–How the Republicans may save the economy and save Obama from himself

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

Readers of this blog know the upper .1% income group has bribed President Obama (via campaign contributions and promises of lucrative employment later) to widen the gap between the rich and the rest. Just a few of many examples:

–Failure to prosecute criminal bankers, and repeated aid to criminal banks
–Appointment of Tim Geithner, the notorious banker sycophant
–Appointment of Jack Lew, the even more notorious banker sycophant
–Increase in FICA, the worst tax in American history
–Commerce Secretary nomination of billionaire Penny Pritzker, who helped fund Obama’s rise to office, and later who will help finance the Obama Library and find big jobs for the Obama family

But perhaps the best (worst?) example is Obama’s “Grand Bargain,” which Professor Bill Black has labelled the “Grand Betrayal.” It is an amazingly harmful plan that would severely punish the middle- and lower-income classes, while not laying a glove on the upper class — exactly what the rich want.

Here’s the irony. Though the Republicans, too, despise the 99%, they despise Obama even more, so are determined to thwart even his anti-99% efforts:

Huffington Post
John Boehner Rejects Obama’s Grand Bargain On Debt Ceiling

WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner is rejecting President Obama’s offer to make historic cuts to the federal government and the social safety net, saying in a statement Saturday evening that he can not agree to the tax increases Democrats insisted on as part of the bargain.

Obama offered to put Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid cuts on the table in exchange for a tax hike of roughly $100 billion per year over 10 years.

Here is President Obama, desperately trying to pay off the 1% and screw the 99%, by massively cutting the social safety net and raising a few meaningless taxes, and here is Republican Speaker Boehner, who won’t let Obama do it!

For the past eight years, the Republican political plan has been to oppose anything that would stimulate the economy, reduce unemployment or close the gap between the rich and the rest, and then blame the resultant misery on Obama.

Now, the Republicans inadvertently are saving the President’s legacy, which left to Obama’s own devices, surely would have included a serious recession, if not a depression, with an increase in poverty, joblessness and the income gap.

Yes, the Republicans are trying to prevent “Obamausterity.”

Washington Post
Why Washington scandal-mania may save Medicare and Social Security
By Greg Sargent, Published: May 14, 2013

Scandal fever currently gripping Washington — IRS, Benghazi, Associated Press phone records — may save Social Security and Medicare two decades later.

Liberals who are dreading the scandal-mania that is taking hold should note that it contains a potential upside: It could make a Grand Bargain that includes cuts to Medicare and Social Security benefits even less likely than it already is.

That’s because when scandal grips Washington, a president actually needs his core supporters more than ever to ward it off, making it harder to do anything that will alienate them.

And Obama’s core supporters, the people he hoodwinked into believing he was “for the little guy,” will not follow him to the economic suicide of cutting social programs.

New York Times
G.O.P., Energized, Weighs How Far to Take Inquiries
By Jonathon Weisman, Published: May 16, 2013

The most pressing question for Congressional Republicans is no longer how to finesse changes to immigration law or gun control, but how far they can push their cases against President Obama without inciting a backlash of the sort that has left them staggering in the past.

House leaders have shown “great reluctance” to allow House committees to issue subpoenas, even as rank-and-file members and the conservative political base have been demanding them, Representative Jason Chaffetz, Republican of Utah, said.

This is just too delicious. The Republicans, the party of “law and order,” also are the party of the rich, so they never pressured Obama to prosecute the banksters.

Now, they fear to prosecute anyone for lying to Congress. They all but have forgotten their anti-gun control, anti-gay, anti-abortion agenda, while possibly taking Obama off the hook for sinking the economy.

(Obama can tell his rich backers, “Gee, I tried to destroy the middle class, but those nasty Republicans wouldn’t let me do it. Can I still have my library?”)

The Republicans, whose sole program was anti-everything — anti-poor, anti-middle-class, anti-unions, anti-government workers, anti-unemployed, anti-Social Security, anti-immigrants, anti-Medicare, anti-Medicaid, anti-economic growth and especially, anti-Obama — are caught among their “antis.”

Inadvertently, the Republicans may save our economy, and save Obama from himself. (Visualize our being chased by a pack of hyenas, when a male lion shows up. If these mutually antagonistic animals fight, we may have a chance to survive.)

They don’t know whom they hate, most.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Five reasons why we should eliminate school loans

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

Elizabeth Warren may be the best senator in Congress — or at least the most honest. Expect to see her attacked from both sides of the aisle.

She continues to castigate the Obama adminsitration (and she’s a Democrat!) for not punishing the crooked banks (all the big banks are crooked) for criminally defrauding millions of Americans out of trillions of dollars, while continuing to stuff their own pockets.

Naturally, Obama avoids this subject (as do the Republicans) like it were poop in the punch bowl. For politicians, the banks are too big (i.e. too big as contributors) to jail.

Recently Senator Warren and the New York Times have talked about student loans. The Times said:

Student Debt Slows Growth as Young Spend Less
By ANNIE LOWREY, Published: May 10, 2013

The anemic economy has left millions of younger working Americans struggling to get ahead. The added millstone of student loan debt, which recently exceeded $1 trillion in total, is making it even harder for many of them, delaying purchases of things like homes, cars and other big-ticket items and acting as a drag on growth, economists said.

Senator Warren said:

“Right now, a big bank can get a loan through the Federal Reserve discount window at a rate of about 0.75%,”

“But this summer, a student who is trying to get a loan to go to college will pay almost 7%. In other words, the federal government is going to charge students interest rates that are nine times higher than the rates for the biggest banks — the same banks that destroyed millions of jobs and nearly broke this economy.”

“Some may say that we can’t afford this proposal. I would remind them that the federal government currently makes 36 cents in profit on every dollar it lends to students. Add up all of those profits and you’ll find that student loans will bring in $34 billion next year.”

She’s beating the drum, but with the wrong stick.

The big debate in Congress is how much interest to charge students. And there are several complex, convoluted plans afoot. But, the federal government, being sovereign over the dollar, neither needs nor uses profits. It never can run short of dollars. It never needs to ask anyone for dollars — not you, not me, not China, not our students.

It is the U.S. states that are monetarily non-sovereign, so can and do run short of dollars. Nevertheless, they spend billions to support schools, grades K through 12.

For reasons buried in history, no American government supports grades 13+ — at least not full support.

So college attendance — which benefits all of America — has become a widespread hardship. According to the National Memo:

Massachusetts’ senior senator points out that the American public saved the big banks, which Attorney General Eric Holder admitted are “too big to jail.” A Bloomberg report suggests taxpayers offer an implied $83 billion subsidy to the biggest banks, with an implied guarantee in case of another financial crisis.

America’s total student loan debt now totals well over $1 trillion, leading to record defaults. Students stricken by the worst of the financial crisis are now badly in need of a bailout. And Senator Warren is one politician who has a plan to do that responsibly: Just treat students with the same generosity we offer the big banks.

What a concept: Treat America’s future as generously as we treat America’s criminals! (If only those kids were bigger political contributors.)

Anyway, I have a better idea, and it’s much simpler than anything Congress has talked about, — and better for America. For exactly the same reasons public elementary and high schools are free, public college should be free. If the monetarily non-sovereign states can support grades K-12, surely our Monetarily Sovereign government can and should support grades 13+.

monetary sovereignty

And here is how we could do it: SIMPLY STOP LENDING ALL THAT MONEY FOR EDUCATION.

Just as private K-12 schools exist alongside of public schools, private 13+ universities can exist alongside of public 13+ universities.

For example, Massachusetts schools like Harvard, Boston University et al could remain private and continue to charge their high-and-getting-higher tuitions, while the five UMass campuses all would be free to every student at every grade level — 100% supported by the federal government.

Just as with grades k-12, those who prefer a private university education could continue to pay for it. Those who prefer a free university education, would have that option.

This would be bad news / good news for the private universities. The bad news is they would have to compete against “free.” The good news is they could feel less obligation to provide scholarships; de facto scholarships for all would be offered at thousands of public universities.

The news for America would be all good:

1. Less financial burden on the U.S. states, which currently provide partial support to state schools.
2. In a world where there is less need for physical labor and more need for educated labor, college education makes America more competitive.
3. Federal dollars, pumped into the economy, will stimulate economic growth.
4. Less financial stress on middle- and lower-income families, to pay for college.
5. Less financial stress on college students to pay for loans.

In the three posts titled, Salary for attending school, Salary for attending school: 2nd paper and Salary for attending school, III, we discussed the reasons for treating school attendance as a job that benefits America.

I suggest salaries would be the 2nd step, with the first step being federal financial support for public universities.

Given that monetarily non-sovereign city and county governments struggle to provide free K-12 education, I cannot imagine any good reason why our Monetarily Sovereign government, with no struggle at all, does not provide a free advanced education.

There is no magic line at grade 12, making it valuable to America while, grade 13 is not. Following food, shelter and health, the two most beneficial gifts we can give our children and our nation, are love and education.

It’s time to stop rationing either.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Ten Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
8. Tax the very rich (.1%) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)

10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

The Ten Steps will add dollars to the economy, stimulate the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Holder clarifies: Banks not too big to jail. Or wait, maybe they are. Or not.

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

The National Memo reported that Attorney General Eric Holder made it crystal clear: Banks are not too big to jail.

Holder: Banks Are Not ‘Too Big To Jail’
May 15th, 2013, Jason Sattler

Attorney General Eric Holder told the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday that big bankers are not “too big to jail.”

O.K., that’s a relief. Now some criminals, people who have stolen billions, will be in jail alongside those other desperados: People who smoke pot.

But wait:

In March, Holder had told the Senate Judiciary Committee, “I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them.”

Responding to a question from Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) about his comment from March, Holder conceded again on Wednesday that such prosecutions may be too difficult . . .

Uh, oh. Maybe the criminal bankers are too big to jail.

But wait:

. . . but (Holder) stressed that “there’s no bank, there’s no institution, there’s no individual that cannot be prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice. Let me be very, very, very clear… banks are not too big to jail,” Holder added.

O.K., now we understand. Those criminal bankers are going to jail.

But wait.

The DOJ has not brought any criminal charges against the big banks since the financial crisis of 2008 forced taxpayers to bail them out.

Got it now. The banksters are too big to jail, but they’re not too big to jail, but they are too big to jail — especially when your boss has been bribed to give these crooks a pass. Simple?

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) sent a letter to the Justice Department earlier this week, calling for explanations into the settlements that have been made with the big banks.

If large financial institutions can break the law and accumulate millions in profits, and if they get caught, and settle by paying out of those profits, they do not have much incentive to follow the law,” she wrote.

Liz, we love what you’re trying to do, but there are no “ifs” involved. President Obama has made sure large financial institutions can break the law and accumulate millions in profits, and when they get caught, they can settle by paying out of those profits. It’s called a “cost of doing business.

And yes, Mr. Obama has made sure these big-contributing, job-promising, Obama-Library-building .1%ers have zero incentive to follow the law. It’s called “gratitude” and “paying it forward.”

High priced speaking gigs coming soon to Barack, Michelle, Natasha and Malia.

Ka-ching!

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

P.S. And by the way, Obama Assets Valued Between $2.6 million And $8.3 million. How did a former “community organizer” and government employee accumulate that much money?

Just askin’.

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Are you enjoying your austerity?

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

Our Monetarily Sovereign government, which has the unlimited ability to create its sovereign currency (the dollar), has been bribed by the upper .1% income group (via campaign contributions and promises of lucrative employment later), to cut the number of dollars in the economy (also known as “austerity”).

Monetary Sovereignty

The purpose of austerity is to widen the gap between the rich and the rest, as federal deficit spending benefits the 99.9% more than the .1%. The GINI ratio demonstrates this increasing gap.

Monetary Sovereignty

The average American has been brainwashed by the politicians and the media and major universities (which are owned by the .1%) into agreeing that the number of dollars should be cut.

Here are excerpts from a pertinent article in the National Memo:

The Chilling Reality Of America’s Worsening Jobs Crisis
May 15th, 2013, Jim Hightower

More than a third of working-age Americans are either out of work or have given up on finding a job.

Monetary sovereignty

Monetary Sovereignty

Also, last month’s hiring increase was almost entirely for receptionists, waiters, clerks, temp workers, car-rental agents and other low-wage positions with no benefits or upwardly mobile possibilities.

Monetary sovereignty

On the other hand, manufacturing — generally the source of good, middle-class jobs — did not add workers in April and has cut some 10,000 jobs in the last year.

Monetary Sovereignty

Especially problematic was the continued rise in underemployment — people wanting full-time work, but having to take part-time and temporary jobs. Underemployment is also pounding college graduates. While they’ve been more successful than non-grads at landing jobs, they’re not getting jobs that fit their career goals or even require the degrees they spent money and time to obtain.

Monetary Sovereignty

Monetary sovereignty

In May, another headline shouted: “Stock Market Soars.” It expressed delight that the Dow Jones Average topped 15,000 for the first time in its history.

Yet this index of Wall Street wealth gives a totally false picture of our nation’s true economic health. Yes, the privileged few are doing extremely well. But the workaday many are struggling — and falling further and further behind as the jobs market sinks steadily from mere recession down into depression.

The stock market is doing well because profits are up, and profits are up because employment costs are down.

President Obama hailed the news that unemployment dipped to 7.5 percent in April. This good-news dip was not due to a jump in job offerings, but to a bad-news labor market so weak and discouraging that more and more Americans are dropping out of it or never entering it.

Monetary Sovereignty

More than a third of our working-age population is no longer even in the job market, and only 58.6 percent of us are employed. Put the opposite way, 41 percent of the potential workforce is not working — about 102 million people.

Our people are trapped in a jobs crisis that is sucking the economic vitality out of our nation, but our leaders refuse even to acknowledge it, much less cope with it.

Our leaders not only do not “cope” with it; they intentionally cause it. They have been bribed to widen the income gap. Destroying the middle- and lower-income groups is the best, fastest, easiest method.

In fact, corporate chieftains are deliberately exacerbating the crisis by hoarding trillions of dollars that ought to be rushed into job-creating expansions, and politicians keep adding to the casualties by gleefully eliminating the middle-class jobs of hundreds of thousands of teachers, firefighters, police and other valuable public employees.

Why would corporations “rush into job-creating expansions,” when they can make more profit by not hiring?

America’s middle class is burning to the ground, while Washington fiddles with nonsense and Wall Street feathers its own nest. It’s disgraceful.

America’s middle class is complicit in its own conflagration. Ask any of your friends whether the federal deficit should be reduced. Ask the unemployed whether the debt is too high. They will shout, “Yes!”

Average Americans have begged Congress and the President to reduce the supply of dollars in the economy, thereby demanding their economic suicide and the economic murders of their children.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY