–TROPHIC CASCADE: How Yellowstone National Park opened my mind

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the gap.
======================================================================================================================================================================================

[The single most important problem facing our economy is the growing GAPs, between the various income/power levels, particularly the GAPs separating the upper .1% from the rest of us. These GAPs have changed U.S. and world economies.]

TROPHIC CASCADE: An ecological process by which the top of the food chain affects all levels, down to the base. It changes an entire ecosystem

All animals and plants compete for food and space, and in competing, they affect other animals and plants.

A trophic cascade can occur when top predators are strengthened or weakened. Strengthening top preditors can reduce the abundance of, and/or change the behavior of, their prey. This, in turn, can reduce the abundance of, and/or change the behavior of their prey, and so on down the line.

Weaker top predators can allow prey immediately below them to grow, often to the detriment of succeeding ecological layers.

A trophic cascade can have unexpected results. For example, trophic cascades in Yellowstone National Park changed the abundance of wildlife, of plant life and even changed the course of Yellowstone’s rivers.

The first trophic cascade lasted for centuries, as U.S. farmers and ranchers (two of our more ecologically destructive business groups), killed gray wolves for sport and to protect livestock.

This killing was so effective that by 1920, gray wolves, the area’s top predator, essentially vanished from Yellowstone.

With the top predator gone, deer and elk overpopulated and overgrazed. Grasses and trees began to disappear, and with them went smaller mammals, bears, beavers, bison, birds, reptiles and many species of fish.

Yellowstone began to die from the absence of its top predator.

Then, in 1995, a second trophic cascade began. Wolves were reintroduced to the Park.

Despite their small number, the wolves benefited the other animals, plants and the land itself. Not only did wolves seeking sustenance, cull the deer, but the threat posed by wolves changed the habits of their prey. The deer began to avoid valleys, where they could be trapped by wolf packs.

This allowed the valley grasses and trees to return and flourish. Small rodents returned, which attracted hawks and eagles. The trees attracted beavers, whose dams created ponds for fish, which in turn attracted many fish-eating animals. The trees produced berries, which attracted bears. Several species of songbirds returned. The roots of the flora stabilized river banks, creating even more ponds for fish.

In turn, the avoidance actions of the deer steered the wolves, which followed wherever their prey led.

[At this point, I urge you to watch: a wonderful 4 ½ minite video describing how trophic cascade changed Yellowstone.]

In American economics, the “top of the ‘food chain,’” is occupied by the U.S. government. The government is the top predator. Like wolves, the government’s existence, direction and sustenance depends upon and guides the desires, actions and motivations of the layers below.

The “next layer below,” and providing the most sustenance to the government, are the billionaires – the wealthiest individuals and largest corporations. They are the big political contributors, made even bigger by recent Supreme Court decisions. Like the wolves following the deer, the government follows where the upper .1% leads.

And below the .1% are all the rest of us – the less rich classes, the upper middle classes, the middle-classes, the medium-to-small businesses, the lower classes and the impoverished.

As the top “predator,” the government not only derives its nourishment from the .1%, but through its actions, controls the entire economic food chain.

And just as the absence of wolves allowed the deer to overgraze – much to the detriment of the entire Park – the lack of government “predation” (i.e. laws restricting the .1%) allows the billionaire individuals and corporations to “overgraze,” (i.e. take too many economic resources for themselves) which is destructive to the rest of the “food chain” (i.e. the entire economy.)

Until now, I had believed and preached that closing the GAP, between the rich and the rest, required lifting the rest, while not punishing the rich. I preached against a “Robin Hood” approach, but rather encouraged increased federal spending, a “high tide lifts all boats” plan.

A proposed “Nine Steps to Prosperity” was created in that vein. Nearly all steps involve direct benefits to the “not-rich,” the so-called 99.9%, with only step #9 (federal ownership of all banks), providing some control of the billionaires.

In ecological terms, this would be tantamount to continually re-planting grasses and shrubs and repeatedly laying out food for the deer and all the remaining animals, while not re-instating the wolves. .

I now believe I was wrong.

I disagree with the right wing’s claims that the rich (the so-called “makers”) should be pampered and allowed to run free without restriction, because “they are the ones who create then jobs.”

Unless the population of “deer,” (the billionaires and billionaire companies), is controlled, our economy cannot fully recover. There always would be far too few resources, causing far too many impoverished, for economic health.

How then are the billionaires to be controlled? Here are some initial thoughts. I invite you to suggest others:

I. All banks should be owned and operated by the federal government (Step #9). No private banking. For the rational, see Step 9: Federal ownership of banks

II. Increase federal taxes on inheritances. Large inheritances widen and perpetuate the GAP. I suggest a progressive tax as much as 77% (See III) on total inheritances, adjusted for future inflations.

III. Progressively higher federal income taxes on high incomes, while eliminating federal taxes on lower incomes. Step 7, in the “Nine Steps to Prosperity” reads, “Increase the standard income tax deduction annually.
Additionally, the progressive income tax top rate should rise again. We might consider something along the lines of 1964 tax rates, where the highest income bracket was about $3 million and taxed at 77%.
Further, all income – salaries, capital gains, gifts, inheritances, etc., should be taxed at the same rate.
Ultimately, those earning up to $500K annually would pay no federal taxes, and those above that level would pay 60%+, adjusted for inflation.

IV. Minimum / maximum wage relationship. In any organization, the highest paid could receive no more than 50x the lowest full-time worker, or be taxed at 100%..

WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH THESE APPROACHES?

1. All federal taxes remove dollars from the economy, which is recessionary.
However, if deficit spending on social benefits continues to increase, more dollars will be pumped into the economy than removed, which will narrow the GAP..

2. Taxes on the rich could reduce motivation for accomplishment.
This type of response understandably might be given by the very rich. However, it is improbable that being taxed on $500K annual income, gifts, inheritances, etc., would reduce the motivation to earn and to be productive.

On the contrary, to paraphrase Paul Ryan, excessive compensation can become, “a hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives of dependency and complacency, that drains them of their will and their incentive to make the most of their lives.” (He actually was talking about aid to the poor, but in reality, the statement applies far more accurately to aiding the rich.)

3. There are many devils in the details. The very rich are adept at finding ways to circumvent the law, just as the deer have evolved to become more adept at hiding from, or outrunning, the wolves.
This would be true of all laws that attempt to narrow the GAP. That said, we must persist in our efforts.

Bottom line: The deer (i.e. the very rich) are out of control. The wolf (the U.S. government) not only has been absent, but has been feeding the deer and encouraging them to breed. The very rich are “overgrazing the economy,” leaving too little for the rest of us.

As a result, our American economy is dying.

On balance, weakening the rich and powerful, while increasing benefits to the 99.9% would benefit the entire nation.

For that reason, I am adding a simple #10 to what now will be called, “The 10 Steps to Prosperity”:

10. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with much higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================
Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)

10. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with much higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income.

—–

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the lines rise. Federal deficit growth is absolutely, positively necessary for economic growth. Period.

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

—-When did the last recession begin and end? You won’t believe this.

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive,
and the motive is the gap.
======================================================================================================================================================================================

Some people claim economics isn’t a real science, but rather more of a “rule-of-thumb,” “by-guess-and-by-golly,” “my intuition is better than your intuition, because I came from a famous school” game. Let’s see if we can prove them wrong.

Look at this graph produced by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, one of the most authoritative sources of economic data in America:

Monetary Sovereignty

Here is an close-up of the most recent official recession:

monetary sovereignty

Looking at these two graphs, particularly the 2nd one, when would you say the most recent recession began and ended?

You might say it began at the start of the first quarter of 2008, and ended in the 2nd quarter, 2009. Think again.

Wikipedia says:

Economic statistician Julius Shiskin suggested several rules of thumb for defining a recession, one of which was two down consecutive quarters of GDP. Some economists prefer a definition of a 1.5% rise in unemployment within 12 months.

In the United Kingdom, recessions are generally defined as two consecutive quarters of negative economic growth, as measured by the seasonal adjusted quarter-on-quarter figures for real GDP.

The exact same recession definition applies for all member states of the European Union.

But the Fed graph includes none of those rather specific measures. No, the Fed relies on the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

(Yes, there is an entire Committee devoted to nothing more than dating what they call “business cycles.” Yes, there is nothing cyclical about recessions. But, why quibble about exact terminology in a science?)

This is the official definition determined by that eminent Committee:

The NBER does not define a recession in terms of two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP. Rather, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales.

“Significant decline” (What is “significant”?)

“Economic activity” (What activity?)

“Spread across the economy” (How “spread”?)

“More than a few months” (What is “few”?)

“Normally visible” (Not always?)

And some unspecified combination of GDP, real income, employment, industrial production and sales.

So there you have it. The “science” of economics has produced its detailed, accurate definition of a key event in any economy.

You now have absolute proof that economics not only is a real science, but that economists can be trusted to know what they are talking about, just like real scientists. Perhaps there is a lesson for all of us. Economics is like religion: The fewer facts we have, the more certain we are.

I understand that next year, the NBER plans to refine the process to make it even more rigorous. They’ll flip a coin.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================
Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)

—–

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the lines rise. Federal deficit growth is absolutely, positively necessary for economic growth. Period.

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Will bank criminals actually be prosecuted?

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive,
and the motive is the gap.
======================================================================================================================================================================================

“Barry Ritholtz is a Bloomberg View columnist writing about finance, the economy and the business world. He started the Big Picture blog in 2003 and is the founder of Ritholtz Wealth Management, an asset management and financial planning firm.”

My opinion: When Ritholtz writes about finance and the business world, he may know what he’s talking about. When he writes about economics, not so much.

Here are some excerpts from an article that includes a bit of both:

Banks Take the Economy Hostage
14 MAY 2, 2014, By Barry Ritholtz

Prosecutors are considering bringing criminal charges against two overseas banks for charges ranging from perjury and fraud to laundering money.

Translation: The subject is overseas banks. Apparently those banks are not important contributors to U.S. politicians‘ campaign funds, nor have they promised U.S. politicians lucrative employment, later.

The reaction has been swift. “Don’t’ play with matches” exhorted Sanford C. Bernstein banking analyst Brad Hintz. Former Federal Reserve lawyer Gil Schwartz warned “The mere threat of requiring a hearing could cause customers to lose confidence in the institution and could cause a run on the bank.”

Translation: If we prosecute the CEO of a U.S. bank, the entire bank will fail, and not just the entire bank, but the entire U.S. banking system — and not just that, but also the entire world’s banking system and national economies all will fail — just for slamming guys like Lloyd Blankfein (Goldman Sachs) and James Dimon (JP Morgan Chase) into the clink.

It used to be thought that fear of indictment, personal disgrace and threat of jail would keep bankers from engaging in illegal activities. But the extraordinary intervention of the U.S. government and Federal Reserve changed the dynamics of prosecution.

Busting those who committed financial crimes would risk undoing all of that. Prosecute our clients, said the bankers’ lawyers, and you risk destabilizing a fragile financial system. Put a systemically important financial institution in your cross hairs, and you put the entire global economy at risk.

Up to here, Ritholtz is on target. He gets it. But,then he misses the point:

The Bush and Obama administrations bought this line of reasoning.

Translation: The innocent politicians were fooled by the banks.

No, Mr. Ritholtz, they weren’t fooled, nor were they concerned about the future of the banking system. They were concerned about the bribes they had accepted from the bankers, and might no longer receive.

After all, a deal is a deal. If you accept money to go easy on criminality, what kind immoral guy would you be to go back on your word?

This argument should never have carried the day. The job of a prosecutor is to prosecute, not to make economic forecasts. Convincing various governmental departments not to do their jobs was a masterful act of salesmanship, one that undercut fundamental principles of rule of law.

Reality: No salesmanship was necessary. The politicians needed a good excuse for not prosecuting criminals and instead rewarding them with big bonuses. OK, it may not really have been a “good” excuse, but it was good enough to fool the masses.

It isn’t the role of the Justice Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the U.S. attorney’s office to make assessments based on the forecasts of economists . . . it was an epic abdication of responsibility– and just because some economist frightened you.

Rest easy, Mr. Ritholtz, no one was frightened — oh except maybe the millions of poor schmucks who lost their houses, their jobs, their life savings and their futures and children’s futures. These people can be told anything, and they will believe it.

Ignoring fraud, perjury and other felonies was a colossal error of judgment.

If becoming rich and powerful beyond most people’s comprehension can be called “a colossal error of judgment,” one wonders what good judgment looks like.

I can hear the politicians now: “Oh, we really wanted to prosecute these criminals, who got rich impoverishing the world. We really did want to put the bums in jail. But, oops, the statute of limitations now has passed, so there is nothing we can do. What a shame.”

(Notice how the Republicans, who attack President Obama on everything — ACA, immigration, gay rights, abortion, unemployment, Benghazi, deficits and debt — have remained curiously silent about his not prosecuting financial criminals. The Republicans too receive bribes from those criminals.)

Meanwhile, Pat Quinn, the Governor of Illinois, wants to spend $100 million taxpayers’ dollars to build an ode to President Obama (laughingly known as a “library”) in Illinois, as a tourist attraction.

That will assure Quinn’s next campaign fund and lucrative jobs after office (unless he goes to jail first — an Illinois governor tradition).

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================
Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)

—–

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the lines rise. Federal deficit growth is absolutely, positively necessary for economic growth. Period.

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Widen THE GAP? See how Australia plans to do it.

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which ultimately leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive,
and the motive is the gap.
======================================================================================================================================================================================

THE GAP.

THE GAP actually is a series of income/wealth gaps between the very rich, the rich, the not-so-rich and down the line to the very poor.

Every income/wealth group wants the gaps below them to widen and the gaps above them to narrow. For the very rich, all gaps are below them, so general gap widening is the goal.

The GAP is what makes the rich rich, for without the GAP no one would be rich, and the wider the GAP, the richer they are. So it is the GAP, not just income, that is of primary importance to the very rich.

It is the very rich who run this and all nations, by bribing politicians (via campaign contributions and promises of lucrative employment later), “bribing” the media (via ownership) and bribing economists and other thought leaders (via contributions to universities and “think” tanks).

The ever-widening GAP is the single most serious problem in all of economics.

Monetary sovereignty

The rich have a simple plan for widening THE GAP: Claim that the central government cannot afford to provide benefits to the lower income groups, so these benefits must be reduced, reduced, reduced. This is known as the BIG LIE.

Here is one example of how Australia puts the BIG LIE into practice.

Australia Considers Cuts to Rein in Second-Smallest Debt
By Benjamin Purvis and Candice Zachariahs May 1, 2014

Australia may sell assets and cut welfare spending to rein in a debt burden that is already the second-smallest among developed nations.

Australia is Monetarily Sovereign. It has the unlimited ability to create its own sovereign currency. So there is no debt “burden.”

Nevertheless, this mythical “burden,” despite being the “second smallest among developed nations,” provides sufficient excuse to continue widening THE GAP.

Australia will sell government assets to rich people at low prices. And, of course, Australia will continue to cut spending that benefits the poor — a perfect one-two punch that will reward the rich and punish the rest.

Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey will deliver his first budget on May 13 — Recommending savings of as much as A$70 billion ($65 billion) a year within a decade. The independent body, led by former Business Council of Australia President Tony Shepherd, wants the government to commit to achieving surpluses over the economic cycle.

former Business Council of Australia President Tony Shepherd, wants the government to commit to achieving surpluses over the economic cycle.

Translation: The Australian government not only will take money from the poor, but will take so much money out of the economy that an inevitable recession will cause massive unemployment and hardship. The rich then will be able to pay less to a larger selection of unemployed, desperate servants.

The government should sell off rail and postal assets, cut family welfare payments and make changes to age pensions and unemployment benefits, the report advised.

The Treasurer announced today that the government would raise the eligibility age for the state pension to 70 by 2035. It now stands at 65 and is scheduled to increase to 67 by 2023.

“The age pension expenditure today is currently more than what we spend on defense,” Hockey said at an event in Melbourne. “This is about the long-term sustainability of our system.”

Translation: The rich will buy rail and postal assets at a steep discount, then immediately raise prices. Not-rich families will pay more and receive less. (Chicago’s latest Mayor Daley was particularly adept at this scam.)

“Sustainability” is the magic word of the BIG LIE, since it pretends that somehow a Monetarily Sovereign government can run short of its sovereign currency.

Hockey said while he was not planning to implement an austerity budget, the fiscal strategy would be prudent and underpin the productive capacity of the economy.

See, it’s like this. Cutting benefits is not austerity. It is . . . er, uh . . . “prudence.” And by some mathematical magic (don’t ask how), reducing the nation’s money supply (i.e. running a surplus) will “underpin” (?) the economy’s productive capacity.

As everyone knows, to cure anemia you must apply leeches and bleed the patient. Right?

The Treasurer announced today that the government would raise the eligibility age for the state pension to 70 by 2035. It now stands at 65 and is scheduled to increase to 67 by 2023.

Translation: Eventually, the not-rich will be told to work until they drop. The ultimate goal is zero pension and zero welfare spending. That would make for a perfect slave class.

As long as the people are ignorant enough to believe the bribed government’s BIG LIE, the rich will continue to push the people down, down, down.

. . . Until the populace realizes what is being done to them, turns back and cries, “Let there be guillotines.”

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================
Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here)

—–

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

THE RECESSION CLOCK
Monetary Sovereignty Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the lines rise. Federal deficit growth is absolutely, positively necessary for economic growth. Period.

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY