–Donald Trump’s secret religion

–Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Donald Trump has a secret.

I read an article written by one of the trainers who teaches airport dogs how to signal the presence of drugs.

The dog repeatedly is given a reward for success. But you knew that, didn’t you?

What you may not have known is (according to this trainer) the best reward is not food. The best reward is play.  The best reward is fun. The best reward is approval.

The trainer carries a ball, and each time the dog does what is wanted, the trainer tosses the ball in a game of “fetch.” Apparently, dogs love play, fun, and approval so much, they will choose fetch over food treats.

People are like that, although in a special “people” way. We genetically are predisposed toward fun, excitement, competition, and victory.

Visualize the fans at a football game. They feel powerful emotions.  They are elated or very angry. They scream themselves hoarse.

People don’t do that over food.

If you were floating above the stadium, and looking down, you saw people screaming and flailing their arms, you might have thought they are stupid or insane.

And you would be right. They have, in fact, lost their rational minds. Their rational minds know that the game’s results will have little effect on their lives. But their irrational mind cares greatly.

Or think about a rock concert and the screaming fans. They barely can hear the music, but they are “there,” in the presence of “the man.” They are part of a special group.

The rapper grabs his crotch and the people think — no, “think” is the wrong word — the people feel as though in the presence of God, and His word is truth.

They not only have lost their ratonal minds during the event, but later they still will have powerful, illogical beliefs about the band and the star. Their love for him might be the greatest love they ever have felt.

Now visualize the “fans” at a Donald Trump event. The people are elated or angry, and always highly emotional. They lean on his every word, his every gesture.

Trump gives them what they crave. He gives them enemies to hate. He gives them hope. He sneers. He mugs for them. He gestures like a rock star, and they scream in appreciation for being “in” on his “special” message, just for them.

He speaks to them in a special, private code.

They don’t care about the words or even the “music.” They crave the experience of being in the cult.

Logical argument does not have the same impact. A professor, speaking to a class, does not generate the same emotions.

No sane person believes Trump emotionally, experientially, or intellectually is qualified to be President of the United States. He has every bad attribute — a liar, a womanizer, ignorant, inexperienced, egomaniacal, hate-mongering, emotionally immature, bigoted.

Like a rock star’s fans, Trump’s fans simply don’t care. 

Provide absolute proof of his deceptions and incompetence, and they will grow angry. They don’t want to hear it. Even when Trump himself admits to groping women, and later denies it, his fans believe his denials. No logic there.

Trump said it, “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.” He is right. His fans would created excuses for his actions.

When a rock star takes drugs, gets drunk in public, trashes hotel rooms, beats his girlfriend, fires a gun, or commits other atrocities, he retains much of his fan base, because he makes them part of his game. They are “in” and the rest of the world is out.

They love belonging to his special faction. They cannot leave the sect, for to do so would make them empty, alone, and friendless, bereft of the approving society they desperately need.

These followers are, what Eric Hoffer termed, “true believers.”

Wikipedia: Hoffer states that mass movements begin with a widespread “desire for change” from discontented people who place their control outside their power and who also have no confidence in existing culture or traditions.

Believing there is no hope for advancement or satisfaction as an individual, true believers are ripe to participate in a movement that offers the option of subsuming their individual lives in a larger collective.

Leaders are vital in the growth of a mass movement, but for the leader to find any success, the seeds of the mass movement must already exist in people’s hearts.

The “New Poor” are the most likely source of converts for mass movements, for they recall their former wealth with resentment and blame others for their current misfortune.

Example: The  working-classes in Germany who passionately supported Hitler in the 1930s after suffering years of economic hardship.

While mass movements idealize the past and glorify the future, the present world is denigrated: “The radical and the reactionary loath the present.”

Thus, by regarding the modern world as vile and worthless, mass movements inspire a perpetual battle against the present.

True believers respond to the slogan “Make America great, again,” because it perfectly idealizes the past and glorifies the future. 

Mass movements aggressively promote the use of doctrines that elevate faith over reason and serve as “fact-proof screens between the faithful and the realities of the world.

Reasonable people wonder why Trump’s followers seem immune to facts. Almost every day Trump says something blatantly untrue, or completely outrageous. Yet he is Teflon.  His followers ignore his lies, and tell themselves “what he really meant.”

They are true believers.

To spread and reinforce their doctrine, mass movements use persuasion, coercion, and proselytization.

Persuasion must be thrilling enough to excite the listener yet vague enough to allow “the frustrated to… hear the echo of their own musings in the impassioned double talk.

“I was going to say ‘dummy’ Bush; I won’t say it. I won’t say it,” Trump said in January.

“I promised I would not say that Carly Fiorina ran Hewlett-Packard into the ground, that she laid off tens of thousands of people and she got viciously fired. I said I will not say it, so I will not say it.

I refuse to call Megyn Kelly a bimbo, because that would not be politically correct. Instead, I will only call her a lightweight reporter!”

“Unlike others, I never attacked dopey Jon Stewart for his phony last name. Would never do that!”

Trump’s followers love the joke.  They howl in laughter. They are “in” with him.

Donald Trump’s secret is that he taps into the needs and hungers of true believers.

Trump’s followers, like the airport dogs, need to be thrilled — and double-talked.

At a recent rally in Fresno, Trump stated that, despite five years of low rainfall in California, “There is no drought. They turn the water into the ocean. If I win, believe me, we’re going to start opening up the water so that you can have your farmers survive.”

Now, this is a very confusing statement. What could he mean? Go ahead and choose your answer to this multiple-choice problem.

If you click the above link, you will find different answers to what Trump might have meant with his double-talk.

But it doesn’t matter what Trump “really” meant, or whether he meant anything at all. Each of his true believers hears what he wants to hear. That is the magic of double-talk.

Successful mass movements need not believe in a god, but they must believe in a devil. Hatred unifies the true believers, and “the ideal devil is a foreigner” attributed with nearly supernatural powers of evil.

For Trump, such “foreigners” as Muslims, Mexicans, immigrants, all Latinos and “the media” are devils — all to be hated. He also termed Hillary Clinton “the devil.”

Most recently, the Mexican billionaire, Carlos Slim, joined the vast ranks of Trump’s hated devils.

There is no logic to Trump — he is all emotion — so logic cannot defeat him. That is why his comments about groping women had a significant impact. These comments are illogically important.

Being a groper and a cheater does not logically affect one’s ability to run the country. But his words affected women emotionally. Too many of them have suffered from boors like Trump.

And his words affected men, who feel protective of their women. They visualize with disgust, Trump’s dirty hands on their wives and daughters.

So despite all the real, logical reasons Trump is unqualified to be President, his groping of women became the most important reason.

True believers are followers, and one thing a follower wants is to follow a winner. When the leader begins losing, the movement grinds down.

Remember what happened to Benito Mussolini, after Italy was defeated in WWII? He was shot, and his body was hung upside down in the public square. The passions he fomented turned against him.

Trump’s passionate fans will turn against him when the sanity sets in and they realize they have been conned by a man who promised much, but lied, lied, lied.

They will realize he cared only for himself, and that they were part of nothing. The “belonging” was an illusion,

And it finally will end when his true believers decide he has committed the worst sin of all: He just isn’t interesting or fun anymore. And worst, he’s a loser.

Then, they will despise him for it, and turn to another religion.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

=======================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

What if Trump had won

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

===============================================================================

In a post dated January 26, 2015, long before Donald Trump became a candidate for president, we described how the Tea/Republican Party had become the party of hatred.

It encouraged its followers to despise:

–The poor and middle income
–The unemployed
–The elderly
–Those wanting to save the environment
–Science and scientists
–Gays
–Immigrants
–Blacks, browns, yellows, reds
–Women
–Non-Christians
–The “establishment”

Trump is the logical outcome of the hatreds instilled in conservatives by Republican leaders. You only can shake your head in wonder at the “shock” those leaders now feign at Trump’s rise.

Like someone who wanted a vicious dog, the conservatives created and nurtured Trump and all his hatreds. Now that he has come back to bite them, they complain about the very thing they asked for.

In a post dated July 11, 2015, we made the first of our many comparisons of Trump with Adolf Hitler.

Just as Hitler did, Trump appeals to the lowest instincts of humanity. He appeals to hatred and xenophobia.

His unapologetic “birther” campaign against President Obama, was a disguised appeal to haters of blacks.

Trump is our modern-day Hitler, and you will see that haters will be his core constituency, just as the haters were Hitler’s.

Most dictators have gained power via hatred of some group. It happened in Hitler’s Germany. It happened in Stalin’s Russia (Jews and Bolsheviks). It happened in Mao’s China (the rich, the educated, the clergy).

Always, there was some group at which hatred was directed — some group falsely blamed. And the result always has been disaster, for that is where hatred always leads.

As Trump’s popularity rises, it is happening here. He is forcing us onto a well-traveled path.

Though other nations were already at war, World War II is generally is considered to have begun when Germany invaded Poland in 1939.

At that time, Germany was relatively modest in size — about 80 million people — and still was recovering, not just from the Great Depression, but also by the onerous conditions the Allies had exacted as a result of World War I (War Guilt Clause of the Treaty of Versailles).

Germany’s military and wealth had been greatly reduced, but:

(Wikipedia): After the Nazi takeover of power in January 1933, the Nazis pursued a greatly enlarged and more aggressive version of rearmament.

During its struggle for power, the National Socialist party promised to recover Germany’s lost national pride.

Dictators often recruit followers on the basis of restoring the nation’s power (i. e. “Make America great, again.”)

By 1941, “little, weak” Germany conquered most of continental Europe. Hitler ruled Europe in just two years of warfare, but later lost only because he “knew more than the generals.” (Does this sound familiar?)

Ignoring the warnings from those generals, he over-estimated his army’s ability to defeat Russia and the United States.

Until Hitler was defeated, his ruthless rampage cost the world fifty million lives and unimaginable  devastation and human suffering.

Now consider what might have happened had Hitler clone, Donald Trump, won the Presidential election. He would have had, at his command, a huge nation, 330 million strong, and the mightiest military the world has ever known.

Trump’s xenophobia and willingness to employ atomic weapons would have unleashed a human extinction event, leaving the world poisoned for centuries.

Just this past September, we published, Astounding similarities: Of whom does this remind you? It’s happening now.”

If you read it, you will see that the parallels between Hitler and Trump cannot be denied. The evil of one is mirrored in the other.

Fortunately for America and the world, we have escaped what could have been the greatest disaster in human history — an apocalyptic war and a permanent dictatorship over what was left of the world.

We were lucky this time, for clearly the closeness of the election shows that Americans have not learned from history.

Far too many of us still are willing to follow a Hitlerian leader, whose power is based on hatred.

There have been many predictions about what will end human life as we know it — global warming, a huge meteor, an unstoppable virus, an invasion by aliens.

I suspect the most likely event will be the rise of another Hitlerian/Trumpian dictator in a powerful nation like America.

It could have happened. It almost happened.

Unless we learn from history, it will happen.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

=======================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

 

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Why I agree with Donald Trump

Donald Trump’s slogan is, “Make America great, again.”

Although he is clueless about what to do and how to do it, or even what it means for a nation to be great, I agree with the slogan.

The implication is that we were great, and now are not great, but could be great once more.

I believe we were great during WWII. Great, not pure, but great because we were moral as much as nations can be moral.

Yes, we were tainted by bigotry, the hatred of blacks. A symbol of our bigotry was those “Colored” and “White” drinking fountains. And the anti-miscegenation laws. And official racial segregation in schools and neighborhoods.

Yes, we were tainted by bigotry, the hatred of Japanese Americans, which resulted in the shameful internments.

Yes, we were tainted by bigotry, the hatred of Jews; the quota system in schools and businesses, and “restricted” communities were common.

And the carpet bombing of civilians and the atom bomb were controversial, though perhaps not controversial enough.

No, this nation was not pure, but still we were great.

At a huge cost of our lives and wealth, we saved the world from the hatred of Hitler and Mussolini. The war gave us a common enemy, which made us cooperate as friends. We loved one another and we felt true compassion.

We saved China and the Pacific from a rampaging Japan, then returned to save our former enemies. (Who does that?)

The Marshall plan helped rebuild Europe, General MacArthur’s SCAP helped rebuild Japan, and the GI bill helped rebuild America.

We were great then. These initiatives cost us billions, but there was no right-wing Tea Party to object. We had morality. We had compassion.  We had love.

Then, after some backsliding, we returned to greatness in 1964:

Wikipedia:

Lyndon Johnson designed the “Great Society” legislation upholding civil rights, public broadcasting, Medicare, Medicaid, aid to education, the arts, urban and rural development, public services, and his “War on Poverty”.

Assisted in part by a growing economy, the War on Poverty helped millions of Americans rise above the poverty line during Johnson’s presidency.

Civil rights bills signed by Johnson banned racial discrimination in public facilities, interstate commerce, the workplace, and housing; and the Voting Rights Act banned certain requirements in southern states used to disenfranchise African Americans.

With the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, the country’s immigration system was reformed and all racial origin quotas were removed.

Sadly, with the Vietnam war, we drifted from greatness.

Today, our leaders  think greatness lies in our military and economic might. They are wrong.We have lost our moral soul.

Without compassion we can be strong and feared, but we cannot be great.

Today’s politicians and their followers look for ways to undo what we had done. Everywhere, there are calls to cut the social programs that made us great.

We cut Medicare, cut Medicaid, cut the Voting Rights Act. We cut aids to education, cut poverty aids.

We cut aid to public broadcasting, the arts, urban and rural development.

Some wish to enforce discrimination against Muslims, Latinos, gays. We’ve made legal immigration too difficult.

Though we sit on the unlimited funds of Monetary Sovereignty, we’ve become a penurious, “I’ve got mine” nation, resentful of those who want a better life.

We have become so twisted we would rather make life worse for the poor, than to benefit from their contributions.

Yes, I agree with Donald Trump.  We need to become great again.  But the man and the party that coined that slogan, wish to do away with the very things that have made us great in the past.

By tradition, Americans are a friendly, generous, open-armed, loving people. But our leaders today, in their lust for power and money, admire and wish to emulate, a mean-spirited, selfish, bigoted version of Russia.

Trump’s Stalinistic, vicious, ego-driven, cheat-the-“losers,” steel curtain, build-a-wall hatred is not America. It is alien to everything American.

Watch him prowl the stage, scowling and insulting those who disagree.  Listen to him threaten to jail his opponent, as dictators do.

There is no compassion in him, no love, no greatness. He is a tin-pot dictator in the making. Do you know that term? (Wiktionary: Tin-pot dictator: An autocratic ruler with little political credibility, but with delusions of grandeur.) Does that sound familiar?

Trump would move America diametrically away from greatness.

Clinton, though far less a threat than Trump, still is too money-driven. She will not be a Kennedy/Johnson liberal, narrowing the Gap between the rich and the rest.

She is a tougher version of Obama, a right-wing Democrat, beholden to the wealthy, and widening the Gap for their benefit.

What next? My crystal ball does not see greatness in our near future. It would require a great leader, but who will that be? Probably not Clinton. Certainly not Trump.

There will be no great conservative leaders. The Tea Party has seen to that. Conservatism has become hatred and selfishness. The Democrats are conservative too, just not hating and somewhat less selfish.

So who?  Perhaps Elizabeth Warren?? Any others?

National greatness is not just a large population. China and India beat us there. And greatness is not just military power or the percentage of billionaires, else Russia and Saudi Arabia would be among the greatest.

Greatness certainly is not a “strongman” dictatorship.

Greatness lives in the hearts of the people and of their leaders.  Greatness is extending  a hand, not an iron fist. Greatness is lifting up, not tearing down. Greatness is feeding, not fearing, a stranger. Greatness is written on the Statue of Liberty.

Every tin-pot dictator in history has spewed hatred. Hatred is easy, especially hatred of those who look, think, pray, or act differently from us. Any fool can hate, and most fools do.

Love is hard. Love takes effort. Love takes understanding, compassion, sympathy, and empathy. 

In the past, those words have described America. We have been great.

So, how will we really make America great again?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

=======================================================================

 

•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.

•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.

•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes..

•No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth.

•Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.

•A growing economy requires a growing supply of money (GDP = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)

•Deficit spending grows the supply of money

•The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.

•The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

•Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.

•The single most important problem in economics is the Gap between rich and the rest.

•Austerity is the government’s method for widening the Gap between rich and poor.

•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.

•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Money bail: Another foible of the Gaps

As most, regular readers of this blog know, the income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest, constitute the single, most important economic problem facing America and the world.

The Gaps exacerbate crime, disease, poor education and housing, infrastructure decline, the ecology, unnecessary war, and unfair justice, among other issues.

Today, we see an example in the following article from the October 1, 2016, Chicago Tribune:

Man held on $5 million bail in U. of I. shooting

An 18-year-old accused of fatally shooting a Mundelein man in the Campustown district at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign early Sunday morning was ordered held in lieu of $5 million bail Friday afternoon.

Robert Patton is accused of shooting into a crowd early Sunday, killing George Korchev, 22, and injuring three others.

Authorities say Patton committed the shooting two weeks after getting released from a boot camp that helped him to avoid prison on a gun charge conviction from an incident last December.

Patton turned himself in around 10:15 p.m. Thursday after the Champaign Police Department issued a warrant for his arrest Wednesday.

Patton could face 20 to 60 years in prison for murder, plus an additional 25 for the firearm, and 6 to 30 years for aggravated battery with a firearm.

What is the purpose of money-bail, and why $5 million?

I’ll answer the 2nd question first: Why $5 million? The clear purpose is to make the bail unaffordable for Patton, so that he will not be loose on the street. The judge clearly does not trust Patton on the street, despite the fact that Patton turned himself in..

That being the case, why offer any bail at all?

If Patton had $5 million (or even the 10%, $500 thousand cash required) should he be free to go?  Would he be less of a risk to the public if he were rich?

Then, the first question: What is the purpose of bail?

According to the American Bar Association:

Bail is not a fine. It is not supposed to be used as punishment.

The purpose of bail is simply to ensure that defendants will appear for trial and all pretrial hearings for which they must be present.

Bail is returned to defendants when their trial is over, in some states minus a processing fee.

The judge or magistrate decides the amount of bail by weighing many factors:

  • the risk of the defendant fleeing,
  • the type of crime alleged,
  • the “dangerousness” of defendants, and
  • the safety of the community.

See the problem? Money bail presumes that poorer people, who are less likely to have bail money, must be more likely to flee and are more dangerous to the community.

A rich man, accused of the same crimes as Patton, will make bail and be free.

Question: Do you agree with that concept?

As a side note, the existence of bail bondsmen — people who lend money to those whom the bondsmen trust to return to court — tacitly assumes they:

  1. Are better able to evaluate the reliability of the accused than is the judge who sets the bond.
  2. Are better able to apprehend a fleeing accused than are the police.

Question: Do you agree with those concepts?

If you answered “No” to both agreement questions, then you feel the entire money-bail system is unfair, outdated and should be eliminated.

Yet it exists, as a constant reminder of the Gap between the rich and the rest — one more reason to institute the Ten Steps To Prosperity (below).

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

==================================================================================================================================================

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY