The bailout package will not include $150 billion for state and local governments, another Democratic priority, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) told Senate Republicans.
See, it’s like this. I need you states to vote for me in November, but first I’ll starve your poorest people who need me most. That’s my plan.
Trump: “Don’t throw him a life preserver. First, let him drown.”
“The thinking among some Trump administration officials is that many states should be reopening their governments soon and that additional funding could deter them from doing so,” reports Axios’ Alayna Treene.
See, it’s like this. The state’s offices, schools, and businesses are closed not because of the Chinese virus, but because they hate me.
It’s all about me.I’m not going to give them any money to help them survive the Chinese virus.
It’s not my virus; it’s the Chinese virus. Let the Chinese help the states.
Politico adds: “The White House and Trump administration have been holding out because, in part, they believe if Congress keeps cutting checks for state and local governments, they will be disincentivized to open up their economies.”
See, it’s like this. Those governors closed their offices, schools, and businesses just to spite me.
If I send the states any money, they’ll just waste the dollars to keep the states’ offices and schools open, and the businesses running, and later they’ll open polling places for the Mexicans, blacks and Muslims to vote. They don’t vote for me, do they?
States and cities have taken steep hits to their budgets from the coronavirus outbreak. “It’s important for the feds to support our efforts to fund the stuff we do,” Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (R-Mass.) said on CBS News.
“If we’re laying off tens of thousands of people at exactly the time when they want to reopen the economy, we’re going to be swimming against the current they’re trying to create.”
See, it’s like this. I want the states to reopen their economies after many of their businesses go bankrupt, so there will be no economies to reopen.
And anyway, what would poor kids do with educations? Let ’em beg me for money so the government can send them checks with my name on them. But later.
I’ll show those governors they can’t sass me.
Trump said Sunday evening he supports backstopping states and local governments at “another time.” White House officials tell Axios they envision such a package weeks or months from now.
See, it’s like this. There’s no rush. People are desperate and starving — but my GOP bootlickers are well-fed, thank you.
(But if you’re nice to me, maybe I’llthrow you a few crumbs.)
The White House reiterated Sunday on Twitter that, as far as they see it, “the success of the phased approach will rely on preparedness and planning by states — safe and efficient screening, sufficient PPE supplies, and the ability to mitigate any rebound.”
See, it’s like this. You have no money. I want you to prepare, “safe and efficient screening, sufficient PPE supplies, and the ability to mitigate any rebound” beforeyou get the money to do those very things.
Sure it’s impossible, but that’s how I want it. I give you an impossible assignment, and while you struggle, I own you. That’s how I operate.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.
Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
Discovery is realizing that the great thinkers are wrong.
Every great thinker is known as a great thinker because he/she showed how previous great thinkers were wrong. Subsequently, he will be shown to be wrong. That is called “science.”
Einstein’s gravity theories showed Newton’s gravity theories to be wrong. And though Einstein’s have stood for a century, they are incompatible with quantum mechanics, so there is a strong likelihood part of Einstein will be proved wrong.
In the above survey, no economist agrees with the two statements, both of which are provably correct. Those economists who made additional comments to justify their opinions invariably mentioned inflation.
The near-unanimous belief was that creating “too much” money causes inflation, which is widely believed, but factually untrue.
Name any inflation, by country and year, and you will find that the inflation began with a scarcity, most often of food or energy. It was only in response to the scarcity, that a nation begins “printing” money
That is why the illusion of “money creation causes inflation” persists.
Here are examples of clarification comments by those who disagreed with the statements:
Marcus Brunnermeier, Princeton: “see numerous historical examples: Germany in 1920s, Latin America, …”
In every historical example, the inflation is precipitated by a food and/or energy shortage.
Darrell Duffie, Stanford: “The present value of debt issuances is equal to the present value of debt payments. So, borrowing more now means paying more later.”
Duffie provides a mere tautology that neither disproves nor proves the statement.
Ray Fair, Yale: “Surely inflation might be a problem.”
Austan Goolsbie, University of Chicago: “‘Always’ makes an ass out of you and me (reminding for a friend)”
I included this one not only because it is humorously inane — he was trying to be clever about the word “assume,” but got it confused with the word “always” — but it’s an example of an expert quoting something about which he has no knowledge.
Oliver Hart, Harvard: “This kind of behavior can quickly lead to inflation or even hyperinflation once the economy is close to full capacity.”
What will be the symptoms of an economy that is close to full capacity? Right. Shortages. It is shortages that cause inflation.
Kenneth Judd, Stanford: “A government may be able to do this once but doing this systematically will make it impossible to sell bonds in the future.”
Except: 1. If the government decides not to sell bonds or 2. If the central bank buys the bonds. The U.S. government doesn’t need to sell a single bond to acquire U.S. dollars. It creates a dollar, ad hoc, every time it spends a dollar.
Anil Kashyap, Chicago: “Money financing yields some seigniorage, but also inflation and the inflation has costs and there are limits to seigniorage capacity.”
A Monetarily Sovereign government needs no seigniorage (i.e. money creation profits).
Eric Maskin, Harvard: “Printing money causes its own problems, e.g., the risk of inflation”
Same old, same old. And wrong.
Robert Shimer, Chicago: “The real value of the money supply is bounded above. At some point, this must create inflation.”
What does “at some point” mean? He has no idea. The “ticking time bomb” claim has been made for 80 years, and still, we experience no explosion. Now that we are sliding into depression, they still worry about inflation. Insane.
AAron Edin, Berkeley: “There are limits to capacity and no limits to wants.”
So? What does that tell you? There are limits to the universe, too. Where are the limits? Should we stop firing rockets because they may fly out of the universe?
Kenneth Judd, Stanford: “Friedman wrote a book “There’s No Such Thing As a Free Lunch.” He also meant road or bridge or army or school or ANYTHING!”
And exactly what are those limits? The 80-year, 50,000% increase in federal debt hasn’t reached those “limits,” so what are the limits? He has no clue. But there is a “free lunch.”
And here are a few more comments from those whose comments already have been shown:
“. . . lots of countries have proved this to be impossible” Not Monetarily Sovereign countries
“There will come a point where the currency is so debased that further spending becomes difficult if not impossible.” The old “a point” that no one can identify.
“At some point, hyperinflation would break it all apart. However, this is an irrelevant question in an open world.” Some point. A point. Ah, that mysterious point,
“Creating money can finance a great deal of spending, but incidents of hyperinflation, collapse, and other crises indicate there are limits.” Except that every hyperinflation has been caused by shortages, and cured by deficit spending to cure the shortages.
“I don’t like this question. I guess it is true in some sense, but surely inflation looms at some point.” Surely — at some point, somehow, somewhere, maybe.
In summary, the vast majority of economists parrot each other, and the more they hear the same thing, the more believable it is. Herd mentality.
So now, with no evidence of support, they offer two objections to federal money creation:
The federal government should live within its “means.”
The federal government doesn’t need to live with its means, but at some unknown point, that would cause inflation.
And those two false statements are the total of economics, today, which is mouthed and printed everywhere.
Meanwhile, the people of the world are starving, because of that drivel.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.
Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
I titled a post written on April 14, “A picture of abject stupidity.” The centerpiece was this photo, which appeared in many publications, including the St. Lous Post Dispatch, along with this description:
While many Americans are filled with fear, Melissa Ackison says the coronavirus pandemic has filled her with anger.
The stay-at-home orders are government overreach, the conservative Ohio state Senate candidate says, and the labeling of some workers as “essential” arbitrary.
“It enrages something inside of you,” said Ackison, who was among those who protested Republican Gov. Mike DeWine’s orders at the statehouse in Columbus with her 10-year-old son. She has “no fear whatsoever” of contracting the virus, she said Thursday, dismissing it as hype.
Melissa Ackinson may or may not be stupid. But there is a strong temptation to call her stupid because:
She is a conservative politician, a follower of Donald (“I know everything”) Trump, and
She is encouraging people to stand on the edge of a cliff during an earthquake.
She may or may not be stupid or simply a conniver trying to advance herself politically on Trump’s shirttails.
But I do not believe her followers are stupid. I believe they are terrorized.
They have lost their jobs — jobs that may never return. They not only have no source of income, but they have scant savings.
They have families to feed; they have rent and mortgages to pay. They can’t even look for work, because there is none, and even if there were any jobs, the people may not even have enough money to travel to a job interview.
These are brave people, willing to risk death in order to work for money, while the politicians’ golden incomes and benefits continue — and meanwhile those same politicians dither and vacillate about an extra $250 Billion, though several more Trillions are needed to save this economy.
And all the while, columnists, who are ignorant of economics write this:
Chapman: The legislation is the start of what is likely to be a cascade of outlays to offset the terrifying collapse of the U.S. economy. Speaker Nancy Pelosi says House Democrats are considering another spending bill that could “easily” exceed $1 trillion, and the administration is not inclined to impersonate Scrooge.
Except that the additional $1 Trillion — if it ever happens, while Congress debates about $250 Billion — is far too little and much too late. At least an additional $5 Trillion is needed. So the Scrooge impersonation continues.
The drastic shift has many people on the left claiming that the previous constraints on budget policy were a fraud. If we can afford all this spending, the argument goes, why can’t we afford “Medicare for All,” the Green New Deal, free college and other ambitious initiatives?
“It’s a fascinating progressive moment because what it’s shown is that all of these issues have never been about ‘how are you going to pay for it?’ ” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., last month. “All of these excuses that we have been given as to why we cannot treat people humanely have suddenly gone up in smoke.”
But this is like thinking that because you laid out several thousand dollars to replace your broken furnace in the dead of winter, you can also add a whole new wing to the house.
Being forced to spend a large sum in a serious emergency, and even borrow to cover it, doesn’t mean you would be wise to give up living within your means.
That false comparison with personal finances either is abject stupidity, or unmitigated ignorance, or simply parroting the party line of the rich, or all of the above.
Meanwhile, the people are left to writhe in terror, because of an inferior Congress and a ridiculous President. They see the long lines of cars with people waiting to receive help from food pantries.
I swear, that if I had no money and no jobs, and I didn’t know how I would feed my family, I too would be standing there, banging on my Congressperson’s door.
It’s the information sources and political leaders who are the stupid ones.
Between them they easily — EASILY — could end the crisis and end the fear.
That they choose not to spend enough money — which is free to our Monetarily Soveregn government — is one of the great disgraces and tragedies of our time.
So, I will do something Donald Trump never would do. I will admit it. I was wrong. The people are not stupid. They are reasonably frightened and reasonably desperate for leadership where none is to be found.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.
Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
#Monetary Sovereignty - Mitchell 