Day 1: The war on the 99% begins

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Today is the first day of the Trump reign, and the war on the 99% already has begun:

Trump’s HUD won’t cut FHA loan fees
By Gail MarksJarvisChicago Tribune

A plan to reduce the fees homebuyers pay on Federal Housing Administration loans was abandoned Friday immediately after the Trump presidential administration took office.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced less than a month ago that on Jan. 27 it would start charging people who took out FHA loans a lower annual fee. The plan was to cut the fee to 0.60 percent, down from 0.85 percent.

But HUD on Friday released a letter that it was suspending the plan “indefinitely.”

The reduction would have saved a person who bought or refinanced a home with a 30-year $200,000 FHA mortgage about $500 a year.

FHA loans are popular with first-time homebuyers because the loans are available to people with lower credit scores and less savings than it takes to get a conventional loan.

Hurt by massive defaults during the housing crisis, FHA increased the annual fees it charges borrowers several times as the agency worked to rebuild its reserves. HUD has said reserves now exceed requirements.

The people with lower credit scores now will pay more to a federal agency that wants to “rebuild its reserves.”

Never mind that a federal agency neither has, nor needs, “reserves.” The federal government creates dollars ad hoc, simply by spending. (See: Monetary Sovereignty)

The Trump administration wants you to believe that taking an extra $500 per year out of the pockets of the poor and middle classes — out of the economy — is a good way to “Make America Great, Again.”

Day 1: Trump signs order to unwind Obamacare
By Ashley Parker and Amy Goldstein, The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump signed an executive order late Friday giving federal agencies broad powers to unwind regulations created under the Affordable Care Act, which might include enforcement of the penalty for people who fail to carry the health insurance that the law requires of most Americans.

Sounds good, right? People won’t be required to carry health insurance. What could possibly go wrong with that?

The executive order, signed in the Oval Office as one of the new president’s first actions, directs agencies to grant relief to all constituencies affected by the sprawling 2010 health care law: consumers, insurers, hospitals, doctors, pharmaceutical companies, states and others.

It does not describe specific federal rules to be softened or lifted, but it appears to give room for agencies to eliminate an array of ACA taxes and requirements.

“Potentially the biggest effect of this order could be widespread waivers from the individual mandate, which would likely create chaos in the individual insurance market,” said Larry Levitt, senior vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

O.K., so a little chaos. I’m sure Trump has thought this out.

In addition, he said, the order suggests that insurers may have new flexibility on the benefits they must provide.

O.K. so fewer benefits. Surely, Trump must have thought this out.

“This doesn’t grant any new powers to federal agencies, but it sends a clear signal that they should use whatever authority they have to scale back regulations and penalties. The Trump administration is looking to unwind the ACA, not necessarily waiting for Congress,” Levitt said.

Hey, who needs regulations?  Gee, I sure hope Trump has thought this out.

But in giving agencies permission to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from or delay” ACA rules, the order appears to create room for the Department of Health and Human Services to narrow or gut a set of medical benefits that the ACA compels insurers to include in health plans.

Gut medical benefits? Yikes! I’m not so sure Trump has thought this out!

The order does not mention Medicaid, but it says one of its goals is to “provide greater flexibility to States,” raising the question of whether the Trump HHS might try to loosen rules for states that have expanded the program for lower-income Americans, as the law allows.

Translation: “Flexibility to States” is conservative-speak for “cut benefits to the 99%.” Maybe Trump has thought this out.

“While President Trump may have promised a smooth transition” from the current law to a replacement, said Leslie Dach, director of the fledgling Protect Our Care Coalition, “the executive order does the opposite, threatening disruption for health providers and patients.”

“Disruption for health providers and patients?” What do you think? Has Trump thought this out?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Trump Voters: Will You Still Be Laughing When The Reality Sinks In?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

O.K., let’s see how he does

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Personally, I believe Donald Trump is an incompetent, amoral, egomaniacal boob, a wannabe dictator, who never should be allowed to walk the streets without a leash held by an adult.

I may be wrong.

Perhaps, by some miracle I can’t foresee,  he will accomplish some or all of the good things he says he will, and won’t do some of the really awful things he says he will.

He starts with the advantage (?) of a Republican Congress, and despite the dark nature of his inaugural address, America is on the upswing after the disaster named “Bush.”

(No, the “wealth, strength, and confidence of our country” has not “disappeared over the horizon” as President Trump claimed.)

So to be fair, we’ll want a baseline from which to measure President Trump’s accomplishments, and Erik Zorn, of the Chicago Tribune, has been wise enough to provide you with that baseline:

Public approval of Donald Trump: 40 percent
Public approval of Barack Obama: 58 percent
Unemployment rate: 4.7 percent
Civilian labor force participation rate: 62.7 percent
National average price per gallon of regular gasoline: $2.33
Consumer confidence indexes: 113.7
Annual inflation rate: 2.1 percent
Median U.S. household family income: $53,889
Percentage of the nonelderly U.S. population without health insurance: 10.4 percent
Poverty rates: adults, 13.5 percent; children, 19.7 percent
National average 30-year fixed mortgage interest rate: 3.96 percent
National debt: $19.96 trillion
Annual federal budget deficit: $441 billion (2.6 percent of the gross domestic product)
Financial markets: Dow Jones industrial average, 19,732.40; Nasdaq, 5,540; Standard & Poors 500, 2,264
GDP growth rate: 3.5 percent
Teen birth rate: 22.3 per 1,000 female teenagers
Out-of-wedlock birth rate: 43.4 per 1,000 females
Abortion rate: 14.6 per 1,000 females
Number of federal prison inmates: 189,316
Overall number of adult prisoners: 6,741,400 (about 2.7 percent of the population)
Violent-crime victimization rate: 372.6 per 100,000 persons
Average temperature of the world’s land and ocean surfaces: 58.69 degrees Fahrenheit
U.S. high school graduation rate: 83.2 percent
U.S. monthly international trade deficit: $45.2 billion
Immigrants living in the U.S. illegally: 11.1 million
Abusers of opioid drugs, including heroin: 12.7 million

Again, this is not a perfectly focused snapshot of a moment in time. Some of these numbers are estimates that will be revised for early 2017 in a year or two, at which point we’ll have a more precise baseline for the Trump years.

Nor is it comprehensive.

It doesn’t attempt to quantify our standing in the world, the status of civil and voting rights for historically disadvantaged groups, the quality of our air and water and so on.

But in this bundle of yardsticks are ways to measure Trump against his boasts and promises, to establish reference points for America’s greatness or lack thereof.

Wary as I am of this man — his methods, motives and seeming madness — I hope I’m wrong about him. I hope all these numbers improve. I hope he returns the nation to us in better shape than when he took it over.

Keep this list in your favorite file, where it will not be lost, and as the weeks and months pass, compare it with a then-current list.

If America continues its eight-year trajectory of improvement, let’s all be among those cheering loudly.

But if the tide turns and things veer toward the bottom, we all should be prepared for the inevitable, right-wing, all-purpose excuses: “Hillary would have been worse” or  “Obama did it,” followed by, “I didn’t vote for him, anyway. I voted for Rand Paul.”

Watch for those excuses immediately following every Trump lie.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

 

Free education for all and the student loan scam

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

I just endured a long, painful discussion with a person who claimed that social benefits like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, poverty aids, education aids, etc. cause “dependence” (his word), so we should eliminate those programs.

He also assured me that soon, people no longer will accept the U.S. dollar, and that the housing bubble, inner-city poverty, and recessions, all were caused by federal deficits. And  “recession/depression is how the economy heals itself,” (his words) and the graphs and data I showed him — graphs and data that proved his ideas wrong — are “misleading” (his word).

As you undoubtedly have learned, it is useless to try to teach people who cling to very strong beliefs and will not accept mathematical data and other facts. If a believer closes his eyes to facts, where can one go?

The only reason I tolerate such people is in hopes that others will learn from the discussion.

O.K., now that I have vented, let’s get to the real subject of this post: Student loans.

To be competitive in an increasingly complex world, America needs educated students. And, as the sciences have become more sophisticated, America needs more highly educated, advanced degree students— masters, doctors, teachers, and researchers.

These are the people who develop the ideas, and it is ideas that keep our nation competitive. 

Physical work is necessary, but growth also requires the imagination that comes from mental work. The world has grown past the point in which physically planting, hammering, and sewing are keys to national success.

Because education greatly benefits America, one would expect America to want to pay for education. And in fact, because of the enlightenment of our founders, America does pay for education, but mostly for grades K-12. It was all that was needed in days of yore.

Somehow, though the world has changed, there has remained a tacit assumption that college is unnecessary and elitist, and most suitable for those who can afford to pay for it.

Today, instead of paying for advanced education, America lends money to students –not to rich students, but to those having less money. The parents of rich students understand that student loans are a scam and financially are able to avoid them.

Repayment of these loans impoverishes parents and young students who otherwise might be able to use their educations to start new businesses and build better lives, not only for themselves, but for all of us.

Our Monetarily Sovereign federal government has no need of, nor use for, repayment — the government creates, ad hoc, all the money it uses — and the loan program causes money to be siphoned off by wealthy, and sometimes crooked, lenders.

Navient sued over student loan operations
Company denies abuse allegations, says action political
By Jesse Hamilton, Bloomberg News

Navient Corp. was sued by a federal regulator over allegations that the student loan giant “systematically” cheated borrowers.

“For years, Navient failed consumers who counted on the company to help give them a fair chance to pay back their student loans,” CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in the statement.

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who led a multistate investigation into Navient, said Wednesday that her office has also sued Navient and its subsidiaries for “widespread abuses across all aspects of its business,” including putting customers in subprime loans the company knew were going to fail.

The suit calls for restitution, the return of unlawful profits, civil penalties and canceling or revising agreements with Illinois consumers.

Whether or not Navient is guilty as is claimed, clearly our federal government subjects  America’s future to unnecessary and impoverishing loan-plus-interest repayments. The government allows, even forces, our less wealthy children to be cheated out of their futures.

The federal government allows, even forces, our less wealthy children to be cheated out of their futures.

Navient handles a portfolio of about $300 billion in student loans and acts as a servicer for the Department of Education.

Why does the U.S. Department of Education use a private servicer for those unnecessary student loans? Why does the government add injury to injury, by forcing less financially-endowed students to pay interest to rapacious lenders — lenders whose profit motives are not in the best interests of America, but rather the lining of their own pockets?

The answer: It is the same reason why not a single criminal banker has been prosecuted and jailed for the rampant lawlessness that caused the Great Recession of 2008.

The answer is: The rich have bribed Congress and the President with campaign contributions now and promises of lucrative employment, later.

It also is the reason why you have been told federal deficit spending is “unsustainable,” and will “lead to inflation,” and will “end the American dollar” This is all part of the Big Lie (See: You understand the Big Lie), sponsored by the rich.

The Big Lie says taxpayers fund federal spending.  While state and local taxpayers do fund state and local spending, the federal government is different. It uniquely is Monetarily Sovereign (See: Monetary Sovereignty)

It never can run short of its own sovereign currency the dollar. Even if all federal tax collections fell to $0, the federal government could continue paying its bills, forever.

The Big Lie is a lie that has been force-fed to the American public for at least 75 years (See: From “ticking time bomb” to looming collapse.”) It is a lie that tells us federal deficit spending causes inflation — even hyperinflation — a lie that gives us the false scare-examples of the Weimar Republic and Zimbabwe. (See: What causes hyperinflation?)

Seventy-five years of scare tactic lies that continue even today, and still we never have had hyperinflation, and even inflation itself is controlled by the Fed via interest rate control. (See: Much ado about nothing. The end of the dollar as a reserve currency)

One final factor inhibits the education of our young: The Gap between the rich and the rest.

The dynamics of groups is such that each of us belongs to an income/wealth/power group that wishes to distance itself from “lesser,” groups while drawing closer to “superior” groups. (See: How does the Big Lie enable the Gap?)

Thus, the public is predisposed to believe the Big Lie because people do not want those poorer to receive Gap-closing benefits — what has been derided as “free stuff.”

The rich have led the public willingly to believe Gap closing is “unfair” because it uses “taxpayer money” and causes “dependence.” (See:  Looking down. The disdain for those below usall false, all part of the Big Lie.

In Summary:

  1. America’s growth and competitiveness are based on education at all levels.
  2. For the same fundamental reasons why the federal government pays for roads, bridges, and the military, it should pay to educate our young people beyond grade 12.
  3. The rich bribe Congress to pass laws that widen the Gap between the rich and the rest
  4. The rich also bribe the media (via ownership) and economists (via university and “think tank” contributions) to tell the public deficit spending is “unsustainable,” “paid for by taxpayers,” and will “cause inflation,” aka the Big Lie.
  5. The Big Lie readily is accepted because the public emotionally doesn’t want the Gap below to be narrowed.

We, the American public must grow up and overcome the allure of the Big Lie. We must resist the dominance of the rich; we must insist that our federal government fund free college for everyone who wants it.

“Free education for all” costs us taxpayers nothing, while our future, and our children’s future, depends on it.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Why writing about economics has become impossible

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

I’ve had trouble focusing on economics lately because I keep being distracted by Donald Trump.

Obviously, what the President of the United States says and does has a profound effect on the economy of the United States and of the entire world. But who knows what Trump is liable to do or say next?

The man is the very definition of a loose cannon.  Say something unkind about him, and if he learns of it, you will receive a volley of insults — mostly lies.  Like a 13-year old, he has zero self-control. He needs a parent to close is Twitter account.

If every country, including the U.S., is in doubt about what the President will do next, what will be the effect on U.S. and world economics?

Obviously, Trump repeatedly demonstrates he is in thrall of Vladimir Putin, whether or not those “Golden Shower” claims are true.

If Putin has sway over Trump, what will be the effect on U.S. and world economics?

Obviously, Trump can change opinions on a dime, and afterward, claim he never really changed at all.  Consider the subject of climate change. You tell me what his position is.

(Consider that he has picked Scott Pruitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], a guy who denies climate change, repeatedly has sued the EPA to prevent limits to CO2 emissions, gets much of his fundraising from oil companies, and year after year, has opposed efforts to save the environment.)

If there is doubt about what the U.S. government will do about climate change, what will be the effect on U.S. and world economics?

Obviously, Trump also is in thrall of the big banks that caused the Great Recession, and cost millions of Americans their homes and jobs. Yet he talks about being the “greatest jobs President,” and has hired not one, not two, not three, but SIX guys from Goldman Sachs to advise him — and this after criticizing “crooked Hillary” for being too close to bankers.

With all those bankers telling Trump what to do, what will be the effect on U.S. and world economics?

Obviously, he doesn’t concern himself with conflicts of interest. He has refused to disengage from businesses that will benefit from his Presidential decisions. For Secretary of State, he nominated Rex Tillerson, a man whose extensive business ties to Russia and Exxon will present enormous conflicts of interest.

Our President and his Secretary of State will be able to profit financially from Presidential decisions. What will be the effect on U.S. and world economics?

Obviously, Trump doesn’t concern himself with knowledge or experience.  He nominated Ben Carson, to be Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. His job involves fair housing laws, affordable housing and access to mortgages, yet he believes poor people don’t need help from the government, and he himself has no governmental or legal experience.

What will be the economic effect of Carson’s ignorance about the fundamentals of his job, and his apathy to the plight of the poor?

Obviously, he doesn’t care about setting a course for his administration. Many of Trump’s appointments claim to disagree with Trump’s own pronouncements. Examples: Jeff Sessions for Attorney General, John F. Kelly for Homeland Security Secretary, James N. Mattis for Defense Secretary, Mike Pompeo for C.I.A. Director, Ryan Zinke for Interior Secretary, Wilbur Ross for Commerce Secretary, and Dan Coats for Director of National Intelligence.

How will having so many people, who claim to disagree with Trump on fundamental issues, affect the U.S.and world economics?

Personally, I still believe we should institute the Ten Steps to Prosperity (below).  But I cannot begin to imagine what will become of a nation left functionally leaderless by an indecisive, resistant to learning egomaniac, surrounded by privatizers, deniers, innumerable conflicts of interest, banksters and a veritable rogues gallery of millionaires and billionaires.

And from this, we economists would try to answer the question, “In what direction is America and the world headed?”

It’s impossible to imagine.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the have-mores and the have-less.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich can afford better health care than can the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (Social Security for All) (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefitting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY