The real difference between the 1% and the 99%

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

As you now know, money is speech. The Supreme Court, and its dearly departed right-wing leader, Antonin Scalia said so, in its notorious “Citizens United” decision.

(This is the same group who decided that corporations are people, but that’s a separate issue.)

If money = speech, how much “speech” did you earn last year? How much “speech” do you spend on rent and food? Did your “speech” pay for your car?

If you are lucky and/or skillful, your earnings of “speech” could increase dramatically some day, in which case you will be entitled to more “speech” than you now are, the rich legally being allowed more “speech” than are the poor.

(And if you’re a corporation, your free speech rights will exceed those of virtually any citizen of America  — but that too, is a separate issue.)

Because money is “speech,” and rich people have more rights to speech than average folk, one would hope rich people, with all their speaking, also would be more truthful about economics than average folk.

Ah, would that it were so.

Today’s Chicago Tribune published an article titled, “Cruz megadonor holding back” which demonstrated the evils of lying money (i.e. false speech):

Ted Cruz, in his outsider’s bid for the white House, has depended heavily on the largesse of just three wealthy donors to establish credibility and stay afloat amid a chaotic nominating process that killed off most of his rivals.

One of the three primary donors, Toby Neugebauer, a private equity manager who recruited the other two top donors, has refrained from spending the vast majority of his $10 million contribution. After Citizens United and other court decisions opened the door to nearly unlimited campaign donations, many donors became frustrated with the control they surrendered to campaign consultants, who blew through millions of dollars on TV ads in a fruitless effort to elect Mitt Romney.

To counter the risk of a repeat of 2012, Neugebauer helped set up three supper PACs last year to support Cruz. The groups, forbidden by law to communicate with the Cruz campaign, planned to divvy up responsibility for aiding his candidacy.

Think about it. Romney’s campaign consultants “blew through millions on TV ads,” and there was no communication with the Romney campaign. Do you believe that?

Why would there be a law against communication? Isn’t this an unconstitutional limitation of free speech? Why can real speech, in the form of actual talking, be limited, but fake speech, in the form of money be unlimited?

Bad law begets more bad law, and our current Supreme Court is a champion of bad law.

Using “Scalialogic,” any limitation on money or speech is unconstitutional. So how did he overlook the few remaining limitations? Too ridiculous, even for him?

We now approach the crux of this post. People do not give millions of dollars to a Presidential candidate, unless they expect something in return.

At minimum, they get access to a President. (When was the last time you had a private discussion with a President of the United States?)

More than just access, they often get special favors, which is why our tax code is so convoluted.  All those special favors baked into the code, make for mind-numbing complexity.  Many laws benefit just one taxpayer — and trust me on this, that one taxpayer is a rich donor.

Ten donors have given a total of $48 million. Many of them made their money in oil and gas, industries that have received strong support from Cruz.

Only the most suspicious among us would believe there is any connection between the rich giving Cruz $10 million, $20 million, $48 million or more of their precious dollars and Cruz supporting “drill, baby drill” everywhere possible.

No, the rich like to deny any selfish reason why they bet all that money on a candidate whom John Boehner referred to as “Lucifer in the flesh.”

Instead, the rich offer high-minded motives, because as everyone knows, the rich are generous, compassionate people, who care only about those less fortunate — which is why the rich want to cut your Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits.

Such cuts are for your own good.

So here it is:

Neugebauer said he and the other donors were not motivated by personal issues or gain. Rather, he said, they are united by a concern for the country’s debt.

“I know its sounds crazy,” he said. “We are anti-establishment, and we all think the country is on the precipice of insolvency.”

You believe this, don’t you: The rich are not motivated by personal issues. The rich are not motivated by personal gain.

And, the rich are anti-establishment? Right, anti the very establishment that has made all their tax savings and corporate wealth possible — which is why they are donating many millions to an establishment Senator.

Makes sense to me.

But what doesn’t make sense to me is how these rich people actually could believe that our Monetarily Sovereign America is “on the precipice of insolvency.”

Is it possible these people are so out of touch with reality, that they truly believe America, which pays all its bills by creating dollars ad hoc, suddenly will lose the ability to create its own sovereign currency?

No.

The phony “insolvency” issue is the rationale for cutting your Social Security and taxing your benefits, cutting your Medicare, cutting your Medicaid, increasing your FICA,  cutting food stamps and other aids to the poor, and lending you (rather than giving you) dollars for college — loans that uniquely cannot be discharged even in bankruptcy.

The very heart of the 1%s efforts to widen the Gap between the rich and the rest is known as the Big Lie, which in its simplest version is: Federal taxes fund federal spending.

Every misstatement about economics, promulgated by the rich (via their bought-and-paid-for media, politicians and economists) evolves from that one simple lie.

While state, county, and city taxes fund state’s, county’s and city’s spending, federal taxes do not fund federal spending. That is the difference between federal financing and all other financing.

And, the real difference between the 1% and the 99%, is this: The 1% tell the Big Lie; the 99% believe the Big Lie.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

 

===================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually Click here
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.
========================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

THE RECESSION CLOCK

Recessions begin an average of 2 years after the blue line first dips below zero. A common phenomenon is for the line briefly to dip below zero, then rise above zero, before falling dramatically below zero. There was a brief dip below zero in 2015, followed by another dip – the familiar pre-recession pattern.
Recessions are cured by a rising red line.

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Mitchell’s laws:
•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.
•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes..

•No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth.
•Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
•A growing economy requires a growing supply of money (GDP = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
•Deficit spending grows the supply of money
•The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
•The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.

•The single most important problem in economics is the Gap between rich and the rest..
•Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

 

Why Bernie will lose

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

Today is Super Tuesday, so fearlessly, before the results are in, I will tell you why Bernie Sanders will lose.

First, let me tell you that I prefer Bernie to Hillary. She is a right-wing, establishment Democrat in the Obama mold, though thankfully she is tougher than him.

While Hillary cares little to nothing about the middle- and lower-income groups, she ironically will get the black vote. (Yes, there is a black vote, a white vote, an Hispanic vote and a religious-racist vote.) Bernie will get none of those, and there is a reason.

Bernie’s “Medicare for All” and free college for all are great ideas, not only for the poor and middle, but for all America. If implemented, they would “make America great again” much faster than Donald’s self-proclaimed greatness.

But, Bernie has fallen into the trap of accepting the enemy’s starting position.

The enemy is the GOP, the Party of the Rich, whose every thought, every waking moment, is devoted to widening the gap between the 1% and the 99%.

It began with the Tea Party, whose “cut taxes” raison d’etre meant, “Cut the taxes on the rich,” but also meant “Cut spending on social programs that benefit the 99%.

That was the sneaky part, because according to the Tea Party, once you cut taxes, you also have to cut spending, and where is the big spending? Social programs.

Which brings us to the trap, otherwise known as “The Big Lie.”

I can express “The Big Lie.” in just five words: “Federal taxes fund federal spending.”

Those five little words have done more damage to the American economy, especially to the 99% of us who are not rich, than any phrase in the English language.

They are a lie. Even if the federal government didn’t collect a penny in taxes, it could fund all of the “Ten Steps To Prosperity” (See below), with no difficulty.

Unlike state and local taxes, which are used for state and local spending, there is no fiscal relationship between federal taxes and federal spending. The state and local governments are monetarily non-sovereign; the federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. And that makes all the difference.

When you pay federal taxes, the dollars go to the U.S. Treasury, where they are destroyed. Destroyed?? Yes, destroyed. And here is the proof:

Throughout the year, the U.S. Treasury will receive about $3.3 trillion tax dollars. But, if ever you wish to know how many dollars the Treasury has, you never will be able to find the answer. The U.S. Treasury has no dollars.

How is that possible? How does the Treasury pay its bills?

To pay a bill, the Treasury sends instructions (not dollars) to the creditor’s bank, instructing the bank to increase the balance in the creditor’s checking account.

At the instant the bank obeys those instructions (and not before), dollars are created and the U.S. money supply increases.

The bank then sends the instructions to the Federal Reserve, which in turn, asks the Treasury whether those instructions are valid. The Treasury says, “Yes,” and the instructions “clear.”

And all that time, the Treasury doesn’t own a dime, not a penny. Even those thousand of sheets of dollar bills the Treasury prints every day aren’t money.

The money supply does not include tax dollars received by the Treasury. Not “M1,” not “M2,” not “M3,” not L, not “total debt.” No measure of America’s money supply includes federal tax dollars received. They cease to exist, once they are received.

Why does the government levy taxes? There are several reasons for this, mostly having to do with history, but none of these reasons has to do with today’s federal spending.

The sole result of federal taxation is to reduce the money supply. (By contrast, state and local taxes do not reduce the money supply)

And this brings us back to Bernie. He hired Professor Stephanie Kelton to head up his economics advisory. She is an expert in Monetary Sovereignty. She knows federal taxes don’t fund federal spending.

Despite the advice she must be giving him, Bernie has tied himself into knots, trying to explain how taxpayers won’t pay for his Medicare for All, and college for all, and other social programs — because he will raise taxes on the rich.

And no one believes his explanations, because he begins with “The Big Lie.”, that federal spending is funded by federal taxes. He should have explained the real reason why no tax increases will be needed — also in five little words: Federal taxes don’t fund federal spending.

Bernie will lose because he is playing the political game. He doesn’t believe Americans are smart enough to understand the truth.

Here is what he should have said: The speech. (Click the link to read it)

Early on, had he told America the truth, and given voters time to absorb and to discuss and debate the truth, he not only would have won the election, but more importantly, he would have built America faster and more powerfully than any President in history.

The truth would have set Bernie free, but he missed his chance, and now we all will pay for it.

Next November, hold your nose and vote for Hillary. She’s not much, but she still is better than anything the Republicans offer.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

 

===================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually Click here
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.
========================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK

Recessions begin an average of 2 years after the blue line first dips below zero. A common phenomenon is for the line briefly to dip below zero, then rise above zero, before falling dramatically below zero. There was a brief dip below zero in 2015, followed by another dip – the familiar pre-recession pattern.
Recessions are cured by a rising red line.

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Mitchell’s laws:
•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.
•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes..

Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.

•The single most important problem in economics is the Gap between rich and the rest..
•Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

How the Rich Use the Big Lie to Cheat You: Chapter II: The Debt

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

In the previous chapter, “The Dollar,” we saw how the US dollar is not a physical entity, but rather is nothing more than an accounting notation — i.e. numbers in an account. Unlike physical objects, numbers have no limit. The government never can run short of numbers.

We also saw that dollars are debts of the US and that the value of any debt is supported by its collateral. While gold and silver often have been part of the collateral for the US dollar, today (as of August 15, 1971) the collateral for the dollar solely is the full faith and credit of the US government.

The word “debt” has powerful, yet ambiguous emotional connotations. For most people, “owing debt” seems financially dangerous, while “paying off debt” seems financially prudent. Yet, among house mortgages, auto payments and credit cards, the vast majority of us “owe debt,” and this includes even the richest 1% of us.

If you are a lender, you own debt. If you own a bank savings or checking account, or a bank CD, or a T-bill, T-bond or T-note you are a lender.

Your bank owes you the dollars deposited into your savings or checking account or CD. They are debts of your bank. They are the way banks do business.

Though deposits are bank debts, banks boast about the amounts of their deposits. As a rule, the bigger the bank, the greater the deposits, the more debt. You seldom will read or hear any concerns about the amount of debt (i.e. deposits) a bank has, and in fact, the term “debt” seldom is used.

One way to lend to your bank is by making a deposit in your checking, savings or CD account. The total amount deposited in US banks is $12 trillion. This is the amount banks owe to their depositors.

Though these accounts constitute bank “debt,” no one other than an accountant calls it “debt.” Everyone refers to it as “deposits.”

As a depositor, you continue to own the dollars you deposited (Otherwise, they would be a gift, not a debt.) And the bank owns those dollars, too, which it invests for profit. By depositing, i.e. by lending to the bank, you increase the supply of dollars in the economy.

The evidence for your ownership of those dollars might be your passbook or online numbers in your account.

To lend to the US, you can buy a T-bond, T-note or T-bill, that is, you can make a deposit in your T-security account at the Federal Reserve Bank. The total of those deposits is $19 trillion, or said another way, the total US debt is $19 trillion.

In short, the US debt is nothing more than the total of deposits in the FRB.

Buying a T-bond is much like buying a bank CD, and having your T-bond “paid off” is much like having your bank CD paid off. In both cases, a bank (FRB or private bank) debits your bank account and credits your checking account. NO ADDITIONAL DOLLARS NEEDED

Knowing that federal “debt” is simply the total of deposits in T-security accounts at the world’s safest bank, the FRB, what do you make of this web site: fixthedebt

The Era of Declining Deficits is Over
January 27th 2016

The Already Unsustainable Debt Path Is Now Much Worse

The official budget and economic forecast from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office shows that the era of declining deficits is over.

–The deficit will stop declining this year and start growing again.
–Trillion-dollar deficits will return by 2022.
–The national debt will grow by more than $10 trillion over the next decade.

Irresponsibility in Washington Is a Chief Culprit in the Worsened Outlook

–Last year, Congress added over $1 trillion to the projected debt in 2026 by passing unpaid-for tax breaks and Medicare spending increases.
–Failure to follow the “pay-as-you-go” law that requires paying for new policies is responsible for roughly half of the deterioration of the country’s fiscal outlook from last year.
–If policymakers continue to act irresponsibly, instead of taking positive action to get the debt under control, the debt projections will be much worse. This could add an additional $1.4 trillion to the debt, making it reach 91 percent of the economy by 2026.

Well, that’s pretty ominous: “Unsustainable, act irresponsibility, deterioration of the country’s fiscal outlook, 91 percent of the economy.”

Before we analyze the validity of these warnings, consider the two luminaries who founded fixthedebt: The notorious Erskine Bowles and Sen. Alan Simpson, Co-Chairs of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform

They suggested balancing the federal budget by taking huge cuts out of Social Security and Medicare, while “broadening the tax base” (i.e. taxing the lower income groups more.) The upper 1% income groups loved it, as did the media, economists and politicians.

The ominous warnings are not new. We published a post showing how, as far back as 1940, and undoubtedly further back than that, the federal debt was referred to as a “Ticking Time Bomb.”

Seventy-five years have passed since that warning. The federal debt has risen from just $42 billion to an astounding $14 trillion — and the “time bomb” still is ticking.

At what point do we begin to understand that the warnings are bogus? Personally, I would be embarrassed to predict disaster for 75 years, only to be proven wrong again and again. Apparently, the fixthedebt folks don’t feel shame.

They use the word “unsustainable” to describe the federal debt and deficit, but they never explain what they mean.

Do they mean the federal government will run short of dollars to service its so-called “debt”? No, I’ve never seen them write that; they know our Monetarily Sovereign, federal government is not like state, county, city and euro nation governments.

Those governments can run short of the currency they use. The federal government cannot run short of its own sovereign currency.

What evidence is provided by “fixthedebt? I found these statements on their website:

The long-term growth in the debt will be largely driven by rising health care costs and an aging population. Nearly half of the projected increase in total spending from 2016 to 2026 is for Social Security and Medicare.

Rising debt will impede economic growth and impair the standard of living for Americans.

Ever-growing levels of debt threaten citizens’ and families’ economic well-being in a number of ways. A large debt:

–Hurts wages and jobs
–Makes borrowing more expensive for important investments
–Harms our children
–Threatens the safety net
–Risks a real crisis
–Prevents us from growing the economy

With the proposed “cure”: Cut Social Security and Medicare benefits, you are supposed to believe this will not “impair the standard of living for Americans.”

Actually, it won’t impair the standard of living for rich Americans.

Here’s a bit more:

As the government continues to issue more and more debt, the debt “crowds out” productive investments in people, machinery, technology, and new ventures.

This is the old, nonsensical, “crowds-out,” mantra. Federal deficit spending adds dollars to the economy. How can adding dollars by purchasing goods and services from the economy and by putting more dollars into people’s pockets “crowd out” investments?

Quite the opposite, federal deficit spending is stimulative. It is the method by which the federal government frees us from recessions and depressions. The Great Depression was cured with the deficit spending of WWII. The recent Great Recession was ended with stimulative deficit spending.

Growing national debt can drive up interest rates throughout the economy, leading to higher interest payments on mortgages, car loans, student loans, and credit card debt. Although rates are currently low—due mainly to the weak economy and temporary efforts by the Federal Reserve to keep them down — they will most certainly rise as the economy recovers, and they will rise much higher if debt continues to grow.

Completely backwards. The national debt has been growing for 75+ years and until recently, interest rates began at zero.

They have gone up a bit now, not because of the debt, but because the Fed increased them. Even fixthedebt admits the Fed, not the debt, controls interest rates.

And note that phrase, “as the economy recovers.” Fixthedebt predicts terrible effects from a rising debt, while simultaneously predicting the economy will recover!

Growing national debt means that the government must pay higher interest payments to service that debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects interest costs will more than triple from about $250 billion in 2016 to more than $800 billion in ten years.

By 2030, 100 percent of the revenue we collect will go toward interest payments and mandatory spending. That leaves little room for important priorities and investments such as national defense, education, infrastructure, low-income support, and basic research.

This is based on the false premise that federal taxes pay for federal spending. If taxes paid for spending, there would be no deficit. So what fixthedebt seems to be saying is, the sale of T-securities (i.e. debt) limits the government’s ability to spend on priority items.

Of course, we know that isn’t true, because the federal government pays its bills by creating dollars ad hoc, and never can run short of dollars. So its ability to spend cannot be limited.

Further, do you remember the Fed’s Quantitative Easing (QE) program? It was a program in which the Fed purchased securities from the private sector.

During QE, the Fed purchased $3.5 TRILLION worth of debt, and now owns close to $4.5 TRILLION in debt.

Where did the Fed get the $4.5 trillion to take that much debt off the market? It’s the government’s bank. As such, it’s ability to create dollars is limited only by its ability to press computer keys. That is the meaning of Monetary Sovereignty.

And those T-securities continued to earn interest; the Fed paid the U.S. Treasury nearly $500 million in interest over the past six years.

Because dollars are infinitely available to the federal government, money freely moves from the left-hand pocket (the Fed) to the right-hand pocket (the Treasury) and back again.

The trustees who oversee Social Security and Medicare estimate both are on a road to insolvency. Social Security’s Disability Insurance trust fund will become exhausted in 2022, and Medicare’s Hospital Insurance trust fund will be exhausted in 2030.

Here again, fixthedebt pretends the US is not Monetarily Sovereign and can run short of its own sovereign currency — the basic element of the Big Lie. Because Social Security and Medicare are federal agencies, they can run short of dollars only if Congress and the President will it.

Failure to get the national debt under control could precipitate a crisis where investors are no longer willing to loan money to the government at affordable rates.

Two lies in one sentence: First, when it comes to the federal government all rates are “affordable.” Second, because the government cannot run short of dollars, it never needs to borrow or rely on investors.

Finally, fixthedebt describes itself as “nonpartisan.” This is a popular ploy, to give legitimacy to a questionable group. Fixthe debt is about as nonpartisan as the Republican National Committee, and about as truthful.

In short, concerns about a non-existent, but never-ending, imaginary debt crisis, constitute a pack of lies and misleading statements, which together form the Big Lie.

We discussed the lies, misstatements and misleading comments found on the fixthedebt website, but there are dozens of such sites, mostly supported the by the richest .1% of us.

Most of them confuse federal deficits (the difference between taxes and spending) with federal debt (the total of T-security accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank). It is possible to have federal deficits without federal debt (Don’t sell T-securities), and it is possible to have federal debt without federal deficits (Sell T-securities even when taxes equal spending).

———————————-//————————————————
Next, we will discuss the question of motive: Why do so many politicians, media and university economists tell the Big Lie.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

===================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually Click here
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

The Ten Steps will grow the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and you.
——————————————————————————————————————————————

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK

Recessions begin an average of 2 years after the blue line first dips below zero. There was a dip below zero in 2015. Recessions are cured by a rising red line.

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

Mitchell’s laws:
•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.
•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes..

Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.

•The single most important problem in economics is the Gap between rich and the rest..
•Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Message from the rich: The U.S. Treasury is running short of dollars

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.
•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes. .
Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.
•The single most important problem in economics is
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the Gap between rich and poor.
•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

===================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

Here are a few shameless quotes from this month’s Congressional Budget Office bulletin, as written by America’s richest.

As of March 15 (2015), the Treasury has (had) no room to borrow.

The debt limit—commonly referred to as the debt ceiling—is the maximum amount of debt that the Department of the Treasury can issue to the public and to other federal agencies.

That amount is set by law and has been increased over the years in order to finance the government’s operations.

The statement is mathematically illogical and factually wrong. Those of you who already understand Monetary Sovereignty are aware the federal debt does not, and cannot, finance the government’s operations.

First the mathematics. Federal debt is the total of T-securities — securities bought by non-government entities and by government agencies. The “debt” is nothing more than bank deposits in T-security accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank.

From where do these buyers obtain the dollars with which to buy T-securities and make these bank deposits?

All dollars come from two sources: Federal deficit spending and bank lending.

But where do the banks obtain the dollars to lend? Yes, they create most, but they must begin with “reserves.” These reserves come from the public in the form of deposits, and from the Federal Reserve Bank.

From where does the public obtain dollars to make deposits?

Bottom line: The initial source of all dollars is the Federal government. It is the federal government that, back in the 1770’s, created the first dollars from thin air. And it is the federal government that continues to create dollars from thin air, simply by paying bills.

Were it not for federal deficit spending, U.S. dollars could not exist.

The government is able to deficit spend endlessly because it is Monetarily Sovereign, i.e. sovereign over its own currency, the U.S. dollar. Being sovereign, the government can do anything it wishes with dollars.

It can create dollars endlessly (via deficit spending). It can destroy dollars (via taxing). It can change the value of dollars (via interest rate control).

Being Monetarily Sovereign, the federal government never needs to ask anyone for dollars — not you, not me, not China.

Contrary to the CBO’s implications, the U.S. Treasury never can run short of dollars unless Congress wills it.

Although dollar bills technically are not in themselves dollars (They are titles to dollars, much like car titles and house titles), the federal government can print all the dollar bills is wishes.

Being Monetarily Sovereign, the federal government makes the rules. If it wished, the federal government could print a trillion, trillion $100 bills and distribute them tomorrow. These bills would be legal tender for all debts. In short, you could use them the same way you use the dollars in your wallet.

Yes, that could cause an inflation, and yes, that is not how dollars are created. But the point is, the federal government cannot run short of its own sovereign currency — unless Congress and the President want that to happen.

The fact that Congress is able to increase the debt ceiling every year is proof there is no limit to the government’s ability to create dollars.

If the federal government did not create dollars, there would be no dollars for banks to lend and there would be no dollars with which to purchase T-securities (aka federal “debt”).

How does the federal government create dollars by paying bills?

To pay a bill, the government sends checks and wires to the creditors’ banks. These checks and wires are not money; they are instructions, telling the banks to increase the balances in the creditors’ checking accounts.

The instant the banks obey those instructions, and credit the accounts, dollars are created. The money supply (M1 and M2) increases. The Treasury creates dollars by sending instructions to banks.

The Congressional Budget Office projects that if the debt limit remains unchanged, the Treasury will run out of cash between mid-November and early December.

This sentence more properly should read, “If Congress prevents the Treasury from creating dollars, the Treasury will run out of cash between mid-November and early December.

On March 16, the debt limit was reset to $18.113 trillion to match the amount of outstanding debt.

Translation: Congress decided it doesn’t want the Treasury to create any more money. The point is not that the Treasury is unable to create all the money it wishes. The point is simply that Congress, at the behest of rich donors, doesn’t want the Treasury to create money to pay for benefits to the middle class and the poor (the “99%”).

This is not a financial decision. It is a political decision. Congress essentially is stamping its feet and saying, “I’ll take my ball and go home unless you give me my way.”

The annual battle over the debt ceiling is an extortion game, in which one party threatens to shut down the government unless certain laws are passed. And these laws may have little to nothing to do with financing.

Whenever you read that certain federal spending is “unaffordable” or “unsustainable,” you are witnessing the Big Lie.

The purpose of the the Big Lie: To fool you into believing certain benefits must be cut — i.e. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, poverty aids, education aids, etc.

It is the wealthy political contributors who want your benefits cut.

What Makes Up the Debt Subject to Limit?
Debt subject to the statutory limit consists of two main components: debt held by the public and debt held by government accounts.

Get it? Congress has limited the amount of T-securities it can sell to itself!

Congress includes under the misleading term “debt,” the amount of money the government has “borrowed” from itself. The purpose: To make the “debt” look more ominous.

If your left hand borrowed $100 from your right hand, would you have any difficulty paying the debt? Of course not. But Congress wants you to believe internal debt is some sort of threat or burden.

Of the $18.1 trillion in outstanding debt subject to limit, $13.1 trillion was held by the public and $5.0 trillion was held by government accounts as of July 31, 2015.

So, not only is the misnamed “debt” a phony issue, but the $18.1 trillion debt is a phony figure.

If the debt limit is not increased, the Treasury will not be authorized to issue additional debt that increases the amount outstanding.

That restriction would ultimately lead to delays of payments for government activities, a default on the government’s debt obligations, or both.

By CBO’s estimate, the Treasury would most likely be able to continue borrowing and have sufficient cash to make its usual payments through mid-November or early December without an increase in the debt limit.

Translation: If Congress fails to increase the “debt” ceiling, that is tantamount to Congress voting to cut Social Security and Medicare payments, military salaries, all other federal salaries and all other payments.

The “debt ceiling” is Congress’s method for cutting benefits to the 99%, without leaving any fingerprints.

Your senators and representatives fear being blamed for benefit cuts, so they pretend the government can’t afford these benefits. The “debt ceiling” provides a handy, no-blame excuse.

Why would Congress do that?

Because that is what the rich of America want.

The rich are rich only because of the Gap between them and the rest of us.

If there were no Gap, i.e. if everyone had the same amount of money, no one would be rich. And the wider the Gap, the richer the rich are.

More than money, the rich want relative power. An easy way for the rich to increase their relative power is to decrease the wealth of the 99% — i.e. to take away your money.

So the rich pay Congress (via campaign contributions) to cut Social Security, cut Medicare, cut Medicaid, cut federal payrolls and cut all other federal benefits to the 99%, under the pretense these benefits are “unaffordable” and “unsustainable.”

They call it “fiscal prudence.”

And they call T-securities “debt” rather than more properly “assets of the economy,” (for that is exactly what T-securities are: Assets of the economy.)

The rich know you always want to cut “debt,” but never would want to cut “assets of the economy.”

So it all is a gigantic con game, with the CBO (being an agency ruled by Congress) as a player.

You are supposed to believe that federal “debt,” (even “debt” owed to itself), is imprudent and must be cut, when in fact, cutting the debt takes dollars out of your pocket and leads to recessions and depressions, while it widens the Gap between the rich and you.

And in a great feat of cynicism and irony, the politicians pretend your children and grandchildren will have to pay the debt, when in fact, your children and grandchildren will pay for the lack of federal deficit spending.

Your children and grandchildren will be punished by needless reductions federal deficit spending, all because the rich instruct Congress to tell you the Treasury is running short of its own sovereign currency, the dollar.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

===================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

The Ten Steps will add dollars to the economy, stimulate the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.
——————————————————————————————————————————————

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty

Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY