Historical bullshit about federal “debt.” From Sept. 26, 1940 to August 12, 2025

This is an update of the many, many previous posts showing the seemingly never-ending warnings about “federal debt” (that isn’t federal and isn’t debt).

The purpose has been to demonstrate how, year after year, so-called experts claim the U.S. is about to enter catastrophe because federal debt is “too high,” while the experts are proven wrong year after year. The economy grows and grows and is healthier than ever.

I’ve been doing this for over 20 years; the experts have been wrong for over 85 years, and they never seem to learn. While I find it frustrating, I’ve tried to remain civil and merely recite the facts. But now, as I pass my 90th year, and the road ahead is short, I’ve grown impatient with civility, and I’ve decided to call it like it is: BULLSHIT.

Last  year, what set me off is a BULLSHIT tweet (or whatever “X” calls them now), from the richest man in the world, who, despite his great wealth, seems to know diddly-squat about federal finance:

No Elon, the U.S. federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, cannot go bankrupt. Even if tax collections fell to $0, and spending tripled, the federal government could continue to pay all its bills, forever.

The Big Lie in economics is: “Federal taxes fund federal spending.” Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

The truth is that federal taxes fund nothing. They are destroyed upon receipt by the Treasury.

The purpose of federal taxes is to:

  1. Control the economy by taxing what the government wishes to discourage and by giving tax breaks to those the government wishes to reward (mainly the wealthy).
  2. Assure demand for the U.S. dollar by requiring taxes to be paid in dollars.

That’s it. Taxes do not fund federal spending. Period.

The U.S. federal government is not like state/local governments, not like euro governments, not like businesses, and not like you and me.

It is uniquely Monetarily Sovereign. It cannot, unwillingly, run short of its own sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar. As real experts have said:

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan: “A government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency. There is nothing to prevent the federal government from creating as much money as it wants and paying it to somebody. The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print the money to do that.

Former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. It’s not tax money… We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.”

Statement from the St. Louis Fed: “As the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e., unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.

Press Conference: Mario Draghi, President of the Monetarily Sovereign ECB, January 9, 2014. Question: Can the ECB ever run out of money? Mario Draghi: Technically, no. We cannot run out of money.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell stated, “As a central bank, we have the ability to create money digitally.”

Paul Krugman (Nobel Prize–winning economist): “The U.S. government is not like a household. It literally prints money, and it can’t run out.” — Numerous op-eds/blog posts

Hyman Minsky (Economist, key influence on MMT)
“The government can always finance its spending by creating money.”

Eric Tymoigne (Economist) “A sovereign government does not need to collect taxes or issue bonds to finance spending. It finances directly through money creation.”

Because the U.S. federal government has the infinite ability to create its sovereign currency, the U.S. dollar, it never borrows dollars.

Contrary to popular wisdom, T-bills, T-notes, and T-bonds do not represent borrowing. They are deposits, the purpose of which is to provide a safe place to store unused dollars and to help the Fed control interest rates.

The government never touches those dollars, which remain the property of the depositors. Not only can our Monetarily Sovereign government not run short of dollars, but federal deficits are necessary to grow the economy, as evidenced by the formula: Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Nonfederal Spending + Net Exports.

The formula shows that economic growth requires federal deficit spending growth.

The record highs of federal debt (red) match the record highs of Gross Domestic Product (blue).

The next graph shows that reduced deficit growth (red) is associated with recessions (vertical gray bars), and increased deficit growth cures recessions. 

When we don’t have sufficient federal deficits, we have depressions and recessions:

U.S. depressions tend to come on the heels of federal surpluses.

        1. 1804-1812: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 48%. Depression began 1807.
        2. 1817-1821: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 29%. Depression began 1819.
        3. 1823-1836: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 99%. Depression began 1837.
        4. 1852-1857: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 59%. Depression began 1857.
        5. 1867-1873: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 27%. Depression began 1873.
        6. 1880-1893: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 57%. Depression began 1893.
        7. 1920-1930: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 36%. Depression began 1929.
        8. 1997-2001: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 15%. Recession began 2001.

Periodically, we publish yet another shrieking claim that the U.S. federal debt is “unsustainable” and a “ticking time bomb.”

This lie has been told to you every year (really, almost every day) since 1940, and that bomb has never exploded, nor will it.

Rather than repeat the entire list of the thousands of lies to which you have been subject, I will list samples here as a reference and add periodically, at the end, new “federal debt is a ticking time bomb BULLSHIT claims as I encounter them.

Read these and see that even respected economists replace facts with BULLSHIT:

————————//—————————

September 26, 1940, New York Times: The federal budget was a “ticking time-bomb which can eventually destroy the American system,” said Robert M. Hanes, president of the American Bankers Association. BULLSHIT

(Yes, the record of bad predictions goes all the way back to 1940. It probably goes back longer, but I don’t have the examples.)

September 26, 1940, New York Times: The federal budget was a “ticking time-bomb which can eventually destroy the American system,” said Robert M. Hanes, president of the American Bankers Association.
By 1960, the debt was “threatening the country’s fiscal future,” said Secretary of Commerce Frederick H. Mueller. (“The enormous cost of various Federal programs is a time-bomb threatening the country’s fiscal future, Secretary of Commerce Frederick H. Mueller warned here yesterday.”)BULLSHIT

By 1983: “The debt probably will explode in the third quarter of 1984,” said Fred Napolitano, former National Association of Home Builders president.BULLSHIT

In 1984: AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland said. “It’s a time bomb ticking away.”BULLSHIT

In 1985: “The federal deficit is a ticking time bomb, and it’s about to blow up,” U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell. (Remember him?)BULLSHIT

Later in 1985: Los Angeles Times: “We labeled the deficit a ‘ticking time bomb that threatens to permanently undermine the strength and vitality of the American economy.”BULLSHIT

In 1987: Richmond Times-Dispatch – Richmond, VA: “100TH CONGRESS FACING U.S. DEFICIT’ TIME BOMB‘”BULLSHIT

Later in 1987: The Dallas Morning News: “A fiscal time bomb is slowly ticking that, if not defused, could explode into a financial crisis within the next few years for the federal government.”BULLSHIT

In 1989: FORTUNE Magazine: “A TIME BOMB FOR U.S. TAXPAYERSBULLSHIT

In 1992: The Pantagraph – Bloomington, Illinois: “I have seen where politicians in Washington have expressed little or no concern about this ticking time bomb they have helped to create, that being the enormous federal budget deficit, approaching $4 trillion.BULLSHIT

Later in 1992, Ross Perot said, “Our great nation is sitting right on top of a ticking time bomb. We have a national debt of $4 trillion.”BULLSHIT

In 1995: Kansas City Star: “Concerned citizens. . . regard the national debt as a ticking time bomb poised to explode with devastating consequences at some future date.”BULLSHIT

In 2003: Porter Stansberry, for the Daily Reckoning: “Generation debt is a ticking time bomb . . . with about ten years left on the clock.”BULLSHIT

In 2004: Bradenton Herald: “A NATION AT RISK: TWIN DEFICIT A TICKING TIME BOMBBULLSHIT

In 2005: Providence Journal: “Some lawmakers see the Medicare drug benefit for what it is: a ticking time bomb.” BULLSHIT

In 2006: NewsMax.com, “We have to worry about the deficit . . . when we combine it with the trade deficit, we have a real ticking time bomb in our economy,” said Mrs. Clinton. BULLSHIT

In 2007: USA Today: “Like a ticking time bomb, the national debt is an explosion waiting to happen.BULLSHIT

In 2010: Heritage Foundation: “Why the National Debt is a Ticking Time Bomb. Interest rates on government bonds are virtually guaranteed to jump over the next few years. BULLSHIT

In 2010: Reason Alert: “. . . the time bomb that’s ticking under the federal budget like a Guy Fawkes’ powder keg.” BULLSHITBullshit Meter - Funny Sticker – Stickerheads Stickers

In 2011: Washington Post, Lori Montgomery:”. . . defuse the biggest budgetary time bombs that are set to explode.” BULLSHIT

June 19, 2013: Chamber of Commerce: Safety net spending is a ‘time bomb’, by Jim Tankersley: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is worried that not enough Americans are worried about social safety net spending. The nation’s largest business lobbying group launched a renewed effort Wednesday to reduce projected federal spending on safety-net programs, labeling them a “ticking time bomb” that, left unchanged, “will bankrupt this nation.” BULLSHIT

On June 15, 2014: CBN News: “The United States of Debt: A Ticking Time BombBULLSHIT

On June 18, 2015: The ticking economic time bomb that presidential candidates are ignoring: Fortune Magazine, Shawn Tully, BULLSHIT

On February 10, 2016, The Daily Bell: “Obama’s $4.1 Trillion Budget Is Latest Sign of America’s Looming Collapse” BULLSHIT

On January 23, 2017: Trump’s ‘Debt Bomb‘: Deficit May Grow, Defense Budget May Not, By Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. BULLSHIT

On January 27, 2017: America’s “debt bomb is going to explode.” That’s according to financial strategist Peter Schiff. Schiff said that while low interest rates had helped keep a lid on U.S. debt, it couldn’t be contained for much longer. Interest rates and inflation are rising, creditors will demand higher premiums, and the country is headed “off the edge of a cliff.” BULLSHIT

On April 28, 2017: Debt in the U.S. Fuel for Growth or Ticking Time Bomb?, American Institute for Economic Research, by Max Gulker, PhD – Senior Research Fellow, Theodore Cangeros BULLSHIT

February 16, 2018 America’s Debt Bomb By Andrew Soergel, Senior Reporter: Conservatives and deficit hawks are hurling criticism at Washington for deepening America’s debt hole. BULLSHIT

April 18, 2018 By Alan Greenspan and John R. Kasich: “Time is running short, and America’s debt time bomb continues to tick.” BULLSHIT

January 10, 2019, Unfunded Govt. Liabilities — Our Ticking Time Bomb. By Myra Adams, Tick, tick, tick goes the time bomb of national doom. BULLSHIT

January 18, 2019; 2019 Is Gold’s Year To Shine (And The Ticking U.S. Debt Time-Bomb) By Gavin Wendt BULLSHIT

April 10, 2019, The National Debt: America’s Ticking Time Bomb. TIL Journal. Entire nations can go bankrupt. One prominent example was the *nation of Greece which was threatened with insolvency a decade ago. Greece survived the economic crisis because the European Union and the IMF bailed the nation out. BULLSHIT

July 11, 2019: National debt is a ‘ticking time bomb: Sen. Mike Lee BULLSHIT

SEP 12, 2019, Our national ticking time bomb, By BILL YEARGIN SPECIAL TO THE SUN SENTINEL | At some point, investors will become concerned about lending to a debt-riddled U.S., which will result in having to offer higher interest rates to attract the money. Even with rates low today, interest expense is the federal government’s third-highest expenditure following the elderly and military. The U.S. already borrows all the money it uses to pay its interest expense, sort of like a Ponzi scheme. Lack of investor confidence will only make this problem worse. BULLSHIT

JANUARY 06, 2020, National debt is a time bomb, BY MARK MANSPERGER, Tri City Herald | The increase in the U.S. deficit last year was about $1.1 trillion, bringing our total national debt to more than $23 trillion! This fiscal year, the deficit is forecasted to be even higher, and when the economy eventually slows down, our annual deficits could be pushing $2 trillion a year! This is financial madness. there’s not going to be a drastic cut in federal expenditures — that is, until we go broke — nor are we going to “grow our way” out of this predicament. Therefore, to gain control of this looming debt, we’re going to have to raise taxes. BULLSHIT

February 14, 2020, OMG! It’s February 14, 2020, and the national debt is still a ticking time bomb! The national debt: A ticking time bomb? America is “headed toward a crisis,” said Tiana Lowe in WashingonExaminer.com. The Treasury Department reported last week that the federal deficit swelled to more than $1 trillion in 2019 for the first time since 2012. Even more alarming was the report from the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicting that $1 trillion deficits will continue for the next 10 years, eventually reaching $1.7 trillion in 2030 BULLSHIT

April 26, 2020, ‘Catastrophic’: Why government debt is a ticking time bomb, Stephen Koukoulas, Yahoo Finance [Re. Monetarily Sovereign Australia’s debt.] BULLSHIT

August 29, 2020, LOS ANGELES, California: America’s mountain of debt is a ticking time bomb. The United States not only looks ill, but also dead broke. To offset the pandemic-induced “Great Cessation,” the U.S. Federal Reserve and Congress have marshalled staggering sums of stimulus spending out of fear that the economy would otherwise plunge to 1930s soup kitchen levels. Assuming that America eventually defeats COVID-19 and does not devolve into a Terminator-like dystopia, how will it avoid the approaching fiscal cliff and national bankruptcy? BULLSHIT

April 16, 2021, NATIONAL POLICY: ECONOMY AND TAXES / MARK ALEXANDER / The National Debt Clock: A Ticking Time Bomb: At the moment, our national debt exceeds $28 TRILLION — about 80% held as public debt and the rest as intragovernmental debt. That is $225,000 per taxpayer. Federal annual spending this year is almost $8 trillion, and more than half of that is deficit spending — piling on the national debt. BULLSHIT

June 17, 2022, Time Bomb On National Debt Is Counting Down Faster Thanks To Fed’s Rate Hike, Tim Brown /We are now staring down the barrel of the end of the U.S. economy based on fiat money, printed out of thin air but charged back to the people at ridiculous interest rates. BULLSHIT

Now, the national debt is approaching $31 trillion, which is $12 trillion more than when Donald Trump took office in 2017, and more than half of that debt was tacked on in his final year. Then we’ve had the disastrous year and a half of Joe Biden. Now, the Fed is hiking its rates, and that spells even more trouble for the national debt and the economy at large. BULLSHIT

December 4, 2022 America’s ticking time bomb: $66 trillion in debt that could crash the economy By Stephen Moore, The national debt is $31 trillion when including Social Security’s and Medicare’s unfunded liabilities. Wake up, America. BULLSHIT

That ticking sound you’re hearing is the American debt time bomb that, with each passing day, is getting precariously close to detonating and crashing the US economy. BULLSHIT

January 13, 2023. A ticking time bomb in the U.S. economy is running perilously close to detonation. Long considered a harbinger of bad luck, Friday, January 13 came with a warning for Congress that the country could default on its debt as soon as June. BULLSHIT

February 5, 2023, ‘The world’s largest Ponzi scheme’: Peter Schiff just blasted the US debt ceiling drama. Here are 3 assets he trusts amid major market uncertainty. Story by Bethan Moorcraft, A ticking time bomb in the U.S. economy is running perilously close to detonation. With the U.S. reaching its debt limit of $31.4 trillion on Jan. 19, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen urged lawmakers to increase or suspend the debt ceiling. BULLSHIT

April 22, 2023 The Debt Ceiling Debate Is About More Than Debt, Jim Tankersley, WASHINGTON — Speaker Kevin McCarthy of California has repeatedly said that he and his fellow House Republicans are refusing to raise the nation’s borrowing limit, and risking economic catastrophe, to force a reckoning on America’s $31 trillion national debt. “Without exaggeration, America’s debt is a ticking time bomb that will detonate unless we take serious, responsible action,” he said this week. BULLSHIT

November 3, 2023 The Fuse on America’s Debt Bomb Just Got Shorter, J Antoni Heritage Organization. The Treasury is now on track to borrow almost as much in just six months as it did in the previous 12 months. That’s nearly a doubling of the deficit. Because the federal debt is $33.7 trillion, just a 1 percent increase in yields adds $337 billion to the annual cost of servicing the debt over time. Absent spending reform, eventually no one will be willing to hold the bomb anymore, and the yields on U.S. debt will begin to resemble those in Argentina. BULLSHIT

February 2, 2024 How Florida can help defuse the nation’s debt bomb By professor emeritus of economics at the University of Colorado Boulder and former comptroller general of the United States. Washington’s out-of-control spending, combined with fiscal and monetary policies have resulted in trillion-dollar-plus annual deficits, over $34 trillion in federal debt, over $125 trillion in total federal liabilities and unfunded obligations, and excess inflation. Excessive spending and loose monetary policy increase inflation in the short term, and mounting debt burdens serve to reduce future economic growth and shift the economic burden and consequences of mounting debt burdens to future generations. BULLSHIT

February 8, 2024 Legendary investor Paul Tudor Jones says a ‘debt bomb’ is about to go off in the U.S.: ‘We’re fast-pouring consumption like crazy’. The U.S. economy may seem like it’s firing on all cylinders, but underneath the surface, a “debt bomb” could be on the verge of exploding, according to billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones. The esteemed investor said in an interview with CNBC that he couldn’t deny the economy was strong, but that it was actually “on steroids” due to massive government spending and borrowing. BULLSHIT

Jones is not the only one to call attention to the growing deficit issue in the U.S. On Sunday, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell took a rare dive into politics, telling CBS’s 60 Minutes that the national debt was “growing faster than the economy,” and calling for lawmakers to get the federal government “back on a sustainable fiscal path.” Meanwhile, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said she is not yet worried about the increasing national debt as long as the government keeps in check the net payments it makes on its debt relative to GDP. BULLSHIT

Those payments are projected to rise from 2.5% last year to 2.9% next year, according to the Office of Management and Budget, below their level in the early 1990s. Jones told CNBC that the strong economy could postpone the effects of the government’s deficit spending, but only for a little while. “The only question is … when does that manifest itself in markets?” he added. BULLSHIT

“It could be this year, it could be next year. Productivity may mask, and it might be three or four years from now. But clearly, clearly we’re on an unsustainable path.” BULLSHIT

June 21, 2024 My Weekly Column: Our debt crisis is a ticking time bomb by Randy Feenstra: On June 18, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) – the government agency tasked with monitoring our nation’s fiscal health – confirmed my serious concerns with President Biden’s reckless spending agenda. BULLSHIT

His administration’s fiscal policies have not only caused cumulative inflation to skyrocket by over 20% since he took office, but they have also accelerated our accumulation of debt to levels that are beyond unsustainable. Instead of changing course, he recently released his budget for Fiscal Year 2025, which has a $ 7.3 trillion price tag and looks to raise taxes on our families, farmers, and businesses to the tune of $5.5 trillion. BULLSHIT

The CBO estimates that his debt “cancellation” policies will cost taxpayers nearly $400 billion over the next ten years. I strongly oppose these bailouts. Iowans who never attended college, entered the workforce early, or helped put their kids through school should not be forced to pick up the tab for President Biden’s costly and unfair executive orders. BULLSHIT

July 22, 2024 Federal debt is the ticking bomb in your wallet By E.J. Antoni a public finance economist and the Richard F. Aster fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and a senior fellow at Unleash. The federal government is already running $2 trillion annual deficits, driving up interest on the debt exponentially. The time bomb of federal finance has already started ticking down. BULLSHIT

October 10, 2024, U.S. Debt Bomb is ticking louder by Nick Beams, World Socialist Website. The immediate economic question is: when will the rise in US government debt give rise to a crisis for the US dollar, a major meltdown in the market for debt, the Treasury bond market, or some other area of the financial system? Government debt is now heading towards $36 trillion and increasing at a pace that is regarded as “unsustainable” by Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, along with many others. BULLSHIT

May 30, 2025 DEFICIT DANGER. BOJ governor warns US debt time bomb outweighs trade war risks. By Dashan Hendricks. BANK of Jamaica (BOJ) governor Richard Byles has issued a stark warning that America’s spiralling budget deficits now present a more severe danger to the global economy than ongoing trade conflicts, as the world’s largest economy grapples with its third credit rating downgrade since 2011. His comments follow Moody’s recent decision to cut the US government’s credit rating from its top-tier Aaa to Aa1, citing concerns over its US$36-trillion debt burden, which now exceeds the nation’s US$30 trillion GDP. BULLSHIT

August 12, 2025 Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) Nancy Mace’s Debt Alarm Tweet was hit with a fact-check after warning on social media that the U.S. national debt had reached $37 trillion, calling it “a bill our kids can’t afford to pay.” The post, shared on Twitter, received over 2 million views and framed the soaring debt as a dire generational crisis.

(No kids will pay the national debt.) It’s not debt, and it’s paid by returning the dollars already in storage.

———————–//———————–

The above articles contain the same old BULLSHIT (“unsustainable,” “cost taxpayers,” “our kids will pay”) that they’ve been telling us since 1940. To buttress their lies, they make false comparisons to family finances or the finances of other monetarily non-sovereign entities like businesses or euro nations.

They have been wrong, repeatedly wrong, for all those years. If we wait long enough, perhaps something might happen to prove them right, perhaps in a thousand years? Today, this makes “only” 85 years of the debt nuts’ BULLSHIT.

The federal deficit yields economic growth year after year. When deficits are insufficient, we have had recessions, which were cured by increased deficits.

If respected economists keep predicting something terrible is imminent year after year, yet exactly the opposite happens, at what point do they reexamine their beliefs?

At what point does the public say, “Fool me once; shame on you. Fool me repeatedly for 85 years; shame on me. This is just a steaming pile of BULLSHIT“?

Whew, I feel a little better, now — but just a little.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell; MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell; https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

 

 

The fundamental lie of Libertarianism

“Libertarianism” says Robert W. Poole (Reason Magazine’s early editor) is “about more than just economics and politics, it really is. It’s about human flourishing and what are the conditions for human beings to have satisfying, flourishing [lives].” Money is power.
Hoover Institution Acquires the Archives of Reason Magazine Co-founder Robert W. Poole Jr. | Hoover Institution
Robert Poole, the voice of Libertarianism
The fundamental philosophy of Libertarians is that power should be with the people, not with the government. Yet Libertarians espouse exactly the opposite when they opt for tax increases and/or benefit decreases to reduce federal deficits. Keep that in mind as you read the following excerpts from an article written by a leading Libertarian. See whether you believe he believes the money and power should be with the people:

Endlessly expanded federal borrowing and spending is not a realistic long-term transportation future

By Robert Poole, Director of Transportation Policy, September 12, 2023

(Robert Poole is one of the founders of the Reason Foundation [which publishes Reason Magazine] and served as its president and CEO from 1978 to 2000.He is currently director of transportation policy at the Reason Foundation and frequently writes about issues related to privatization.)

The national debt will affect the future of transportation funding, and the public-private partnership community needs to understand why and what the implications for P3s may be.

The most recent parts of the story began on Aug. 1, when Fitch Ratings downgraded the federal government’s bond rating from AAA to AA+. For a company, that might not be a big deal, but for the government of the world’s largest economy, the downgrade was a shot across the bow.

This was the second time a rating agency took such an action with the federal government’s bond rating, with S&P doing so in 2011.

Headlines in the financial press, such as The Wall Street Journal’s “America’s Fiscal Time Bomb Ticks Louder” and “U.S. Downgrade Flashes Warning Sign.” indicate how seriously the downgrade should be taken.

The downgrades had nothing to do with the federal government’s ability to pay. They reflected the government’s willingness to pay, as evidenced by the ridiculous debt ceiling laws. Being Monetarily Sovereign, the federal government has the infinite ability to pay for anything. Mr. Poole confuses “ability”with “willingness.” We have written many times about the so-called fiscal “time bomb.” The first mention we noted was in 1940;

September 1940, the federal budget was a “ticking time-bomb which can eventually destroy the American system,” said Robert M. Hanes, president of the American Bankers Association.

Subsequently, references to the federal “debt” as a ticking time bomb appeared regularly in all media, from scholarly journals to daily newspapers. The 1940 mention came when the total federal “debt” was approximately $48 Billion. Today, that debt is roughly $26 Trillion, an astounding 54,000% increase.
Despite that increase, the “ticking time bomb” still has yet to explode, but the doomsday preachers, having learned nothing from the many years of experience, continue to fret. Eighty-three consecutive years of wrong predictions, and people still believe? What word comes to mind?

As the Journal’s Greg Ip wrote: One reason for Fitch’s downgrade was the absence of any political will to deal with the main drivers of the deficit: spending programs for older Americans, including Social Security and Medicare, and repeated cuts to tax rates for most households.

No, the reason for the downgrade was the uncertainty caused by the useless debt limit laws. The word “useless” is appropriate. There is no use for a law that limits the federal government’s ability to pay for what it already has purchased. And should anyone believe the law has any purpose whatsoever, they should explain why, since 1960, Congress has acted 78 separate times to permanently raise, temporarily extend, or revise the definition of the debt limit – 49 times under Republican presidents and 29 times under Democratic presidents. If the law had any value, why is it so easily and often increased without exploding as a “time bomb”? Money is power, so ironically, if one truly believed the power belongs with the people and not with the government, he would favor money flowing to the people and from the government. Yet the exact opposite is stated by the Libertarian writer.

Fitch noted how much worse U.S. fiscal metrics are than its peer countries. For example, The U.S. is on track to spend 10% of federal revenue on interest by 2025, compared with just 1% for the average triple-A-rated country and 4.8% for double-A-rated.

Why, then, isn’t the U.S. rating even lower?

Mr. Poole doesn’t give examples of those “triple-A” and “double-A” rated countries, probably because they aren’t comparable to the U.S. government. Perhaps, they don’t have a foolish, useless debt-ceiling law. Or perhaps, they are not Monetarily Sovereign nations that can issue their national currency in unlimited amounts, as the U.S. can. It would have been helpful for Mr. Poole to list the nations he refers to, but of course, he never will because that would destroy his argument.

Because the reserve status of the dollar and the size and safety of Treasury debt gives the U.S. unprecedented borrowing ability.

First, the U.S. government does not borrow U.S. dollars. It pays for goods and services by creating dollars ad hoc, which it has the unlimited ability to do. The U.S. government never unintentionally can run short of dollars.

Statement from the St. Louis Fed: “As the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e., unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.”

Not dependent on credit markets” means they don’t borrow dollars. Second, “reserve status” merely means that banks keep dollars on reserve to facilitate international trade. Not only does the U.S. dollar have reserve status, but so do numerous other currencies, depending on geography. Though the U.S. dollar is the most common reserve currency, other reserve currencies include: the euro, the Japanese yen, the Mexican peso, the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Australian dollar, the Indian rupee, the Swiss franc, the Swedish krona, and many other currencies now being held in reserve by banks, worldwide. Being a reserve currency does not bestow special safety on a currency. It does not indicate a nation’s ability to pay its bills. Third, Mr. Poole mentions the size and safety of Treasury debt in the same article about its being a “ticking time bomb.” I suggest he has just exploded his own warning, as well as he should.

Indeed, it was hard to get presidents or Congress to worry about the deficit when interest rates were low. Today, a bond market signaling that the world is no longer safe for debts may be the first step to tackling them.

Interest rates have no meaning for a Monetarily Sovereign nation like the U.S., which has the infinite ability to create its own currency. Whether interest is 1% or 50%, or anything between, the U.S. federal government simply presses computer keys to pay. Further, the U.S. Federal Reserve pays whatever interest rate it wishes. It sets the rate by fiat. Unlike private borrowers, the Fed does not need to set a rate that is attractive to lenders because:

a. The government does not borrow. The purpose of T-bills, T-notes, and T-bonds is not to provide the government with spending money. The goal is to provide a safe storage place for unused dollars. The federal government never touches the dollars in T-security accounts.

b. If the Treasury wanted to issue T-securities that no one wanted to buy, the Federal Reserve could purchase them.

The long-term consequences of the growing debt were estimated in the latest Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) 2023 Long-Term Budget Outlook.

Its baseline 30-year projection, which assumes no changes in existing laws and programs, is that by 2053, the national debt will constitute 181% of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product—compared with 98% today.

The debt/GDP ratio is the most misunderstood fraction in all economics. Contrary to widespread ignorance, that ratio has absolutely nothing to do with the ability of the U.S. to pay its bills. The federal government has the infinite ability to create dollars, which it does by pressing computer keys.

Alan Greenspan: “There is nothing to prevent the federal government from creating as much money as it wants and paying it to somebody.”

The so-called “debt” is the total of T-security deposits accepted by the federal government. These are dollars in accounts owned by depositors, never touched by the federal government, and paid off simply by returning the dollars in the accounts. The misnamed “debt” consists of net deposits made between yesterday and ten or more years ago. By contrast, GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is a one-year spending measure. So, the debt/GDP fraction compares a multi-year total with a one-year total — mathematically senseless. Imagine your house mortgage being $300,000 and you earning $150,000 a year. That would be a 200% ratio that millions of people support all the time. The debt/GDP is even more senseless than that, because GDP doesn’t pay debt. Of course, you aren’t Monetarily Sovereign — you can’t create dollars at will — and the federal debt isn’t real debt. So, the whole thing is foolish, though no more foolish than current worries about Debt/GDP ratios. If you want to waste time evaluating the world’s most useless ratio, go here. It shows the percentages for dozens of countries. I challenge you to use those ratios to determine the world’s best and worst credit risks.

And paying interest on that debt will increase from taking 15% of federal revenue today to 35% of federal revenue in 2053 (more than any national budget item except Social Security and Medicare). And that’s just CBO’s baseline estimate.

Given that the federal government has the infinite ability to create dollars, why does Mr. Poole stress about paying interest? Ignorance or intent to deceive?

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that, given likely extensions of tax cuts and expansions of federal programs, the 2053 national debt will likely rise to 222% of GDP.

Whether the debt is 22%, 222%, or 2222% of GDP has zero effect on the federal government’s ability to pay its bills.

Where does transportation fit in the discussion about the national debt?

Well, in July, the House Appropriations Committee, in response to conservative members saying they’re concerned about out-of-control federal borrowing while a Democrat is in the White House—as opposed to mainly supporting massive deficit spending during the Trump administration—proposed trimming Fiscal Year 2024 Department of Transportation (DOT) discretionary grant spending by $5 billion.

Here is where we get to Congress’s misunderstanding (intentional or otherwise) of the federal government’s ability to pay for things.

Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

Even if the federal government collected zero taxes, it could continue spending forever. There is no reason to cut spending for budgetary reasons. The government has infinite money.

This relatively minor cut would affect only a few programs in six modal agency discretionary grant programs totaling $22.5 billion last year. Yet a headline in Eno Transportation Weekly read, “FY24 House Funding Bill Has Massive Cuts to DOT Grant Programs.”

This proposal raised similar cries of alarm from highway, transit, and rail organizations, such as the headline “Transportation Funding Under Threat in House of Representatives” by United for Infrastructure, which advocates for more infrastructure investment.

Suppose we make the possibly innocent assumption that the Department of Transportation (DOT) had good reasons for its discretionary grant spending. In that case, we now will be forced to do without that spending. The people will be deprived of important transportation improvements, all because of economic ignorance.

Let’s think ahead a few years to when massive federal funding in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, often referred to as the bipartisan infrastructure law, and the Inflation Reduction Act’s budget has been expended.

At that point, state transportation budgets would be expected to revert to their pre-stimulus spending levels.

This is an important point. Though the federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, can create infinite dollars, the states, counties, and cities are monetarily non-sovereign. They can and often do run short of dollars.

Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

Why then are states asked to fund what the federal government could easily fund without collecting a penny in taxes? Economic ignorance.

But what can we expect transportation organizations and state DOTs to call for?

Based on history, it’s almost certain states will propose the most recent year of those expanded funding levels as their new budget baselines and ask Congress for federal funding.

And if Congress goes along with the calls for that level of infrastructure spending, there will be another massive amount of federal borrowing.

Reminder: The federal government does not borrow. It creates dollars at will.

Quote from former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke when he was on 60 Minutes: Scott Pelley: Is that tax money that the Fed is spending? Ben Bernanke: It’s not tax money… We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.

Since CBO’s dire debt forecasts don’t include this level of increased federal transportation spending, this increase would make all CBO’s 30-year projections seriously underestimating.

Many years ago, a chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Herb Stein, propounded what became known as Stein’s Law. “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.”

But the longer that rude awakening takes to happen, the worse the consequences will be.

Someone, please tell Herb Stein that because the U.S. federal government is Monetarily Sovereign, it can continue to deficit spend forever. It never needs to stop.

America’s transportation leaders should think hard about lobbying for this unsustainable spending to continue.

Sorry, Mr. Poole, but federal spending has proved to be infinitely sustainable. There is no reason for it ever to stop.

The largest contribution to the out-of-control national debt is the impending bankruptcy of Medicare and Social Security.

Because the U.S. government is Monetarily Sovereign, it cannot go bankrupt. For the same reason, no federal government agencies- i.e., Medicare and Social Security- can go bankrupt unless Congress and the President want them to. The federal government could and should eliminate the FICA tax and fund Medicare and Social Security the same way it funds Congress and the White House: By creating dollars. Federal spending is not “out-of-control.” Congress and the President control it. It is exactly what Congress and the President want it to be.

If, or when, Congress finally gets around to grappling with the costs of those programs, it’s likely that most or all federal discretionary programs, including infrastructure programs, will be in for severe and long-term spending cuts.

Transportation leaders should start planning for that significant change now.

Does “severe, long-term spending cuts” in transportation sound like “human flourishing,” the Libertarian excuse for the existence of Libertarianism?

One ray of hope for the highway and bridge sector is the opportunity that comes with the urgent need to phase out per-gallon fuel taxes and replace them with per-mile road user charges, also called mileage-based user fees.

Unnecessary taxes. All federal tax dollars are destroyed upon receipt by the Treasury. Taxes are paid with dollars from the M1 money supply measure. When they reach the Treasury, they cease to be part of any money supply measure. Thus, federal taxes effectively are destroyed upon receipt.

If done right, that transition could fully restore the users-pay/users-benefit principles on which the gas tax was based a hundred years ago.

It could even mean converting state highway systems into revenue-financed highway utilities analogous to electric, gas, and water utilities.

Public utilities, which can be government-owned or investor-owned, charge customers based on how much of the service they use. They also issue long-term revenue bonds backed by the projected income from their user charges to fund the costs of maintaining and improving the infrastructure.

This is the usual Libertarian “soak the private sector” (as opposed to “human flourishing,”), though the federal government has infinite money. Ironically, while Libertarians supposedly favor the private sector, they ask the private sector to give the federal government more money. Do these folks even know what they want?

Long-time traffic and revenue consultant Ed Regan has suggested that metro areas could add a transit tax to charges in the road user charge (RUC) future.

This would mean only residents of an urban area would pay for its transit subsidies—not rural taxpayers or federal taxpayers in general.

This isn’t ideal, but it would be more equitable than today’s system of diverting nationwide highway user tax revenue to transit in a few hundred metro areas.

It would be even more equitable for the federal government to stop pretending it spends tax dollars. The purpose of federal taxes is not to provide spending dollars to a government that has infinite dollars. The fundamental purposes of federal tax dollars are:
  1. Primarily, to control the economy by taxing what the government wishes to discourage and giving tax breaks to what the government hopes to encourage.
  2. Secondarily, to create demand for the U.S.  dollar by requiring taxes to be paid in dollars.
  3. In reality, to widen the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest by claiming that benefits to the poor and middle are “unaffordable” and “unsustainable.”
That is why you are falsely told that Social Security and Medicare benefits must be cut.

In the near term, as advocates of more spending point out, thousands of bridges still need refurbishment or replacement across the country.

But there is no way that federal taxpayers, via expanded federal spending, can address that total problem without massive tax increases.

That is a lie. Federal taxes do not fund federal spending. Period.

State and local transportation officials should start planning for a self-help transportation future that requires users to pay for the infrastructure they use and utilizes public-private partnerships to fund and operate significant projects.

Rather than taking from the private sector, the federal government should fund infrastructure the same way it funds everything else: By simply creating dollars.

A version of this column first appeared in Public Works Financing.

SUMMARY Unlike state and local governments, the U.S. federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. Two hundred and sixty years ago, the government created laws from thin air, and some of those laws created dollars from thin air. They created as many laws and dollars as they wished and gave those dollars the value they wished. It all was arbitrary. Today, the federal government retains the infinite right to create as many dollars as it wishes and to give those dollars whatever value it wishes. Thus the U.S. government never can run short of dollars and has absolute control over inflation. It can pay for anything instantly without collecting a penny in taxes. Unlike state/local taxes, federal taxes are destroyed upon receipt by the Treasury. Similarly, no federal government agency runs short of dollars unless Congress and the President want them to. This includes such federal agencies as the Supreme Court, the White House, Congress, all the branches of the military, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and every federal Department. Libertarians claim to believe the federal government has too much power. Yet, to cure federal deficits, they want to cut benefits and increase taxes. Libertarians want to take dollars from the private sector and give them to the federal government — exactly the opposite of the Libertarian stated philosophy. They claim to wish for “human flourishing” and for “freedom,” but it is a freedom to be impoverished and without medical care and transportation, ultimately ending in anarchy. Libertarianism is a fraud that claims to want something noble, but in practice opts for something evil. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY