Unlike state/local governments, the U.S. government is Monetarily Sovereign. That means it never, NEVER, unintentionally can run short of its own sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar.
Federal taxes do not support federal spending. Even if all federal tax collections ceased, the federal government could continue spending forever.
The federal government has infinite money. It cannot run short of dollars.
The federal debt and deficit are not a burden on anyone — not on you, not on your grandchildren. On the contrary, when federal debt growth slows, we have recessions and depressions, which are cured by increases in federal debt growth.
Inflations never are caused by federal deficit spending. Inflations always are caused by shortages, most often by shortages of food and/or energy. In fact, inflations often are cured by deficit spending to obtain and distribute the scarce goods.
Federal deficit spending itself is not socialism. Socialism is government ownership and control. That said, some forms of socialism are good for the economy. Examples: Virtually all streets and highways, Social Security, public parks and beaches, many museums and zoos, many rivers and lakes, the military and VA hospitals, many libraries, federal lands, federal buildings, federal agencies like NASA, FBI, and CIA.
Government in itself is neither good nor bad. Government is a tool. The function of the tool is to improve and protect the lives of the people. To the degree it fulfills that mission, it is good. Where it fails that mission, it is bad. Mere size is not an issue any more than the size of the pencil in the voter’s booth is an issue.
I. Given Congress’s infinite checkbook, why is there even a discussion of a government shutdown?
II. The Democrats had suggested $1,200 checks. Even Trump wanted $2,000 checks. Why was this reduced to $600, and still is being debated, in face of the private sector’s worst financial crisis in many years?
III. Why exclude assistance to states?
IV. Why has Congress struggled for months to produce a plan for preventing/curing the COVID recession, that has hurt so many people?
V. Pfizer Says Millions of COVID-19 Vaccine Doses Are Sitting Unclaimed in Warehouse Coolers. The federal government has not given the company shipping instructions. Why?
You can contact your Senator or Representative– that person to whom you gave your valuable vote — and ask these questions.
Do you think you will get an informative answer? An honest answer? An intelligent answer?
If not, why did you toss away your vote on an uninformative, dishonest, unintelligent fool?
What should Congress really do? Institute the Ten Steps to Prosperity (below) immediately, especially rush Step #3: Social Security for All.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
Rule #2. Eventually, Trump will stab you in the back
Rule #3. If it’s good, Trump created it. If it’s bad, you ruined it.
Rule #4. There is no discernable difference between a lie and a truth.
Rule #5. People who sacrifice without reward are suckers.
Rule #6. Trump is not the center of the universe; Trump is the universe.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Attorney General William Barr did everything he could to ingratiate himself with President Trump. As Eric Zorn wrote for the Chicago Tribune:
Before this week, it was tough to identify the single most infamous act of William Barr’s tenure as U.S. attorney general.
Was it personally ordering the expansion of the security perimeter around Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C., in early June, clearing out protesters with tear gas just prior to President Donald Trump‘s photo-op holding up a Bible in front of St. John’s Episcopal Church?
Barr offered a flimsy argument for why Trump didn’t obstruct justice when he told Barr to remove special counsel Robert Mueller in the middle of his Russia probe.
Was it issuing a preemptive summary of the 2019 report of special counsel Robert Mueller into Russian election interference that a federal judge later characterized as “distorted” and “misleading” for the way he downplayed Trump’s obstruction of justice and abuse of power?
Was it openly campaigning for Trump by parroting the line of right-wing hysterics that electing moderate Democrat Joe Biden would mean our nation was “irrevocably committed to the socialist path”?
Was it his amplification and endorsement of Trump’s charge that the Obama administration had “spied on” the Trump campaign even though Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded that the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election had been properly predicated?
Was Barr’s most infamous act overruling his own prosecutors and seeking leniency for Trump pal Roger Stone after Stone’s conviction on witness tampering and lying to investigators? That move was infamous enough that four federal prosecutors quit over it.
Or, related, was it trying to drop the case against Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who’d pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI?
Was it having the Justice Department intervene on Trump’s behalf in a civil defamation suit filed by a woman who claimed Trump had raped her in the 1990s?
Was it declaring that pandemic-related restrictions such as stay-at-home orders were “the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in American history”aside from slavery? House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., called that remark one of the “most ridiculous, tone-deaf, God-awful things I’ve ever heard.”
Was it casting doubt in advance on the integrity of the 2020 electionwith a series of unsupported warnings about fraud and foreign plots to defeat Trump?
Was it ignoring long-standing Justice Department policies after the 2020 election and authorizing prosecutors to investigate allegations of voter fraud before the results of the race were certified? That move, which weakened a safeguard protecting elections from partisan interference, prompted the Justice Department official in charge of voter fraud investigations, Richard Pilger, to step down almost immediately.
Or was it writing this cringeworthy, fawning letter of resignation?
Here are some excerpts: I have bolded some of the “highlights.”
“Dear Mr. President,
“I am greatly honored that you called on me to serve your Administration and the American people once again as Attorney General. I am proud to have played a role in the many successes and unprecedented achievements you have delivered for the American people.
“Your record is all the more historic because you accomplished it in the face of relentless, implacable resistance. Your 2016 victory speech in which you reached out to your opponents and called for working together for the benefit of the American people was immediately met by a partisan onslaught against you in which no tactic, no matter how abusing and deceitful, was out of bounds.
“The nadir of this campaign was the effort to cripple, if not oust, your Administration with frenzied and baseless accusations of collusion with Russia.”
Consider that this is a letter of resignation, not an obituary, but it is loaded with shameless adulation and applause for the boss, and not a word of truth to be found.
The unrelenting brown-nosing continues:
“Few could have weathered these attacks, much less forge ahead with a positive program for the country. You built the strongest and most resilient economy in American history — one that has brought unprecedented progressto those previously left out. You have restored American military strength.
“By brokering historing peace deals in the Mideast you have achieved what most thought impossible. You have curbed illegal immigrationand enhanced the security of our nation’s borders.
“You have advanced the rule of law by appointing a record number of judges committed to constitutional principles. With Operation Warp Speed, you delivered a vaccine for coronavirus on a schedule no one thoguht conveivable — a feat that will undoubtedly save millions of lives.”
This is not the place to argue why each of the bolded phrases actually is a misstatement of fact. Rather, the point is the butt-kissing, toadying nature of the so-called “letter of resignation,” that have little-to-nothing to do with Barr or with his resignation.
Ah, but Barr has even more butt-kissing to do:
“During your Administration, the Department of Justice has worked tirelessly to protect the public from violent crime; worked closely with leaders in Mexico to fight the drug cartels; cracked down on China‘s exploitation of our economy and workers; defended competitonin the marketplace, especially the technology sector; and supported the men and women of law enforcement who selflessly — and too often thanklessly — risk their lives to keep our communities safe.”
Far be it for us to point out that neither Trump nor Barr has done any of the above, nor will we be so discourteous as to point out how many of those under Barr have resigned in disgust.
He ends with a final bit of suckup:
“Wishing you, Melania, and your family a Merry Christmas and a Blessed Holiday Season. God Bless.”
Well, surely no one could possibly have done more to leave lip prints on the boss’s rear than Barr, not only with this bootlicking and mendacious letter, but with his ongoing job performance.
As House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler said,
“From misleading the American publicabout the Mueller report to his dangerous efforts to overturn COVID safety measures, from his callous disregard for civil rights to his rampant politicization of the Justice Department, William Barr was willing to do the president’s bidding on every front but one.
“Barr refused to play along with President Trump’s nonsensical claims to have won the election. He is now out as attorney general one month early.”
And here was Barr’s reward for drowning his reputation in mud, hoping to please Donald Trump:
“Joe Biden lied on the debate stage he said there’s nothing happening, nothing happening, and Bill Barr should have stepped up.
“All he had to do is say an investigation is going on.
“But when you affect an election … when they are saying things, making statements and the press is purposely not reporting it, Bill Barr, I believe, not believe I know, had an obligation to set the record straight.”
Trump said that Barr should have acted more like then-special counsel Robert Mueller, who was heading the Russia probe, and disputed a 2019 BuzzFeed report that Trump directed his former personal lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.
“But Bob Mueller stood up and he interjected that this article was false. Bill Barr should have done the same.”
Barr, through sad experience, learned the Six Rules of Trump, though far too late to save his tattered reputation.
But I shed no tears for Barr, nor do I shed tears for Steve Bannon, Tom Price, Scott Pruitt, Ben Carson, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, Michael Cohen, Wilbur Ross, Chris Collins, Duncan Hunter, Salvatore Testa, Tony Salerno, Roger Stone, Felix Sater, Jeffrey Epstein, Alexander Acosta, George Papadopoulos, Alex Van der Zwaan, Konstantin Kilimnik, Ralph Shortey, Timothy Nolan, et al.
Barr came in believing he could be the right-hand man to a king — perhaps even the controlling voice behind the throne. Instead, he became just another Trump joker, now discarded by the poseur.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
Given his narcissism and predilection for lying, it was unseemly but not surprising when Trump, peddling fantastical theories about massive voter fraud, refused to accept defeat, despite a cascade of contrary court decisions.
Fear does strange things to a man
But he isn’t alone in ensuring that the presidency Biden will claim on Jan. 20 is a poisoned chalice.
Top congressional Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellof Kentucky and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, have acquiesced in Trump’s disinformation campaign, hiding behind pious statements about counting every legal vote.
As Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro noted in his devastating response, the Supreme Court “should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated.”
Here is a list of the Republican Representatives who, on behalf of Donald Trump, attempted a coup. They voted to commit treason. They tried to destroy our democracy by canceling the votes of millions of Americans, to make Donald Trump the dictator.
We fought the Revolutionary War to overthrow a dictator and to install a democracy, and today, after 240 years, the Republican party has become so corrupted by Trump, it is attempting to undo the sacrifices of previous generations.
Russia, China, North Korea et al, would like nothing better than for our democracy to fail. Fortunately, despite the efforts of America’s enemies, our democracy has survived this blatantly right-wing extremist effort.
Not only have dozens of Republican judges rejected all of Trump’s lawsuits, but the Republican-dominated Supreme Court refused even to consider this unconstitutional effort.
There is only one word that aptly describes these lawmakers, and that word is “traitor.”
Keep this list handy for the next election, coming in only two years. It will help you vote for democracy and against treason.
(We would be remiss if we didn’t add Senator Ted Cruz to the list of traitors, as Cruz hungrily begged to be the lead lawyer prosecuting the suit).
Mike Johnson, Fourth Congressional District, Louisiana
Gary Palmer, Sixth Congressional District, Alabama
Kevin McCarthy, Twenty-Third Congressional District, of California
Steve Scalise First Congressional District, Louisiana
Jim Jordan Fourth Congressional District Ohio
Ralph Abraham, Fifth Congressional District, Louisiana
Robert Aderholt, Fourth Congressional District, Alabama
Rick W. Allen, Twelfth Congressional District, Georgia
Jodey Arrington, Nineteenth Congressional District, Texas
Brian Babin Thirty-Sixth Congressional District Texas
James R. Baird, Fourth Congressional District, Indiana
Jim Banks Third Congressional District Indiana
Jack Bergman, First Congressional District, Michigan
Andy Biggs Fifth Congressional District Arizona
Gus Bilirakis Twelfth Congressional District Florida,
Dan Bishop Ninth Congressional District North Carolina
Mike Bost Twelfth Congressional District Illinois
Kevin Brady Eighth Congressional District Texas
Mo Brooks Fifth Congressional District Alabama
Ken Buck Fourth Congressional District Colorado
Ted Budd Thirteenth Congressional District North, Carolina
Tim Burchett, Second Congressional District, Tennessee
Michael C. Burgess, Twenty-Sixth Congressional District, of Texas
Bradley Byrne, First Congressional District, Alabama
Ken Calvert Forty-Second Congressional District California
Earl L. “Buddy” Carter, First Congressional District, Georgia
Ben Cline Sixth Congressional District Virginia
Michael Cloud, Twenty-Seventh Congressional, District Texas
Doug Collins Ninth Congressional District Georgia
Mike Conaway, Eleventh Congressional District, Texas
Rick Crawford, First Congressional District, Arkansas
Dan Crenshaw, Second Congressional District, Texas
Scott DesJarlais, Fourth Congressional District, Tennessee
Mario Diaz-Balart, Twenty-Fifth Congressional District, of Florida
Jeff Duncan Third Congressional District South Carolina
Neal P. Dunn, M.D., Second Congressional District, Florida
Tom Emmer Sixth Congressional District Minnesota
Ron Estes Fourth Congressional District Kansas
A. Drew Ferguson, IV, Third Congressional District, Georgia
Chuck Fleischmann, Third Congressional District, Tennessee
Bill Flores Seventeenth Congressional District Texas in
Jeff Fortenberry, First Congressional District, Nebraska
Virginia Foxx, Fifth Congressional District North, Carolina
Russ Fulcher First Congressional District Idaho
Matt Gaetz First Congressional District Florida
Greg Gianforte, At Large Congressional District, Montana
Bob Gibbs Seventh Congressional District Ohio
Louie Gohmert, First Congressional District Texas
Lance Gooden, Fifth Congressional District, Texas.
Sam Graves Sixth Congressional District Missouri
Mark Green Seventh Congressional District Tennessee
H. Morgan Griffith, Ninth Congressional District, Virginia
Michael Guest, Third Congressional District, Mississippi
Jim Hagedorn, First Congressional District, Minnesota
Andy Harris, M.D., First Congressional District, Maryland
Vicky Hartzler, Fourth Congressional District, Missouri
Kevin Hern First Congressional District Oklahoma
Jody Hice Tenth Congressional District Georgia
Clay Higgins Third Congressional District Louisiana
Trey Hollingsworth, Ninth Congressional District, Indiana
Richard Hudson, Eighth Congressional District, North Carolina
Bill Huizenga, Second Congressional District, Michigan
Bill Johnson Sixth Congressional District Ohio
John Joyce Thirteenth Congressional District, Pennsylvania
Fred Keller Twelfth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Mike Kelly Sixteenth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Trent Kelly First Congressional District Mississippi
Steve King Fourth Congressional District Iowa
David Kustoff, Eighth Congressional District, Tennessee
Darin LaHood, Eighteenth Congressional District, Illinois
Doug LaMalfa, First Congressional District, California
Doug Lamborn, Fifth Congressional District, Colorado
Robert E. Latta, Fifth Congressional District Ohio
Debbie Lesko, Eighth Congressional District, Arizona
Billy Long Seventh Congressional District Missouri in
Barry Loudermilk, Eleventh Congressional District, Georgia
Blaine Luetkemeyer, Third Congressional District, Missouri
Kenny Marchant, Twenty-Fourth Congressional, District Texas
Roger Marshall, M.D., First Congressional District, Kansas
Tom McClintock, Fourth Congressional District, California
Cathy McMorris, Rodgers Fifth Congressional District, of Washington
Dan Meuser Ninth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Carol D. Miller, Third Congressional District West, Virginia
John Moolenaar, Fourth Congressional District, Michigan
Alex X. Mooney, Second Congressional District West, Virginia
Markwayne Mullin, Second Congressional District, Oklahoma
Gregory Murphy, M.D., Third Congressional District North, Carolina
Dan Newhouse, Fourth Congressional District, Washington
Ralph Norman, Fifth Congressional District South, Carolina
Steven Palazzo, Fourth Congressional District, Mississippi
Greg Pence Sixth Congressional District, Indiana
Scott Perry Tenth Congressional District Pennsylvania
Bill Posey Eighth Congressional District, Florida
Guy Reschenthaler, Fourteenth Congressional District, Pennsylvania
Tom Rice, Seventh Congressional District South Carolina
Mike Rogers Third Congressional District, Alabama
John Rose Sixth Congressional District, Tennessee
David Rouzer, Seventh Congressional District, North Carolina
John Rutherford, Fourth Congressional District, Florida
Austin Scott Eighth Congressional District, Georgia
Mike Simpson, Second Congressional District, Idaho
Adrian Smith, Third Congressional District, Nebraska
Jason Smith Eighth Congressional District, Missouri
Ross Spano Fifteenth Congressional District, Florida
Pete Stauber Eighth Congressional District Minnesota in
Elise Stefanik, Twenty-First Congressional District, New York
W. Gregory Steube, Seventeenth Congressional District, New Jersey
Glenn “GT” Thompson, Fifteenth Congressional District, Pennsylvania
Tom Tiffany Seventh Congressional District, Wisconsin
William Timmons, Fourth Congressional District, South Carolina
Jeff Van Drew, Second Congressional District, South Carolina
Ann Wagner Second Congressional District Missouri
Tim Walberg Seventh Congressional District Michigan
Mark Walker, Sixth Congressional District North, Carolina
Jackie Walorski, Second Congressional District, Indiana
Michael Waltz, Sixth Congressional District, Florida
Randy Weber, Fourteenth Congressional District, Texas
Daniel Webster, Eleventh Congressional District, Florida
Brad Wenstrup, Second Congressional District, Ohio
Bruce Westerman, Fourth Congressional District, Arkansas
Roger Williams, Twenty-Fifth Congressional District, of Texas
Joe Wilson Second Congressional District South Carolina
Rob Wittman, First Congressional District, Virginia
Ron Wright Sixth Congressional District, Texas
Ted S. Yoho Third Congressional District, Florida
Lee Zeldin First Congressional District, New York
And soon will come the riots by enemies of America (posing as patriots) who haven’t the slightest notion about what a democracy is. They don’t believe the voters. They don’t believe the judges. They don’t believe the media.
They believe only Donald Trump, he of the 22,000+ lies, and his sycophants.
There is a penalty for their ignorance. Sadly, America’s democracy will have to get through this, somehow.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps:
You may or may not be an economist, but every day, you and your friends discuss government spending, taxes, deficits, debts, interest rates, recessions, depressions, and inflation. You talk about Medicare, Obamacare, Social Security, global warming, military funding, dams, streets and highways, flood and windstorm remediation, poverty, college, crime, rents and home prices, and, of course, politics — all of which are related to economics.
When speaking about our economy, everyone is an expert.
Really?
Give this short True/False test to your friends to see whether they truly know what they are talking about. Five correct out of ten is well above average.
Questions — True (T) or False (F):
A dollar bill is a form of money. ________
The recent growth of the federal debt is unsustainable. ________
Unlike the federal government, a state government can run short of U.S. dollars. ________
Massive federal deficit spending leads to inflation. ________
Gold is a form of money. ________
Federal taxes fund federal government spending. ________
Too little federal deficit growth leads to recessions and depressions. ________
The huge federal debt will be a burden on future taxpayers. ________
The federal government cannot afford to pay for Medicare for All, Social Security for All, and College for All.________
Massive federal deficit spending is socialism. ________
IS THIS MONEY?
ANSWERS: 1. False. A dollar bill is a title to a dollar. Just as a car title is not a car, and a house title is not a house, a dollar bill is not a dollar. It is a non-interest-paying bearer instrument, that indicates the bearer owns a dollar.
If you happen to own a bond, and you have a piece of paper in your safe deposit vault, that piece of paper is not in itself, a bond. It is just evidence you own a bond.
The actual dollar (or bond) is merely a number on a balance sheet. Numbers, dollars, and bonds have no physical existence. They all are merely data. One day, the dollar bill may become totally obsolete, and we will pay all our debts online with invisible, non-physical dollars.
Thus, money and bonds are the same thing. All money is a zero-interest form of debt. On the dollar billare the words, “Federal Reserve note.” “Bill” and “note” are words that connote debt.
If you buy a car on credit, you create a note, i.e., you create money. Borrowing money creates money because all money is debt. When you spend on a credit card, you create money, and when you pay the credit card company, you destroy money.
2. False. The federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. It created the first U.S. dollars out of thin air. It created as many as it wished and gave them the value it wished.
The federal government still has the infinite ability to create U.S. dollars out of thin air. What is known as federal “debt” actually is the total of deposits into Treasury security accounts, similar to bank savings accounts.
Because the federal government has the infinite ability to create dollars, it never touches the dollars in T-security accounts.
That is why the federal government does not borrow; it doesn’t need to. The federal government never can run short of dollars.
Those “debt” dollars remain in the accounts, gathering interest, until the accounts mature, at which time the government merely returns the balance to the account owner.
Why does the government allow people to make deposits into T-security accounts if it doesn’t need or use the money? Two primary reasons:
A. To provide a safe parking place for unused dollars, which helps stabilize the dollar.
B. To help the government control interest rates.
3. True. State and local governments’ finances are like yours and mine: Monetarily NON-sovereign. We are not the issuers of the U.S. dollar and we do not have the infinite ability to create dollars.
We do, however, have some ability to create dollars, which we do by lending and borrowing. When we borrow, for instance, $10,000 from a bank, a mortgage is created. That mortgage is a form of money . So, you receive $10,000 and the bank receives your $10,000 mortgage, which the bank can spend or exchange for dollars.
You and your bank have created $10,000 from thin air.
4. False. Inflation is caused by shortages, most often by scarcities of food or energy (oil). Inflation never is caused by “too much” federal deficit spending.
Example: Zimbabwe’s notorious inflation began when the government took farmland from experienced farmers and gave it to inexperienced people. The predictable result: A food shortage, which led to a hyperinflation.
After causing the hyperinflation, the government could have cured it by importing food and distributing it to the people. Spending money that way would have eliminated the shortages and ended the hyperinflation.
The illusion Zimbabwe’s inflation (or any other inflation) was caused by money “printing” came from the fact that the Zimbabwe government printed larger and larger banknotes, which did nothing to reduce the shortages, and so, did not address the hyperinflation. This currency printing did not cause the inflation: food shortages did.
Note: Monetarily non-sovereign governments (i.e. state & local governments, euro nations) have only limited ability to create money (by borrowing), and to use that money to purchase scarce goods, so they are much less able to cure inflation.
In recent years, U.S. inflations have been caused by oil shortages, and are controlled by federal purchases of oil, and distribution of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
For modest and incremental inflation control, the U.S. federal government increases interest rates, which increases the exchange value of the dollar.
Red line is federal debt. Blue line is inflation. No relationship between them.
5. False. Gold, silver, platinum are not, and never have been, a form of money. As we discussed earlier, money has no physical existence; it is a form of debt. Gold et al, are elements that in the past have been used for barter, not as money.
The money value of a $10 gold coin always is $10, but the barter value may be thousands of dollars. In either case, the coin itself is not money. It either is a title to ten dollars, or it is used for barter.
Further, since all money is a form of debt, and all debt requires collateral, silver and gold have been used as collateral for the type of debt called “money.”
Today, silver and gold no longer are used as collateral for federal money. The collateral for that debt is solely the full faith and creditof the federal government. No federal assets are pledged as collateral for any federal money.
By contrast, when you take out a home mortgage, the collateral for that debt is the house itself, plusyour personal full faith and credit.
6. False. Although state and local taxes do fund state and local government spending, federal taxes fund nothing. In fact, unlike state and local government taxes, federal taxes are destroyed upon receipt.
State and local tax dollars are deposited into banks, and therefore remain part of the nation’s money-supply (M1 and M2). By contrast, tax dollars leave the economy, and disappear from any money-supply measure.
Even if the federal government collected zero taxes, it could continue spending, forever. Being Monetarily Sovereign, the federal government has no need for income. That is why the federal government does not borrow. T-bills, T-notes, and T-bonds are not evidence of borrowing. They are evidence only of deposits into T-security accounts.
A. To control the economy by rewarding activities the federal government wishes to encourage and by punishing the activities the government wishes to discourage, and
B. To make the populace believe the government’s ability to spend is limited by taxes, so that the people will not ask for more benefits.
The federal government is controlled by the very rich. Gap Psychology shows that the rich become richer by widening the Gap between themselves and those below them on any income/wealth/power scale. Most federal spending benefits lower-income groups most, so the rich-controlled government spreads disinformation about program affordability.
C. A third purpose of federal taxes is possible: To narrow the Gap between the rich and the rest.Although some politicians claim this already is one effect of taxes, the rich have been clever enough and influential enough to negate that purpose.
7. True. A growing economy requires a growing supply of money. Federal deficit spending increases the nation’s money supply. One common measure of the economy is Gross Domestic Product, the formula for which is:
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Nonfederal Spending + Net Exports
All three terms increase the money supply and increase GDP.
Red line is federal debt growth. Vertical bars are recessions. Prior to recessions, debt growth declines. Recessions are cured by increases in federal debt growth (aka “stimulus.”)
Whenever the U.S. misguidedly has tried to reduce the federal “debt,” very bad things have happened.
1804-1812: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 48%. Depression began 1807.
1817-1821: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 29%. Depression began 1819.
1823-1836: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 99%. Depression began 1837.
1852-1857: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 59%. Depression began 1857.
1867-1873: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 27%. Depression began 1873.
1880-1893: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 57%. Depression began 1893.
1920-1930: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 36%. Depression began 1929.
1997-2001: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 15%. Recession began 2001.
8. False. Federal taxes have no relationship to federal “debt” (i.e. deposits). Every day, millions of dollars of federal “debt” are paid off simply by returning the money that has been residing in T-security accounts. No tax dollars are involved.
In 1939, the federal debt was $48 billion. This year, the federal debt is $21 trillion — a 44-fold increase in 80 years.
Yet here we are, and none of the scare stories about the “unsustainability” and “unaffordability” of federal debt has come true. For these past 80 years, you repeatedly have been told the federal debt is a “ticking time bomb.” It still is ticking, and no explosion. The slowest “time bomb” in history.
The federal debt is not a danger. Rather, a growing federal debt is absolutely necessary for economic growth.
9. False.The federal government can afford anything. It has an infinite supply of dollars.
Unfortunately, every time any federal spending program is proposed, Congress twists itself into contortions, trying (or pretending to try) to answer the question, “How will you pay for it?”
The correct answer is, “The federal government simply will write a check.” No federal check ever bounces, because the federal government has absolute control over the U.S. dollar, and U.S. banks.
The government created the original U.S. dollars by creating laws from thin air. So long as the government is not limited in its passing of laws, it will not be limited in its money creation.
If they wished, Congress and the President could pay for the Tens Steps to Prosperity (below), merely by pressing a few computer keys. So long as there were no incurable shortages, the economy would grow, poverty would disappear, and there would be no inflation.
If the notion of infinite money sounds too good to be true, that is only because we have been brainwashed by the politicians, the media, and the economists who are controlled by the very rich. They want you to believe that money is in limited supply.
10. False.Socialism is not just government spending. Socialism describes any enterprise OWNED and CONTROLLED by a government.
Although “socialism” often is used as a pejorative by those who dislike government involvement in anything, the nature of all governments is that some aspects are socialistic. A few examples:
Public parks
Most streets and highways
Public beaches
Most large dams
The Great Lakes and the Mississippi River
The Library of Congress and other public libraries
Subway systems and many public surface transportation systems
State colleges and universities
National parks
The White House
Congress
The Supreme Court
Most of America’s acreage west of the Mississippi River
The entire military, including Veterans Administration Hospitals
Water and sewage treatment plants
Weather Service, NASA, FBI, CIA, and all other government agencies
The fact that some proposed projects may or may not be socialist is neither good nor bad. There are some things the private sector can do better. There are some things the government can do better. And there are some things that can be done better by a joint effort.
SOCIALISM
Banking, for instance, is a function that would be much better accomplished by the federal government than by the private sector, because the federal government is not distorted by the profit goal, which has caused repeated cases of bank malfeasance.
Finally, if you happen to know an economics professor or writer, give him/her this quiz and see how he does. That should be interesting.
Gap Psychology describes the common desire to distance oneself from those “below” in any socio-economic ranking, and to come nearer those “above.” The socio-economic distance is referred to as “The Gap.”
Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.Implementation of Monetary Sovereignty and The Ten Steps To Prosperity can grow the economy and narrow the Gaps: