Private banks: America’s worst criminals

Where there is money, there will be criminals stealing the money — the more money, the more criminals — and banks control more money than anyone.

Number 9 in the “Ten Steps to Prosperity” is this one: Federal ownership of all banks.

A few excerpts from that article:

Banks are involved in most U.S. dollar creation. Even the dollars created at the direction of the federal government originate with banks.

The two primary dollar-creation methods in the U.S. are bank lending and federal spending:

Each time a banklends, it simply increases the numbers in the borrower’s checking account. That instantly adds dollars to the money supply.

When the federal government spends, it sends instructions to a creditor’s bank, instructing the bank to increase the numbers in the creditor’s checking account. When the bank does as instructed, dollars are added to the money supply.

This participation in the vast majority of all dollar creation gives banks enormous financial power, and as we all know — and the “Great Recession of 2008” reminds us —  power corrupts banks, especially when multiplied by a profit motive and government complicity.

Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, and that makes all the difference. The government neither needs nor uses profits, and unlike bank employees, federal government employees do not receive remunerations based on federal agency profits.

In Summary: No public purpose is served when the banking industry is in private hands.

For many of the same reasons that the U.S. Treasury is owned by the federal government, not by the private sector, the federal government should nationalize and run all banks. 

The article describing the need for Step 9 tells why banks become corrupt, though most Americans believe that the bank they use is essentially honest and accurate.

That belief is naive.

BuzzFeed News
FINCEN FILES

The FinCEN Files investigation is based on thousands of “suspicious activity reports” and other US government documents that BuzzFeed News has shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and more than 100 news organizations around the world.

It offers an unprecedented view of global financial corruption, the banks enabling it, and the government agencies that fail to stop it.

Prior to this reporting, very few SARs had ever been revealed. The FinCEN Files encompass more than 2,100. Here is what the investigation has uncovered (I urge you to click the next link to read the full article):

8 Things You Need To Know About The Dark Side Of The World’s Biggest Banks, As Revealed In The FinCEN Files

Big banks around the world approve trillions of dollars of suspicious transactions despite their own staff’s warnings that they might be related to crime.

Terror networks, drug cartels, organized crime rings, and rapacious kleptocrats have all benefited, using the US financial system to wash clean their illicit profits.

The banks — and their shareholders — make a profit off all this activity, while the transfers help these notorious figures sow misery around the world.

The US government is informed of these transactions through “suspicious activity reports” (SARs) that banks file.

Those reports are designed to aid the fight against money laundering, but experts say the system contains a crucial loophole: Banks are required to file alerts to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN — but not to halt the suspicious activity or to stop serving shadowy clients.

Sources told BuzzFeed News that the vast majority of these reports, also known as SARs, are never even read, much less investigated.

One of the biggest money laundering schemes in memory became an international scandal for Deutsche Bank; top executives there had been warned the bank was at risk of being exploited by criminals.

(You may remember that Deutche Bank also inexplicably made over $2 billion in loans to Donald Trump when no other banks would touch him.)

There are plenty of laws on the books, that should prohibit banks from ignoring SARs. But the lesson is: The profit motive is the strongest power in the universe — stronger than all the armies and all the police in all the nations on earth.   Money leads to crime. Big money leads to unstoppable big crime.

Consider this article:

HSBC, Europe’s largest bank, had just been caught allowing a network of drug kingpins, including the notorious Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, to launder more than $880 million through its accounts. And it had brazenly done business in off-limits countries such as Sudan and Myanmar.

HSBC executives pleaded for another chance, and the US Department of Justice granted it: Admit your guilt, pay $1.9 billion in fines, and submit to an independent monitor.

But, even under the most intensive scrutiny, the bank continued to facilitate and profit from transactions it suspected were dirty.

At the end of the monitor’s five-year tenure, he said HSBC had made progress, but the bank itself told shareholders that he found it was still not “adequately managing financial crime risk.”

And, consider this article:

Elizabeth Warren And Bernie Sanders Want Big Banking Reforms Following The FinCEN Files Investigations
Warren called for the creation of a new unit in the US Treasury Department, separate from FinCEN, “to investigate these types of financial crimes.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren called on Monday for reforming the government practice of offering banks deferred prosecution agreements instead of real punishments when they are caught abetting money laundering, one of the problems highlighted in the series.

She also called for the passage of her so-called Ending Too Big to Jail Act, legislation she introduced in 2018 that she said would hold Wall Street executives criminally accountable when the banks they lead break the law. This, she said, would stop the practice of allowing “bankers to walk away with drop in the bucket settlements and slaps on the wrist.”

Yes, bankers should be jailed for criminal activities, but Warren’s and Sanders’s program will do little-to-nothing for two reasons:

  1. If the threat of jail could stop crime, there would be no crime. Given sufficient motivation (big profits), there will be big crime. Laws are insufficient.
    Laws have not stopped the drug trade. Laws did not stop alcohol during prohibition. Laws did not stop gambling. Money is stronger than the threat of punishment.
  2. The only way to reduce crime –not “stop;” crime can’t be stopped– is to reduce the motivation.

The prime motivator for bank crime is bank profits.

Rather than passing more laws that will be broken, the federal government should merely remove the profit motive from banking by eliminating private banking.

All banks should be owned by the federal government, which has no need for profits.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Proud boys and brown shirts, all part of the pattern

Well, we can’t say we weren’t warned:

Here are just a few warnings through the years:

Why does bigotry work so well? Monday, Sep 7 2020

America is now in its greatest danger since the Civil War. Sunday, Aug 23 2020

The four characters in a dictatorship Saturday, Aug 15 2020

Your America on the brink. Don’t give Trump the excuse he so desperately wants. Wednesday, Jun 10 2020

“Lügenpresse”: Hitler’s “fake news.” We’re making the same mistake, again. December 10, 2017

Astounding similarities: Hitler in America. It’s happening now. Friday, Sep 30 2016

Hitler redux Monday, Dec 7 2015

Hitler in America. Why a bigot can win the Presidency Saturday, Jul 4 2015

The above are articles published on this blog. There are thousands more, published elsewhere.

Trump has been so obvious as a Hitler wannabe that the earliest of these posts were published before Trump was even elected.

Now, Trump has said, “I am urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully, because that’s what has to happen. I am urging them to do it.”

And what are these supporters supposed to do, other than intimidate voters — especially minority voters — and frighten them away? Of course, that is the plan: To eliminate America’s voting democracy.

People who follow Trump’s advice and hang around watching polling places will be prosecuted, Nevada’s attorney general says

Nevada’s attorney general said he would prosecute people who follow President Donald Trump’s advice to go to polling places and monitor votes being counted, accusing the president of encouraging voter intimidation.

During his first debate against the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, on Tuesday, Trump refused to commit to accepting the results of the November election and repeated his unsubstantiated claims that mail-in voting is open to widespread fraud.

Trump falsely claimed that poll watchers with his campaign were being wrongly barred from satellite in-person absentee voting sites in Philadelphia.

In reality, as The Philadelphia Inquirer reported, no poll watchers affiliated with the Trump campaign are certified to observe polls in the state of Pennsylvania.

And then there are these excerpts:

Considering what he was up against, Biden did fine.

How can one respond to a man who barks one lie after another while refusing to keep his pestilential maw shut for a mere two minutes so his opponent can speak?

Try to respond to one lie and he lets loose another four and drowns you out with them before you’re done.

But the Trump campaign came into the debate pushing the line that Biden is a senile old man. Biden more than demonstrated that isn’t true.

Most of all, Biden came off like a politician, citing policies and data and hitting the president over his record while occasionally trying to raise his own rhetoric to the lofty heights traditionally favored by men and women in public life, seeking the honor of winning its highest office.

Trump is utterly incapable of running to the center of public opinion, of making an appeal to a broader range of voters.

So he just gets louder and meaner with the same old extreme, right-wing, Republican message, hoping and expecting that a wider swath of the public will submit to the assault.

If anyone out there still believes that in some way Trump is less dangerous to America than Hitler was to Germany, I pity that person’s ignorance of history. Never could the German people imagine the Hitlerian horrors that were to befall them. They would have laughed at warnings. No German laughs, now.

At least, Germans had an excuse for following their madman. Their economy had been shredded by World War I and by the appalling terms forced upon them by the winning Allies.

For America, the “Great Recession” was bad, but the economy was not nearly so bad as 1930s Germany’s was, and it was recovering. Nevertheless, some Americans wanted change, and boy did they get it. In spades. We Americans received change from a benevolent, caring society to a mean-spirited, bile-filled nightmare.

The darkness that is Trump has spread over the land. All he offers is hatred and more hatred — hatred of blacks, hatred of browns, hatred of gays, hatred of Muslims, hatred of the media, hatred of Obama, hatred of Democrats, hatred of liberals, hatred of the poor, hatred of immigrants, hatred of all other democracies, hatred of our democracy, hatred of former associates and relatives who tell the truth about him.

Trump’s hatred is as contagious as the COVID and much more deadly. America is learning that. Like the COVID does, Trumpian hatred will continue to punish us for many years.

There is no compassion in Trump. He “loves” only murderous dictators like Putin and Kim. But truly, he loves only himself.

In Germany, the politicians who followed Hitler to disaster later denied their involvement. In America, it will be the same.

The Republican Party was not always cold and without humanity. It was actually conservative, meaning it wished to conserve America’s traditionally humane mores and care for the underdog. That was one part of the American dream.

But first with the Nixon “Southern Strategy” (an appeal to Southern, white bigotry), and then the dawning of the Tea Party (a merciless, pro-rich ideology), the Republicans’ hearts hardened.

Today, the GOP is a party of “punish ’em,” “deport ’em,” “wall ’em out,” and “kick ’em while they’re down,” with the primary solution to every problem being to blame the victims for their own misery. To the right-wing, compassion is for “losers.”

Never is expressed a concern about the have-nots in America, even by the right-wing have-nots themselves. In a tad more than five weeks, at the behest of the right-wing, 20 million Americans may lose their healthcare insurance coverage, while innocent children at out southern border will continue to be tortured by sadists.

The pusillanimous right-wingers, the Lindsey Grahams and the Fox News know-nothings, who echo Trump’s every lie, will upon his exit from office, deny they ever knew him, just as Trump denies ever knowing any former associate who has a bad truth to say about him.

There are reasons why Germany has no statues of Hitler. I am quite sure that, for similar reasons, America will have no statues of Donald Trump.

Ever.

Meanwhile, as we teeter on the edge of tyranny, one only can pray that those who express so much love for Jesus and for unborn fetuses, also will begin to shed some tears for already-born children of color and of poverty — and for the future of our once-great nation.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

A letter that every politician and every voter should read

I just received the following letter from a woman, Elizabeth Estrada Lopez, who read the recent post, Affordable housing laws are not a solution. They are a symptom.

I was so impressed by her situation and by her wisdom, I wanted to share her letter, and my response, with you. She wrote:

Lack of money or low wages is a valid point.

Affordable housing is not fair housing.

Many below & poverty level wage people, like myself, who work very hard and need affordable housing, are placed in impoverished areas or areas where there is no public transportation and end up paying more in gasoline to travel back and forth to work & grocery shopping that is it a lose-lose proposition.

People fail to thrive grouped in impoverished communities.

The environment is a daily discouragement creating more stress and low self-esteem. This is my experience and is not a blanket statement that covers the world.

I responded, “Thank you, Ms. Lopez. I hope you don’t mind that I intend to quote you in a future post. You make several good points that I would like to write about. Be well, Rodger Malcolm Mitchell.

She, in turn, wrote, “Yes Sir. I want to help society in any way I can.”

Oh, if only our politicians had the same attitude as Ms. Lopez.

As the article stated, the widespread, false belief that the federal deficit and debt are too high, “unaffordable.” and “sustainable” is fostered and disseminated by the rich to keep down those “below & poverty level” people like you.

The reason is “Gap Psychology, the desire to distance oneself from those below, on any comparative measure.

“Rich” is a comparative, not an absolute, term.  A man having $1,000 is rich if everyone else has $1,000, but he is poor if everyone else has $1 million. So, there are two ways to become richer: Obtain more for yourself, or force others to have less.

Poverty is not a lack of work. Poverty is not a lack of effort. Poverty is not a lack of intelligence. Poverty is a lack of money, and the solution to a lack of money is to give impoverished people money.

Period.

The federal government has infinite money. The federal government could and should give people money. Doing so, would eliminate, or at least dramatically reduce, poverty.

There is another, widespread, false belief, and that is, if the government gives people money, they won’t work.

The rich like to portray the poor as lazy and deserving of their poverty. So in the minds of the rich (and many in the middle-income groups) giving people money is immoral, in that is encourages sloth.

Utter nonsense.

The fact is that by any standard, the poor on average work harder than those above them, economically. No one labors less than the rich except for the very rich.

Sadly, even Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), an economic philosophy that understands the federal government’s unlimited money supply, offers as a solution, something they call a “Jobs Guarantee” (JG). It is a process by which the federal government finds or creates minimum-wage jobs for the unemployed.

The only thing the “Jobs Guarantee” guarantees is that the poor will work hard, stay poor, and live in the impoverished areas you described, and never escape.

Question for economists and politicians: If the poor need money, why give them minimum wage jobs? Why not give them the money they need?

Answer: Because of some deeply ingrained belief that “if given money, the poor won’t work. They need the moral pride that comes with having a job.”

Again, utter, puritanical and paternalistic nonsense. A minimum wage job does not provide morality or pride. It only provides insufficient money, together with the “daily discouragement creating more stress and low self-esteem” you, Ms. Lopez, described.

If a person loses her job, has she suddenly become lazy or immoral? Of course not, but it is a myth the rich like to spread.

Today’s America reminds me of a billionaire uncle who won’t help his impoverished nieces and nephews because of self-proclaimed “moral reasons.”

My heart goes out to you, Ms. Lopez. You write like an intelligent and decent woman, whose poverty is not due to any character flaw, but rather to fate.

When I read a letter such as yours, all I can think is, “There but for the grace of God, go I.

I will send a copy of your letter to a few Senators and Representatives. Perhaps they will think more seriously about how to help the impoverished, and not merely disparage them.

Meanwhile, you and your family, friends, and neighbors, please be sure to vote for the politicians most likely to empathize with your plight, and offer real solutions.

One day, Americans will understand the needs of the poor, the power of our government, and the solutions for the less fortunate. Some may say, “yes, but not now.” I say, “If not now, when?”

Much good fortune to you,

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

The “Medicare for All” controversy

Because I have Medicare coverage, I received in the mail, my copy of “Medicare & You, 2021.”   Feel free to read it by clicking the link.

Though it is a huge book, about 140 pages long, describing many Medicare rules and coverages, it is not comprehensive. Medicare rules are complex, and there is much more a person needs to know.

For instance, individual states have separate rules, so many questions need to be answered by individual state representatives. And all the costs must be found elsewhere.

There may be three people on earth who have read and understand all the Medicare laws — or maybe not even three.

Here is Medicare’s brief summary:

To Qualify For Medicare:
If you’re already getting benefits from Social Security or the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), you’ll automatically get Part A and Part B starting
the first day of the month you turn 65.

If you’re under 65 and have a disability, you’ll automatically get Part A and Part B after you get disability benefits from Social Security or certain disability benefits from the RRB for 24 months.

If you live in Puerto Rico, you don’t automatically get Part B. You must sign up for it.

If you have ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also called Lou Gehrig’s disease), you’ll get Part A and Part B automatically the month your Social
Security disability benefits begin.

If you don’t want Part B, let us know before the coverage start date on your Medicare card. If you do nothing, you’ll keep Part B and will have to pay Part B premiums through your Social Security benefits. If you choose not to keep Part B but decide you want it later, you may have to wait to enroll and pay a penalty for as long as you have Part B

Summaries of benefits:

And this doesn’t even touch on the ten (!) different “Medigap” plans that cover some of what original Medicare doesn’t. The descriptions of these ten plans begin on page 71.

And then there are the numerous Medicare Part D (prescription drugs) plans.  We won’t even get into the convoluted, complex rules, and various coverage alternatives described on pp 75-85.

Another of the big problems with the Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Medigap, and Part D program is: You cannot know which plan is best for you.

The reason: You don’t know what your health situation will be in the coming months and years. You are forced to guess. So if you choose a plan that doesn’t cover your future misfortune, you’re out of luck.

Further, if you have a serious condition, and wish to change Medigap plans, you may not be able to find one that will accept you.

There are a great many limitations on who and what the various Medicare plans will cover, and none of it is free. You supposedly pay for it as part of your payroll taxes. We say “supposedly,” because every penny you pay in any federal taxes — payroll, income, etc. — every penny is destroyed upon receipt.

So you pay needlessly for incomplete, complex plans. Additionally, Medigap and Part D require separate, out-of-pocket premiums.

In short, unless you are a rocket scientist who also can see the future, you probably can’t have the plan that’s best for you.

There is a better way. In addition to eliminating the useless and regressive payroll tax, Medicare itself can and should be improved.

Here is a suggested summary of a Medicare for All plan:

To Qualify for Medicare for All:
You are a citizen of the United States, or you have lived in the United States and its territories, for at least 6 months in the previous calendar year.

Summary of the benefits:
1. You can go to any doctor or hospital that is accepted by Medicare for All, anywhere in the world.
2. You do not need a referral to see a specialist.
3. All medical services, including doctor, hospital, medically necessary services, and pharmaceutical costs (including dental, vision, and periodical examinations and treatments are covered by Medicare for All. There are no co-pays, deductibles, or out-of-pocket costs.
4. No pre-approvals are necessary.
5. There are no cost-limits.

That’s it. There is no need to determine which plan is best for you. The one plan is comprehensive. The federal government will pay for everything.

And lest you think such a plan will be too costly, remember this: The U.S. federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. That means it has the unlimited ability to pay for anything. It never can run short of dollars.

Proof of that is occurring right now, as this year the federal government has pumped an additional $4 trillion+ into the economy to help America survive the economic costs of the COVID-19 virus.

The more the federal government spends, the more economic stimulus the economy receives.

And no, federal spending never causes inflation, which always is caused by shortages, usually shortages of food or energy. Those notorious Zimbabwe and Weimar hyperinflations were caused by scarcities, not the resultant money-printing.

Then, we come to Congressional fear of insurance companies. These companies are nothing but middlemen between you and your healthcare providers.

They bribe your Congressional representatives to maintain the status quo. They add nothing; they merely pass your money along, while extracting a piece for themselves.

Original Medicare eliminated some of the insurance middlemen. It now is time to eliminate the rest.

Finally, we come to the dreaded word, “socialism.” Although the vast majority of Americans favor Medicare and its benefits, any expansion and simplification of these benefits is immediately and wrongly attacked as “socialism.”

It isn’t socialism. Socialism is government ownership and control over resources, not government spending. Medicare and Social Security are not socialism. The biggest example of socialism in America is the U.S.

military. Shall we do away with the military?

The VA hospitals, the federal highway system, NASA, the FBI and CIA are socialism. Shall we do away with them?

The “socialism” epithet is a lie when applied to Medicare for All. It is a lie designed to keep you from having the same healthcare the rich have.

Bottom Line
The United States has one of the worst medical programs of any major nation. The reason solely is due to debt fear-mongers who falsely proclaim that federal spending is “unsustainable.”

Given the federal government’s unlimited access to dollars, a simpler, more comprehensive health-care plan, totally funded by the federal government, can and should be instituted.

The fact that America doesn’t have one is a disgrace. We have a whole suite of expensive, yet inferior, incomplete plans, foisted on us by Congressional and Presidential cowardice and ignorance.

You deserve better.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO IMPROVE AND PROTECT THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE.

The most important problems in economics involve:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

  1. Eliminate FICA
  2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D, plus long-term care — for everyone
  3. Social Security for all or a reverse income tax
  4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
  5. Salary for attending school
  6. Eliminate federal taxes on business
  7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 
  8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.
  9. Federal ownership of all banks
  10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY