–Knives and muskets? Or machine guns and atomic bombs?

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor, which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.
======================================================================================================================================================================================

2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Jesus: “all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.”
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Lately, we have seen “Stand Your Ground” cases, or cases influenced by those laws, in which people who killed unarmed people, were not convicted of murder. In one case, the gunner shot at the fleeing victim, which would be less a “Stand Your Ground,” and more a “Track Black Men Down Like Dogs” case — a law I fully expect to be passed in a Southern state sometime soon.

And we also have seen the usual “Child Accidentally Shoots Younger Brother” and “Homeowner Kills Innocent Man at the Door” cases.

So as anger-management candidates continue to take innocent blood, we again are forced to analyze that ubiquitous 2nd Amendment.

The Constitution does not explain what “well-regulated militia” means, nor does it explain “arms.” The Supreme Court has chosen arbitrarily to ignore the fact that few gun owners belong to any sort of militia, let alone a “well-regulated” one.

In fact, the Court has decided that the first 13 words of the 2nd Amendment mean . . . well, absolutely nothing. The Amendment would have exactly the same meaning, with or without those useless words the founders, in their ignorance, threw in for no reason at all.

So, we now ask what those same founders meant (if anything) by “arms.”

According to the MERRIAM-WEBSTER Dictionary:

Arms
: a means (as a weapon) of offense or defense
Weapon: something (such as a gun, knife, club, or bomb) that is used for fighting or attacking someone or for defending yourself when someone is attacking you.

Since “arms” currently means guns, knives, clubs or bombs, all of these weapons presumably would be included in the 2nd Amendment. We assume, for instance, that “Stand your ground” laws include not just guns, but knives, clubs and bombs. (If you feel threatened, toss a grenade.)

But, what exactly is a “gun”? Again, according to the dictionary:

Gun:
a : a piece of ordnance usually with high muzzle velocity and comparatively flat trajectory
b : a portable firearm (as a rifle or handgun)
c : a device that throws a projectile

That’s pretty general. Are all guns included in the 2nd Amendment or just some guns? And if all guns are not included, why not?

Here is a list of guns (courtesy of Wikipedia). Check those you believe are not included in the 2nd Amendment, and explain why they are not constitutional, while the others are.

TYPES OF GUNS
_____ Long gun
____ Arquebus
____ Blunderbuss
____ Musket
____ Musketoon
____ Wall gun
____ Grenade launcher
____ Submachine gun
____ Personal defense weapon
____ Rifle
____ Lever action rifle
____ Bolt action rifle
____ Assault rifle
____ Battle rifle
____ Carbine
____ Service rifle
____ Sniper rifle
____ Shotgun
____ Combat shotgun
____ Semi-automatic shotgun
____ Automatic shotgun
____ Machine guns
____ Gatling gun
____ Minigun
____ Nordenfelt gun
____ Metal Storm
____ Mitrailleuse
____ Submachine gun
____ Machine pistol
____ Machine gun
____ General-purpose machine gun
____ Light machine gun
____ Squad Automatic Weapon
____ Infantry Automatic Rifle
____ Medium machine gun
____ Heavy machine gun
____ Handguns
____ Service revolver
____ Machine pistol
____ Autocannon guns
____ Autocannon
____ Chain gun
____ Revolver cannon
____ Artillery guns
____ Artillery gun
____ Cannon
____ Carronade
____ Falconet
____ Field gun
____ Howitzer
____ Tank guns
____ Tank gun
____ Hunting guns
____ Elephant gun
____ Express rifle
____ Shotgun
____ Varmint rifle
____ Rescue equipment guns
____ Flare gun
____ Lyle gun
____ Training and entertainment guns
____ Air gun
____ Airsoft gun
____ BB gun
____ Drill Purpose Rifle
____ Paintball gun
____ Potato cannon
____ Spud gun
____ Cap gun
____ Water gun
____ Nerf gun

Since a bomb also is a type of arms, we should decide which of the following are not covered by the 2nd Amendment, and why they are not covered:

TYPES OF BOMBS

_____General-purpose bomb
____ Bouncing bomb
____ Bunker buster (can be nuclear)
____ Car bomb
____ Petrol bomb
____ Cluster bomb
____ Flour bomb (made with flour)
____ Gravitational bomb
____ Glide bomb
____ Pipe bomb
____ Smoke bomb
____ Stink bomb.
____ Suicide bomb
____ Suitcase bomb
____ Thermobaric bomb
____ Tank bomb or slap bomb
____ Barrel bomb
____ Atomic bomb
____ Cobalt bomb
____ Dirty bomb
____ Electromagnetic bomb
____ Hydrogen bomb
____ Neutron bomb
____ Nuclear bomb

While you’re pondering the question of Constitutionality, let’s dispense with one issue immediately: Effectiveness

The authors of the 2nd Amendment must have been well aware that some arms are better for killing than others. But that seems to have been of no concern. If the “security of a free state” was at issue, presumably the best killing machines were welcome.

Today, we know that a 50 caliber machine gun is a better killing machine than a musket, and an atomic bomb is better yet.

And yes, the original framers didn’t know anything about 50 caliber machine guns and atomic bombs. But if we are to be interpreters of the Constitution, we can’t have it both ways. We can’t agree that the framers didn’t know about advanced weaponry, yet simultaneously say the framers wanted ownership of AK47s to be legal.

If we wish to be originalists (as some of our Supreme Court justices claim to be), then the only legal arms would be knives, clubs, ball cannons and muskets. But if we wish to claim that the original framers anticipated the invention of advanced weaponry, and included them in their definition of “arms,” then indeed machine guns and atomic bombs should be legal for citizens to own.

Either killing ability is a constitutional issue or it isn’t. Either what the framers knew is an issue or it isn’t. Which will it be: Knives and muskets? Or machine guns and atomic bombs?

Just askin’.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================
Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)

—–

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

THE RECESSION CLOCK

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the lines rise. Federal deficit growth is absolutely, positively necessary for economic growth. Period.

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–What causes hyper-inflation? Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe, Argentina, Venezuela

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell If I had a dollar for every time I am told America is about to experience hyper-inflation (given with the examples of Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe, Argentina and Venezuela) I might be able to give Bill Gates a “run for his money.” O.K., not really, but it does become tiresome. So perhaps I can put a small dent in the Henny-Penny, sky-is-falling, phony hysteria, by providing a short, simple explanation of what causes inflations. Let’s begin with the absolute basics: All money is a form of debt. There is no money that is not debt. When you own a dollar, you own a debt of the United States government. That dollar bill in your wallet is a Federal Reserve Note. The words “bill” and “note” signify debt. The value of any debt is based, in part, on the value of its collateral. When you take out a mortgage, the bank evaluates the property and the full faith and credit of the mortgagee. Together, they comprise the collateral for the loan. The collateral for a debt/dollar also is “full faith and credit” — the full faith and credit of the U.S. federal government. This may sound nebulous to some, but it actually involves certain, specific and valuable guarantees, among which are: 1. The government will accept U.S. currency in payment of debts to the government 2. It unfailingly will pay all it’s dollar debts with U.S. dollars and will not default 3. It will force all your domestic creditors to accept U.S. dollars, if you offer it, to satisfy your debt. 4. It will not require domestic creditors to accept any other money 5. It will take action to protect the value of the dollar. 6. It will maintain a market for U.S. currency 7. It will continue to use U.S. currency and will not change to another currency. 8. All forms of U.S. currency will be reciprocal, that is five $1 bills always will equal one $5 bill and vice versa. If any of the elements of full faith and credit were to change, and the value of the federal government’s full faith and credit were to decline, the value of the debt/dollar would decline, i.e. we’d have inflation. If the full faith an credit declined enough, we’d have hyper-inflation. Every hyperinflation in history has been caused, not by excessive “money printing,” as is widely and falsely believed, but rather by two events:

A change in the full faith and credit of the sovereign currency issuer
A shortage of a critical commodity, usually food, energy, or labor.

Inflation never is caused by increases in the money supply. It always is caused by a change in full faith and credit, or by the supply of a critical commodity. Each of the title-mentioned nations experienced a political problem, not a “too-much-money” problem, that caused their extreme inflations. In fact, it was the inflations that caused the “too-much-currency” to be created and not the other way around. Whenever you hear of a nation experiencing hyperinflation, remember that the problem was not caused by excessive spending, but by a reduction in that nation’s full faith and credit and/or supply of critical goods and services. For the United States, about the only thing that could cause the first hyperinflation in our existence, would be if a reckless fool like Ted Cruz, John Cornyn or some other Tea Party nut, prevented the paying of federal debts (as repeatedly the nuts have threatened to do). That would cause an extreme change in item #2 of full faith and credit (above), which would debase the value of the U.S. debt/dollar. And we’d have hyper-inflation. So don’t worry about a “government-‘printing’-too-much-money” inflation; worry about a Cruz/Corwin/Tea Party hyperinflation. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Monetary Sovereignty describes money creation and destruction.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics. Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: Ten Steps To Prosperity:

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Germany wants Spain and France to remain “bile bears”

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Introduction: Per Wikipedia, China uses bear bile as an ingredient in Traditional Chinese Medicine. To facilitate the bile milking process, the bears are commonly kept in extraction cages, also known as crush cages. The cages prevent the bears from being able to stand upright, or in some cases even greater restriction. Farmed bile bears are often malnourished and in poor health, living to an average age of five years.

France and Spain are among the many bile bears of the eurozone.

Berlin attacks EU’s easing of austerity demands

The German and Finnish finance ministries have issued a stinging rebuke of Brussels’ attempt to ease austerity demands on struggling eurozone countries, saying such flexibility improperly provided France and Spain with additional time to cut their budgets to meet EU deficit limits.

Translation: “Yes, we know the euro is a disaster. We know Euro users have surrendered the single most valuable asset they have: Their Monetary Sovereignty. So unless a monetarily non-sovereign nation has positive net exports (not all can), its money supply dwindles and its economy (the majority not part of the upper 1% income/power group) suffers.

“But, the 99% do not suffer enough. The gap between the rich and the rest does not grow fast enough. We want more, more, more blood from the ‘little’ people.”

The German and Finnish position is likely to reignite a bitter fight over whether the EU’s austerity-led crisis response has exacerbated economic stagnation in the eurozone, a debate that largely faded last year after Olli Rehn, the EU’s economic commissioner, awarded France, Spain and four other eurozone countries extra time to reduce their budget deficits below the EU-mandated cap of 3 per cent of economic output.

Translation: “There was a fight about whether reducing money growth cuts economic growth. There also is a fight about whether bleeding a sick patient further reduces the patients energy.

“But the fight ‘faded’ when the doctors agreed to bleed the patient more slowly than originally planned, allowing the patient to die more slowly.”

The memo comes the same week Mr Rehn issued economic forecasts that showed both France and Spain, even with an extra two years, were still failing to cut their deficits in line with EU recommendations.

Translation: “How dare these nations resist having their life-blood drained away. Don’t they understand that this is all for the benefit of their richest and most powerful?”

If you go to that truly excellent web site, http://www.tradingeconomics.com, you’ll find this graph demonstrating France’s financial bleeding:

and this graph demonstrating Spain’s:

These two countries are hemorrhaging euros, but their good neighbors feel they are not bleeding fast enough. (None of this would be a problem if France and Spain still were Monetarily Sovereign and could create their own money. It became a problem when they bound themselves to an alien currency, the euro.)

When the bleeding becomes so bad that the nations teeter on the precipice of death, they will be “saved” by a new loan from the EU or a “moderation” of the terms. Thus France and Spain (and the other euro nations with a negative balance of trade) will be kept alive as trading partners, but little else.

And it’s all to save the euro, the greatest device ever invented for draining a nation’s life-blood and widening the gap between the rich and the rest.

France and Spain (and Italy and Greece et al), you have volunteered to be Germany’s bile bears.

Enjoy your cage.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

—–

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Bucks Beat Bigots

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

A Reuters article in today’s Florida Sun Sentinal, was headlined:

Arizona goverernor kills bill on service to gays.

I wish I could tell you Governor Jan Brewer had a moral epiphany, and realized the proposed law was rank bigotry, and not the phony “freedom of religion” BS the Republicans claimed.

But, morality had nothing to do with it:

Arizon Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed a controversial bill Wednesday that critics see as a license to discriminate against gay in the name of religion, saying the measure could result in “unintended and negative consequences.”

Those “unintended and negative consequences” all were based on money.

A number of major business organizations and some Republicans had urged Brewer to veto the bill.

Question: Do you think even one of those major business organizations and Republicans mentioned anything about morality, bigotry or doing the right thing? Isn’t it more likely all the conversations began like this: “Governor, we’re going to lose a ton of money and you’re going to lose a ton of campaign bucks, if you sign this.”

Critics . . . threatened boycotts and other public-relations retaliation against Arizona unless Brewer vetoed the bill.

SEN. JOHN McCAIN, R-AZ (2/25/2014): This can affect tourism, it can affect our state’s economy and job creation.
JAN CRAWFORD, CBS (2/26/2014): The Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee says it could jeopardize plans for the state to host next year’s game.

Yes, many organizations threatened not to do bu$ine$$ in Arizona. Do you think that may have been “morally” persuasive?

Of course, there is the usual professorial (bought-and-paid-for) defense we have seen so often:

In a four-page letter sent this week to Brewer, 11 constitutional scholars (who?) said the Arizona law had been “egregiously misrepresented by many of its critics.” (How?)

“Some of us are Republicans; some of us are Democrats. Some of us are religious; some of us are not. Some of us oppose same-sex marriage; some of us support it,” the letter said. (How many of each?)

Nine of the signers (which nine?) of the letter said they supported the legislation; two were not sure (“Not sure,” but they signed the letter??). “But all of us believe that many criticisms (Which criticisms?) of the Arizona law are deeply misleading,” (Misleading in what way?) the letter said.

The federal government and 18 states have Religious Freedom Restoration Acts on their books. More than 12 other states have interpreted their state constitutions to provide similar protections to religious individuals.

Under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the government is barred from imposing a substantial burden on a person’s exercise of religion unless the government can offer a compelling justification for the burden and then minimize the burden as much as possible.

So you see, helping to put out the fire burning down a home owned by gays, would put a substantial “burden” on a firefighter’s exercise of religion, as would serving a gay person in a restaurant owned by a fundamentalist Christian. Oh, the burdens they are asked to endure.

It goes like this. “According to my interpretation of my religion, blacks marrying whites is a sin, as are the mixed race children of such a marriage. So President Obama, stay out of my restaurant, and if your house is on fire, I’m not going to help put it out, and if you’re being robbed, I won’t stop the robber. You, as a mixed race sinner, will not receive service from me.”

“And as for you women who don’t cover your heads or your faces — if you are being attacked or even raped, don’t expect any help from us Muslim police officers.

“Oh, and you pork eaters, sellers or cooks won’t get any service from us Jews and Muslims. And you Christians who pray to Mary, well we Jews consider that blasphemic idolitry, so don’t expect service from us.”

The Arizona-style bill, based on the kind of “freedom of religion,” which if carried to the fundamentalist logic it advocated, was sure to rip this nation apart.

We are a large nation — a “melting pot.” We all believe different things. We advocate different things; we object to different things. What is the “right” way? Is it the Catholic way? Is it the Protestant way? The Jewish way? (Reformed, conservative or orthodox?) The Muslim way? (Sunni or Shiite?)

If you are Catholic, and do not adhere to the strictures of Sunni Islam, does a Muslim have the legal right to discriminate against you?

Bottom line, we either can be accepting and tolerant of our neighbor’s views, or we can be cruel and divisive if our neighbor doesn’t do everything we believe is correct.

Arizona found the answer. When money talks, money always is correct. Money is the great uniter.

Bucks beat bigots.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

—–

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: