–Federal savings = the economy’s loss

The debt hawks are to economics as the creationists are to biology. They, who do not understand Monetary Sovereignty, do not understand economics.

According to Joe Davidson, a columnist for the Washington Post:

“Here are some of the proposals that will have new life in the Republican-led House:

“* Federal employees would have two weeks off without pay, under a plan by Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), who says it would save $5.5 billion. Members of Congress also would be called to sacrifice by taking a 10-percent pay cut.

“* Federal raises and bonuses would be frozen for one year, and the number of employees would be limited, under legislation sponsored by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.).

“* The growth in the federal workforce would be cut by limiting hires to one for every two retirees, under a measure proposed by Rep. Cynthia M. Lummis (R-Wyo.). Her bill excludes the departments of Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs, which are among the government’s largest employers.
ad_icon

“* The federal workforce, with exceptions for security-related agencies, would shrink through attrition to February 2009 levels under legislation offered by Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah).

“* The number of political appointees would drop to 2,000 from about 3,500 under a plan pushed by McCain and Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), who was defeated Tuesday.

“* Legislation sponsored by Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) that would have eliminated the proposed 1.4 percent pay raise for federal employees was defeated in the House this year, but similar legislation could fare better next year.

“* Federal employees could be fired if they fall behind on their taxes, a proposal pushed by Coburn and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).”

Sounds wonderful, except for one small detail. Every dollar “saved” by these maneuvers is a dollar lost to the economy. For instance, forcing Federal employees to take two weeks without pay, would cost the economy the $5.5 billion Davidson talks about. That’s a $5.5 billion anti-stimulus.

So while the Fed feebly attempts to pump money into the economy, Congress attempts to reduce the amount of money pumped into the economy.

This is yet another example of Congress and the media having no clue about Monetary Sovereignty. If you want to help your country, please take a minute to contact your Congressional representatives and tell them to acquaint themselves with Monetary Sovereignty.

Or we can continue to suffer a recession every five years, on average, as we have for the past century.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
http://www.rodgermitchell.com

No nation can tax itself into prosperity. Those who say the stimulus “didn’t work” remind of the guy whose house is on fire. A neighbor runs with a garden hose and starts spraying, but the fire continues. The neighbor wants to call the fire department, which would bring the big hoses, but the guy says, “Don’t call. As you can see, water doesn’t put out fires.”

One thought on “–Federal savings = the economy’s loss

  1. Note to Kathleen Parker, at the Washington Post, regarding her 11/4/10 article titled, “Blindsided by their own blindness” at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/03/AR2010110305318.html?wpisrc=nl_pmopinions&sid=ST2010110304145
    ================================================
    Ms. Parker, you are correct that President Obama communicated, communicated, communicated. Unfortunately, when one talks a great deal, but communicates the wrong message, all his wonderful communication is for naught.

    The one thing he did not communicate is monetary sovereignty

    He didn’t tell people why federal deficits benefit the economy, and why spending cuts will slow recovery. Perhaps he himself does not understand monetary sovereignty. But he should.

    You said, “Whether candidates could properly articulate market arguments was less important than whether they understood that expanded government means less individual freedom. You don’t need a doctorate in Keynesian theory to get them apples.

    Because you yourself do not understand monetary sovereignty, you do not understand that a growing economy requires a growing supply of money. Deficit spending is the government’s method for adding money to the economy. As for freedom, don’t confuse federal spending with freedom restrictions. The people in Haiti have plenty of freedom. They just have no money.

    Yes, you don’t need a doctorate in Keynesian theory, but you do need to understand monetary sovereignty, which requires about 15 minutes of reading at https://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/monetarily-sovereign-the-key-to-understanding-economics/

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s