Given his narcissism and predilection for lying, it was unseemly but not surprising when Trump, peddling fantastical theories about massive voter fraud, refused to accept defeat, despite a cascade of contrary court decisions.
Fear does strange things to a man
But he isn’t alone in ensuring that the presidency Biden will claim on Jan. 20 is a poisoned chalice.
Top congressional Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellof Kentucky and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, have acquiesced in Trump’s disinformation campaign, hiding behind pious statements about counting every legal vote.
As Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro noted in his devastating response, the Supreme Court “should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated.”
Here is a list of the Republican Representatives who, on behalf of Donald Trump, attempted a coup. They voted to commit treason. They tried to destroy our democracy by canceling the votes of millions of Americans, to make Donald Trump the dictator.
We fought the Revolutionary War to overthrow a dictator and to install a democracy, and today, after 240 years, the Republican party has become so corrupted by Trump, it is attempting to undo the sacrifices of previous generations.
Russia, China, North Korea et al, would like nothing better than for our democracy to fail. Fortunately, despite the efforts of America’s enemies, our democracy has survived this blatantly right-wing extremist effort.
Not only have dozens of Republican judges rejected all of Trump’s lawsuits, but the Republican-dominated Supreme Court refused even to consider this unconstitutional effort.
There is only one word that aptly describes these lawmakers, and that word is “traitor.”
Keep this list handy for the next election, coming in only two years. It will help you vote for democracy and against treason.
(We would be remiss if we didn’t add Senator Ted Cruz to the list of traitors, as Cruz hungrily begged to be the lead lawyer prosecuting the suit).
Mike Johnson, Fourth Congressional District, Louisiana
Gary Palmer, Sixth Congressional District, Alabama
Kevin McCarthy, Twenty-Third Congressional District, of California
Steve Scalise First Congressional District, Louisiana
Jim Jordan Fourth Congressional District Ohio
Ralph Abraham, Fifth Congressional District, Louisiana
Robert Aderholt, Fourth Congressional District, Alabama
Rick W. Allen, Twelfth Congressional District, Georgia
Jodey Arrington, Nineteenth Congressional District, Texas
Brian Babin Thirty-Sixth Congressional District Texas
James R. Baird, Fourth Congressional District, Indiana
Jim Banks Third Congressional District Indiana
Jack Bergman, First Congressional District, Michigan
Andy Biggs Fifth Congressional District Arizona
Gus Bilirakis Twelfth Congressional District Florida,
Dan Bishop Ninth Congressional District North Carolina
Mike Bost Twelfth Congressional District Illinois
Kevin Brady Eighth Congressional District Texas
Mo Brooks Fifth Congressional District Alabama
Ken Buck Fourth Congressional District Colorado
Ted Budd Thirteenth Congressional District North, Carolina
Tim Burchett, Second Congressional District, Tennessee
Michael C. Burgess, Twenty-Sixth Congressional District, of Texas
Bradley Byrne, First Congressional District, Alabama
Ken Calvert Forty-Second Congressional District California
Earl L. “Buddy” Carter, First Congressional District, Georgia
Ben Cline Sixth Congressional District Virginia
Michael Cloud, Twenty-Seventh Congressional, District Texas
Doug Collins Ninth Congressional District Georgia
Mike Conaway, Eleventh Congressional District, Texas
Rick Crawford, First Congressional District, Arkansas
Dan Crenshaw, Second Congressional District, Texas
Scott DesJarlais, Fourth Congressional District, Tennessee
Mario Diaz-Balart, Twenty-Fifth Congressional District, of Florida
Jeff Duncan Third Congressional District South Carolina
Neal P. Dunn, M.D., Second Congressional District, Florida
Tom Emmer Sixth Congressional District Minnesota
Ron Estes Fourth Congressional District Kansas
A. Drew Ferguson, IV, Third Congressional District, Georgia
Chuck Fleischmann, Third Congressional District, Tennessee
Bill Flores Seventeenth Congressional District Texas in
Jeff Fortenberry, First Congressional District, Nebraska
Virginia Foxx, Fifth Congressional District North, Carolina
Russ Fulcher First Congressional District Idaho
Matt Gaetz First Congressional District Florida
Greg Gianforte, At Large Congressional District, Montana
Bob Gibbs Seventh Congressional District Ohio
Louie Gohmert, First Congressional District Texas
Lance Gooden, Fifth Congressional District, Texas.
Sam Graves Sixth Congressional District Missouri
Mark Green Seventh Congressional District Tennessee
H. Morgan Griffith, Ninth Congressional District, Virginia
Michael Guest, Third Congressional District, Mississippi
Jim Hagedorn, First Congressional District, Minnesota
Andy Harris, M.D., First Congressional District, Maryland
Vicky Hartzler, Fourth Congressional District, Missouri
Kevin Hern First Congressional District Oklahoma
Jody Hice Tenth Congressional District Georgia
Clay Higgins Third Congressional District Louisiana
Trey Hollingsworth, Ninth Congressional District, Indiana
Richard Hudson, Eighth Congressional District, North Carolina
Bill Huizenga, Second Congressional District, Michigan
Bill Johnson Sixth Congressional District Ohio
John Joyce Thirteenth Congressional District, Pennsylvania
Fred Keller Twelfth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Mike Kelly Sixteenth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Trent Kelly First Congressional District Mississippi
Steve King Fourth Congressional District Iowa
David Kustoff, Eighth Congressional District, Tennessee
Darin LaHood, Eighteenth Congressional District, Illinois
Doug LaMalfa, First Congressional District, California
Doug Lamborn, Fifth Congressional District, Colorado
Robert E. Latta, Fifth Congressional District Ohio
Debbie Lesko, Eighth Congressional District, Arizona
Billy Long Seventh Congressional District Missouri in
Barry Loudermilk, Eleventh Congressional District, Georgia
Blaine Luetkemeyer, Third Congressional District, Missouri
Kenny Marchant, Twenty-Fourth Congressional, District Texas
Roger Marshall, M.D., First Congressional District, Kansas
Tom McClintock, Fourth Congressional District, California
Cathy McMorris, Rodgers Fifth Congressional District, of Washington
Dan Meuser Ninth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Carol D. Miller, Third Congressional District West, Virginia
John Moolenaar, Fourth Congressional District, Michigan
Alex X. Mooney, Second Congressional District West, Virginia
Markwayne Mullin, Second Congressional District, Oklahoma
Gregory Murphy, M.D., Third Congressional District North, Carolina
Dan Newhouse, Fourth Congressional District, Washington
Ralph Norman, Fifth Congressional District South, Carolina
Steven Palazzo, Fourth Congressional District, Mississippi
Greg Pence Sixth Congressional District, Indiana
Scott Perry Tenth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Bill Posey Eighth Congressional District, Florida
Guy Reschenthaler, Fourteenth Congressional District, Pennsylvania
Tom Rice, Seventh Congressional District South Carolina
Mike Rogers Third Congressional District, Alabama
John Rose Sixth Congressional District, Tennessee
David Rouzer, Seventh Congressional District, North Carolina
John Rutherford, Fourth Congressional District, Florida
Austin Scott Eighth Congressional District, Georgia
Mike Simpson, Second Congressional District, Idaho
Adrian Smith, Third Congressional District, Nebraska
Jason Smith Eighth Congressional District, Missouri
Ross Spano Fifteenth Congressional District, Florida
Pete Stauber Eighth Congressional District Minnesota in
Elise Stefanik, Twenty-First Congressional District, New York
W. Gregory Steube, Seventeenth Congressional District, New Jersey
Glenn “GT” Thompson, Fifteenth Congressional District, Pennsylvania
Tom Tiffany Seventh Congressional District, Wisconsin
William Timmons, Fourth Congressional District, South Carolina
Jeff Van Drew, Second Congressional District, South Carolina
Ann Wagner Second Congressional District Missouri
Tim Walberg Seventh Congressional District Michigan
Mark Walker, Sixth Congressional District North, Carolina
Jackie Walorski, Second Congressional District, Indiana
Michael Waltz, Sixth Congressional District, Florida
Randy Weber, Fourteenth Congressional District, Texas
Daniel Webster, Eleventh Congressional District, Florida
Brad Wenstrup, Second Congressional District, Ohio
Bruce Westerman, Fourth Congressional District, Arkansas
Roger Williams, Twenty-Fifth Congressional District, of Texas
Joe Wilson Second Congressional District South Carolina
Rob Wittman, First Congressional District, Virginia
Ron Wright Sixth Congressional District, Texas
Ted S. Yoho Third Congressional District, Florida
Lee Zeldin First Congressional District, New York
And soon will come the riots by enemies of America (posing as patriots) who haven’t the slightest notion about what a democracy is. They don’t believe the voters. They don’t believe the judges. They don’t believe the media.
They believe only Donald Trump, he of the 22,000+ lies, and his sycophants.
There is a penalty for their ignorance. Sadly, America’s democracy will have to get through this, somehow.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.
A lying, semiliterate, lazy, incompetent. immoral, irreligious, womanizing, draft-dodging, TV performer has managed to:
Set one half of America against the other half.
Turn our former allies against us.
Weaken America vs. our enemies
Turn the Republican party against everything it formerly stood for: Law & order, the sanctity of marriage and family values, conservation of historical norms, and sovereign states’ rights.
Lead an entire Christian denomination, the Evangelicals, to close their eyes to abject evil and to follow a leader who rejects all Evangelical beliefs: Faith in Christ, forsaking sin, the infallible word of the Bible, atonement, and conversion.
As this post is being written, more than 100 House Republicans have signed on to an extraordinary lawsuit by the State of Texas, to overturn the entire Presidential election, and action that if successful, would end the United States of America as we know it.
There is a reason we are known as the United States. We are composed of individual, sovereign states, united for mutual protection and benefit.
How did Trump alienate the Christian right to the point of civil war advocacy? Here’s one opinion
It’s one of the most enduring conundrums of the Donald Trump era: How is it that the Christian right, the self-appointed monitors of American morality, have come to so enthusiastically back a thrice-married chronic adulterer who lies as easily as he breathes?
When we think of the religious right, we’re often thinking of a cultural movement or social movement that works from the bottom up, expressing the anxieties and reactions of a particular group in American society to change social realities, focused on issues like reproductive rights or same-sex marriage.
But Christian nationalism really works from the top down. It actively shapes and manipulates its target population, and it often shifts its target.
When movement leaders are talking to the congregants or to pastors who speak to congregants, it’s all abortion all the time. The foot soldiers may even believe that they’re fighting for things like a ban on abortion or same-sex marriage, but the leaders have actually consciously reframed these issues in such a way that they can control the vote of a large subsection of the American public.
They use that to solidify and maintain political power for themselves and their allies, to increase the flow of public and private money in their direction, and to enact economic policies that are favorable to their funders.
(They argue) that social welfare programs have no basis in Scripture. He says that the government should not directly fund needs for the poor. (They say) the responsibility to meet the needs of the poor lies first with a husband and a marriage, second with a family if the husband is absent, and third with the church.
(They say) nowhere does God command the institutions of government or commerce to fully support those with genuine needs.
These policies are incredibly favorable to the plutocratic fortunes that are funding the movement. The movement wouldn’t be what it is without some subsection of very wealthy individuals and extended families that are supporting the movement financially. I’m thinking of like the DeVos, Prince families, the Green family, and so many others that I described in my book.
These families, in turn, benefit from a deregulation of lack of environmental control regulation, low taxation, and minimal workers’ rights.
If you wonder why a truly religious person would want to let the environment go to hell, reduce workers rights, separate children from their parents, cut taxes on the rich, eliminate healthcare for the poor, and support the least religious human being on this planet, the answer is: It’s what the ultra-rich want, and in America, it is the ultra-rich who control the beliefs of the common people.
The First Amendment to U.S. Constitution says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
The reason for divorcing religion from politics is that the combination of religion and politics historically and inevitably leads to dictatorship.
If a political leader also wears the mantle of religion, how do the people voice grievances against God? That leader can provide interpretations of his favorite Bible (and there are infinite interpretations voiced daily) to benefit himself and his family.
He could, for instance, claim that God wills the public not to support the poor, but rather to support the rich. Sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? But that is exactly what the right-wing of America has done, all in the name of abortion.
Abortion??!
Yes, by elevating abortion above all other considerations, the rich have convinced the right-wing, especially the religious and poorly-educated, to vote against their own consciences and well-being.
In essence the rich tell the poor, “If you let me cut down the forests, pollute the water and air, heat the earth, keep your salaries low, eliminate your healthcare, and turn a blind eye to the leader’s evil, irreligious ways, I’ll vote against the single most important thing in the world: Abortion.”
By framing it as “God’s will,” the rich are able to convince the poorly educated, and the Republican party of sycophants, to go along with ideas they otherwise would find abhorrent.
Religion is far more emotional than logical, which is why a man who clearly has never stepped inside a house of worship, can hold up a bible and claim “They’re trying to take religion away,” and not be laughed off the stage.
Aside from adopting the religious flag, Trump has two more flags to wave: Patriotism and masculinity, both of which live in most hearts, but have specialappeal to the less educated.
On a basic level, patriotism is like fandom. “Fandom is a subculture composed of fans characterized by a feeling of empathy and camaraderie with others who share a common interest.”
Chicago Bears fans, Texas loyalists, Star Trek groupies, John Wayne buffs, the very religious, or other club members all have two things in common:
-They take excessive comfort in being embraced by a group that thinks the way they do.
-They harbor some antipathy toward those who don’t think the way they do.
America is the greatest country in the world — if you’re an American. Otherwise, France is. Or England is. Or Israel is. That pride of membership is translated as patriotism. Being a patriot is considered good just as being religious is considered good. That is why Trump followers love to wave the American flag every time they attend a rally held by the oft-time draft-dodger.
The excessive use of flags is a kind of “lady doth protest too much” support for an infamous Putin-loving, Kim-loving, ally-hating traitor-to-America President.
When President Trump was released from the hospital after being treated for COVID-19, he had a prescription for how Americans could handle the coronavirus.
“Don’t let it dominate you. Don’t be afraid of it,” he said in a video from the White House. The apparent idea: that the coronavirus, which has killed at least 225,000 people in the U.S., could be wrestled into submission.
Trump’s overt hypermasculinity was a defining feature of his candidacy in 2016, whether he was talking about his testosterone count or his penis size or shrugging off the infamous Access Hollywood tape, in which he talked about committing sexual assault as “locker room talk.”
That macho approach went on to define his presidency as well. Trump has been blatant about amping up his particular, aggressive and pugilistic brand of masculinity. After four years, that machismo has manifested itself in seemingly every area of his presidency.
Trump and some of his high-profile supporters often portray mask wearing as a sign of weakness. He mocked Joe Biden in the first debate for wearing a mask, and Trump implied at one point that to wear one publicly would be to give in: “I didn’t want to give the press the pleasure of seeing it.”
Conservative commentator Tomi Lahren was more explicit in linking masks to gender, joking that Biden “might as well carry a purse with that mask.”
In the past, men have been less likely to adopt all sorts of public health measures, like wearing seat belts and helmets. Trump has enormous messaging power to encourage mask-wearing, or discourage it. As it stands, Republicans are less likely than Democrats to believe masks are effective, or to say they wear masks.
Trump has praised strongmen or authoritarian leaders. He has hailed Russia’s Vladimir Putin and China’s Xi Jinping as “strong” and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan as “a tough guy who deserves respect.”
Trump’s pugilistic style also could exacerbate existing tensions, as when Trump tweeted that he had a “much bigger and more powerful” “Nuclear Button” than North Korea’s Kim Jong Un — “and my button works!”
Masculinity is also reflected in Trump’s economic rhetoric. He was blatant about it this week when he told a crowd in Michigan, “We’re getting your husbands back to work.” (This is despite the fact that women have disproportionately dropped out of the labor force during the pandemic.)
But it also has arguably long been present in the president’s insistent focus on male-dominated, blue-collar professions.
In multiple major economic addresses and State of the Union speeches, Trump has highlighted professions like manufacturing, mining and construction, but virtually ignored other working-class, “pink-collar” workers in female-dominated, care-oriented jobs like nursing or health aides. And in his job-creation initiatives, Trump has also tended to focus on those blue-collar areas — particularly manufacturing.
Indeed, he seems to relish the public appearances he gets to do while promoting these industries, as he dons hard hats or sits behind the wheel of a semi.
Trump’s hyper-masculinity even filters down to the women.
More than one-third of non-incumbent Republican women running for Congress had campaign materials prominently featuring them with guns.
Arizona Republican U.S. House candidate Tiffany Shedd, for example, has a photo of herself with a rifle resting on her shoulder on her website. In some campaign photos, Colorado Republican U.S. House candidate Lauren Boebert has a pistol strapped to her thigh.
IN SUMMARY:
Most thinking people are puzzled by Trump’s appeal. Logically speaking, a lying, semiliterate, lazy, incompetent. immoral, irreligious, womanizing, draft-dodging, TV performer should not appeal to nearly half of America’s voting population.
But people do not live in a logical world. Most human decisions are emotional.
Trump has overcome what might seem to be his disastrous shortcomings by focusing on several emotional appeals: Religious opposition to abortion, patriotism, and hyper-masculinity, all three of which carry special weight with his political base: Less educated, Christian Evangalist, males.
Add in those Jews, who are taken with his seeming support for Israel, and Trump needs only a relative few people of color, foreign-born, females, and gays.
The entire GOP, even those who secretly despise Trump and all he stands for, has been impressed with the cultish fervor of his followers. Like people being swept up in a crowd of rioters, they find themselves first leading, and then following the pack of traitors Trump has unleashed.
Historically, those who give birth to war, later are consumed by their offspring.
And so it will be with Trumpism, as the entire nation is consumed by the hatred he has sown.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
You may or may not be an economist, but every day, you and your friends discuss government spending, taxes, deficits, debts, interest rates, recessions, depressions, and inflation. You talk about Medicare, Obamacare, Social Security, global warming, military funding, dams, streets and highways, flood and windstorm remediation, poverty, college, crime, rents and home prices, and, of course, politics — all of which are related to economics.
When speaking about our economy, everyone is an expert.
Really?
Give this short True/False test to your friends to see whether they truly know what they are talking about. Five correct out of ten is well above average.
Questions — True (T) or False (F):
A dollar bill is a form of money. ________
The recent growth of the federal debt is unsustainable. ________
Unlike the federal government, a state government can run short of U.S. dollars. ________
Massive federal deficit spending leads to inflation. ________
Gold is a form of money. ________
Federal taxes fund federal government spending. ________
Too little federal deficit growth leads to recessions and depressions. ________
The huge federal debt will be a burden on future taxpayers. ________
The federal government cannot afford to pay for Medicare for All, Social Security for All, and College for All.________
Massive federal deficit spending is socialism. ________
IS THIS MONEY?
ANSWERS: 1. False. A dollar bill is a title to a dollar. Just as a car title is not a car, and a house title is not a house, a dollar bill is not a dollar. It is a non-interest-paying bearer instrument, that indicates the bearer owns a dollar.
If you happen to own a bond, and you have a piece of paper in your safe deposit vault, that piece of paper is not in itself, a bond. It is just evidence you own a bond.
The actual dollar (or bond) is merely a number on a balance sheet. Numbers, dollars, and bonds have no physical existence. They all are merely data. One day, the dollar bill may become totally obsolete, and we will pay all our debts online with invisible, non-physical dollars.
Thus, money and bonds are the same thing. All money is a zero-interest form of debt. On the dollar billare the words, “Federal Reserve note.” “Bill” and “note” are words that connote debt.
If you buy a car on credit, you create a note, i.e., you create money. Borrowing money creates money because all money is debt. When you spend on a credit card, you create money, and when you pay the credit card company, you destroy money.
2. False. The federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. It created the first U.S. dollars out of thin air. It created as many as it wished and gave them the value it wished.
The federal government still has the infinite ability to create U.S. dollars out of thin air. What is known as federal “debt” actually is the total of deposits into Treasury security accounts, similar to bank savings accounts.
Because the federal government has the infinite ability to create dollars, it never touches the dollars in T-security accounts.
That is why the federal government does not borrow; it doesn’t need to. The federal government never can run short of dollars.
Those “debt” dollars remain in the accounts, gathering interest, until the accounts mature, at which time the government merely returns the balance to the account owner.
Why does the government allow people to make deposits into T-security accounts if it doesn’t need or use the money? Two primary reasons:
A. To provide a safe parking place for unused dollars, which helps stabilize the dollar.
B. To help the government control interest rates.
3. True. State and local governments’ finances are like yours and mine: Monetarily NON-sovereign. We are not the issuers of the U.S. dollar and we do not have the infinite ability to create dollars.
We do, however, have some ability to create dollars, which we do by lending and borrowing. When we borrow, for instance, $10,000 from a bank, a mortgage is created. That mortgage is a form of money . So, you receive $10,000 and the bank receives your $10,000 mortgage, which the bank can spend or exchange for dollars.
You and your bank have created $10,000 from thin air.
4. False. Inflation is caused by shortages, most often by scarcities of food or energy (oil). Inflation never is caused by “too much” federal deficit spending.
Example: Zimbabwe’s notorious inflation began when the government took farmland from experienced farmers and gave it to inexperienced people. The predictable result: A food shortage, which led to a hyperinflation.
After causing the hyperinflation, the government could have cured it by importing food and distributing it to the people. Spending money that way would have eliminated the shortages and ended the hyperinflation.
The illusion Zimbabwe’s inflation (or any other inflation) was caused by money “printing” came from the fact that the Zimbabwe government printed larger and larger banknotes, which did nothing to reduce the shortages, and so, did not address the hyperinflation. This currency printing did not cause the inflation: food shortages did.
Note: Monetarily non-sovereign governments (i.e. state & local governments, euro nations) have only limited ability to create money (by borrowing), and to use that money to purchase scarce goods, so they are much less able to cure inflation.
In recent years, U.S. inflations have been caused by oil shortages, and are controlled by federal purchases of oil, and distribution of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
For modest and incremental inflation control, the U.S. federal government increases interest rates, which increases the exchange value of the dollar.
Red line is federal debt. Blue line is inflation. No relationship between them.
5. False. Gold, silver, platinum are not, and never have been, a form of money. As we discussed earlier, money has no physical existence; it is a form of debt. Gold et al, are elements that in the past have been used for barter, not as money.
The money value of a $10 gold coin always is $10, but the barter value may be thousands of dollars. In either case, the coin itself is not money. It either is a title to ten dollars, or it is used for barter.
Further, since all money is a form of debt, and all debt requires collateral, silver and gold have been used as collateral for the type of debt called “money.”
Today, silver and gold no longer are used as collateral for federal money. The collateral for that debt is solely the full faith and creditof the federal government. No federal assets are pledged as collateral for any federal money.
By contrast, when you take out a home mortgage, the collateral for that debt is the house itself, plusyour personal full faith and credit.
6. False. Although state and local taxes do fund state and local government spending, federal taxes fund nothing. In fact, unlike state and local government taxes, federal taxes are destroyed upon receipt.
State and local tax dollars are deposited into banks, and therefore remain part of the nation’s money-supply (M1 and M2). By contrast, tax dollars leave the economy, and disappear from any money-supply measure.
Even if the federal government collected zero taxes, it could continue spending, forever. Being Monetarily Sovereign, the federal government has no need for income. That is why the federal government does not borrow. T-bills, T-notes, and T-bonds are not evidence of borrowing. They are evidence only of deposits into T-security accounts.
A. To control the economy by rewarding activities the federal government wishes to encourage and by punishing the activities the government wishes to discourage, and
B. To make the populace believe the government’s ability to spend is limited by taxes, so that the people will not ask for more benefits.
The federal government is controlled by the very rich. Gap Psychology shows that the rich become richer by widening the Gap between themselves and those below them on any income/wealth/power scale. Most federal spending benefits lower-income groups most, so the rich-controlled government spreads disinformation about program affordability.
C. A third purpose of federal taxes is possible: To narrow the Gap between the rich and the rest.Although some politicians claim this already is one effect of taxes, the rich have been clever enough and influential enough to negate that purpose.
7. True. A growing economy requires a growing supply of money. Federal deficit spending increases the nation’s money supply. One common measure of the economy is Gross Domestic Product, the formula for which is:
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Nonfederal Spending + Net Exports
All three terms increase the money supply and increase GDP.
Red line is federal debt growth. Vertical bars are recessions. Prior to recessions, debt growth declines. Recessions are cured by increases in federal debt growth (aka “stimulus.”)
Whenever the U.S. misguidedly has tried to reduce the federal “debt,” very bad things have happened.
1804-1812: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 48%. Depression began 1807.
1817-1821: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 29%. Depression began 1819.
1823-1836: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 99%. Depression began 1837.
1852-1857: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 59%. Depression began 1857.
1867-1873: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 27%. Depression began 1873.
1880-1893: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 57%. Depression began 1893.
1920-1930: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 36%. Depression began 1929.
1997-2001: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 15%. Recession began 2001.
8. False. Federal taxes have no relationship to federal “debt” (i.e. deposits). Every day, millions of dollars of federal “debt” are paid off simply by returning the money that has been residing in T-security accounts. No tax dollars are involved.
In 1939, the federal debt was $48 billion. This year, the federal debt is $21 trillion — a 44-fold increase in 80 years.
Yet here we are, and none of the scare stories about the “unsustainability” and “unaffordability” of federal debt has come true. For these past 80 years, you repeatedly have been told the federal debt is a “ticking time bomb.” It still is ticking, and no explosion. The slowest “time bomb” in history.
The federal debt is not a danger. Rather, a growing federal debt is absolutely necessary for economic growth.
9. False.The federal government can afford anything. It has an infinite supply of dollars.
Unfortunately, every time any federal spending program is proposed, Congress twists itself into contortions, trying (or pretending to try) to answer the question, “How will you pay for it?”
The correct answer is, “The federal government simply will write a check.” No federal check ever bounces, because the federal government has absolute control over the U.S. dollar, and U.S. banks.
The government created the original U.S. dollars by creating laws from thin air. So long as the government is not limited in its passing of laws, it will not be limited in its money creation.
If they wished, Congress and the President could pay for the Tens Steps to Prosperity (below), merely by pressing a few computer keys. So long as there were no incurable shortages, the economy would grow, poverty would disappear, and there would be no inflation.
If the notion of infinite money sounds too good to be true, that is only because we have been brainwashed by the politicians, the media, and the economists who are controlled by the very rich. They want you to believe that money is in limited supply.
10. False.Socialism is not just government spending. Socialism describes any enterprise OWNED and CONTROLLED by a government.
Although “socialism” often is used as a pejorative by those who dislike government involvement in anything, the nature of all governments is that some aspects are socialistic. A few examples:
Public parks
Most streets and highways
Public beaches
Most large dams
The Great Lakes and the Mississippi River
The Library of Congress and other public libraries
Subway systems and many public surface transportation systems
State colleges and universities
National parks
The White House
Congress
The Supreme Court
Most of America’s acreage west of the Mississippi River
The entire military, including Veterans Administration Hospitals
Water and sewage treatment plants
Weather Service, NASA, FBI, CIA, and all other government agencies
The fact that some proposed projects may or may not be socialist is neither good nor bad. There are some things the private sector can do better. There are some things the government can do better. And there are some things that can be done better by a joint effort.
SOCIALISM
Banking, for instance, is a function that would be much better accomplished by the federal government than by the private sector, because the federal government is not distorted by the profit goal, which has caused repeated cases of bank malfeasance.
Finally, if you happen to know an economics professor or writer, give him/her this quiz and see how he does. That should be interesting.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: