Sanders’s climate change ideas spoiled by cowardice.

Bernie Sanders has proposed a list of his Presidential aspirations, which is long on goals, though short on specific details.

Image result for bernie sanders
The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist, remember this: I don’t believe that government should take over the grocery store down the street or control the means of production.

President Trump was elected with a much shorter list (eliminate Obamacare, build a wall, do the NRA’s and Vladimir Putin’s bidding, deny science, attack allies while sucking up to dictators),  and blame others for his failures, so perhaps Bernie can be forgiven for his omission of specificity.

New York Times: 8/22/19
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Thursday unveiled an aggressive $16.3 trillion climate change plan that calls for the U.S. to reach 100 percent renewable energy for electricity and transportation “no later than” 2030, as well as for “complete decarbonization” by 2050.

He refers to the plan itself, which would also declare climate change a national emergency, as a Green New Deal.

 Here are some sample features of one proposal: 

  • Reaching 100 percent renewable energy for electricity and transportation by no later than 2030 and complete decarbonization by 2050 at latest – consistent with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change goals – by expanding the existing federal Power Marketing Administrations to build new solar, wind, and geothermal energy sources.
  • Ending unemployment by creating 20 million jobs needed to solve the climate crisis. These jobs will be good-paying, union jobs with strong benefits and safety standards in steel and auto manufacturing, construction, energy efficiency retrofitting, coding and server farms, and renewable power plants.
  • We will also create millions of jobs in sustainable agriculture, engineering, a reimagined and expanded Civilian Conservation Corp, and preserving our public lands.
  • Directly invest an historic $16.3 trillion public investment toward these efforts, in line with the mobilization of resources made during the New Deal and WWII, but with an explicit choice to include black, indigenous and other minority communities who were systematically excluded in the past.
  • A just transition for workers. This plan will prioritize the fossil fuel workers who have powered our economy for more than a century and who have too often been neglected by corporations and politicians.
  • We will guarantee five years of a worker’s current salary, housing assistance, job training, health care, pension support, and priority job placement for any displaced worker, as well as early retirement support for those who choose it or can no longer work.
  • Declaring climate change a national emergency. We must take action to ensure a habitable planet for ourselves, for our children, and for our grandchildren. We will do whatever it takes to defeat the threat of climate change.
  • Saving American families money by weatherizing homes and lowering energy bills, building affordable and high-quality, modern public transportation, providing grants and trade-in programs for families and small businesses to purchase high-efficiency electric vehicles, and rebuilding our inefficient and crumbling infrastructure, including deploying universal, affordable high-speed internet.
  • Supporting small family farms by investing in ecologically regenerative and sustainable agriculture. This plan will transform our agricultural system to fight climate change, provide sustainable, local foods, and break the corporate stranglehold on farmers and ranchers.
  • Justice for frontline communities – especially under-resourced groups, communities of color, Native Americans, people with disabilities, children and the elderly – to recover from, and prepare for, the climate impacts, including through a $40 billion Climate Justice Resiliency Fund.
  • Commit to reducing emissions throughout the world, including providing $200 billion to the Green Climate Fund, rejoining the Paris Agreement, and reasserting the United States’ leadership in the global fight against climate change.
  • Meeting and exceeding our fair share of global emissions reductions. We will reduce domestic emissions by at least 71 percent by 2030 and reduce emissions among less industrialized nations by 36 percent by 2030 — the total equivalent of reducing our domestic emissions by 161 percent.
  • Making massive investments in research and development. We will invest in public research to drastically reduce the cost of energy storage, electric vehicles, and make our plastic more sustainable through advanced chemistry. 
  • Expanding the climate justice movement. We will do this by coming together in a truly inclusive movement that prioritizes young people, workers, indigenous peoples, communities of color, and other historically marginalized groups to take on the fossil fuel industry and other polluters to push this over the finish line and lead the globe in solving the climate crisis.
  • Investing in conservation and public lands to heal our soils, forests, and prairie lands. We will reauthorize and expand the Civilian Conservation Corps and fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Corps to provide good-paying jobs building green infrastructure.

One may disagree with some aspects of this list, but if one truly wishes to “make America great, again,” the list overall is a much better starting place than caging children and deny the poor of medical insurance.

There is, however, one aspect of the list that demonstrates abject cowardice and ignorance:

“This plan will pay for itself over 15 years“, Bernie claims. 

“We will pay for the massive investment we need to reverse the climate crisis by:

  • Making the fossil fuel industry pay for their pollution, through litigation, fees, and taxes, and eliminating federal fossil fuel subsidies.
  • Generating revenue from the wholesale of energy produced by the regional Power Marketing Authorities. Revenues will be collected from 2023-2035, and after 2035 electricity will be virtually free, aside from operations and maintenance costs.
  • Scaling back military spending on maintaining global oil dependence.
  • Collecting new income tax revenue from the 20 million new jobs created by the plan.
  • Reduced need for federal and state safety net spending due to the creation of millions of good-paying, unionized jobs.
  • Making the wealthy and large corporations pay their fair share.
  • Sanders says his proposal would “pay for itself” in 15 years and create 20 million jobs. It would impose new taxes on the fossil fuel industry and eliminate subsidies, which he says would account for $3.1 trillion and be a way of making the industry “pay for their pollution.”

No, the plan will not pay for itself. Nor will federal taxpayers fund the plan. Federal taxes pay for nothing.

The plan, as proposed, will be funded by federal deficit spending, which will pump $16 trillion growth dollars into the economy. The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, never can run short of its own sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar.

Image result for bernanke and greenspan
It’s our little secret. Don’t tell the people we don’t use their tax dollars.

Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

Alan Greenspan: “Central banks can issue currency, a non-interest-bearing claim on the government, effectively without limit. A government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency.”

St. Louis Federal Reserve: “As the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e.,unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.

Bernie demonstrates courage by proposing such far-reaching plans, but he demonstrates cowardice by failing to tell the voters the truth, namely:

  1. Our Monetarily Sovereign federal government never can run short of its own sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar. It can afford anything, and it does not need to collect dollars from domestic or foreign taxpayers.
  2. The federal deficit and debt are not a burden on the federal government or on federal taxpayers, nor do the deficit and debt limit any future federal spending.
  3. The federal deficit and debt do not lead to inflation, which actually is caused by shortages of goods, not by excess dollars.

By hiding the facts, Sanders is reduced to proposing complex, economy-crushing tax-collection schemes supposedly to “pay for” the federal spending that the federal government easily pays for without taxes.

Thus Sanders must defend not only his spending proposals, but his tax-collection proposals, making passage of his plans far more difficult.

 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the richer and the poorer.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts a, b & d, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Make America Disgraced Again. MADA

With his slogan, “Make America Great, Again,” Trump implied that America was not great. And, historically speaking, he was right that America has not always been great.

There were, in fact, many times when we Americans disgraced ourselves.

  1. We Americans disgraced ourselves during the years we enslaved, tortured and killed black people.
  2. We Americans disgraced ourselves when we imprisoned Japanese Americans during WWII.
  3. We Americans disgraced ourselves when we turned away the SS St. Louis, loaded with Jews trying to escape Hitler.
  4. We Americans disgraced ourselves during the years we refused voting rights for women and blacks.
  5. We Americans disgraced ourselves during the years of anti-Irish sentiment.
  6. We Americans disgraced ourselves when we killed native Americans, and broke our treaties with them.
  7. We Americans disgraced ourselves when we prosecuted the Vietnam war, unnecessarily killing millions of innocent Vietnamese and Americans.
  8. We Americans still disgrace ourselves by jailing, per capita, more people than any other nation on earth, and then compounding the problem by giving guns — high-powered guns — to any fool who wants one.
  9. We Americans still disgrace ourselves by denying millions of people affordable health care, while “lesser” countries offer it.
  10. Millions of Americans disgrace themselves by supporting an absurd, immoral, ill-prepared, unqualified President.

Though America has been great in many, many ways, and still is, it is being led far, far from its previous glories.

Image result for trump
(I have second thoughts about everything.” [At G7, 8/24/2019]

Newsweek DAILY BRIEFING – 08.21.2019
TRUMP ADMIN TO DETAIN CHILDREN INDEFINITELY
The Trump administration has issued a rule change that would end limits on migrant minors’ time in detention and limit safeguards against cruel and unsanitary conditions.

California Senator Kamala Harris asked on Twitter Wednesday, “how does detaining families longer make our border secure or stop transnational gangs — things the DHS should actually be spending their time doing?”

Senator Elizabeth Warren: “The Flores agreement mandates that migrant children cannot be held in detention for more than 20 days. Today, the Trump administration announced its plans to roll back Flores—putting thousands of children in danger.

Inspectors found soiled, emotionally distraught children who were unable to brush their teeth or shower. The administration tried to justify not providing kids with soap and toothbrushes.

The new rule would remove a 20-day limit on detaining families in jails. Families will now be sent to “family residential centers” where they will remain until their immigration case is heard.

It takes an average of 713 days for a judge to hear a case.

“The detention of children can lead to trauma, suicidal feelings, and exposure to dangerously inadequate medical care,” said Clara Long, acting deputy Washington director at Human Rights Watch. “No amount of time in detention is safe for children and prolonged detention is particularly harmful.”

The torturing of innocent men, women, and children is not the badge of a great nation.

The Trump administration, rather than making America great again, instead has chosen to repeat the worst, immoral, cruel excesses of previously disgraced administrations.

Trump’s method for “making America great, again,” includes insulting our allies:

Trump scolds Denmark, calls prime minister ‘nasty’
By Jan M. Olsen and Laurie Kellman Associated Press
Trump said Wednesday he scrapped his trip to Denmark because the prime minister made a “nasty” statement when she rejected his idea to buy Greenland as an absurdity.

“You don’t talk to the United States that way, at least under me,” Trump told reporters in Washington. “I thought it was not a nice statement, the way she blew me off.”

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called the whole thing “an absurd discussion” and said she was “disappointed and surprised” that Trump had canceled his visit.

Trump said Frederiksen’s comment labeling his idea as absurd “was nasty.

Trump’s cancellation was “deeply insulting to the people of Greenland and Denmark,” former Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt wrote on Twitter.

Claus Oxfeldt, chairman of Denmark’s main police union, told Danish media that “It has created great frustrations to have spent so much time preparing for a visit that is canceled,” Oxfeldt was quoted as saying.

There stood Trump, whose every tweet insults someone,* suddenly becoming hyper-sensitive by claiming “America” was insulted when the Danish Prime Minister rightfully called his absurd idea, “absurd.” ( *See: The 598 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter)

No, Mr. Trump, you are not America, and America was not insulted. You, however, are known internationally as an absurd boor, and that, unfortunately, reflects poorly on us Americans.

In short, every day, it is you Mr. Trump, who insults America.

Trump doubles down on charge that Jews who vote Democrat are ‘disloyal’ [The New York Times]
President Trump on Wednesday repeated his allegation that Jews who vote for Democrats are “being very disloyal to Jewish people and very disloyal to Israel.”

Trump also thanked conservative radio host Wayne Allyn Root (an evangelical Christian) for saying Jews in Israel love Trump “like he’s the King of Israel” and “the second coming of God.”

Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the Anti-Defamation League, said Trump was trying to make himself out to be a savior. “Literally, it’s hard to think of something less kosher than telling the Jewish people you’re the king of Israel, and therefore, we should have some fidelity to you.”

Trump’s comment that Jews are, or should be, loyal to Israel, is part of the bigot’s old trope that Jews are not loyal to the country in which they live.

It was the excuse Hitler gave for murdering them. That slur, together with Trump’s love for dictators, has him re-emerging as the next Hitler “wannabe.”

And as for showing loyalty to a bigot like Trump, the vast majority of Jews have learned from Hitler, the cost of bigotry. When any group is maltreated by a bigot, eventually the maltreatment falls on the Jews. It’s always the Jews.

With Trump as its leader, America cannot claim greatness, nor can those who continue to back Trump.

Trump says he’s ‘Chosen One’ to take on China over trade
From CNBC
President Trump on Wednesday framed his trade war with China in religious terms, saying he was “the Chosen One” to confront Beijing over economic policies he considers unfair to the U.S.

“This isn’t my trade war, this is a trade war that should have taken place a long time ago. Somebody had to do it,” Trump said. He then looked up and pointed to the heavens, saying, “I am the Chosen One.”

Historically, dictators have portrayed themselves as God, or one chosen by God.

From the Pharaohs to Rafael Trujillo (“God in Heaven, Trujillo on Earth”) to Francisco Macias Nguema (“There is no other God than Macias Nguema”) to Trump’s pal, Kim Jong-Il (“Creator of the Universe“).

Will Americans, one day, refer to Donald Trump as “the chosen one”?

Every day, Trump disgraces America and each of us. Fortunately, every four years, we are given the ability to reverse our past errors of judgment or immorality.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the richer and the poorer.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts a, b & d, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Money Bail: The pro-rich, anti-everyone-else “tax” on the accused

“Equal justice under law” is a phrase engraved on the front of the United States Supreme Court building in Washington D.C. 

On October 1, 2016, we published the post titled, Money bail: Another foible of the Gaps,  Here are a few notes based on that post:

The income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest, constitute the single, most important economic problem facing America and the world.

The Gaps exacerbate crime, disease, poor education and housing, infrastructure decline, the ecology, unnecessary war, and unfair justice, among other issues.”

I read where an 18-year-old accused of fatally shooting a man was ordered held in lieu of $5 million bail.

Why $5 million? The clear purpose was to make the bail unaffordable for the man, so that he will not be loose on the street.

Why offer any bail at all? Answer: So if it turned out that he was rich, he could avoid jail while he awaited trial.

But, if he had enough money to make bail, would that have proved he offered less risk to the public, while awaiting trial, or was more likely to show up for his trial?

Rich people jump bail all the time.

A judge or magistrate decides the amount of bail by weighing many factors:

— the risk of the defendant fleeing,
— the type of crime alleged,
— the ‘dangerousness‘ of defendants, and
— the safety of the community.

Money bail falsely presumes that poorer people, who are less likely to afford bail money, must be more likely to flee and are more dangerous to the community.

Money bail forces many innocent people to remain in jail for months, simply because they cannot afford to pay.

Sometimes judges set bail at a low amount, even $500. What is the purpose? Why set bail at all, and just rely on the accused to show up for trial?

And what if the accused is too poor even to afford payment of that low amount of bail? What does that prove?

Here is what Bernie Sanders had to say:

“For most of our history as a country, the United States incarcerated people at about the same rates as other western democracies do today.

“In the early 1970s we had the same low crime rate as today, but we now have an incarceration rate five times higher. Indeed, America is now the world’s leading jailer.

“We lock up more than 2 million people in America, which is more of our own people than any country on Earth.

“Hundreds of thousands of incarcerated people in America have not been convicted of a crime and are solely in jail because they can’t afford their bail. We are criminalizing poverty.”

“Right now, hundreds of thousands of people without a criminal conviction are in jail simply because they could not afford bail. Young people can spend hundreds of days in jail, only to be acquitted — yet the severe damage to their lives cannot be undone.

“This is why Bernie introduced the No Money Bail Act of 2018 to end cash bail and to end the criminalization of poverty in America. ”

See also: S: 3271

The money bail system is a relic of the old imperial view that the rich are honest and dependable, while the poor are criminal and irresponsible.

When a judge imposes, for instance, a million-dollar bail, what does that tell you? It says that the judge doesn’t trust the accused to return for trial.

But that bail might require a poor man to languish in jail for weeks or months, while a rich man will be free to go about his business, spend time with his family, perhaps even travel.

And if he is wealthy enough, he even may leave the jurisdiction, sacrifice the million dollars, and go free to a foreign jurisdiction, without enduring a trial.

The notion that the rich can be trusted more than the poor not only is false and bigoted, but dangerous to society.

As currently practiced, it is a violation of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution and the U.S. Code:”In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial . . . ”

18 U.S.C. § 3161 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 3161. Time limits and exclusions:

Any information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested or served with a summons in connection with such charges.

If an individual has been charged with a felony in a district in which no grand jury has been in session during such thirty-day period, the period of time for filing of the indictment shall be extended an additional thirty days.

In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense shall commence within seventy days from the filing date (and making public) of the information or indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs.

If a defendant consents in writing to be tried before a magistrate judge on a complaint, the trial shall commence within seventy days from the date of such consent.

Any period of delay resulting from a continuance granted by any judge on his own motion or at the request of the defendant or his counsel or at the request of the attorney for the Government, if the judge granted such continuance on the basis of his findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

In short, the Constitution allows an innocent person to be held for 60 to 70 days, to any length of time that “serves the ends of justice.”‘

So if you are accused of a crime you didn’t commit, and you don’t have access to the bail money set by a judge, you could suffer in jail for weeks, months, years — even for longer than a guilty verdict would impose.

If you are rich, you don’t need to worry about that.

Is that equal justice for all?

Some might claim that the bail system actually protects you, because if it didn’t exist, judges might be tempted to keep innocent you in jail longer, just to protect against you fleeing.

Judges are people. They do smart things and they do stupid things. They convict innocent people and find guilty people innocent. There is no failsafe method of justice.

But, we trudge on.

Americans believe it is better to release a guilty person than to imprison an innocent person. (That is why we require all 12 people in a jury, rather than just a majority, to agree on criminal charges.)

But the bail system imprisons innocent people every day — often for long periods.

I suggest we eliminate the entire bail system, and replace it with an honor system along with an ankle bracelet system.

Yes, that will allow some criminals to flee, and it also will allow some to create crimes while awaiting trial. But that is the price we should be willing to pay so that we stop imprisoning innocent people for lengthy terms.

It is far more in keeping with the purposes of the Sixth Amendment.  

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereigntyFacebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the richer and the poorer.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts a, b & d, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

THE WEEK Magazine spreads the Big Lie

THE WEEK Magazine is an outstanding, left-leaning publication that might be expected to opt for more social spending. Sadly, they too are caught up in the traditionally right-wing Big Lie.

The Big Lie is: Federal finances are similar to personal, state government, and local government finances, so the federal government needs tax income in order to spend.

State and local government spending is funded by state and local taxes. Federal spending is not.

While you and your local governments require income in order to spend, the federal government creates its own income. It has no need for taxes.

The Big Lie is disseminated by the very rich, who are motivated by Gap Psychology, the common motivation to distance oneself from those below, and to approach those above. The rich wish to widen the income/wealth/power Gap between them and the rest of the populace.

The easiest way to accomplish this: Cut federal benefits to the non-rich.

The very rich disseminate the Big Lie by influencing our primary, trusted information sources: The media, politicians, and university economists.

The media are influenced via advertising dollars and media ownership.
The politicians are influenced via campaign contributions and promises of future lucrative employment.
The university economists are influenced via university contributions and jobs in think tanks.

Here is a classic example of a medium, THE WEEK Magazine, doing the bidding of the very rich:

Why is 2030 significant? (August 18, 2019)
It’s the year when America’s so-called dependency ratio — or the percentage of nonworking citizens who rely on those who are employed — will exceed 70 percent.

“Nonworking citizens do rely on those who are employed,” but only if we are talking about state and local government assistance, not federal assistance.

The reason: State and local taxes do fund various social services; federal taxes do not.

The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, has the unlimited ability to create its own sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar.

Even if all tax collections totaled $0, the federal government could continue spending, forever.

The federal government does not need or use tax dollars for anything, and indeed, destroys tax dollars upon receipt. Federal taxpayers do not support nonworking citizens. Federal deficit spending fends Social Security.

The article continues:

This will have profound consequences for Social Security and Medicare, the former of which is now projected to exhaust its $2.9 trillion reserve by 2035.

(At that point, unless Congress increases taxes or cuts benefits, only payroll taxes from a shrinking workforce would finance the program, and benefits would likely be reduced by 20 percent.)

To widen the Gap between the rich and the rest, the rich focus on the two biggest social benefits, Social Security and Medicare, by making the false claim that these two programs are funded by payroll taxes (FICA).

They are not. They are funded by federal deficit spending.

Congress does not need to “increase taxes or cut benefits.” To fund unlimited Social Security and Medicare for All, Congress and the President merely need to agree to spend what is needed — which the government has the unlimited ability to do.

For example, the Tax Relief Act of 2010 gave a two-percentage-point payroll/self-employment tax holiday for employees and those self-employed. The purpose was to help the economy recover from the “Great Recession” of 2008.

Social Security benefits were not reduced, which made it obvious that the federal government has the unlimited ability to fund Social Security, or indeed any expenditure, without collecting taxes.

The article continues:

Will this affect the economy? 
As the percentage of Americans with full-time jobs drops, so, too, will GDP.

Researchers from Har­vard’s Med­i­cal School and the RAND Corp. recently compared the growth rates of states that are aging at different paces. Their findings were startling. For every 10 percent jump in the portion of a population over 60, economic growth fell 5.5 percent.

Nationally, the group estimated, the aging of America’s workforce has already lopped 1.2 percent off Gross Domestic Proeduct (GDP) this decade; this may explain why the average rate of growth has been a meager 2.3 percent since 2009.

Another vexing question is how well America’s consumer-driven economy will hold up when so many of us are living frugally on fixed incomes.

The article, accidentally or intentionally, omits one key mathematical fact. The equation for GDP is:

GDP = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports

To instantly increase GDP, Congress needs only to increase one term in the equation — Federal Spending — which Congress has the unlimited ability to do.

Not only would a federal spending increase, in of itself, immediately increase GDP, but the downstream effects of a federal spending increase also would be to increase non-federal spending (by putting more dollars into consumers’ pockets).

And there is no fundamental need for fixed-income Americans to live frugally. The federal government could solve that problem with the stroke of a pen and the press of a computer key.

Merely enact the Ten Steps to Prosperity (At the end of this post).

Former Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

The article continues:

How about health care? 
American spending on health care is expected to rise from about $4 trillion a year to $6 trillion, or 19.4 percent of GDP, by 2027.

By 2025, U.S. health-care providers believe they will face a collective shortage of about 500,000 home health aides, 100,000 nursing assistants, and 29,000 nurse practitioners. Some are also bracing for a shortage of up to 122,000 doctors by 2032.

This problem was complicated by Congress capping Medicare reimbursement to teaching hospitals for each resident in 1997, when there was talk of a doctor glut. 

The problem could be solved by uncapping Medicare reimbursements and by enacting Steps #2, #4, and #5 of the Ten Steps to Prosperity.

What other problems are ahead? 
Cities will need to adjust their infrastructure for older people: Crosswalk timers will have to be reset to give them more time to get across the street, and far more curb cutouts for walkers and wheelchairs will need to be installed.

The problem, ironically, will be worse in the sidewalk-less, car-oriented suburbs America created to make Baby Boomer childhoods so utopian.

What happens to tens of millions of suburban residents when they’re 85 and unable to drive or walk to stores, community centers, or doctors?

All of the above problems, and many not even mentioned, can be solved with money, of which the federal government has an unlimited supply.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan: “A government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency.”

When THE WEEK Magazine writes about a non-working citizens problem, a retirement problem, a Social Security problem, a health care problem, a GDP problem, an infrastructure problem et al, what the publication really is writing about is a money problem.

Given an unlimited supply of dollars — which Congress has available to it — all these problems can be prevented and solved.

The very rich do not want you to understand that simple fact, because they wish to widen the Gap between them and you.

It truly is sad that even a liberal-leaning publication promulgates the Big Lie, that federal taxes fund federal spending.

By failing to differentiate between federal government finances vs. state/local government finances and personal finances, THE WEEK Magazine reinforces the myths that make the rich richer and the rest poorer.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereigntyFacebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the richer and the poorer.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA

2. Federally funded Medicare — parts a, b & d, plus long-term care — for everyone

3. Provide a monthly economic bonus to every man, woman and child in America (similar to social security for all)

4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone

5. Salary for attending school

6. Eliminate federal taxes on business

7. Increase the standard income tax deduction, annually. 

8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

9. Federal ownership of all banks

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99.9% 

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY