-Who will drown in the “bleeding heart,” liberal tide of American decency?

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes. .
Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.
●The single most important problem in economics is
the gap between rich and poor.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the gap between rich and poor.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

=========================================================================================================================================================================================================================

We Americans fundamentally are decent human beings. We empathize with, and we feel compassion for, those less fortunate than us. It is built into our genes and expressed in our souls.

In uneven steps, some quick, some slow, some even receding, the tide of American history has moved us up from cold cruelty and indifference, toward what we have come to term “liberalism.”

Once, we had supported slavery. We were wrong. By any measure, and for any time, slavery is, was and always will be merciless and indecent. Slave owners lacked empathy and compassion and decency. Yes, even the venerated founders of our nation were guilty.

A Republican president with liberal leanings, abolished slavery. Yet, some of our conservative brothers still fly cruel banners, still yearn for those shameful days. They lack empathy and compassion. They row against a powerful tide, their pitiful philosophy of no avail.

Once, women had no vote. That was wrong. Today, women own their vote. A liberal tide lifted them.

Women and children, once trapped in rich men’s sweatshops, were freed by liberal thought.

One day, our women will achieve equality in pay. They already have in professional tennis, due in great measure to such Americans as Billie Jean King and (See:) Venus Williams, who fought against male conservatism.

One day, this equality will be found in all jobs and all workplaces. The glass ceiling will be shattered. The tide is relentless.

“Separate but equal,” that Southern bastard-child of slavery, was cruel and indecent. A liberal president abolished this shameful practice.

The devices and deceptions designed to deny the poor their right to vote, once were outlawed, now somewhat resurrected by a right-wing, Supreme Court. We receded, briefly. But the tide will return, mightier than ever.

Bigotry and hatred, in all their variations, are indecent. Conservative claims that the poor are lazy “takers,” who deserve their poverty, not only are factually wrong, but are indecent.

Denying unemployment compensation, denying food and shelter for the poor, cutting Social Security benefits for the elderly — they all deny American values; they flail against an irrepressible tide.

Conservatives claim that immigrants — men, women, even children — bring crime, disease and indolence, and so should be shut out and sent out of America. Those claims also are factually wrong. The claimants deny the tide of American decency.

Preventing full marriage rights to gay people was indecent. No harm is done to anyone when gays marry. The notion that gay marriage somehow diminishes the marriage rights of straight people, is false, cruel and indecent.

As even Justice Kennedy wrote:

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were.

As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage.

Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions.

They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

Still, the conservative wing of the Supreme Court — Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito — in a cruel and shameful performance, devoid of compassion and humanity, denied the tide.

To paraphrase Franklin D. Roosevelt, their words will live in infamy. Their shame will outlast them.

Denial of health insurance for the poor is cruel and indecent. Three members of the Supreme Court’s conservative wing — Alito, Thomas and Scalia — worship the cold letter of the law above the human purpose of the law, which is to prevent moral tragedy.

They have forgotten, if ever they knew, why America exists.

(Ironically, these men who strut and preen as “originalists,” i.e. interpreters of the 200-year-old intent of our founders, now for political idealism, find themselves reluctant to interpret the intent of a recent Congress.

It was right-wing Scalia who denounced the Court’s departure from the plain meaning of four words, “established by the state,” [ACA] while he himself has ignored the plain meaning of four other words: “A well regulated Militia” [2nd Amendment]. Such is his hypocrisy.

And it was the right wing of the Court, who decided that money is a synonym for free speech in elections, disingenuously claiming the more “speech,” the better, while granting the rich far more “free speech” than the poor.

If history remembers them at all, it will remember the Supreme Court right-wing cabal as infamous men who lurked on the wrong side of history.

In the past, we freely raped our environment, killing what we touched and spreading poisons over the land. The rich still do this, but less now, for liberal thought has moved the tide inexorably toward protection of our earth, air, water and climate.

Sadly, deniers of climate change, deniers of fossil combustion poisons, and deniers of our dwindling species, value today’s dollar more than tomorrow’s children.

But that must and will change.

We tortured and killed people in the name of “law and order.” Now, less so. Soon perhaps, never.

One wonders what it is conservatives wish to conserve. Hatred and bigotry? Lack of empathy? Lack of compassion? Lack of human decency? Is this their desired legacy?

Today’s conservatives cannot long deny, deny, deny, as they drown in the “bleeding heart,” liberal tide of American decency.

Americans know, deep withing their hearts, that like the equally and wrongly denied Evolution, the “bleeding heart,” liberal tide is real and inevitable.

We the people, neither can, nor wish to, swim against it.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

==========================================================================================================================================================================
The Ten Steps to Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded free Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Federally funded, free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually. (Refer to this.)
8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all their forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)
10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

Initiating The Ten Steps sequentially will add dollars to the economy, stimulate the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.-

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK

Long term view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Recent view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY

–And these guys want to be President of the United States? Is this the best America can do?

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes. .
Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.
●The single most important problem in economics is
the gap between rich and poor.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the gap between rich and poor.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

=========================================================================================================================================================================================================================

You might think that “hiring” President of the United States would bring forth our most brilliant, our most honest, our most creative people and our strongest leaders as candidates.

Sadly, it seem to bring forth the dregs — people who crave the honor and glory, and will do the bidding of the rich, like beggars kneeling before kings.

To disabuse you of any false beliefs, we have compiled some comments under the title: “And this guy wants to be President of the United States??”

Rick Santorum:“Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum on Thursday called the tragic church shooting in Charleston, S.C. — which left nine people dead — a “crime of hate” and connected the event to a broader “assault on our religious liberty.

“You’re sort of lost that somebody could walk into a Bible study in a church and indiscriminately kill people.”

Santorum, the infamous ultra bible-thumping climate change denier, also is a denier of right-wing racial bigotry. He claimed that the guy who said, “I’m here to shoot black people” really was assaulting religious liberty.

No Rick. He was a religious guy, just like you. He sat there for an hour, studying the Bible. Then he took his easily obtained gun and killed 9 black people. Get it?

And we won’t even get into how climatologist Santorum said, “When it comes to climate change, leave it to the scientists.” (Scientists such as Rick?)

Jeb Bush: Another right-wing climate change denier (who one day in the future will claim he knew it all the time), said: ““I hope I’m not going to get castigated for saying this, by my priest back home, but I don’t get my economic policy from my bishops or my cardinals or my pope. Religion ought to be about making us better as people and less about things that end up getting into the political realm.”

Apparently, Jeb thinks caring for the earth and our environment has nothing to do with us being better people.

Donald Trump: (Re. ISIS): “Take back the oil. Once you go over and take back that oil, they have nothing. You bomb the hell out of them, and then you encircle it, and then you go in. And you let Mobil go in, and you let our great oil companies go in. Once you take that oil, they have nothing left.”

Hey, it worked in Iraq, didn’t it? And who cares how many American youngsters get killed, so long as Mobile makes a fortune? Spoken like a rich fool.

Rick Perry: “Whether or not you feel compelled to follow a particular lifestyle or not, you have the ability to decide not to do that. I may have the genetic coding that I’m inclined to be an alcoholic, but I have the desire not to do that, and I look at the homosexual issue the same way.”

Rick, it sounds like you do have the genetic coding to be an alcoholic, and you have yielded to that desire.

Sober up, “Oops.”

Lindsey Graham: “The Confederate flag is part of who we are. The flag represents to some people a Civil War and that was the symbol of one side. To others it’s a racist symbol, and it’s been used by people, it’s been used in a racist way.

But the problems we have in South Carolina and throughout the world are not because of a movie or a symbol, it’s because of what’s in people’s heart.”

The Confederate flag represents slavery. Is that who you are, Lindsey?

To paraphrase your logic, the swastika must be part of who Germans are. It represents to some people WWII, and to others its a racist symbol. But the racist problems in Germany are not because of the swastika, but because of what’s in people’s heart.

So fly that swastika?

Ted Cruz: “It is the job of a chaplain to be insensitive to atheists”

“I didn’t threaten to shut down the government”

In truth, Ted Cruz makes so many “wacko bird” (per Senator John McCain) comments, they could fill the page. Saying a chaplain’s job is to be insensitive, crosses the border into blithering nuttiness.

As for his claim he didn’t threaten to shut down the government, add that to: The sky isn’t blue; the world isn’t round and water isn’t wet — all equally true.

Mike Huckabee: Doesn’t want to give women access to no-co-pay birth control under the Affordable Care Act, because that tells women “they are helpless without Uncle Sugar coming in and providing for them a prescription each month for birth control because they cannot control their libido or their reproductive system without the help of government.”

Hmmm . . . So having insurance to pay for birth control proves you cannot “control” your libido? Apparently, in Huckabeeland, women should do without sex or just keep on having babies.

Mike, better talk this over with Janet Huckabee.

Bobby Jindal: (LSU has) “one of the lowest tuition rates in the entire country — less than $10,000” a year for tuition, books, meals and housing.”

Uh, Bobby . . . It costs over $20,000 — more than double. You didnt know that?

But why be surprised by a guy who came into office with a $1 billion surplus, and quickly turned it into a $1.6 billion deficit, while cutting funding for education?

Ben Carson: A lot of people who go into prison go into prison straight—and when they come out, they’re gay. So, did something happen while they were in there? Ask yourself that question.”

Ben, are you saying that being jail-raped makes a person gay? How did you ever get to be a doctor? Exactly what is your point?

Marco Rubio: “There’s a lot of issues going on in the country, and immigration right now is not at the forefront. We’re not going to grant blanket amnesty to 12 million people. We’re also not going to round up and deport 12 million people.”

“Our climate is always changing. We’ve had hurricanes in Florida forever. . . . I’m not a scientist, man. . . . I do not believe that human activity is causing these dramatic changes to our climate the way these scientists are portraying it.

OK, Marco, you don’t want them to become citizens and you don’t want to deport them. So exactly what’s your plan? Does it depend on your audience on any given day?

Apparently, since you’re not a scientist, we should believe you instead of what scientists say??

Scott Walker: When asked whether he believes in evolution: “I’m going to punt on that one.”

“I hate big government . . . A key to success is not how many people are dependent on the government – but rather how many people are not.

Think of it: A potential President of the United States who has to “punt” on whether he believes in evolution? Yikes! What happens if he become President and encounters a hard question? More punting?

Scott, that great enemy of big government, thinks it’s good that his government requires women to undergo ultrasounds for no medical reason, regardless of the patient’s wishes, and regardless of what doctors say is necessary.

Rand Paul: “I have heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking normal children who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines.”

“With regard to the idea of whether you have a right to health care . . . I’m a physician . . . that means you have a right to come to my house and conscript me. It means you believe in slavery. It means that you’re going to enslave not only me, but the janitor at my hospital, the person who cleans my office, the assistants who work in my office, the nurses.”

Perfect. Rand, “the physician,” spreads a myth about vaccines, so he can discourage parents from vaccinating their children. Endangering the lives of our children is what he thinks a President should do.

It also is helpful for Rand, “the physician,” to explain that a right to health care actually is slavery. Some physician he must have been; some President he would make.

Carly Fiorina: “My track record at Hewlett-Packard is very clear. We took a company and doubled it in size to almost $90 billion. We took the growth rate from two percent to nine percent. And yes, indeed, we grew jobs, because we transformed a company that was falling behind and failing to one that was growing and succeeding.”

Sounds great. So exactly why was she fired after only six years?

She “doubled” the size of HP by merging with a company almost the same size (Compaq)– a merger that has proved to be a failure. Carly, here’s how I doubled my pay in just one hour: I married a working woman.

She selectively chose the growth-rate dates. Using date-for-date, revenue growth actually fell from 7 percent to 3 percent, not rose from 2% to 9%. Sort of a difference.

And as for “growing jobs,” the combined HP/Compaq job count declined during her tenure.

Ah, facts, facts. I’m a politician. I don’t worry about facts. I just want the glory of being President, a big pension the rest of my life, plus a Presidential library. Isn’t that what we all want?

All of the above shows that somehow, the American system for picking our Presidents is fatally flawed.

We invariably wind up with a weak, political creature, willing to say or do anything to get money and votes, eager to do whatever the rich tell him to do, and surrounded by flunkees who tell him he’s brilliant.

Think back to the Presidents during your lifetime. Can you remember any honest, bold, effective leaders in the bunch?

This isn’t working. Maybe if we found a way to eliminate campaign contributions, we’d find people who actually wanted to lead this nation, and were capable of doing it, rather than hiring political boobs who just want to get rich.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

==========================================================================================================================================================================
The Ten Steps to Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded free Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Federally funded, free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually. (Refer to this.)
8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all their forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)
10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

Initiating The Ten Steps sequentially will add dollars to the economy, stimulate the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.-

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK

Long term view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Recent view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY

–Causing the end of the Union as we know it — and all for blind hatred. Any sane voices out there? Hello?

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes. .
Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.
●The single most important problem in economics is
the gap between rich and poor.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the gap between rich and poor.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

=========================================================================================================================================================================================================================

The Constitution of the United States is the fundamental arbiter of American lawThe U.S. Supreme Court translates the words of the Constitution into the realities of American law.

Article III. Judicial branch: SECTION. 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

Congress proposes new laws. The President approves those laws unless overridden by Congress. The Supreme Court makes the final determination about whether those laws comport with the U.S. Constitution.

Thus, the three branches of our government — Legislative, Executive and Judicial — form a check and balance, that in total has comprised the law of our land, and is the basis of our strength.

People may disagree with some decisions and attempt to change them. (I personally don’t think corporations are people, nor do I think dollars are speech.)

But, those of us, who respect this nation of laws, follow those laws, while they are on the books.

Neither Congress nor the President judges cases and the Supreme Court does not propose new laws. However, the boundaries can be somewhat blurry.

Congress conducts “hearings” that very much resemble judicial trials in that there are attorneys, witness testimony, the threat of perjury, investigations, subpoenas and depositions and a finding, including contempt — and all are immune to due process laws.

The President may issue a “signing statement” that not only tells federal agencies how the President interprets a law that Congress has passed, but how that law is to be applied. This can have dramatic effects on the application of a law.

The Supreme Court, in its interpretations of the Constitution, may not only change existing law, but create entirely new law. This has been referred to as an “activist” Court. Many of the amendments in the Bill of Rights have been expanded in this way.

It is quite rare for any politician or lower court blatantly to disobey a Supreme Court ruling. Such disobedience, if successful, would set a horrifying precedent — a slippery slope — down which would slide our three-branch system of government.

The strength of the United States lies in the word “United.” Without a Supreme Court, our Constitution would be interpreted solely by regional or even local courts, ultimately disuniting the United States of America — aka “balkanization.”

We would be as Europe, subject to the same internecine strife and wars, year after year.

Considering the trauma such disobedience would cause America, it would be surprising for any informed American patriot, much less an entire political party, to suggest it.

Even the Civil War, which was based partly on bigotry, at least had an economic excuse. No thinking person wants another Civil war, for whatever the reason.

Yet here we are, the same threats and without even the economic excuse of the Civil warthis time based solely on blind hatred and bigotry: Religious hatred and sexual orientation bigotry:

The New Nullification Crisis: GOPers Vow To Defy SCOTUS Over Gay Marriage
By: Tierney Sneed, a reporter for Talking Points Memo. She previously worked for U.S. News and World Report.

Ahead of a potentially historic Supreme Court ruling, leading Republicans are vowing to defy any decision that sanctions same-sex marriage and are challenging the very legitimacy of the high court.

Opponents of same-sex marriage, including some of the major contenders for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, are darkly warning that they will not “honor” an adverse Supreme Court decision.

Some are calling for civil disobedience.

Others are moving to strip the Supreme Court of its authority to decide whether gay couples should be allowed to marry, while others have questioned whether the court has that jurisdiction in the first place.

The opposition to same-sex marriage can be summarized as: My interpretation of my bible says that gay people should not be allowed same-sex marriage.”

There are three parts to this bigotry, that could destroy the Union:

1. “My interpretation” overrides your interpretation. There may be millions of people — even the majority of Americans — who believe as you do, but I don’t care. I am willing to sacrifice this nation to get my way.

2. “My bible” is the only religious book that matters. I really don’t care what religious books you use, or what your religious leaders say. Your religious beliefs are wrong.

3. “Gay people” are not welcome in my world. In my opinion, they are inferior, damaged and evil, and should not have the same rights I have.

Here are some of the leading proponents of the new nullification:

Rick Santorum: “We’re not bound by what nine people say in perpetuity . . . the Supreme Court doesn’t have the final word. It has its word. Its word has validity. But it’s important for Congress and the president, frankly, to push back when the Supreme Court gets it wrong.”

Santorum is among the signers of the anti-gay marriage pledge being circulated by a group associated with the website DefendMarriage.Org.

The group recently placed a full-page ad in The Washington Post with an open letter to the Supreme Court promising civil disobedience if the court struck down bans on gay marriage.

“We will not honor any decision by the Supreme Court which will force us to violate a clear biblical understanding of marriage as solely the union of one man and one woman,” the letter said.

Actually, the Supreme Court does have the final word in America. That is why we have a Supreme Court.

Santorum is a self-described “religious” Christian. So long as you follow his religion and his interpretations, you’ll be safe in America. Otherwise, not.

Isn’t that what Christ taught?

Mike Huckabee: Also signed the DefendMarriage.Org civil disobedience pledge. (As President) he would ignore a Supreme Court ruling in favor of same-sex marriage.

“Presidents have understood that the Supreme Court cannot make a law, they cannot make it, the legislature has to make it, the executive branch has to sign it and enforce it. And the notion that the Supreme Court comes up with the ruling and that automatically subjects the two other branches to following it defies everything there is about the three equal branches of government.

Er, uh excuse me Mr. Huckabee, but in fact, that is exactly what the three equal branches of our government is about. Otherwise, what would be the purpose of the Supreme Court?

Ted Cruz: “If the court tries to do this it will be rampant judicial activism. It will be lawlessness, it will be fundamentally illegitimate.”

What Cruz probably means: “My bigoted supporters don’t like it, so that makes it “fundamentally illegitimate.”

Ben Carson: “First of all, we have to understand how the Constitution works. The president is required to carry out the laws of the land, the laws of the land come from the legislative branch. So if the legislative branch creates a law or changes a law, the executive branch has a responsibly to carry it out. It doesn’t say they have the responsibility to carry out a judicial law. And that’s something we need to talk about.”

Hmmm, the neurosurgeon turned Constitutional expert now explains there are three different kinds of laws, legislative, executive and judicial. It will be interesting to hear which of our laws is which.

Sadly, we can’t have laws against bigotry and stupidity, so even fool MDs can say what they wish.

Steve King:has also introduced legislation the Supreme Court from considering the question of same-sex marriage. “We could pass this bill before the Supreme Court could even hear the oral arguments. That would stop it right then, there would be no decision coming out of the Supreme Court. This is a brake, and whether we can get the brake on or not between now and June, that we don’t know.”

Bigotry always is stupid, and King long has epitomized that stupidity. The notion that Congress could pass a law to prevent the Supreme Court from considering a law, would in of itself be unconstitutional. As my grandchildren would say, “Well, duh . . .”

Tom DeLay: “A ruling by the Supreme Court is nothing but an opinion if the legislative branch and the executive branch do not enforce it. Not only that, if the states would just invoke the 10th Amendment and assert their sovereignty, they can defy a ruling by the Supreme Court. It’s in the Constitution. We can tell the court what cases they can hear.”

To make this Union, the states voluntarily surrendered their sovereignty to a sovereign national government.

Aside from being stupid, bigotry is scary. DeLay not only doesn’t want to enforce what the Supreme Court decides (thereby nullifying the purpose of the Supreme Court), but he doesn’t understand what the word “Supreme” means.

The states cannot “defy” the Supreme Court (or, for instance, we could have a return to slavery. Uh oh. Maybe that’s the wrong example for DeLay of Texas.)

Texas State Rep. Cecil Bell: “The reality is that when the Supreme Court sets precedents, states don’t always adhere to them. I am not predicting what Texas will do — but to assume that Texas will suddenly change how it does business is presumptuous.”

Gee, Mr. Bell, exactly which Supreme Court decision do you plan “not to adhere to”? Sorry, but I don’t plan to visit you in prison.

Alabama State Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore:

“When federal courts start changing our Constitution by defining words that are not even there, like marriage, they’re going to do the same thing with family in the future. When a word’s not in the Constitution, clearly the powers of the Supreme Court do not allow them to redefine words and seize power.”

To the crazed, bigoted mind, it must mean the Supreme Court can’t make decisions about words not in the Constitution, like for instance: “Marriage.”

Presumably, the Supreme Court also can’t make decisions involving such words as “Internet,” “automobile, “airplane,” “telephone,” “gay,” “bisexual,” “lesbian,” “atomic,” “Catholic,” “Protestant” “African American” “solar power” and . . . oh, you get the idea.

I patiently await the sane, tolerant, patriotic voices of the Republican Party. Are you people out there?

Hello?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

==========================================================================================================================================================================
The Ten Steps to Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded free Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Federally funded, free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually. (Refer to this.)
8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all their forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)
10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

Initiating The Ten Steps sequentially will add dollars to the economy, stimulate the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.-

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK

Long term view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Recent view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY

–Virtually everything that happens in economics is engineered by the rich: Kansas version

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Mitchell’s laws:
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes. .
Liberals think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.
●The single most important problem in economics is
the gap between rich and poor.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening
the gap between rich and poor.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

=========================================================================================================================================================================================================================

Would it be too much to speculate that 99% of the literate world is completely clueless about the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty? Or is 99% an underestimate?

Surely, only a small percentage of the people, even those living the nightmare of the euro, understand what has happened to them. All they seem to understand is they are poor when pre-euro, they were not poor.

And not only don’t they understand that they have surrendered the single most valuable asset they have — their Monetary Sovereignty — but they don’t know why this was done, and who engineered it.

(Hint: The rich, of course.) Virtually everything that happens in economics is engineered by the rich.

And now we look at our brethren in Kansas, a monetarily non-sovereign entity, just like Greece, Italy, France and the other euro nations.

What’s The Matter With Kansas And Its Tax Cuts? It Can’t Do Math
Forbes: Business, JUL 15, 2014 @ 1:31 PM
Howard Gleckman, CONTRIBUTOR

The tax cuts in Kansas have been breathtaking. In 2012, at (Governor Sam) Brownback’s urging, the legislature cut individual tax rates by 25 percent and repealed the tax on sole proprietorships and other “pass-through” businesses.

In 2013, the legislature cut taxes again. It passed a measure to gradually lower rates even more over five years. By 2018, the top rate, which was 6.45 percent in 2012, will fall to 3.9 percent.

Kansas is a Republican state. Although the Democrats love the rich, they do save a bit of affection for the poor. The Republicans, by contrast, worship the rich, to the total exclusion of anyone having fewer than a hundred million in assets.

So when the Republicans cut taxes, they cut the taxes that mostly affect the rich: income taxes. And when they increase taxes, they increase the taxes that mostly affect the not-rich: sales taxes.

Brownback To Sign Historic Sales Tax Hike After Bruising Budget Battle

Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback’s signature personal income tax cuts emerged mostly intact from a grueling legislative fight to close a budget deficit that arose after revenue failed to match the conservative governor’s predictions of an economic boom.

Brownback and his GOP allies managed to avoid backtracking on past reductions on income tax rates.

Instead, they raised the state’s sales tax to one of the highest rates in the nation and smokers will be paying 50 cents more for each pack of cigarettes.

Get it? The rich-owned Republicans cut those pesky income taxes on the rich, and then replaced them with sales taxes that mostly impact the middle and low income people. It’s a direct transfer of dollars from poor to rich.

Two bills approved by Kansas legislators in the waning hours of their session will raise $384 million during the fiscal year beginning July 1, to avert a deficit prohibited by the state constitution.

The sales tax will rise to 6.5 percent from 6.15 percent and the cigarette tax will jump to $1.29.

Republicans who pushed the plan said its tax increases have to be seen in the context of the income tax cuts in 2012 and 2013, which the Legislature’s top tax analyst said could be worth $900 million annually.

Isn’t it beautiful?

The rich saved hundreds of millions of dollars a year, and the poor and middle classes will pay for it — and they have no idea what has been done to them.

So long as it’s positioned as anti-Obama and/or anti-liberal, that’s sufficient for them.

Ah, the bliss of ignorance.

We close this post with a sample of economic ignorance as expressed in the above-referenced Forbes article by Howard Glickman:

One cannot credibly argue that tax cuts increase revenue or even pay for themselves. They didn’t for Ronald Reagan. They don’t for Sam Brownback.

They won’t for the next politician who tries — whether he (or she) is in Washington, D.C. or in some state capital.

As has become the norm, Mr. Glickman and Forbes equate the Monetarily Sovereign federal government (which neither needs nor uses tax dollars) and the monetarily non-sovereign state governments (which both need and used tax dollars).

The rich-owned media help perpetuate that myth of equivalence, because it allows them to fool the public, and to transfer dollars from the 99.9% to the .1%, as requested by the .1%.

What do conservatives conserve? They conserve the riches of the rich.

Now that’s engineering.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

==========================================================================================================================================================================
The Ten Steps to Prosperity:

1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Federally funded free Medicare — parts A, B & D plus long term nursing care — for everyone (Click here)
3. Provide an Economic Bonus to every man, woman and child in America, and/or every state a per capita Economic Bonus. (Click here) Or institute a reverse income tax.
4. Federally funded, free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
5. Salary for attending school (Click here)
6. Eliminate corporate taxes (Click here)
7. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually. (Refer to this.)
8. Tax the very rich (the “.1%”) more, with higher, progressive tax rates on all their forms of income. (Click here)
9. Federal ownership of all banks (Click here and here)
10. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99% (Click here)

Initiating The Ten Steps sequentially will add dollars to the economy, stimulate the economy, and narrow the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest.-

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
1. A growing economy requires a growing supply of dollars (GDP=Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)
2. All deficit spending grows the supply of dollars
3. The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control.
4. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

THE RECESSION CLOCK

Long term view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Recent view:
Monetary Sovereignty

Vertical gray bars mark recessions.

As the federal deficit growth lines drop, we approach recession, which will be cured only when the growth lines rise. Increasing federal deficit growth (aka “stimulus”) is necessary for long-term economic growth.

#MONETARYSOVEREIGNTY