–How the “stinking liars” inadvertently disclosed why the debt is necessary

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.
•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes. .
Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.
•The single most important problem in economics is
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

===================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

The previous post told you of “stinking liars,” those politicians, media and economists who tell you the federal government’s finances are like your finances, and so the government can run short of dollars and needs to eliminate debt, cut spending and increase taxes, i.e invoke austerity upon us.

The purpose of what we term, the Big Lie is to widen the Gap between the very rich and you, mostly by pushing you down.

Wouldn’t you know it, but shortly after we published that post, the right-wing, Chicago Tribune published an editorial filled with the very Big Lies we had just deplored.

It should have been titled, “The Chicago Tribune’s Big Lies,” but instead it was titled:

The next president’s debts

ct-us-national-debt-20150715-jpg-20150731
Federal Reserve Board Chairwoman Janet Yellen testifies in front of a monitor counting the current U.S. national debt while appearing at the House Financial Services Committee hearing on the state of the economy July 15, 2015, in Washington.<

Instantly, we are treated to the specter of Janet Yellen sitting in front of a misleading scare-sign, designed to make you worry about the so-called “debt,” when in fact, it shows nothing more than the total of T-security accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank.

Every single one of those dollars is safely ensconced in T-security accounts (similar to your bank savings account). You own some of those dollars, if you own any T-bills, T-bonds, etc.

And the bank owes you those dollars, but you don’t fret about bank “debt,” do you? (And you certainly wouldn’t fret if your bank had the unlimited ability to create dollars.)

You may have your dollars back in an instant, merely by having them transferred from your T-security account to your checking account. No problem at all, and no burden on the federal government or future taxpayers or your grandchildren or anyone else the liars claim will destoy America.

So there was the Chicago Tribune’s first Big Lie, shamefully aided and abetted by the Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

On the mid-July day Jeb Bush candidly told Sioux City Republicans he wants to curb federal favors to Iowa’s ethanol industry, he got a lucky pick-me-up from the non-partisan group, First Budget: How, asked a member of this ascendant advocacy group, would he balance federal revenue and spending?

Who is “First Budget” and why would anyone want to “balance federal revenue and spending”?

Well, “First Budget” has a website that proudly states, “First Budget is a joint nonpartisan initiative of The Concord Coalition and the Campaign to Fix the Debt. Those are two nefarious right-wing, austerity front groups, whose purpose in life is to tell you that federal support of economic growth is bad for you and for your descendants.

“Nonpartisan”? “NON PARTISAN”???

To give you an idea of how shameless the lies are, the Campaign to Fix the Debt was founded by the notorious duo of Erskine Bowles and Sen. Alan Simpson. Remember them? Yes, these are the guys who brought you the sequester, the disastrous debt-cutting program that set back our recovery from the Great Recession by many years. We still haven’t recovered.

And Fix the Debt is bankrolled by the even more notorious Pete Peterson: [ The Campaign to Fix the Debt is the latest incarnation of a decades-long effort by former Nixon man turned Wall Street billionaire Pete Peterson to slash earned benefit programs such as Social Security and Medicare under the guise of fixing the nation’s “debt problem.”]

Bush, who favors raising the age at which Americans can draw Social Security, said he also backs a federal hiring freeze and not replacing all retirees.

“You are not going to get it to balance immediately, but with high (economic) growth and a focused approach to limiting spending, including entitlements over the long haul, you can get it in balance,” Bush said.

“Without (the economy) growing, it won’t happen. And if we don’t fix the entitlement system, it won’t happen.”

What gibberish! Can anyone explain how fewer people receiving Social Security payments, fewer people receiving employment from the federal government, and more people paying more taxes (to achieve “balanced revenue”) will achieve “high economic growth”?

It’s utter nonsense, sort of like scoring fewer runs and giving up more runs, will help the Cubs win more games. What Bush, Bowles, Simpson, Peterson et al propose, is designed to reduce economic growth, and more specifically, to widen the Gap between the rich and the rest.

And as for balancing revenue (taxes) with spending, that would mean no new dollars entering the economy. If anyone can explain how an economy can grow if its money supply doesn’t’ grow, I’d love to hear it. That would be a miracle of economics, indeed.

With that frankness, a candidate for president paid his respects to First Budget’s pressure over the existential threat that federal debts and entitlements pose to America as we know it.

There, in one sentence, the owned-by-the-rich Tribune expresses the Big Lie: The statement that America cannot exist with those big T-security bank accounts, and that rather than stimulating the economy, Social Security and Medicare payments slow the economy.

Never mind that the bought-and-paid-for media have been saying the federal debt is a “ticking time bomb” for at least 75 years. And here we still are. Still ticking.

In the Tribune’s “black is white, and up is down” Big Lie, adding money to the economy shrinks the economy, while austerity grows the economy.

Yeah sure, austerity works. Just ask Greece.

Looming over these dangers is a current federal debt — that is, a federal taxpayers’ debt — of $18.3 trillion.

There’s another Big Lie.

In reality, Not one taxpayer owes one cent of the federal debt, though millions of taxpayers OWN billions of dollars of the federal debt. They own T-security accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank.

And the bigger the misnamed “federal debt,” the more money taxpayers own in T-security accounts. The more proper name would be “T-security deposits” rather than “debt.” Isn’t “deposits” what you call the money you have in bank accounts?

The Tribune article ends with this revealing question, in which the “stinking liars” accidentally admit why the so-called federal “debt” is necessary:

As for candidates always prattling that they want to “invest” more in schools, or defense, or a hundred other needs: At their events or in your talks with their surrogates, ask the questions First Budget volunteers are forcing politicians to confront.

As two of the group’s officers wrote in a July 19 op-ed for The Cedar Rapids Gazette, “If they promise tax cuts or more spending, how will they pay for them without increasing the debt?

Exactly right. You cannot pay for all the benefits the world’s wealthiest Monetarily Sovereign government should provide, without increasing the so-called “debt.”

The rich don’t want you to have those benefits, so they create a straw man: The “unsustainable” debt. It’s a stinking lie but, that’s the whole point, isn’t it?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

===================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

The Ten Steps will add dollars to the economy, stimulate the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.
——————————————————————————————————————————————

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY

–I guess it’s that time again, to pressure big campaign donors

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive,
and the motive is the gap.
======================================================================================================================================================================================
Yes, it’s time again for collecting big campaign money, you know, what the Scalia Supreme Court euphemistically calls “free speech.”

First the good news:

House Republicans adding to debt as balanced budget commitment wavers
Tax measures, spending bills not offset, costs hidden with accounting gimmicks

More than a dozen bills with costs that are not fully offset elsewhere in the budget have passed the Republican-controlled House and threaten to add nearly $1 trillion to federal debt over the next decade.

Adding to the misnamed “debt” will send many billions into our economy. Federal Deficits = Private Sector Income. That is a good thing.

But of course, there is expected news:

The measures include a slew of tax breaks known as tax extenders. Among them are a $155 billion research and development tax credit [benefits to companies], a $90 billion expansion of the child tax credit to higher-income families and a $2 billion enhanced tax deduction for businesses that make charitable food donations.

O.K., we like federal tax deductions. They add dollars to the economy. But did the right-wing pols really have to widen the gap between the rich and the rest? Isn’t the gap too wide, already? How much greed is enough?

Republicans have demanded that spending increases, including for disaster relief and other crises, be funded or offset in the budget.

Yes, of course, because those things benefit the lower income/wealth/power groups, and can narrow the gap between the rich and the rest — the last thing the rich want.

When Republicans dropped the pay-as-you-go rhetoric in favor of tax breaks and funding for programs they support, such as $6 billion to restore military pensions, Democrats accused Republicans of applying a double standard.

If there’s one thing the right-wing loves as much as guns, it’s the military. Must be a genetic thing.

Republicans recoiled from President Obama’s $3.7 billion request to help resolve the border crisis.

What? Spend money to help children escape from the horrific living (dying?) conditions in their home countries? Unthinkable. Deport ’em all.

Rep. Tom Cole, Oklahoma Republican and member of the House Budget Committee, said, “I’m not going to apologize because Republicans believe in low taxes and less regulation. I think that’s why God made Republicans.

I revise my previous statement. They love guns, the military and God. As for loving poor people, not really.

House Republicans last week threw their support behind a $14 billion bill to reform the Department of Veterans Affairs [there’s that military, again].

It is partially offset by about $4 billion with a budget trick called pension smoothing, which allows companies to temporarily put less money into pension accounts resulting in higher [net] profits and bigger tax bills for the companies.

It’s another good/bad thing. It’s good that companies get higher net profits, but it’s bad that more taxes are taken out of the economy.

Said Maya MacGuineas, CEO of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “The real test of fiscal responsibility is the willingness to make the tough choices to pay for your own priorities. If you believe a policy is worthwhile, you should be willing to pay for it.”

By now, you must know of Maya MacGuineas, the well-paid shill for the screw-the-poor movement and vocal purveyor of the Big Lie. If she’s in on it, hang on to your wallet, unless you’re part of the upper .1%

So cough up plutocrats. If you expect Republican votes — votes that go against Republican cut-the-deficit electioneering — you’ll have to come up with plenty of campaign cash.

And by the way, my daughter needs a big job when she graduates college.

And so will I.

================================
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)

9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)


10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY

–The BIG LIE: It’s everywhere. Repetition creates belief, which creates more repetition.

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.

●Austerity starves the economy to feed the government, and leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.

==========================================================================================================================================

In economics we suffer the BIG LIE. It is a lie, because it is untrue. And it is big, because it adversely affects every facet of our lives. The BIG LIE, in its simplest, most basic form is this:

“A Monetarily Sovereign government unwillingly can run short of its sovereign currency.”

The U.S. became Monetarily Sovereign on August 15, 1971, when it went off a gold standard. The government creates dollars by paying bills. It pays bills by instructing banks to increase the numbers in checking accounts. It can do this endlessly, now that it no longer needs supplies of gold to collateralize dollars. In short, the BIG TRUTH is:

It is not possible for the U.S. government unwillingly to run short of dollars.

Even were all federal taxes and so-called federal “borrowing to fall to $0, the U.S. government could pay any bills of any size, forever. This includes 100% funding of Social Security, Medicare for everyone and every other federal initiative.

Not only is the BIG TRUTH factually true, but it has been proven true. Not only is the BIG LIE factually false, but it repeatedly has been proven false. Yet the BIG LIE is widely believed — so widely believed it seldom even is argued, but rather merely assumed as fact — and he BIG TRUTH is widely derided. There are two reasons.

1. The BIG LIE appeals to ignorant intuition, because though it is untrue about federal finances, it is true about personal finances. While the federal government cannot run short of dollars, we citizens can run short.

2. The BIG LIE benefits the upper 1% income group by increasing the gap between the 1% and the 99%. Most federal deficit spending benefits the 99% more than the 1%. Deficit reductions increase the gap. And most information sources – the media editors and politicians – are part of, or beholden to, the 1%.

Thus the BIG LIE, despite its factual and experiential shortcomings, is repeated everywhere in America and around the world, and seldom even debated. Here are examples of the BIG LIE in the words of the liars:

“We need to stop spending money we don’t have. President Obama has given us four years of trillion-dollar-plus deficits.” Paul Ryan

“Spending money we don’t have” applies to people, cities and businesses, all of which are monetarily non-sovereign, not to the Monetarily Sovereign federal government, which creates money by spending. The only way we can “have” money is via federal spending. No federal spending, no “having.”

“With Medicare expected to go bust by 2024 . . . “ Jan Crawford of CBS News

Medicare, as a federal agency, cannot “go bust,” unless Congress and the President decide not to fund it. Even if FICA were $0, the government could continue paying benefits, as always.

“Canada’s path of great budgetary discipline and a very heavy emphasis on growth and overcoming the crisis, not living on borrowed money, can be an example for the way in which problems on the other side of the Atlantic can be addressed. This is also the right solution for Europe.” Angela Merkel, Germany

For every nation, including Canada, Gross Domestic Product = Government Spending + Private Investment and Consumption + Net exports. So if Government Spending goes down, growing the economy requires something else to go up. That’s simple algebra. Canada’s is a net exporter, otherwise it would be in a depression.

‘Medicare is the second-biggest item in the entire federal budget and one of the fastest-growing. Over the past 30 years, its cost has doubled as a share of our gross domestic product, and over the next 30, it’s on track to double again. But the revenues that pay for it are not keeping pace.” Steve Chapman, Chicago Tribune

The president of AARP recently admitted that FICA does not pay for Medicare or Social Security.

“We need a national sales tax — a consumption tax, like the dreaded but efficient value-added tax — but Mr. Romney and Mr. Ryan don’t have the gumption to support it.” David Stockman, Ronald Reagan’s budget director

Just as federal spending adds dollars to the economy, federal taxes remove dollars from the economy, which by simple mathematics, reduces GDP growth. Taxes depress economies.

Just as a doctor would treat an illness, we must look for the cause of the ailment. In the case of the deficit, that’s government overspending. So the question clearly is, “Where do we cut?” Gretchen Hamel, executive director of Public Notice.

The need to cut federal spending merely is assumed. No evidence ever is provided. The reason: No such evidence exists.

“The issue of the debt and the deficit – and what to do about it – has paralyzed Washington lawmakers. But when it comes to measures for reducing the deficit on which they might reach common ground, they will get little help in building support for an agreement by turning to public opinion.” Andrew Kohut, President, Pew Research Center

While public opinion is nearly unanimous that the federal deficit should be reduced, there can be no agreement about how. The reason: Every plan for reducing the deficit discloses the BIG TRUTH that deficit reduction hurts the economy.

“Was the budget deficit increase in 2008, Rob Portman’s fault?” Published: Saturday, August 11, 2012, By Stephen Koff, The Cleveland Plain Dealer

The headline uses the world “fault” to describe a deficit increase. The correct word would have been “accomplishment.”

“Since 2010, Social Security has been paying out more in benefits than it collects in taxes, adding to the urgency for Congress to address the program’s long-term finances.” Aug. 12, 2012, Associated Press writer Andres Gonzalez contributed to this report.

FICA does not pay for Social Security benefits. The best way to “address the program’s long-term finances” would be to eliminate FICA and support SS out of the general fund.

“You must have a balanced plan that reforms the tax code in a progressive, pro-growth manner and produces additional revenue if you are serious about reducing the deficit by at least $4 trillion without disrupting the country’s fragile economic recovery and hurting the disadvantaged.” August 12, 2012, By Erskine Bowles, in St. Louis Post Dispatch

He wants to increase taxes to grow the economy, a mathematical idiocy.

“The long-term entitlement crisis is seeping into the short term. Social Security slipped into the red last year. Medicare follows suit in roughly a decade. And Europe is demonstrating that creditors’ patience with political and fiscal dysfunction is not infinite.” Michael Gerson (from the Seattle Times)

Gerson does not understand the difference between Monetary Sovereignty (the U.S.) and monetary non-sovereignty (the euro nations). Or at least, he pretends he doesn’t understand. As an employee of the 1%, he is paid to disseminate the BIG LIE.

One could go on and on, with repetitions of the BIG LIE. Is it any wonder the public has come to believe and even repeat the BIG LIE? We read the BIG LIE in our newspapers. We hear the BIG LIE from politicians, on radio and TV, and even from our neighbors. We drown in the BIG LIE. Repetition creates belief, which creates more repetition.

And all these repetitions have one thing in common: They express alarm at the size of the federal deficit, but none provides any evidence the deficit harms the economy. The reason for no evidence: The deficit is absolutely necessary for economic growth.

“It’s bad because it’s big,” is the only “evidence” the liars provide, but that is exactly the same as saying, “Gross Domestic Product is bad because it’s big.”

Abraham Lincoln supposedly said, ” . . . you can not fool all of the people all of the time.” Old Abe might have been wrong about this one. The 1% has managed to fool nearly all the people about the federal deficit.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty


==========================================================================================================================================
No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia. Two key equations in economics:
Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption + Net exports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY