-How to fail by succeeding — anti-abortion version

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

This post could have been titled, “Be careful what you wish for.”

The “religious” right has worked hard to undo Roe vs. Wade, bit by bit. If you are sympathetic to that movement, here are a few things you should know:

First, you’ll be hit hard in the pocketbook.

GOP Tries To Slow Anti-Abortion Push In Key States
By Thomas Beaumont, 08/02/13

Anti-abortion Republicans passed a wave of new restrictions that would sharply limit when a woman could terminate a pregnancy and where she could go to do so.

What the right has begun to realize is that almost every law has two sides, one side that seems beneficial and one side that has negative implications:

GOP leaders believe pressing further is a mistake for a party trying to soften its harder edges after election losses last year.

Sen. Dale Schultz in Wisconsin, who is trying to fend off more abortion legislation in the state’s GOP-controlled legislature, even though he says he personally supports it. “And we were pushing people too fast. All we’re going to do is panic people and this is going to blow up if we don’t begin to moderate on some of this stuff.”

GOP leaders say they are worried about alienating women and young people, who disproportionately favor abortion rights.

Anti-abortionists are right to fear alienating those huge demographics — women and young people — especially since the current, much-needed goal of the GOP is to be seen as a kinder, gentler, more compassionate party.

But there is even more to be concerned about: Money.

What will happen when many thousands (millions?) of unwanted children are born to mothers ill equipped, financially, emotionally or physically, to care for them?

On whom will the burden fall, to raise these children, some of whom may have serious physical problems (one reason for abortion)?

And what will too many of these children become, given the circumstances of their often poor upbringing?

Yes, a minority of such will succeed. But being realistic, unwanted children, children born into poverty or children with serious mental and physical problems, have a far greater than average chance of becoming wards of the state, in jail or in hospitals.

These children are more likely to need your government contributions for food, housing, schooling and medical care. Who will pay for all that? You, the state taxpayer in your anti-abortion state.

And since these unwanted, unaffordable children will have a far greater chance of becoming criminals, who will be the victims of their crimes? You, the resident of your anti-abortion state.

A glance at the finances of my own state (Illinois) shows a few of the things I help pay for:

Department of Children and Family Services 1,212,382
Department of Healthcare and Family Services 16,021,226
Department of Human Services 4,990,621
Department of Corrections 1,235,838
Total Illinois Spending: 55,194,602

This is a quick sampling of expenses. There are many more. I would guess that more than half of my Illinois tax payments go to supporting the poor, and that doesn’t include taxation by my town (Wilmette) and my county (Cook) — even a greater percentage of which also goes toward helping the poor.

Now I am very much for helping the poor, as readers of this blog know — but I am against forcing poor people to create more poor people for me to support.

While the wealthy always will be able to find and pay for abortions, the anti-abortion laws will force poor people to bring into this world, more unwanted, poor people.

Bottom line: The more restrictive your abortion laws, the more restricted will be your own quality of life. The unwanted, unaffordable children not only will be a burden on their parents, they will be a burden on you, for you will pay to raise them and pay to support their parents.

Now the extra money you’ll pay to raise these children and their parents may not matter to you. You may be wealthy, charitable and/or not care what you pay in state, county and city taxes.

Or, you may be morally committed to the need to protect a microscopic embryo or a fetus. You may feel your financial sacrifices are worthwhile. And I respect your morality.

But does your morality also extend to financial, emotional and physical misery your laws will visit on the parents of unwanted children and the children themselves? Or does your morality apply only to the unborn, and end at the moment of birth?

Finally, if the additional taxes, the additional poverty, the additional crime and the additional hardship do not give you pause, consider this:

While most Americans do not favor unlimited abortions, most voting Americans (especially those having teeth, indoor plumbing and a knowledge of evolution) do favor Roe vs. Wade, and strongly resent the chipping away at that ruling, piece by piece.

As the GOP has begun to fear, political parties that support strong, anti-abortion positions will dwindle into lesser and lesser minorities, having less and less influence. They will lose the power to accomplish their anti-abortion goals — or any other goals.

So be careful what you wish for.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone (Click here)
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–How the International Monetary Fund saved Spain

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

If you would like to understand why the IMF told Spain to raise taxes and to cut spending, the purpose is to accomplish the following wonderful results.

Quoting from this IMF press release: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2013 Article IV Consultation with Spain, Press Release No. 13/292, August 2, 2013:

Key imbalances are correcting rapidly. Sovereign yields fell sharply since the European Central Bank’s announcements about Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), the current account swung into surplus, the fiscal deficit fell sharply in 2012 despite the recession, private sector debt declined, and the banking system is stronger.

Wow! Sounds great. It looks like that IMF austerity thing really works.

Er, uh, what?

But the adjustment process is proving slow and difficult. Growth has been negative in the last seven quarters, unemployment has reached unacceptably high levels, and financing conditions remain tight for small firms.

Translation: Don’t worry about negative growth, high unemployment and small firms starved for money, when “key imbalances are correcting rapidly” and the “banking system is stronger.” Sure, the little folk are getting killed, but the rich folk are doing O.K., and they are the ones who pay us at the IMF.

The reform process has accelerated and deepened.

Translation: “Reform” is a euphemism for: “Cut benefits to the middle- and lower-classes.” We’ve convinced Spain to “accelerate and deepen” those cuts.

An independent council is being introduced and a commission of experts has issued a proposal to ensure pension system sustainability.

Translation: “Pension system sustainability” is another euphemism for: “Screw the people out of their pensions.” A pension that pays $0 is sustainable, forever. Right?

On labor market policy, a major reform was instituted in July 2012 to improve firms’ ability to adjust working conditions (including wages).

Translation: “Adjust working conditions and wages” is yet another euphemism for: Worsen working conditions and lower wages.

Don’t you just love people speaking euphemisms? These folks say “bullsh*t” and you hear “natural plant growth enhancer.”

Unemployment insurance was reduced by 17 percent after 6 months of benefits, and hiring subsidies were reformed.

Translation: We like the fact that Spain stopped giving financial help to companies hiring employees, making it harder for people to find jobs, and at the same time, cut unemployment insurance. A brilliant one-two punch workers’ guts.

Executive Directors commended the authorities for strong progress on critical reforms amid challenging conditions, which is helping to stabilize the economy.

However the economy remains in recession, with unacceptably high unemployment, and the outlook remains difficult.

Spain Unemployment Projections:
Year: 2009 . 2010 . 2011 . 2012 . 2013 . 2014 . 2015 . 2016 . 2017 . 2018
Rate: 18.0 .. 20.1 . 21.7 .. 25.0 . 27.2 .. 27.0 . 26.9 .. 26.6 . 26.0 .. 25.3

Translation: “Stabilize the economy” means: Unemployment has gone from awful to catastrophic, but in a “stable” way.

The economy remains in recession, with unacceptably high unemployment, and the outlook remains difficult. Directors stressed the need for decisive further action to generate growth and jobs.

Translation: Following our recommendations has put your economy in the toilet, so do more of the same.

Directors underscored that labor market dynamics need to improve further in order to reduce unemployment sufficiently, including by enhancing internal flexibility, reducing duality, and improving active labor market policies.

Translation: Employment needs to increase in order to reduce unemployment. Right? The rest of what we said is additional garbage.

Many Directors generally saw merit in exploring a social agreement between unions and employers to bring forward the employment gains from structural reforms, while they noted that it would be difficult to achieve.

Translation: Unions have to agree to even lower wages, even worse working conditions and non-union businesses. For some reason, they resist this “social agreement.”

Directors agreed that the new medium-term structural targets strike a reasonable balance between reducing the deficit and supporting growth in the short term.

Translation: Oops, did we just admit that reducing the deficit is the opposite of supporting growth? We hope nobody read this far.

Directors stressed that actions at the European level, including initiatives aimed at improving monetary transmission, reversing financial fragmentation, and making progress toward a banking union are essential to support Spain’s adjustment effort.

Translation:Whoa! did we also just admit that the euro itself is a truly stupid idea? By “banking union” are we finally talking about a “financial union”? Are we on the cusp of recommending a form of United States of Europe, and is this the first hint?

[For many years I’ve said there are only two solutions for the euro nations. Either:
1. Drop the euro and re-adopt your own sovereign currency to become Monetarily Sovereign or
2. Create a financial union in which the EU gives (not lends) euros to nations as needed.]

O.K. folks, here’s the plan. We, the IMF directors, will criticize everything and recommend everything. Then, no matter what happens, we’ll be able to point to an article that warned about what happened and recommended what solved it. We never can be wrong!

And that’s why we get paid the big euros

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone (Click here)
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Australia, you cannot beat America for the title

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

Most Americans believe our Monetarily Sovereign government – the world’s only government with the unlimited ability to create U.S. dollars – by some magic can run short of dollars, and therefore should take dollars from the private sector.

We also hold the irrational belief that taking dollars from the private sector strengthens the economy.

We had thought those strange beliefs would assure us of the proud title, “Most Ignorant About Economics.” But, no. As we struggle to pull ourselves from the tar pit of recession and austerity, the Australians try to wrest this bit of exclusivity from us.

Financial Review
Labor reels from $20bn budget hole
Phillip Coorey, Chief political correspondent

The federal government faces a forecast revenue shortfall of more than $20 billion over the next four years, prompting a robust internal debate about whether the budget razor gang should make cuts to offset all the losses or delay the surplus yet again.

Measures under consideration to help plug the revenue hole include increases in tobacco excise, abolishing loss carry-back tax provisions for business, and tightening family tax benefits and so-called middle-class welfare.

So there they go. Australian politicians (undoubtedly bribed by the rich, like American politicians) now wish to make their businesses less able to hire workers and also to take money from poor families.

Will these people stop at nothing in their relentless effort to wrest the “Most Ignorant” title from us and to widen the gap between the rich and the rest?

The Age
Income spread evens out a bit
Tim Colebatch, August 1, 2013

The Bureau of Statistics (says) the Gini coefficient of income inequality has declined by 5 per cent (i.e. less inequality) since the GFC. But between 1997 and 2008, inequality increased by 15 per cent. Two-thirds of that is still there.

The bureau highlights the huge impact of government in reducing inequality by pensions, benefits and free services.

Australia’s politicians, like America’s, are terrified that central government spending on benefits to the middle- and lower-income people will reduce income inequality – the very last thing the rich want.

So, the Australian pols do everything to convince the populace their Monetarily Sovereign government is running short of dollars and needs to take money from the private sector.

And like their American counterparts, the Australian people buy into the myth.

Here’s a bit more from “Labor reels from $20bn budget hole”:

Shadow treasurer Joe Hockey Hockey said Prime -Minister Kevin Rudd was softening the population for a ballooning in debt to be associated with the renewed revenue downgrades.

“The government can’t stop spending, spending like there’s no tomorrow. He is playing down the debt challenge because he wants to increase it. He wants to increase the debt.

Translation: Mr. Rudd is accused of wanting to increase the money supply in Australia’s private sector (That is what “increase the debt” means.) People would actually have more Australian dollars in their pockets. Oh, horrors!

Financial Review
Bank deposits ‘taxed’ for bailout fund
Phillip Coorey and Matthew Dunckley

The Australian Financial Review has learned that the government’s economic statement will contain a deposit insurance levy, which will raise funds to underwrite any Australian bank should it need assistance in the future.

The proposed levy would be between 0.05 per cent and 0.1 per cent. Presently, the government guarantees deposits up to $250,000 without charging the banks.

The revenue raised by the levy will also be added to the budget bottom line, helping the government offset a forecast plunge in revenues since the May budget and meet its target of returning to surplus in 2016-17.

Translation: The levy will help the government meet its target of returning the private sector to deficit in 2016-17 (A government surplus is a private sector deficit).

Treasurer Chris Brown said “we have no plans to tax banks.’’

Translation: We won’t call it a “tax.” We’ll call it a “service fee” Or perhaps a “sock-it-to-the-public stipend.” By not calling it a “tax,” we won’t hurt the economy.

One big bank has warned the levy would be passed on in the form of reduced interest payments on deposits.

Are they saying if we, the government, take dollars from the banks, the banks will spend fewer dollars? We didn’t know that!

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said, “This is a government that cannot control its spending, (so) whenever it gets into trouble, it hits you the Australian people with more taxes.

Translation: “The government should not tax you, because taxes take dollars from the private sector, especially from the rich.

“However, the government should reduce its spending, which puts fewer dollars into the private sector, especially the poor. I know. It makes no sense, but it’s what the rich have paid me to say.”

Bottom line, Australia, you may try to take the title, “Most Ignorant About Economics,” but we are Americans. Nobody beats us. When it comes to economics, we can out-ignorant anyone (except maybe the euro nations).

And, we have a unique weapon that assures us of victory.

We have the Tea Party.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone (Click here)
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Beware of Obama bearing “Grand Bargains.” The big lie that destroys America.

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

Those of you who HAVE read “What President Obama’s ‘grand bargain’ means to your wallet Friday, Nov 2 2012, know that it is a “bargain” only to the rich and a punishment for the middle- and lower-income groups.

The Grand Bargain is a lie, akin to “I’ll be working late at the office, dear,” for Obama is the nation’s political philanderer.

Because he is a Democrat, Obama is “married” to the middle- and lower-income groups, but he cheats on his “wife” every day. His true love is the rich.

His spouse, the middle class, is abused at home with lies, and with threats of Social Security cuts, and with actual cuts to federal spending that would feed, clothe and house her, and further cuts to federal employment — all engineered by her faithless husband, the President.

Meanwhile, Obama will do anything for his rich mistress, who seduces him with campaign contributions and promises of lucrative jobs and a big Obama Library later, and who asks only that he widen the gap between a beautiful rich mistress and the plain, overworked rest of us.

(The Obama model is Bill Clinton who, courtesy of the rich, has become fabulously wealthy, as a “thank you” for cutting the federal deficit. That single act enriched the rich, impoverished the not-rich, widened the gap and led to the recession inherited by President Bush — and Clinton’s mistress has rewarded him ever since.)

Yesterday, as Obama’s latest gift to his mistress, he offered her yet another “grand bargain.”

Obama proposes ‘grand bargain’ on corporate tax rate, infrastructure
By Steve Holland | Reuters

In exchange for his support for a corporate tax reduction, Obama wants the money generated by a tax overhaul to be used to fund such projects as repairing roads and bridges, improving education at community colleges and promoting manufacturing, senior administration officials said.

Think about it. A tax “overhaul” cannot fund anything. The taxes of a Monetarily Sovereign government do not pay for that government’s spending.

If federal taxes were reduced to $0 or increased to $100 trillion, neither event would affect our Monetarily Sovereign government’s ability to spend. Not even by a penny.

So that is one part of the lie.

Then, there is the “tax overhaul” itself. What does that euphemism mean? No one knows for sure, but we have a pretty good idea it means another euphemism: “Broadening the tax base.”

And what does that mean? Generally, it means tax the poor more and tax the rich less. It means pawn your wife’s engagement ring to buy your mistress a fur coat — then tell your wife this is a good thing, because you’ve cut your family insurance costs.

Of course, the broadening might include elimination of so-called “loopholes,” also a mystery term. Here is how “loophole” is defined:

1. All money earned by the private sector — all your money and all business money — is owned by the federal government. All of it.
2. Any of your money you are allowed to keep is a “loophole.”

Simple?

Because Obama harps on his proposals being “revenue neutral,” any tax deductions will be matched by tax increases. Money left in the private sector’s left pocket, will be taken from the private sector’s right pocket — and by some magic of mathematics, Obama considers that stimulative.

The most common measure of the economy is GDP, for which the formula is:

GDP = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending – Net Imports.

So, for instance, if you were to add $100 to Federal Spending and subtract $100 from Non-Federal Spending, would you add to GDP?

The correct answer, of course, is “No,” but counter to all logic and mathematics, President Obama has been telling you, “Yes.”

Bottom line: To cheat on his spouse, Obama relies on one fundamental lie. It is the basis of all of Obama’s “grand bargains.” The BIG LIE is: Federal taxes pay for federal spending.

Eliminate that single lie — six little words — and you eliminate all the misstatements about our economy, the need for austerity, federal deficits, federal debt, Social Security being unsustainable, Medicare being unsustainable, unemployment, the need for spending cuts and broadening the tax base, etc. etc.

Forget the latest grand bargain or grander bargain or grandest bargain. All these “bargains” are based on the BIG LIE, the purpose of which is to widen the income gap. That’s is all Obama’s mistress asks of him.

Instead remember these two simple truths:

Your spouse may not really be working late at the office, and

FEDERAL TAXES ABSOLUTELY DO NOT PAY FOR FEDERAL SPENDING. Remember these words, and the politicians never will be able to fool you, again.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY