Private banks: America’s worst criminals

Where there is money, there will be criminals stealing the money — the more money, the more criminals — and banks control more money than anyone.

Number 9 in the “Ten Steps to Prosperity” is this one: Federal ownership of all banks.

A few excerpts from that article:

Banks are involved in most U.S. dollar creation. Even the dollars created at the direction of the federal government originate with banks.

The two primary dollar-creation methods in the U.S. are bank lending and federal spending:

Each time a banklends, it simply increases the numbers in the borrower’s checking account. That instantly adds dollars to the money supply.

When the federal government spends, it sends instructions to a creditor’s bank, instructing the bank to increase the numbers in the creditor’s checking account. When the bank does as instructed, dollars are added to the money supply.

This participation in the vast majority of all dollar creation gives banks enormous financial power, and as we all know — and the “Great Recession of 2008” reminds us —  power corrupts banks, especially when multiplied by a profit motive and government complicity.

Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, and that makes all the difference. The government neither needs nor uses profits, and unlike bank employees, federal government employees do not receive remunerations based on federal agency profits.

In Summary: No public purpose is served when the banking industry is in private hands.

For many of the same reasons that the U.S. Treasury is owned by the federal government, not by the private sector, the federal government should nationalize and run all banks. 

The article describing the need for Step 9 tells why banks become corrupt, though most Americans believe that the bank they use is essentially honest and accurate.

That belief is naive.

BuzzFeed News
FINCEN FILES

The FinCEN Files investigation is based on thousands of “suspicious activity reports” and other US government documents that BuzzFeed News has shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and more than 100 news organizations around the world.

It offers an unprecedented view of global financial corruption, the banks enabling it, and the government agencies that fail to stop it.

Prior to this reporting, very few SARs had ever been revealed. The FinCEN Files encompass more than 2,100. Here is what the investigation has uncovered (I urge you to click the next link to read the full article):

8 Things You Need To Know About The Dark Side Of The World’s Biggest Banks, As Revealed In The FinCEN Files

Big banks around the world approve trillions of dollars of suspicious transactions despite their own staff’s warnings that they might be related to crime.

Terror networks, drug cartels, organized crime rings, and rapacious kleptocrats have all benefited, using the US financial system to wash clean their illicit profits.

The banks — and their shareholders — make a profit off all this activity, while the transfers help these notorious figures sow misery around the world.

The US government is informed of these transactions through “suspicious activity reports” (SARs) that banks file.

Those reports are designed to aid the fight against money laundering, but experts say the system contains a crucial loophole: Banks are required to file alerts to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN — but not to halt the suspicious activity or to stop serving shadowy clients.

Sources told BuzzFeed News that the vast majority of these reports, also known as SARs, are never even read, much less investigated.

One of the biggest money laundering schemes in memory became an international scandal for Deutsche Bank; top executives there had been warned the bank was at risk of being exploited by criminals.

(You may remember that Deutche Bank also inexplicably made over $2 billion in loans to Donald Trump when no other banks would touch him.)

There are plenty of laws on the books, that should prohibit banks from ignoring SARs. But the lesson is: The profit motive is the strongest power in the universe — stronger than all the armies and all the police in all the nations on earth.   Money leads to crime. Big money leads to unstoppable big crime.

Consider this article:

HSBC, Europe’s largest bank, had just been caught allowing a network of drug kingpins, including the notorious Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, to launder more than $880 million through its accounts. And it had brazenly done business in off-limits countries such as Sudan and Myanmar.

HSBC executives pleaded for another chance, and the US Department of Justice granted it: Admit your guilt, pay $1.9 billion in fines, and submit to an independent monitor.

But, even under the most intensive scrutiny, the bank continued to facilitate and profit from transactions it suspected were dirty.

At the end of the monitor’s five-year tenure, he said HSBC had made progress, but the bank itself told shareholders that he found it was still not “adequately managing financial crime risk.”

And, consider this article:

Elizabeth Warren And Bernie Sanders Want Big Banking Reforms Following The FinCEN Files Investigations
Warren called for the creation of a new unit in the US Treasury Department, separate from FinCEN, “to investigate these types of financial crimes.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren called on Monday for reforming the government practice of offering banks deferred prosecution agreements instead of real punishments when they are caught abetting money laundering, one of the problems highlighted in the series.

She also called for the passage of her so-called Ending Too Big to Jail Act, legislation she introduced in 2018 that she said would hold Wall Street executives criminally accountable when the banks they lead break the law. This, she said, would stop the practice of allowing “bankers to walk away with drop in the bucket settlements and slaps on the wrist.”

Yes, bankers should be jailed for criminal activities, but Warren’s and Sanders’s program will do little-to-nothing for two reasons:

  1. If the threat of jail could stop crime, there would be no crime. Given sufficient motivation (big profits), there will be big crime. Laws are insufficient.
    Laws have not stopped the drug trade. Laws did not stop alcohol during prohibition. Laws did not stop gambling. Money is stronger than the threat of punishment.
  2. The only way to reduce crime –not “stop;” crime can’t be stopped– is to reduce the motivation.

The prime motivator for bank crime is bank profits.

Rather than passing more laws that will be broken, the federal government should merely remove the profit motive from banking by eliminating private banking.

All banks should be owned by the federal government, which has no need for profits.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Proud boys and brown shirts, all part of the pattern

Well, we can’t say we weren’t warned:

Here are just a few warnings through the years:

Why does bigotry work so well? Monday, Sep 7 2020

America is now in its greatest danger since the Civil War. Sunday, Aug 23 2020

The four characters in a dictatorship Saturday, Aug 15 2020

Your America on the brink. Don’t give Trump the excuse he so desperately wants. Wednesday, Jun 10 2020

“Lügenpresse”: Hitler’s “fake news.” We’re making the same mistake, again. December 10, 2017

Astounding similarities: Hitler in America. It’s happening now. Friday, Sep 30 2016

Hitler redux Monday, Dec 7 2015

Hitler in America. Why a bigot can win the Presidency Saturday, Jul 4 2015

The above are articles published on this blog. There are thousands more, published elsewhere.

Trump has been so obvious as a Hitler wannabe that the earliest of these posts were published before Trump was even elected.

Now, Trump has said, “I am urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully, because that’s what has to happen. I am urging them to do it.”

And what are these supporters supposed to do, other than intimidate voters — especially minority voters — and frighten them away? Of course, that is the plan: To eliminate America’s voting democracy.

People who follow Trump’s advice and hang around watching polling places will be prosecuted, Nevada’s attorney general says

Nevada’s attorney general said he would prosecute people who follow President Donald Trump’s advice to go to polling places and monitor votes being counted, accusing the president of encouraging voter intimidation.

During his first debate against the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, on Tuesday, Trump refused to commit to accepting the results of the November election and repeated his unsubstantiated claims that mail-in voting is open to widespread fraud.

Trump falsely claimed that poll watchers with his campaign were being wrongly barred from satellite in-person absentee voting sites in Philadelphia.

In reality, as The Philadelphia Inquirer reported, no poll watchers affiliated with the Trump campaign are certified to observe polls in the state of Pennsylvania.

And then there are these excerpts:

Considering what he was up against, Biden did fine.

How can one respond to a man who barks one lie after another while refusing to keep his pestilential maw shut for a mere two minutes so his opponent can speak?

Try to respond to one lie and he lets loose another four and drowns you out with them before you’re done.

But the Trump campaign came into the debate pushing the line that Biden is a senile old man. Biden more than demonstrated that isn’t true.

Most of all, Biden came off like a politician, citing policies and data and hitting the president over his record while occasionally trying to raise his own rhetoric to the lofty heights traditionally favored by men and women in public life, seeking the honor of winning its highest office.

Trump is utterly incapable of running to the center of public opinion, of making an appeal to a broader range of voters.

So he just gets louder and meaner with the same old extreme, right-wing, Republican message, hoping and expecting that a wider swath of the public will submit to the assault.

If anyone out there still believes that in some way Trump is less dangerous to America than Hitler was to Germany, I pity that person’s ignorance of history. Never could the German people imagine the Hitlerian horrors that were to befall them. They would have laughed at warnings. No German laughs, now.

At least, Germans had an excuse for following their madman. Their economy had been shredded by World War I and by the appalling terms forced upon them by the winning Allies.

For America, the “Great Recession” was bad, but the economy was not nearly so bad as 1930s Germany’s was, and it was recovering. Nevertheless, some Americans wanted change, and boy did they get it. In spades. We Americans received change from a benevolent, caring society to a mean-spirited, bile-filled nightmare.

The darkness that is Trump has spread over the land. All he offers is hatred and more hatred — hatred of blacks, hatred of browns, hatred of gays, hatred of Muslims, hatred of the media, hatred of Obama, hatred of Democrats, hatred of liberals, hatred of the poor, hatred of immigrants, hatred of all other democracies, hatred of our democracy, hatred of former associates and relatives who tell the truth about him.

Trump’s hatred is as contagious as the COVID and much more deadly. America is learning that. Like the COVID does, Trumpian hatred will continue to punish us for many years.

There is no compassion in Trump. He “loves” only murderous dictators like Putin and Kim. But truly, he loves only himself.

In Germany, the politicians who followed Hitler to disaster later denied their involvement. In America, it will be the same.

The Republican Party was not always cold and without humanity. It was actually conservative, meaning it wished to conserve America’s traditionally humane mores and care for the underdog. That was one part of the American dream.

But first with the Nixon “Southern Strategy” (an appeal to Southern, white bigotry), and then the dawning of the Tea Party (a merciless, pro-rich ideology), the Republicans’ hearts hardened.

Today, the GOP is a party of “punish ’em,” “deport ’em,” “wall ’em out,” and “kick ’em while they’re down,” with the primary solution to every problem being to blame the victims for their own misery. To the right-wing, compassion is for “losers.”

Never is expressed a concern about the have-nots in America, even by the right-wing have-nots themselves. In a tad more than five weeks, at the behest of the right-wing, 20 million Americans may lose their healthcare insurance coverage, while innocent children at out southern border will continue to be tortured by sadists.

The pusillanimous right-wingers, the Lindsey Grahams and the Fox News know-nothings, who echo Trump’s every lie, will upon his exit from office, deny they ever knew him, just as Trump denies ever knowing any former associate who has a bad truth to say about him.

There are reasons why Germany has no statues of Hitler. I am quite sure that, for similar reasons, America will have no statues of Donald Trump.

Ever.

Meanwhile, as we teeter on the edge of tyranny, one only can pray that those who express so much love for Jesus and for unborn fetuses, also will begin to shed some tears for already-born children of color and of poverty — and for the future of our once-great nation.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

A letter that every politician and every voter should read

I just received the following letter from a woman, Elizabeth Estrada Lopez, who read the recent post, Affordable housing laws are not a solution. They are a symptom.

I was so impressed by her situation and by her wisdom, I wanted to share her letter, and my response, with you. She wrote:

Lack of money or low wages is a valid point.

Affordable housing is not fair housing.

Many below & poverty level wage people, like myself, who work very hard and need affordable housing, are placed in impoverished areas or areas where there is no public transportation and end up paying more in gasoline to travel back and forth to work & grocery shopping that is it a lose-lose proposition.

People fail to thrive grouped in impoverished communities.

The environment is a daily discouragement creating more stress and low self-esteem. This is my experience and is not a blanket statement that covers the world.

I responded, “Thank you, Ms. Lopez. I hope you don’t mind that I intend to quote you in a future post. You make several good points that I would like to write about. Be well, Rodger Malcolm Mitchell.

She, in turn, wrote, “Yes Sir. I want to help society in any way I can.”

Oh, if only our politicians had the same attitude as Ms. Lopez.

As the article stated, the widespread, false belief that the federal deficit and debt are too high, “unaffordable.” and “sustainable” is fostered and disseminated by the rich to keep down those “below & poverty level” people like you.

The reason is “Gap Psychology, the desire to distance oneself from those below, on any comparative measure.

“Rich” is a comparative, not an absolute, term.  A man having $1,000 is rich if everyone else has $1,000, but he is poor if everyone else has $1 million. So, there are two ways to become richer: Obtain more for yourself, or force others to have less.

Poverty is not a lack of work. Poverty is not a lack of effort. Poverty is not a lack of intelligence. Poverty is a lack of money, and the solution to a lack of money is to give impoverished people money.

Period.

The federal government has infinite money. The federal government could and should give people money. Doing so, would eliminate, or at least dramatically reduce, poverty.

There is another, widespread, false belief, and that is, if the government gives people money, they won’t work.

The rich like to portray the poor as lazy and deserving of their poverty. So in the minds of the rich (and many in the middle-income groups) giving people money is immoral, in that is encourages sloth.

Utter nonsense.

The fact is that by any standard, the poor on average work harder than those above them, economically. No one labors less than the rich except for the very rich.

Sadly, even Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), an economic philosophy that understands the federal government’s unlimited money supply, offers as a solution, something they call a “Jobs Guarantee” (JG). It is a process by which the federal government finds or creates minimum-wage jobs for the unemployed.

The only thing the “Jobs Guarantee” guarantees is that the poor will work hard, stay poor, and live in the impoverished areas you described, and never escape.

Question for economists and politicians: If the poor need money, why give them minimum wage jobs? Why not give them the money they need?

Answer: Because of some deeply ingrained belief that “if given money, the poor won’t work. They need the moral pride that comes with having a job.”

Again, utter, puritanical and paternalistic nonsense. A minimum wage job does not provide morality or pride. It only provides insufficient money, together with the “daily discouragement creating more stress and low self-esteem” you, Ms. Lopez, described.

If a person loses her job, has she suddenly become lazy or immoral? Of course not, but it is a myth the rich like to spread.

Today’s America reminds me of a billionaire uncle who won’t help his impoverished nieces and nephews because of self-proclaimed “moral reasons.”

My heart goes out to you, Ms. Lopez. You write like an intelligent and decent woman, whose poverty is not due to any character flaw, but rather to fate.

When I read a letter such as yours, all I can think is, “There but for the grace of God, go I.

I will send a copy of your letter to a few Senators and Representatives. Perhaps they will think more seriously about how to help the impoverished, and not merely disparage them.

Meanwhile, you and your family, friends, and neighbors, please be sure to vote for the politicians most likely to empathize with your plight, and offer real solutions.

One day, Americans will understand the needs of the poor, the power of our government, and the solutions for the less fortunate. Some may say, “yes, but not now.” I say, “If not now, when?”

Much good fortune to you,

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

The employer health-care insurance scam

In the posts, “‘The “Medicare for All’ controversy”, and “Ten Steps to Prosperity: Step 2. Federally funded Medicare — Parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone”, we describe how easily the federal government could provide free healthcare insurance to every man, woman, and child in America.

The program could pay for comprehensive, no deductible, no-coinsurance, no-limit, no out-of-pocket costs of any kind insurance, without levying a penny in federal taxes.

Instead of that, America, the wealthiest nation on earth has this:Even Golden Handcuffs Are Shackles

‘Focused on survival’: Millions of laid-off Americans still living without health insurance
Alexis Keenan·Reporter
Fri, September 25, 2020, 3:12 PM CDT
With hundreds of thousands of Americans filing new unemployment claims every week, sobering evidence of the difficulties faced by laid-off workers is showing up in the estimated number of U.S. adults now lacking health insurance.

Since the onset of COVID-19 in mid-March, workers who lost employment-based healthcare insurance (ESI) far outnumber those who gained coverage, either through a public or private option.

Approximately 4.6 million to 5.6 million workers who lost job-based coverage since March are now uninsured.

It’s common for those who have lost job-based insurance to go without it. Unless you have a serious health issue, insurance is just not on the priority list.

Medicaid eligibility largely depends on the state where the laid-off worker resides, and is based on current monthly income.

In states that have expanded Medicaid, those with current monthly income less than 138% of the federal poverty level are eligible. For a family of 3, the limit is approximately $2,500 per month. For an individual, the limit is approximately $1,466 per month.

In states that have not expanded Medicaid, eligibility is limited to parents with minor children whose median income is below 40% of the federal poverty level, or whose annual income did not exceed $8,532 for a family of three in 2019.

ESI is designed to seem like a wonderful perk. In most cases, the employer seems to pay most or all of the premiums, and you, the employee, usually are guaranteed coverage, even with pre-existing conditions.

Except:

  1. The employer really doesn’t pay. He’s just a go-between. When hiring, employers calculate the cost of employees to include all costs (salaries, perks, office space, expense accounts, etc.) The reality is, the employee pays for everything, with the only benefit being the tax benefits for running the costs through the employer. Salaries could be higher if the employer didn’t pay for healthcare insurance.
  2.  Most insurance plans charge according to experience, so the employers pay more for “expensive employees” (older employees and those with expensive medical conditions.) That is one reason why you “expensive employees” have more difficulty finding jobs. Employers quietly discriminate against you.
  3. If you lose your job, you may have difficulty finding healthcare insurance, or if you do, it probably will be at a high cost at just the time when your income has disappeared. So the “free” ESI is a pair of golden handcuffs (that you really pay for).

Especially, if you are in your 50s or older, the terror of losing your healthcare insurance, at just the time in your life when you will begin to need it  most, can leave you completely at the mercy of your employer.

And that is the whole point.

America’s rich write America’s laws, including tax laws.

From H&R Block:

In 2018, the IRS allowed you to deduct medical expenses that exceeded 7.5% of your adjusted gross income.

Beginning Jan. 1, 2019, all taxpayers may deduct only the amount of the total unreimbursed allowable medical care expenses for the year that exceeds 10% of their adjusted gross income.

You aren’t able to claim both an itemized tax deduction with your standard deduction. Essentially, your medical deduction needs to be significant, along with other itemizations, to give you a great deduction.

For the current tax year, the standard deduction is worth $12,000 for single taxpayers and $24,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly. If you’re filing as the head of household, it’s worth $18,000.

Get it? For a business, all medical expenses are tax-deductible. Businesses pay taxes on profits. But,, for you individually, medical expenses only are deductible after they go above 10% of your adjusted gross income or your standard deduction.

If, for instance, your income is $50,000, the first $5,000 of your medical expenses isn’t tax deductible.

Side note: The so-called “standard deduction” is not a deduction. It is the amount you can’t claim if you wish to itemize your expenses. The higher the “standard deduction,” the less you can claim as a deduction for expenses.

The above paragraph about standard deductions really should read, “For the current tax year, single taxpayers can’t take the first $12,000 expenses as deductions. Married taxpayers can’t take the first $24,000, and heads of households can’t take the first $18,000.”

That means the vast majority of Americans can’t take any expense deduction at all. By contrast, businesses can deduct almost all their expenses.

It’s just another con job by the rich.

Getting back to Medicare for All, if the federal government funded a comprehensive plan that covered all your hospital, doctor, equipment, and long-term care costs, not only could your salary be higher, but your employer would not “own” you. Losing your job would be far less traumatic.

The federal government already has done the hard work by creating Medicare for All (over 65), so the functional problems have been solved. It would be a simple matter to reduce the qualifying age to 0, and to eliminate deductibles and co-pays.

Except, that is not what the rich want. They want to widen the Gap between the rich and the rest, and one sneaky way to do it is via employer-provided healthcare insurance.

And now, we’ll entertain the false claims that Medicare for All is “unsustainable” and/or “socialism.”

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY