles, tie length, and the truth.

Trump Called Powell an ‘Enemy.’

“My only question is, who is our bigger enemy, Jay Powell or Chairman Xi?” Mr. Trump wrote.

Kevin Cramer, Republican of North Dakota criticized Mr. Trump’s attacks on Mr. Powell: “This is an area where I frankly disagree with the president. He’s forever attacking the Federal Reserve and particularly Jay Powell.

They are independent of politics, and they ought to remain independent of politics.”

To Trump, nothing is independent of politics. Trump has but one criterion in evaluating people: Do they express eternal fealty for him?

As for other criteria: Talent? No.
Knowledge” No.
Honesty? Are you kidding? In a Trump administration?
Intelligence? Only if it’s low.

Lawmakers from both parties routinely give the Fed chair high marks.

Their view of the chair matters, because while the president nominates members to the Fed’s Board of Governors, the White House has no other significant power over the central bank.

Monetary policymakers answer to Congress.

Sadly, the President does have the power to fire the Fed Chairman “for cause,” which with a slavish, timid, immoral GOP, “cause” would be any nonsense Trump could dream up.

Thank heavens Trump feels reluctant to take that step, or by now we would have had half a dozen Scott Pruits and Paul Manaforts as Fed Chairmen.

And yet::

Trump has recently nominated a Fed critic, Judy Shelton, to sit among the Fed’s leadership in Washington.

Her confirmation hearing could come as soon as Feb. 13, 2020.

True to form, Trump has nominated a useless sycophant:

Which Judy Shelton will the Fed get? Gold standard advocate or Trump defender?
By Sam Bell, Jan 29, 2020
Fed nominee has flip-flopped 180 degrees on monetary policy since Trump’s election; will she flip back?

After describing low interest rates as an assault on democratic capitalism during the Obama years, Shelton now embraces lower rates and suggests that the next Bretton Woods conference to reshape international monetary arrangements should be held at Mar-a-Lago.

Many have already written about her flip-flops, including the Wall Street Journal’s Greg Ip and Bloomberg’s Ramesh Ponnuru.

As Ip writes, “Having accused the Fed, under Mr. Obama, ‘of catering to the political class,’ she now says it should support Mr. Trump’s agenda by cutting interest rates to ‘ensure maximum access to capital.’”

If the above doesn’t send shivers up your spine, you have become far too inured to Trump’s own lies and incompetence.

Not only does Shelton have no consistent or coherent policy regarding interest rates, and not only is she an obvious fawner to a compulsive “fawnee,” but she wants to return us to a (fools) gold standard.

And not just an ordinary gold standard but . . .

A “Universal Gold Reserve Bank that would have the potential to become a sort of global monetary authority.”

Thus, does Shelton want the U.S. to surrender the single most valuable asset any government can have — its Monetary Sovereignty — but she also wants the entire world to give up Monetary Sovereignty to an unelected group of what? Honest bankers?

And she fleshes out this truly dumb idea, by making it even worse, if that’s possible:

Circa 2000 Shelton toyed with the idea of a common currency for North America.

“The common currency for this union could be an ‘amero,’” — and she even favored a global common currency.

She asked, “how can we ignore the parallel need for a common unit of account, a global form of money?”

Ah yes, a a global common currency, a cousin of the truly awful euro, which essentially has destroyed the economies of those nations that have adopted it.

The euro nations, having surrendered control over their own money, and given control to the new Masters, the European Union bankers and their billionaire patrons, have “had” to foist austerity on the masses.

For a monetarily non-sovereign government, austerity is necessary, because unlike a Monetarily Sovereign government, such a government needs some form of income. This income must be derived from taxes, which eventually requires net exports.

But because exports must equal imports, if some nations have net exports, other nations must have net imports, and net imports send money out of the country.

That’s fine for a Monetarily Sovereign government like the U.S., which has the unlimited ability to create its sovereign currency,  so it never can run short of money. But it’s not so fine for the euro governments, which gave away that power, and who now live at the mercy of rapacious EU bankers.

And that is what Shelton wants for America.

And she is what Trump wants for the Federal Reserve, An obsequious “yes” woman to run  an institution he feels is unnecessary, even harmful.

Trump’s ignorance is reflected in such headlines as:
Trump says the Federal Reserve has ‘gone crazy,’ and
Trump says the Federal Reserve caused the stock market correction, and
Trump says U.S. Federal Reserve ‘too proud to admit mistake’, and
Trump knocks ‘boneheads’ at Federal Reserve, says interest rates should be ‘zero, or less’ and the best one,
Trump: I Will Abolish The Federal Reserve

See the plan? When the economy and/or the stock market do well, it’s because of Trump. But if they do poorly, it’s because of the Fed. Perfect

The self-anointed “stable genius” has all bases covered. He can’t lose.

Judging by her record, a Shelton Federal Reserve would like nothing better than to end the Fed and hand the powers to a new global monetary authority, the Universal Gold Reserve Bank.

She believes that setting monetary policy to address domestic conditions is “selfish.” (Really.)

In the absence of a proper gold standard, she says she favors fixing the dollar to rival currencies or gold. (Never mind that this would put American monetary policy at the whim of gold speculators and European central bankers.)

For Shelton, limiting the Fed’s power is the point.

Of course, this all assumes she would show up for the job. The last time the Senate confirmed her for a position — U.S. envoy to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development — she missed about half the meetings, as the Wall Street Journal reported in August.

If the lousy attendance record, the ceding of Monetary Sovereignty and the flip-flopping for Trump don’t disturb the Senate, perhaps Milton Friedman’s assessment of Shelton will.

In 1994, he wrote of then-colleague Judy Shelton’s op-ed, “It would be hard to pack more error into so few words.”

A few years ago Shelton supported a Virginia effort to study an alternative Virginia currency should the dollar collapse. Since then that effort has faltered.

Perhaps America would be better served if she focused on helping her home state of Virginia prepare for a catastrophe rather than causing one as a Federal Reserve official.

Because of Trump’s brilliance, his administration, indeed his entire life, has been famous for its revolving door of fools, toadies, liars, and/or miscreants. Consider this cast of characters:

HHS Secretary Tom Price
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt
HUD Secretary Ben Carson
Campaign manager Paul Manafort

Image result for alfred e. neuman

Deputy campaign manager Rick Gates
National security adviser Michael Flynn
Personal Lawyer Michael Cohen
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross
Mobster Salvatore Testa
Mobster Fat Tony Salerno
Roger Stone
Jeffrey Epstein
Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta
Foreign Policy Adviser George Papadopoulos
Kellyanne Conway
Konstantin Kilimnik
and now, Judy Shelton

What President ever has surrounded himself with such people?

November is coming. Can we survive that long?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve:

  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Guess which nation offers free college to everyone.

Before we answer, let’s make one point very clear: The U.S. federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, has the unlimited ability to create U.S. dollars.

It never can run short of dollars. It can pay any bills of any size, instantly, and without collecting a single penny in taxes.

Further, and contrary to the popular myth, federal deficit spending does not cause inflation. Instead, inflations are caused by shortages, most often shortages of food or energy (oil), not by “excessive” federal deficits or debt. (Ironically, shortages often are cured by federal deficit spending.)

Consider Japan, which has a much-derided Debt/GDP of 240%:

Japan General Government Gross Debt to GDP
Chart: Japanese debt/GDP ratio for 25 years.

America’s debt terrorists would claim that level of debt must lead to inflation.

But Japan’s inflation generally has languished below 1% and often has been below 0%:

Chart: Japan’s inflation rates for 25 years

In summary, the U.S. government easily could provide a free college education to everyone in America, who wanted one.

So, if a college education benefits not only the students, but everyone in the nation, why doesn’t the U.S. federal government fund college for everyone?

The reason: Our deficit terrorists persist in telling you that despite the American government being Monetarily Sovereign, while the public is monetarily non-sovereign, funding college would be unaffordable for the government.

Oh, really?

How US students get a university degree for free in Germany
By Franz Strasser, BBC News, Germany, 3 June 2015

While the cost of college education in the US has reached record highs, Germany has abandoned tuition fees altogether for German and international students alike.

An increasing number of Americans are taking advantage and saving tens of thousands of dollars to get their degrees.

Before we continue with excerpts from the article, keep this in mind: Unlike the U.S. government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for anything, without collecting taxes, the German government is monetarily non-sovereign.

It does not have a sovereign currency. It uses the euro, which is the sovereign currency of the European Union.

When Germany spends, German taxpayers pay.

So why are German taxpayers willing to pay for college, while the American government is not?

Germans have a greater belief in the importance of education than do Americans.

Some Americans believe a college education is an unnecessary, but expensive, form of elitism. They don’t understand that the competitive future of America will be determined by the educated.

Other Americans adopt the “If I had to pay, they should have to pay” attitude, a kind of cutting one’s nose to spite one’s face.

And it hurts us all.

In rural South Carolina one night, Hunter Bliss told his mother he wanted to apply to university in Germany. Amy Hall chuckled, dismissed it, and told him he could go if he got in.

“When he got accepted I burst into tears,” says Amy, a single mother.

“For him to stay here in the US was going to be very costly,” says Amy. “We would have had to get federal loans and student loans because he has a very fit mind and great goals.”

More than 4,600 US students are fully enrolled at Germany universities, an increase of 20% over three years.

At the same time, the total student debt in the US has reached $1.3 trillion (£850 billion).

Health insurance for students in Germany is €80 ($87) a month, much less than what Amy would have had to pay in the US to add him to her plan.

To cover rent, mandatory health insurance and other expenses, Hunter’s mother sends him between $6,000-7,000 each year.

At his nearest school back home, the University of South Carolina, that amount would not have covered the tuition fees.

Even with scholarships, that would have totalled about $10,000 a year. Housing, books and living expenses would make that number much higher.

We interrupt again to remind you that sometimes even a college scholarship isn’t sufficient, when one needs to pay ancillary expenses, and when one must forego a regular paying job.

That is why in the Ten Steps to Prosperity (below), one step is for the government to fund school tuition, and another step is for the government to provide a salary for attending the school.

The financial advantages of studying in Germany have not been lost on other US students. Katherine Burlingame decided to get her Master’s degree at a university in the East German town of Cottbus.

A graduate of Pennsylvania State University, Katherine spent less than €500 ($570) a month in Cottbus, which included housing, transportation and healthcare.

On top of that she received a monthly scholarship by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Council) of €750 ($815) which more than covered her costs.

“When I found out that just like Germans I’m studying for free, it was sort of mind blowing,” Katherine says.

“I realized how easy the admission process was and how there was no tuition fee. This was a wow moment for me.”

In the 2014-2015 academic year, private US universities charged students on average more than $31,000 for tuition and fees, with many schools charging well over $50,000.

The lie that federal debt is “unsustainable” “unaffordable,” and somehow immoral, has prevented many thousands of bright, ambitious, future American leaders from fulfilling the destiny that would have benefited them and America.

We cannot know how many potential American scientists, mathematicians, inventors, business leaders,  etc. America has lost for lack of education funds. We cannot know what it has cost us as a nation and as individuals.

But we do know this. The cost has been enormous, especially when compared to the zero cost to us of federal spending.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve:

  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

The single biggest problem in healthcare.

Someone I care deeply about has two relatively rare disease conditions: Thymoma (cancer of the thymus) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS — disorders that reduce the bone marrow’s ability to create normal blood cells.)

The treatment for the uncommon thymoma and MDS, together with her age, sex, other conditions, and her unique genetic profile, requires more than using an approved drug or drugs.

It requires finding a unique, specialized treatment, perhaps appropriate only to one person on earth.

Though today doctors generally prescribe a standard approved treatment for a common ailment — i.e. aspirin for a headache, chemotherapy for a cancer — each of us responds differently to every chemical and to every treatment, much to the frustration of doctors and their patients, who expect everyone to react the same.

Each of us is a unique human specimen as DNA searches reveal. At some time in the future, possibly every disease will be custom-treated for each individual.

Until them, it is the enormous differences in people multiplied by their infinite reactions to treatments, multiplied again by the immeasurable number of diseases and other afflictions, that makes the following excerpts germane.

18 DECEMBER 2019
How Artificial Intelligence Will Change Medicine
Claudia Wallis, Contributing Editor
(This report was produced independently by the editors of Scientific American, who take sole responsibility for the editorial content.)

The biomedical world is awash in data. We have terabytes of genomic information from mouse to human, troves of health metrics from clinical trials, and reams of so-called real-world data from insurance companies and pharmacies.

Using powerful computers, scientists have scrutinized this bounty with some fine results, but it has become clear that we can learn much more with an assist from artificial intelligence.

Over the next decade, deep-learning neural networks will likely transform how we look for patterns in data and how research is conducted and applied to human health.

Innovations In AI and Digital Health
Right now the biggest bets are being placed in the realm of drug discovery. And for good reason.

The average cost of bringing a new drug to market nearly doubled between 2003 and 2013 to $2.6 billion, and because nine out of 10 fail in the final two phases of clinical trials, most of the money goes to waste.

Every large pharma company is working with at least one AI-focused start-up to see if it can raise the return on investment.

Machine-learning algorithms can sift through millions of compounds, narrowing the options for a particular drug target.

Perhaps more exciting, AI systems—unconstrained by prevailing theories and biases—can identify entirely new targets by spotting subtle differences at the level of tissues, cells, genes or proteins between, say, a healthy brain and one marked by Parkinson’s—differences that might elude or even mystify a human scientist.

The pharmaceutical companies “waste” many billions of dollars searching for the one drug that works on enough similar people, who have a certain condition common enough that sales of the cure will be profitable.

If a company somehow discovered a drug that could cure the thymoma for just one woman, that drug would not be produced. Even if a drug could cure the MDS of a thousand people, it never would be brought to market.

The profit motive would prevent it.

And that takes us to the single biggest problem in health care. It is the biggest problem facing hospitals; the biggest problem facing doctors and nurses, etc. It is the biggest problem facing pharmaceutical companies. It is the biggest problem facing patients.

The single biggest problem in the entire realm of healthcare involves money.

And fortunately, we Americans own a solution to that problem. Our federal government has the unlimited ability to create money, specifically our sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar.

Our federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, is not constrained by a profit motive. It wants no profits; it needs no income; it never can run short of dollars. Never.

Contrary to the disinformation by those who say America’s deficit spending is “unsustainable,” or harmful, federal deficits and debt are neither. They not only are beneficial, but absolutely necessary.

Without federal deficit spending, America would descend into a 3rd world depression unmatched in history. (Every depression in U.S. history has been introduced by federal surpluses).

The search for medical preventions and cures is constrained by money. For pharmaceutical companies, it is constrained by the need for profits. For universities, it is constrained by the need to pay for researchers, their research, and their equipment.

And all of it could be funded by the press of a federal computer, money-creation key.

Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

Will the inefficiencies of today’s electronic health records (EHRs) be addressed by smart systems that prevent prescribing errors and provide early warnings of disease?

Some of the world’s biggest tech giants are working on it.

More accurately, some of the world’s biggest tech giants are working on systems they can sell for a profit — which does not always correlate with the needs of patients.

By contrast, all phases of medical research could be federally funded, allowing for the goals to be preventions and cures rather than only profits.

The bigger concern is a shortage of people with both biomedical knowledge and algorithm-building proficiency.

The solution to the “shortage of people” problem is addressed in the Ten Steps to Prosperity, Step #4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone, and Step #5. Salary for attending school, both of which the federal government easily could fund.

This brings us to a related article that appeared in the December 18, 2019 issue of Nature Magazine. Excerpts:

Hunting for New Drugs with AI
The $1-trillion global pharmaceutical industry has been in a drug development and productivity slide for at least two decades.

Pharmaceutical companies are spending more and more—the 10 largest ones now pay nearly $80 billion a year—to come up with fewer and fewer successful drugs.

Ten years ago every dollar invested in research and development saw a return of 10 cents; today it yields less than two cents.

In part, that is because the drugs that are easiest to find and that safely and effectively treat common disorders have all been found; what is left is hunting for drugs that address problems with complex and elusive solutions and that would treat disorders affecting only tiny portions of the population—and thus could return far less in revenue.

These same challenges have increased the lab-to-market time line to 12 years, with 90 percent of drugs washing out in one of the phases of human trials.

The private sector cannot afford endlessly to lose money, but the federal government can. Remember that since 1940 the federal government has lost more than $20 trillion, with no ill effects.

Alan Greenspan: “Central banks can issue currency, a non-interest-bearing claim on the government, effectively without limit. A government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency.”

In fact, the federal government easily could afford to lose double or triple that amount and the only effect would be for the economy to be strengthened and the populace to be enriched by the addition of dollars to their pockets.

And did we mention that finding new and better cures faster, would benefit everyone?

Step #10 of the Ten Steps to Prosperity reads: “Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9%”

I suggest that vastly increased federal funding for medical research and development be one of those “myriad initiatives.”

The federal government has the unlimited ability to fund personnel and equipment in the pharmaceutical industry and universities, and to provide financial incentives that encourage and enable faster and more complete searches for new preventions and cures.

It can be done. It should be done. It must be done, or development will continue to decline and we all will suffer.

The people who prevent this, by making false claims about “unsustainable” federal deficits and debt, are complicit in the suffering and too-early deaths of billions.

Disregard their deceptions. Demand more federal spending on projects vital to America.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve:

  1. Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
  2. Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY