Who are cult followers?

On July 16, 2015, we posted, “Is your favorite candidate a psychopath? How to tell.” The post listed ten criteria and, by coincidence, ten Presidential candidates, and asked readers to decide which was most likely to be a psychopath. 

My scoring, even back then, when Donald Trump had much less public exposure, was that he clearly “won.”

Almost a year later, on May 12, 2016, we posted “Will our next President be a psychopath?” which introduced you to the Hare Psychopathy Check List-Revised (PCL-R).

It consists of the following twenty criteria, which are to be scored 0, 1, or 2 (as in “not,’ “somewhat,” and “extremely,”):

Out of a maximum score of 40, the cut-off for the label of “psychopath” is 30 in the United States and 25 in the United Kingdom. A cut-off score of 25 is also sometimes used for research purposes.

We left it to readers to decide which Presidential candidate most earned the description, “psychopath.”

Four days later, we posted, “A psychopath slipped into the White House . . .

It contained the same twenty criteria, but with expanded descriptions of each, along with our scoring and the reasons. Trump scored 39 out of 40 on the psychopath scale.

Finally, on October 28, 2025, we posted, “Psychological Assessment of Donald Trump,” which included the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), a psychological instrument that’s widely used in research settings.

It appears in hundreds of peer-reviewed psychology papers and is considered the “gold-standard” self-report scale for grandiose narcissism (as opposed to “vulnerable” narcissism, which requires other instruments).

It covers: Entitlement / Grandiosity (Narcissism), Manipulation / Cynicism (Machiavellianism), and Callousness / Impulsivity / Lack of empathy (Psychopathy).

The subject is ranked on five levels: 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly Agree, and there are 27 questions.

I had my own opinions, but out of curiosity, I asked ChatGPT to apply those rankings to Donald Trump. The AI’s assessment: “A clinician seeing these traits might say: ‘This person shows extremely elevated narcissistic traits, with strong malevolent tendencies.

“‘If corroborated in functional assessment, they could meet criteria for NPD — potentially among the most extreme seen.’”

By any impartial measure, there can be no doubt that Donald J. Trump is a psychopath with narcissistic personality disorder and strong malevolent tendencies.

Given his massive political and military power and his past and ongoing misdeeds, Donald Trump can be considered the single most dangerous and harmful human on planet Earth.

It’s not a close call. Anyone who can understand a newspaper, radio, or television knows that Trump is mentally and psychologically unfit for the power he holds.

This leaves us with the questions: Who supports Trump? What is their mental state?

It widely is recognized that Trump’s MAGA group has all the markings of a cult. 

The word “cult” derives from the Latin term cultus, meaning “worship.” Cults are groups with unusual, often extreme, religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs and rituals.

Extreme devotion to a particular person, object, or goal is another characteristic often ascribed to cults.

Common Features of People Who Tend to Join Cults

A. Personality traits

  1. High suggestibility/compliance: Prone to follow accept radical ideas without critical evaluation.
  2. Strong need for belonging/affiliation: Unusually strong desire for social connection, often after social isolation or major life transitions.
  3. Low self-esteem/identity diffusion: Struggles with identity or self-worth may seek clear rules, purpose, or a defined role
  4. Openness to irrational experience: Receptivity to unusual ideas, especially in spiritual or fringe groups.
  5. Authoritarian submission: Tendency to defer to powerful authority figures.
  6. Low critical thinking/cognitive closure: Preference for certainty and clear answers, Uncomfortable with ambiguity.

B. Life circumstances/situational factors

  1. Major transitions —such as moving to a new city, graduating, failing, losing a loved one, or other disruptions — make people vulnerable.
  2. Isolation or marginalization: Emotional or physical isolation can make group inclusion feel intensely rewarding.
  3. Search for meaning/existential crises: People grappling with purpose or identity are more likely to be drawn to a structured ideology.
  4. Poverty, especially combined with feelings of unfair treatment by others — relatives, bosses, “the world.”

C. Emotional traits

  1. High emotional intensity: Strong fears, hatreds, and loves. Desire for vengeance, retribution.
  2. Heightened anxiety or insecurity: Desire for certainty and control makes strict rules and hierarchical systems appealing.
  3. Idealism: Strong desire to “save the world” or to achieve a higher purpose.

D. Cognitive style

  1. Black-and-white thinking: “Us vs. them” worldview.
  2. Suspension of skepticism: A willingness to accept extraordinary claims without evidence. Highly influenced by conspiracy theories.
  3. Absorption of fantasy-proneness: Tendency to become deeply involved in mental imagery, rituals, or charismatic narratives. 

The above are common features of “true believers.” Regarding the MAGA cult, these are the people Donald Trump referred to when he said, “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters, OK?”

Not all MAGAs are true believers, however. Most of the politicians in the Republican Party recognize Trump’s psychopathy, yet they act like true believers. These are the psychopathic sycophants.

Some may even be highly intelligent, educated, and accomplished. This group is very well-represented in cults — often more than the “vulnerable/low self-esteem” stereotype.

Psychopathic sycophants are: Not true believers; Not passive users; Not vulnerable idealists; They are opportunists who consciously exploit the leader’s pathology. 

They recognize the leader’s: Fragility, delusions,  need for adoration, lack of impulse control, and lack of self-awareness. They weaponize those weaknesses for their own gain.

Think: Stephen Miller, Jared Kushner, Kristi Noem, Elise Stefanik, Mike Johnson.

Think: Himmler, Goebbels, Beria, Bannon, Rasputin

These individuals hold true power while pretending to flatter the unfortunate egomaniacal, narcissistic figurehead who demands attention.

The Four Essential Groups in an Authoritarian Cult

Group Who They Are What They Want Core Psychological Driver Why They Support the Cult Power Level
1 The Leader / The Narcissist Center The authoritarian figure — often grandiose, manipulative, insecure Worship, control, validation Pathological narcissism; fear of irrelevance The cult provides a mirror reflecting their greatness High (but fragile)
2 The True Believers Devoted followers; emotionally invested Meaning, identity, belonging, certainty Anxiety relief; dependency, fear, anger, hatred The cult gives them purpose and safety High (when organized)
3 The Power Seekers Elites who know the leader is flawed but use them Access to power, wealth, protection Cynicism and ambition The cult is a tool for personal gain Very High — They often run things
4 The Users / The Audience Those who feed the cult indirectly: voters, viewers, consumers Entertainment, alignment, tribe identity Social conformity; curiosity The cult is spectacle and identity affirmation Variable — They enable survival

The leader doesn’t rule alone. The cult cannot survive without clever collaborators, the sycophants (# 3):

  1. Translate delusions into policy
  2. Shield the leader from consequences
  3. Craft enemies for him to hate
  4. Exploit believers
  5. Script the narrative
  6. Enforce loyalty tests
  7. Manage purges
  8. Inherit the machinery when the cult crumbles
  9. Often are more intelligent and far more dangerous than the leader is.

The narcissistic leader is replaceable. The movement’s structure isn’t. When the figurehead falls: The sycophants retain the networks, the militias, the donors, the propaganda machine. They select the next leader.

When history asks: “How did one deranged man nearly destroy a nation?” The answer is: “He didn’t do it alone.”

Nearly all cults eventually collapse or split up. This is how these 4 groups behave during an authoritarian collapse

Behavior of the 4 Groups During Authoritarian Collapse

Group What Triggers Their Shift How They React What They Say Final Role
1️⃣ The Leader (Narcissist, Psychopath Center) Loss of power, public humiliation, coup or death,  legal accountability Denial–>rage–>paranoia–> self-victimization. Purges allies, demands more loyalty, escalates lies. “I am the real victim!” “They’re all traitors!” “Only I can solve this!” Retreats into fantasy; may flee, radicalize, or self-destruct
2️⃣ True Believers (Devoted Base) Cognitive dissonance: Leader fails, prophecies break, scandals Split into factions:
a) Rationalizers (rewrite history)
b) Radicals (double down)
c) Defectors (shamed + silent)
“He was betrayed!” or “He didn’t go far enough!” Fragmented, often scapegoated, prosecuted
3️⃣ Opportunists (Power Seekers/Inner Circle) When loyalty becomes a liability Jump ship first. Publicly rewrite their own history. Destroy evidence. Blame the leader for everything. “I barely knew him.” “I tried to warn everyone.” “I took orders.” Land on their feet — often become leaders of “the recovery” — or prosecuted.
4️⃣ Users (Passive audience: media, public, voters) Loss of entertainment value or stigma of association Quiet disengagement. Retroactively claim they “always” saw through it. Shift attention to the next spectacle. “I just watched for the drama.” “Don’t blame me.” Grant social permission to move on — but leave the door open for the next demagogue

As you read about Trump’s followers and their Common Features, you will see why facts and logical arguments do not influence them. They were not persuaded by logic but rather by their own psychological needs.

People do not leave a cult when they see the truth. They leave when the cost of believing outweighs the comfort it provides.

Trump gives his followers what they believe they need, so to sway them requires replacement. They will not willingly go into the “void” of a world without Trump. 

MAGAs will regretfully leave the cult for these reasons:

  1. Betrayal by the Leader: The leader violates the follower’s core expectations: Breaking the cult’s own rules, corruption / self-enrichment, abandoning followers during a crisis
  2. Direct Personal Harm to the Member: Financial ruin, Legal trouble, Loss of family, Emotional or physical abuse
  3. Witnessing Harm to Innocents: Especially to children or loyal fellow members.
  4. Repeated Contradictions: Failed predictions, Broken promises, Internal inconsistencies, Constant shifting of the narrative
  5. Loss of Community Reinforcement: Friends leave, Media support shifts, Authority figures break ranks
  6. A Trusted Messenger From the Outside: A friend or loved one expresses care, not superiority, concern not facts or pity.
  7. A Soft Landing: A place to go — socially, emotionally, practically.

Deprogramming fails when leaving means isolation or loss of identity and support.

MAGAs do not support Trump because of logic. They support him because he fills a need or a void in their lives.

 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Donald Trump’s secret religion

–Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Donald Trump has a secret.

I read an article written by one of the trainers who teaches airport dogs how to signal the presence of drugs.

The dog repeatedly is given a reward for success. But you knew that, didn’t you?

What you may not have known is (according to this trainer) the best reward is not food. The best reward is play.  The best reward is fun. The best reward is approval.

The trainer carries a ball, and each time the dog does what is wanted, the trainer tosses the ball in a game of “fetch.” Apparently, dogs love play, fun, and approval so much, they will choose fetch over food treats.

People are like that, although in a special “people” way. We genetically are predisposed toward fun, excitement, competition, and victory.

Visualize the fans at a football game. They feel powerful emotions.  They are elated or very angry. They scream themselves hoarse.

People don’t do that over food.

If you were floating above the stadium, and looking down, you saw people screaming and flailing their arms, you might have thought they are stupid or insane.

And you would be right. They have, in fact, lost their rational minds. Their rational minds know that the game’s results will have little effect on their lives. But their irrational mind cares greatly.

Or think about a rock concert and the screaming fans. They barely can hear the music, but they are “there,” in the presence of “the man.” They are part of a special group.

The rapper grabs his crotch and the people think — no, “think” is the wrong word — the people feel as though in the presence of God, and His word is truth.

They not only have lost their ratonal minds during the event, but later they still will have powerful, illogical beliefs about the band and the star. Their love for him might be the greatest love they ever have felt.

Now visualize the “fans” at a Donald Trump event. The people are elated or angry, and always highly emotional. They lean on his every word, his every gesture.

Trump gives them what they crave. He gives them enemies to hate. He gives them hope. He sneers. He mugs for them. He gestures like a rock star, and they scream in appreciation for being “in” on his “special” message, just for them.

He speaks to them in a special, private code.

They don’t care about the words or even the “music.” They crave the experience of being in the cult.

Logical argument does not have the same impact. A professor, speaking to a class, does not generate the same emotions.

No sane person believes Trump emotionally, experientially, or intellectually is qualified to be President of the United States. He has every bad attribute — a liar, a womanizer, ignorant, inexperienced, egomaniacal, hate-mongering, emotionally immature, bigoted.

Like a rock star’s fans, Trump’s fans simply don’t care. 

Provide absolute proof of his deceptions and incompetence, and they will grow angry. They don’t want to hear it. Even when Trump himself admits to groping women, and later denies it, his fans believe his denials. No logic there.

Trump said it, “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.” He is right. His fans would created excuses for his actions.

When a rock star takes drugs, gets drunk in public, trashes hotel rooms, beats his girlfriend, fires a gun, or commits other atrocities, he retains much of his fan base, because he makes them part of his game. They are “in” and the rest of the world is out.

They love belonging to his special faction. They cannot leave the sect, for to do so would make them empty, alone, and friendless, bereft of the approving society they desperately need.

These followers are, what Eric Hoffer termed, “true believers.”

Wikipedia: Hoffer states that mass movements begin with a widespread “desire for change” from discontented people who place their control outside their power and who also have no confidence in existing culture or traditions.

Believing there is no hope for advancement or satisfaction as an individual, true believers are ripe to participate in a movement that offers the option of subsuming their individual lives in a larger collective.

Leaders are vital in the growth of a mass movement, but for the leader to find any success, the seeds of the mass movement must already exist in people’s hearts.

The “New Poor” are the most likely source of converts for mass movements, for they recall their former wealth with resentment and blame others for their current misfortune.

Example: The  working-classes in Germany who passionately supported Hitler in the 1930s after suffering years of economic hardship.

While mass movements idealize the past and glorify the future, the present world is denigrated: “The radical and the reactionary loath the present.”

Thus, by regarding the modern world as vile and worthless, mass movements inspire a perpetual battle against the present.

True believers respond to the slogan “Make America great, again,” because it perfectly idealizes the past and glorifies the future. 

Mass movements aggressively promote the use of doctrines that elevate faith over reason and serve as “fact-proof screens between the faithful and the realities of the world.

Reasonable people wonder why Trump’s followers seem immune to facts. Almost every day Trump says something blatantly untrue, or completely outrageous. Yet he is Teflon.  His followers ignore his lies, and tell themselves “what he really meant.”

They are true believers.

To spread and reinforce their doctrine, mass movements use persuasion, coercion, and proselytization.

Persuasion must be thrilling enough to excite the listener yet vague enough to allow “the frustrated to… hear the echo of their own musings in the impassioned double talk.

“I was going to say ‘dummy’ Bush; I won’t say it. I won’t say it,” Trump said in January.

“I promised I would not say that Carly Fiorina ran Hewlett-Packard into the ground, that she laid off tens of thousands of people and she got viciously fired. I said I will not say it, so I will not say it.

I refuse to call Megyn Kelly a bimbo, because that would not be politically correct. Instead, I will only call her a lightweight reporter!”

“Unlike others, I never attacked dopey Jon Stewart for his phony last name. Would never do that!”

Trump’s followers love the joke.  They howl in laughter. They are “in” with him.

Donald Trump’s secret is that he taps into the needs and hungers of true believers.

Trump’s followers, like the airport dogs, need to be thrilled — and double-talked.

At a recent rally in Fresno, Trump stated that, despite five years of low rainfall in California, “There is no drought. They turn the water into the ocean. If I win, believe me, we’re going to start opening up the water so that you can have your farmers survive.”

Now, this is a very confusing statement. What could he mean? Go ahead and choose your answer to this multiple-choice problem.

If you click the above link, you will find different answers to what Trump might have meant with his double-talk.

But it doesn’t matter what Trump “really” meant, or whether he meant anything at all. Each of his true believers hears what he wants to hear. That is the magic of double-talk.

Successful mass movements need not believe in a god, but they must believe in a devil. Hatred unifies the true believers, and “the ideal devil is a foreigner” attributed with nearly supernatural powers of evil.

For Trump, such “foreigners” as Muslims, Mexicans, immigrants, all Latinos and “the media” are devils — all to be hated. He also termed Hillary Clinton “the devil.”

Most recently, the Mexican billionaire, Carlos Slim, joined the vast ranks of Trump’s hated devils.

There is no logic to Trump — he is all emotion — so logic cannot defeat him. That is why his comments about groping women had a significant impact. These comments are illogically important.

Being a groper and a cheater does not logically affect one’s ability to run the country. But his words affected women emotionally. Too many of them have suffered from boors like Trump.

And his words affected men, who feel protective of their women. They visualize with disgust, Trump’s dirty hands on their wives and daughters.

So despite all the real, logical reasons Trump is unqualified to be President, his groping of women became the most important reason.

True believers are followers, and one thing a follower wants is to follow a winner. When the leader begins losing, the movement grinds down.

Remember what happened to Benito Mussolini, after Italy was defeated in WWII? He was shot, and his body was hung upside down in the public square. The passions he fomented turned against him.

Trump’s passionate fans will turn against him when the sanity sets in and they realize they have been conned by a man who promised much, but lied, lied, lied.

They will realize he cared only for himself, and that they were part of nothing. The “belonging” was an illusion,

And it finally will end when his true believers decide he has committed the worst sin of all: He just isn’t interesting or fun anymore. And worst, he’s a loser.

Then, they will despise him for it, and turn to another religion.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

=======================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

The single most important problems in economics involve the excessive income/wealth/power Gaps between the rich and the rest.

Wide Gaps negatively affect poverty, health and longevity, education, housing, law and crime, war, leadership, ownership, bigotry, supply and demand, taxation, GDP, international relations, scientific advancement, the environment, human motivation and well-being, and virtually every other issue in economics.

Implementation of The Ten Steps To Prosperity can narrow the Gaps:

Ten Steps To Prosperity:
1. ELIMINATE FICA (Ten Reasons to Eliminate FICA )
Although the article lists 10 reasons to eliminate FICA, there are two fundamental reasons:
*FICA is the most regressive tax in American history, widening the Gap by punishing the low and middle-income groups, while leaving the rich untouched, and
*The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses FICA to support Social Security and Medicare.
2. FEDERALLY FUNDED MEDICARE — PARTS A, B & D, PLUS LONG TERM CARE — FOR EVERYONE (H.R. 676, Medicare for All )
This article addresses the questions:
*Does the economy benefit when the rich afford better health care than the rest of Americans?
*Aside from improved health care, what are the other economic effects of “Medicare for everyone?”
*How much would it cost taxpayers?
*Who opposes it?”
3. PROVIDE AN ANNUAL ECONOMIC BONUS TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA, AND/OR EVERY STATE, A PER CAPITA ECONOMIC BONUS (The JG (Jobs Guarantee) vs the GI (Guaranteed Income) vs the EB) Or institute a reverse income tax.
This article is the fifth in a series about direct financial assistance to Americans:

Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Employer of Last Resort is a bad idea. Sunday, Jan 1 2012
MMT’s Job Guarantee (JG) — “Another crazy, rightwing, Austrian nutjob?” Thursday, Jan 12 2012
Why Modern Monetary Theory’s Jobs Guarantee is like the EU’s euro: A beloved solution to the wrong problem. Tuesday, May 29 2012
“You can’t fire me. I’m on JG” Saturday, Jun 2 2012

Economic growth should include the “bottom” 99.9%, not just the .1%, the only question being, how best to accomplish that. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) favors giving everyone a job. Monetary Sovereignty (MS) favors giving everyone money. The five articles describe the pros and cons of each approach.
4. FREE EDUCATION (INCLUDING POST-GRAD) FOR EVERYONEFive reasons why we should eliminate school loans
Monetarily non-sovereign State and local governments, despite their limited finances, support grades K-12. That level of education may have been sufficient for a largely agrarian economy, but not for our currently more technical economy that demands greater numbers of highly educated workers.
Because state and local funding is so limited, grades K-12 receive short shrift, especially those schools whose populations come from the lowest economic groups. And college is too costly for most families.
An educated populace benefits a nation, and benefiting the nation is the purpose of the federal government, which has the unlimited ability to pay for K-16 and beyond.
5. SALARY FOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
Even were schooling to be completely free, many young people cannot attend, because they and their families cannot afford to support non-workers. In a foundering boat, everyone needs to bail, and no one can take time off for study.
If a young person’s “job” is to learn and be productive, he/she should be paid to do that job, especially since that job is one of America’s most important.
6. ELIMINATE CORPORATE TAXES
Corporations themselves exist only as legalities. They don’t pay taxes or pay for anything else. They are dollar-transferring machines. They transfer dollars from customers to employees, suppliers, shareholders and the government (the later having no use for those dollars).
Any tax on corporations reduces the amount going to employees, suppliers and shareholders, which diminishes the economy. Ultimately, all corporate taxes come around and reappear as deductions from your personal income.
7. INCREASE THE STANDARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION, ANNUALLY. (Refer to this.) Federal taxes punish taxpayers and harm the economy. The federal government has no need for those punishing and harmful tax dollars. There are several ways to reduce taxes, and we should evaluate and choose the most progressive approaches.
Cutting FICA and corporate taxes would be a good early step, as both dramatically affect the 99%. Annual increases in the standard income tax deduction, and a reverse income tax also would provide benefits from the bottom up. Both would narrow the Gap.
8. TAX THE VERY RICH (THE “.1%) MORE, WITH HIGHER PROGRESSIVE TAX RATES ON ALL FORMS OF INCOME. (TROPHIC CASCADE)
There was a time when I argued against increasing anyone’s federal taxes. After all, the federal government has no need for tax dollars, and all taxes reduce Gross Domestic Product, thereby negatively affecting the entire economy, including the 99.9%.
But I have come to realize that narrowing the Gap requires trimming the top. It simply would not be possible to provide the 99.9% with enough benefits to narrow the Gap in any meaningful way. Bill Gates reportedly owns $70 billion. To get to that level, he must have been earning $10 billion a year. Pick any acceptable Gap (1000 to 1?), and the lowest paid American would have to receive $10 million a year. Unreasonable.
9. FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF ALL BANKS (Click The end of private banking and How should America decide “who-gets-money”?)
Banks have created all the dollars that exist. Even dollars created at the direction of the federal government, actually come into being when banks increase the numbers in checking accounts. This gives the banks enormous financial power, and as we all know, power corrupts — especially when multiplied by a profit motive.
Although the federal government also is powerful and corrupted, it does not suffer from a profit motive, the world’s most corrupting influence.
10. INCREASE FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE MYRIAD INITIATIVES THAT BENEFIT AMERICA’S 99.9% (Federal agencies)Browse the agencies. See how many agencies benefit the lower- and middle-income/wealth/ power groups, by adding dollars to the economy and/or by actions more beneficial to the 99.9% than to the .1%.
Save this reference as your primer to current economics. Sadly, much of the material is not being taught in American schools, which is all the more reason for you to use it.

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY