Forget “cancel culture.” Ignorance is bliss, the right-wing mantra

Remember when conservatives criticized so-called “cancel culture.” That’s gone. Now they are the “kings of cancel.” Today, right-wingers have a fundamental belief (pun intended) that exposing children to harsh facts (i.e., “woke”) injures their little brains. Keeping children ignorant of realities helps them in some unknown way. These beliefs are based not on scientific research but on religious and political interpretations and intuition. So, young children should not be told about sex, sexuality, bigotry, crime, war, slavery, vaccination, or anything else that some parents don’t like. Never mind that other parents may want their children to have this information. Conservatives believe keeping children ignorant takes precedence over providing them with “dangerous, irreligious, or just plain icky” information. Also, never mind that children will receive twisted versions of the facts from their peers, and having no contrary factual information, they’ll believe the lies. As the right-wing tells you, learning the playground versions of sex, bigotry, crime, war, slavery, etc., is good. Learning actual facts in school is bad. Thus, gay people either do not exist or should be bullied, unprotected sex is OK, so long as it’s done in ignorance, and slavery either never happened or was benign or even beneficial because that’s what all the little playground friends and Tucker Carlson say. I was reminded of our return to the dark ages when I saw excerpts from an article in the local Sun-Sentinel, a Florida newspaper.

Some topics in AP African American Studies dropped. New curriculum gives DeSantis a few wins but still has the potential for another showdown. By Sommer Brugal and Ana Ceballos Miami Herald

MIAMI — The organization in charge of Advanced Placement courses offered in high schools across the country released the final version of its new African American Studies course, notably leaving out some lessons. Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida Department of Education called out earlier this year for what they said was an effort to “push an agenda” on students.

The “agenda” has to do with slavery facts that might embarrass some white students. Presumably, it also has to do with queer facts that might embarrass some straight students. And some other facts that might embarrass certain Christian denominations. Seemingly, embarrassment is the test of education in right-wing minds.

A review of the 300-page course shows the College Board decided to exclude topics on the Black queer experience— a case DeSantis has singled out in his criticism — and only include the Black Lives Matter movement and the reparations debate as optional, meaning they won’t be required or contained on the final AP exam.

As every right-winger knows, there are no black gay people, and if there are, they should be ignored because being gay is a choice – a wrong choice – and those gay people simply should just straighten up (again, no pun intended) I can’t remember when I first made the decision to be straight, but it must have happened before I read any gay-oriented books, or I might have been convinced to be gay. Or so the right wing tells us.

However, the course includes Black authors and scholars flagged as inappropriate by Florida education officials, such as Kimberlé Crenshaw and Angela Davis. Ideas rejected by the DeSantis administration, such as intersectionality and race-related concepts, remained in the curriculum.

It’s easy to understand why thought leaders like Ron DeSantis would object to Kimberle Crenshaw because, as Wikipedia says:

She is a leading scholar of critical race theory (CRT), an interdisciplinary academic field devoted to analyzing how social and political laws and media shape (and are shaped by) social conceptions of race and ethnicity.

CRT also considers racism to be systemic in various laws and rules and not only based on individuals’ prejudices. The word critical in the name is an academic reference to critical thinking, critical theory, and scholarly criticism rather than criticizing or blaming individuals. 

So clearly, her ideas are subversive because if there is one thing we wish to avoid, it is having our children think critically about race. It is much better to pick up bigotry from their parents and other kids.

And as for Angela Davis:

She is an American revolutionary Marxist and feminist political activist, philosopher, academic, author, and professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Davis was a longtime member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) and a founding member of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS).  Here, the theory is the fewer kids know about Communism, the greater their ability to resist the siren song of communism (although being a revolutionary, she should be welcomed by Donald Trump, who attempted a coup. There’s nothing more revolutionary than a coup.)

In January, DeSantis argued against the inclusion of critical race theory and an attempt to use Black history for “political purposes.”

“Political purposes” is a bit mysterious. Perhaps it means telling kids that slavery was evil, which could reflect poorly on any Southerners who still fly the revolutionary rebel flag.

DeSantis and the Florida Department of Education are willing to prohibit content they deem “liberal indoctrination” in schools.

(As opposed to conservative indoctrination?)

Despite being challenged by the DeSantis administration and state reviewers of the coursework, ideas such as intersectionality — a concept that refers to how racism, sexism, and classism can overlap and affect people — and the plight of African Americans throughout history are highlighted as “essential knowledge” for students, meaning they must demonstrate mastery of the topic for the exam.

In one unit, “Freedom, Enslavement, and Resistance,” the College Board considers it essential for students to know how slavery prevented Black people from building wealth and has led to present-day wealth disparities along racial lines — a concept reviewers in Florida previously said could violate state laws and rules because it “supposes that no slaves or their descendants accumulated any wealth.”

Seed, it’s like this. If we can show that at least one slave or slave descendent accumulated at least a little wealth, then there is no reason for Florida students to understand how slavery prevented Black people from building wealth. Sounds reasonable — to conservatives.

The state Board of Education earlier this year approved new academic standards for instruction about African American history that include teachings about how enslaved people benefited from their bondage.

As every conservative knows, slavery was great for the slaves, and indeed, we all wish we had been slaves so we could have “benefitted from our bondage.”

Another unit, “The Black Feminist Movement, Womanism, and Intersectionality,” addresses the framework for understanding Black women’s “distinct experiences through the interactions of their social, economic, and political identities with systems of inequality and privilege.”

Themes such as migration and the African diaspora, intersections of identity, creativity, expression, and the arts; and resistance and resilience run throughout the course.

However, one of the most significant changes featured in the final work is the “Further explorations week,” said College Board officials.

The section, which would be taught during the final week of lessons, includes a list of optional topics, such as the Black Lives Matter movement and the reparations debate. Incarceration and abolition, Black women writers and filmmakers, African-American art, and culinary traditions are other topics that can be taught.

Conservatives don’t want our children to learn any of that stuff. It’s much better to claim it never happened, put up statues of traitors, wave rebel flags along with American flags, and deny elections. And then there’s this article, also in the Sun Sentinel:

Sanitizing public school libraries Moody

If you thought the purpose of a public school library was to enrich a student’s education, you’re wrong, according to Attorney General Ashley Moody.

As she sees it, it’s to promote the government’s points of view. Only.

That’s the gist of her breathtaking argument in a federal court lawsuit over how Escambia County bans books.

Public school libraries “are a forum for government, not private speech,” she has told the court. That is authoritarianism on steroids.

The case involves a well-known children’s book, “And Tango Makes Three,” about two male penguins who raised a chick at New York’s Central Park Zoo.

The book banners and burners have attacked it since it was published eight years ago. They claim it promotes homosexuality.

This all is based on the utter nonsense that talking about homosexuality makes kids gay. Supposedly, it’s something kids decide to do rather than it being inborn. Apparently, in a conservative world, there is a time when you make a conscious decision to be gay, and if you read or hear anything positive about gay couples, it will sound so wonderful you’ll make the “wrong” decision. I’m trying to remember the time when I made the conscious decision to be straight. I do recall that in my college fraternity, we had at least one openly gay guy, and it was all I could do to keep from turning gay. I mean, who could resist the taunts, bigotry, and ignorant hatred being gay engenders. Of course, it’s non-scientific idiocy. People may make a conscious decision to come out of the closet, but having homosexual feelings is not a decision. So, relax; reading about male penguins raising a chick will not turn your children gay. Why are the conservatives so terrified? My observation is that conservatives live in fear of everything. To begin, they fear change. That is the basic rule of conservatism: To conserve the past. They fear blacks, browns, yellows, reds, Jews, Muslims, gays, immigrants, and even women. That is why they exhibit so much bigotry toward these groups. Fear is the basis for hatred, and hatred is the basis for today’s Republican Party. They even hate each other as evidenced by their crazy House battles. They carry guns because they fear strangers. They fear “the deep state” and “woke,” though they have no idea what these are. And in their fear, they follow a “strong” (i.e., loud) leader who promises to destroy all whom they fear.

Escambia banned a range of books at the prompting of a teacher whom the suit claims was influenced by Moms for Liberty.

This Florida-based censorship lobby goes after books touching on Black and LBGTQ issues in particular. That teacher and others have challenged 218 books, according to the litigation.

In the conservative world, “Liberty” means constraining your kids from learning what conservatives fear. (Also, “patriotism” means attempting a coup and threatening to hang the Vice-President for not overturning an election.)

George Orwell revisited Moody’s argument in favor of the Escambia School Board is as extreme and dangerous as it could possibly be. It echoes the “Big Brother” dystopia of George Orwell’s prophetic fiction, “1984.”

It’s only a short, logical step away from saying that state university libraries and classrooms also can be purged of anything the government does not approve.

In fact, Florida is already halfway there. Laws promoted by the state’s other leading authoritarian, Gov. Ron DeSantis, forbid schools to teach about critical race theory or encourage diversity.

Anything about sexual orientation is taboo since the law depends on someone’s interpretation of what is age-appropriate.

That’s in what’s better known as DeSantis’ so-called “Don’t say gay” law, which was initially sold as applying only to kindergarten through third grade, then swiftly expanded through eighth grade by the Legislature the following year, and through 12th grade by the Florida Board of Education.

In the conservative world, 18-year-olds are too young to learn about sex, though old enough to marry, be executed for murder, or to kill and witness killing people in the military. Once censorship and bigotry blend, there is no limit to the books that can be burned. A case always can be made that any book is inappropriate for mass consumption, depending on the blueness of one’s nose. How about books about communism, for fear they will turn children into communists? Should DeSantis ban books about slavery that will make our children want to be slaves or slaveholders, and books about murder that will turn all our kids into murderers? It’s ridiculous. There is no limit to what the ignorance promoters can find to ban. Consider the following Hitlerian proposal. Read it slowly and imagine it being promoted in China or Russia:

A pending policy by the Board of Governors forbids Florida universities from fostering “Any activity organized with a purpose of effecting or preventing change to a government policy, action or function, or any activity intended to achieve a desired result related to social issues, where the university endorses or promotes a position in communications, advertisements, programs or campus activities.”

“Any activity” (including writing, talking, thinking, even doing nothing) . . . “effecting or preventing change” (for or against change; both would be illegal) . . . “government policy, action or function”” (say nothing about the government, for or against) . . . “desired result” (do not express any desire for anything to happen) . . . “social issues” (every issue can be construed as a social issue). . . where the university endorses or promotes a position in communications, advertisements, programs or campus activities” (which covers everything the university does). I challenge you to name one thing a Florida university can do that does not run afoul of some interpretation of this policy. It forbids Florida universities from doing anything at all, including teaching.  And this is all in the name of “Liberty.” Is that your interpretation of “liberty”?

That will spark more lawsuits in which Florida’s attorney general will oppose, rather than defend, freedom of speech and inquiry.

Moody wrote, “Viewpoint-based educational choices are constitutionally permissible because public-school systems, including their libraries, convey the government’s message, and, when the government speaks, it may ‘regulate the content…of its own message,’” 

This is from the party that rails against the “deep state” controlling our lives.

Rebutting the student plaintiffs in the Escambia case, she argues: “The government has no constitutional obligation to present educational material with which it disagrees.”

In short, teachers must parrot the government’s message, and no disagreement is allowed.

Without limits on that chilling thought, a Republican state could bar Democratic authors from its school libraries. Or vice versa.

Hers is a prescription for education bleached of anything even remotely controversial. A school board controlled by religious fundamentalists could ban Darwin’s “Origin of Species.” Or, indeed, Orwell’s “1984.”

An uneducated population is the raw material from which dictatorships are made.

That is why Donald Trump said, “I love the poorly educated.” And, in fact, Trump, with his dictatorial bent, has done exceptionally well among poorly educated voters. The less you know, the more likely you are to vote for a conservative.

It’s not Moody’s first deep dive into right-wing extremism, however.

Attacking abortion rights, she claims Florida’s constitutional privacy provision applies only to information, not to keeping the government out of your bedroom.

She seizes on any pretext to ask the Florida Supreme Court to bar from the ballot any voter initiative she doesn’t like — specifically, gun control, legalizing marijuana, or abortion rights.

She supports DeSantis’ claim, in a court case, that he has “executive privilege” to keep secret any document he wishes.

The best thing about Moody is that she’s term-limited. Someone else will be elected attorney general in 2026. We can only hope it is someone who better values a well-rounded education as a cornerstone of democracy.

Sadly, in Florida, that “someone else” probably will be another right-winger who will spout off about ‘Freedom” as a vague concept. Then they will do everything possible to eliminate the free discussion of racial bigotry, slavery, sex and sexual orientation, guns, voting rights, gerrymandering, immigration, and any government policy. To a right-winger, “freedom” means “freedom to do exactly as they want you to do.” Ignorance is bliss in the world of MAGA. So burn more books or let the Republicans burn them for you. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

It’s happening. One step on the road to dictatorship

Much has been written about Donald Trump’s dictatorial proclivity. He has not been secretive about his desire to rule with an iron hand and to destroy those who disagree with him. His similarities to Hitler have been documented by many sources. Though America has had strong leaders, we have been fortunate in avoiding the most repressive, undemocratic forms of government. Even with a former leader who insisted he had won a lost vote and recruited followers to overturn an election, there have been no successful coups, the closest being the Civil War. Until now. Dictatorships generally begin with hatred. Hatred breeds fear, our single most powerful emotion. Strong emotions can stir a formerly passive population to follow a dictatorial leader. In fact, hate-mongering is the usual prelude to a dictatorship. One hate-mongering method is to control the sources of information, particularly the standard media and the schools. Donald Trump repeatedly calls the media “Fake,” especially when they say anything that is not worshipful of him. That, too, is well documented.
QAnon Pastor Holds Book Burning at His Church
Qanon Pastor Greg Locke Led His Congregation in a Book Burning of Stories like Harry Potter and Twilight.
He calls the government “the swamp,” which is ironic considering the low moral and legal level of the people he hired during his presidency. But this post is about schools where our youngest people are indoctrinated.

Faculty group: Higher education under assault from GOP Florida Sun-Sentinel, December 8, 2023 The report cites Florida laws, policy changes, and political maneuvers over the last 2 years. By Divya Kumar Tampa Bay Times

TAMPA — The American Association of University Professors has released a blistering assessment of higher education in Florida, saying its yearlong “special investigation” revealed a system under assault from Republican leaders determined to limit academic freedom and impose their worldview on the state’s public campuses.

The report, released Wednesday, cited a string of laws, policy changes, and political maneuvers over the last two years, concluding they amounted to an “ideologically driven assault unparalleled in US history.”

The report opens with a quote from Florida A&M University professor LeRoy Pernell, a plaintiff in a lawsuit against the state’s Intellectual Freedom Act, also known as the Stop Woke Act: “What we are witnessing in Florida is an intellectual reign of terror.”

“What is unfolding in Florida is horrifying,” the report said, comparing events in the state to far-right administrations across the world. “It should serve as a cautionary tale to all in higher education, but we are mindful that this tale has yet to reach its conclusion. The time for intervention has not passed — yet.”

Jeremy Redfern, a spokesperson for Gov. Ron DeSantis, called the report “a hoax” and pointed to some of the governor’s comments Tuesday while announcing his state budget for next year. DeSantis proposed $150 million for faculty recruitment and retention and touted a new state policy on tenure as a check on quality.

The policy calls for tenured faculty to be reviewed every five years and opens the possibility of termination.

This makes it easier to fire teachers who do not toe the Republican line.

”Everyone’s been complaining for years about college professors trying to indoctrinate and stuff,” DeSantis said. “For Florida, that’s not what we want with your tax dollars. We want academic rigor. We want the pursuit of truth.”

DeSantis’s version of “pursuit of truth” is to deny racism exists, and if it exists, it isn’t important.

Henry Reichman, a professor emeritus at California State University-East Bay and co-chairperson of the investigating committee, said he was “deeply moved” by the process of developing the report.

“One of the things that struck me was the pain,” he said. “In almost every single interview we had, there were people kind of mourning.”

Afshan Jafar, another co-chairperson and a sociology professor at Connecticut College, said “What we have seen in Florida, there’s just nothing like it.

Investigators said they encountered educators in crisis over their careers, unsure whether to quit and leave or stay and push through. Some wanted to resign, but circumstances stood in their way.

“They don’t know what to do,” Jafar said. “They have nowhere to go. They’re trying to find an outlet where someone would listen to them, hoping it would have an impact.”

In his remarks on Tuesday, DeSantis acknowledged talk of professors leaving the state but said it wasn’t a concern. ”Just understand: If you have Marxist professors leaving, that is a gain for the state of Florida,” he said. “That’s not a negative.”

First, the professors are leaving not because they teach Marxism but because they aren’t allowed to teach the facts about racism and diversity (aka “woke”). Second, the irony is that the leader of the Republican Party, Donald Trump, is notoriously palsy-walsy with one of the world’s leading communists, Vladimir Putin. But DeSantis claims to hate Marxists. It boggles.

He also said his administration had kept costs down by eliminating universities’ diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, which he described as divisive. ”That’s a bureaucracy that can wither and go away,” DeSantis said.

The guy who wastes millions to ship immigrants all over the country is worried about the cost of teaching diversity, equity, and inclusion?? No intelligent person is fooled.

The investigation was broken into four sections: “The Takeover of New College,” “Academic Governance in Florida Higher Education,” “Academic Freedom,” “Bias and Discrimination” and “The Human Toll.”

In a detailed and heavily footnoted chronology, the committee reviewed this year’s events at New College of Florida in Sarasota — beginning with DeSantis’ appointment of six conservative trustees and continuing with their decisions to oust the president, replace her with former education commissioner Richard Corcoran, deny tenure to some faculty, disband the school’s diversity office and remove gender studies as a major.

The above, and the banning of books DeSantis doesn’t like, describe DeSantis’s “pursuit of truth.”

“What’s happening at New College is a disgrace,” former University of Florida president Bernie Machen told the committee.

The report also chronicled faculty leaving for other jobs outside the state or leaving academia. It cited a survey that found 300 of the 642 Florida professors who participated planned to seek employment elsewhere.

Andrew Gothard, president of the statewide union United Faculty of Florida, told the committee he predicted some universities would lose between 20% to 30% of faculty in the next year.

Several educators spoke about their decisions to leave or retire early. Some were based on the faculty member’s fear they could no longer teach their subject, while others were made because of their kids’ education.

Others felt inclined to move because of laws surrounding transgender health care and the climate toward LGBTQ+ people.

“It has impacted so many different aspects of people’s lives,” Jafar said. “It’s not just higher ed.”

The committee also said the governor largely controls Florida’s universities through board appointments.

And what is this “woke” that has DeSantis banning books and firing teachers? It means “alert to and concerned about social injustice and discrimination.”  Beginning in the 2010s, it broadened to include racial injustice, sexism, and LGBT rights. Unless your parents brought you up to be a raving bigot, you will welcome teaching about:
  1. The history of the Holocaust
  2. The history of slavery in America
  3. The history of bigotry in America
  4. The types of bigotry in America
  5. The effects of bigotry in America
  6. Fighting bigotry in America
Knowing these facts can prevent them from recurring. But DeSantis and other conservatives object to students learning the facts. By denying that bigotry existed and still exists, or worse yet, by claiming that opposing bigotry is itself a form of bigotry, tyrants like Trump and DeSantis attract not just fellow bigots but all those who are afraid the oppressed will rise up against them. No dictator can assume power without the backing of the people. They needn’t be a majority, just enough fearful people to make a noisy, passionate voting base. Today’s Republican party is bifurcated mainly into the rich, who expect and receive favorable financial treatment from the right wing and the angry mob, who resent and fear those below them on the socio-economic scale. By sowing fear of foreigners and immigrants, non-Christians, gays, the law, and “the establishment” or the “deep state,” Republicans can command loyalty even when operating outside conservative norms. That is why lying, adultery, bigotry, nihilism, corruption, treason, and incompetence — typically vote killers, especially among upright conservatives — are overlooked and in some cases, even viewed as a strength by the self-proclaimed religious. Fear is the most potent motivator humans experience. Using fear, the very powerful and those who view themselves as vulnerable form an unholy alliance to support a dictator who promises them protection. But it is a deal with the devil, and the hoped-for protection turns out to be a torture chamber. Education is the enemy of bigotry and, thus, the enemy of dictators. To learn that scapegoats are humans with hope, fears, and feelings is to gain empathy, the last thing a dictator wants the masses to have. Brainwashing students by depriving them of historical facts is a favorite and effective method for recruiting a “no-questions-asked” cadre of loyal followers who hate dictatorships like communism as concepts but love dictators as saviors. Sadly, once dictators gain power, they are tough to dislodge. We can only pray that America doesn’t learn that lesson from actual experience. The following 12 months should be pivotal in U.S. history. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

How can someone understand, but not understand, the same issue?

See related image detail. Opinion: College Rip-Off – John Stossel | Prescott eNews
John Stossel
John Stossel puzzles me. When you first conclude he knows nothing about economics, he writes something spot-on. Then he follows up with ignorance about the same subject. In that, he reminds of Paul Krugman, who alternately understands, then doesn’t understand, Monetary Sovereignty. Stossel can do it in two sentences. Here is an article on Reason.com, the Libertarian version of QAnon. Look at the subhead.

Worry About Budget Deficits, Not Trade Deficits Next year’s $1 trillion federal government budget deficit will bankrupt us. Trade deficits are trivial.

“Federal government’s budget deficit will bankrupt us.”  Suddenly, the U.S. government will go bankrupt? After world wars, numerous recessions and depressions, now, when the economy is growing rapidly, the federal government is going bankrupt??
The blue line is Gross Domestic Product. The red line is federal “debt.” There is no hint that federal “debt” is leading to bankruptcy. Quite the opposite. As “debt” grows, so does the economy.
.
The green line is real (allowing for inflation), per capita GDP. There still is no hint that increasing federal “debt” leads to bankruptcy. Again, quite the opposite.
If Stossel wants to bet that next year’s budget deficit will bankrupt the U.S. government, I will put up every dollar I own that says Stossel is wrong. One wonders why someone, anyone, would make such a foolish statement and expect belief. Being Monetarily Sovereign, the U.S. government cannot run short of U.S. dollars. Increased federal deficit spending is necessary for economic growth. GDP=Federal Spending+Non-federal Spending+Net Exports

Former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan: “A government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency.”

I suspect Stossel knows he’s wrong, so I’m guessing he hasn’t moved to another country or exchanged all his U.S. dollars for another currency in advance of a mythical U.S. bankruptcy. He’s just promulgating the usual Libertarian BS that has been wrong for at least 84+ years and will continue to be incorrect during his lifetime and beyond. But wait. He also says, “Trade deficits are trivial.” In that, he is correct. A trade deficit merely means we give other nations some of the plentiful U.S. dollars we create at the touch of a computer key, and in return, we receive valuable and scarce goods and services. I run trade deficits with my local Costco and with my cleaning lady. I don’t feel bad about it, though I don’t even have the government’s infinite ability to create dollars. The more money I have, the more stuff I can buy. The federal government has infinite money.

Maybe Donald Trump is such a powerful communicator and pot-stirrer that other countries, embarrassed by their own trade barriers, will eliminate them. Then, I will thank the president for the wonderful thing he did. Genuine free trade will be a recipe for wonderful economic growth.

But I fear the opposite: a trade war and stagnation—because much of what Trump and his followers say is economically absurd.

“What Trump and his followers say is economically absurd”? Who could have guessed that MAGAs know so little? Could it be possible that QAnon, Fox, Alex Jones, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson, and Donald Trump are not reliable sources?

“(If) you don’t have steel, you don’t have a country!” announced the president.

Lots of things are essential to America—and international trade is the best way to make sure we have them. When a storm blocks roads in the Midwest, we get supplies from Canada, Mexico, and China. Why add roadblocks?

Steel is important, but “the choice isn’t between producing 100 percent of our steel (and having a country) or producing no steel (and presumably losing our country),” writes Veronique De Rugy of the Mercatus Center.

Trump uses the “you don’t have a country” meme for everything. “If you don’t have a steel industry, you don’t have a country.” “If you don’t have a border, you don’t have a country.” “If you don’t have a wall, you don’t have a country.” “If you don’t have a military, you don’t have a country.” “If you don’t have a strong military, you don’t have a country.” These are a few of his nonsense statements about the end of America. Ms de Rugy’s response was correct.

Today, most of the steel we use is made in America. Imports come from friendly places like Canada and Europe. Just 3 percent come from China.

Still, insists the president, “Nearly two-thirds of American raw steel companies have gone out of business!”

There’s been consolidation. But so, what? For 30 years, American steel production has stayed about the same. Profits rose from $714 million in 2016 to $2.8 billion last year. And the industry added nearly 8,000 jobs.

Trump loves to cherry-pick, twist, and outright lie about statistics to make his point. A day later, he’ll say the opposite. His followers will swoon at each new version despite its incompatibility with what Trump said yesterday.

Trump says, “Our factories were left to rot and to rust all over the place. Thriving communities turned into ghost towns. You guys know that, right?”

No. Few American communities became ghost towns. More boomed because of cheap imports.

It’s sad when a steelworker loses work, but for every steelworker, 40 Americans work in industries that use steel. They, and we, benefit from lower prices.

Right again, John. Wrong again, Donald.

Trump touts the handful of companies benefiting from his tariffs: “Century Aluminum in Kentucky—Century is a great company—will be investing over $100 million.”

Great. But now we’ll get a feeding frenzy of businesses competing to catch Trump’s ear. Century Aluminum got his attention. Your company better pay lobbyists. Countries, too.

After speaking to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull of Australia, Trump tweeted: “We don’t have to impose steel or aluminum tariffs on our ally, the great nation of Australia!”

So, the purpose of tariffs is . . . what? To punish our enemies? To reward our businesses? Or simply increase prices for the American consumer.

Economies thrive when there are clear rules that everyone understands. Now we’ve got “The Art of the Deal,” one company and country at a time.

I understand that Trump, the developer liked to make special deals, but when presidents do that, it’s crony capitalism—crapitalism. You get the deal if you know the right people. That’s what kept most of Africa and South America poor.

But Trump thinks trade itself makes us poorer: “We lose … on trade. Every year, $800 billion.”

Actually, last year’s trade deficit with China was $375 billion. But even if it were $800 billion, who cares? All a trade deficit shows is that a country sells us more than we sell them. We get the better of that deal. They get excess dollar bills, but we get stuff.

Right on, John. We have the infinite ability to create dollars by pressing computer keys. The U.S. government can send dollars into the economy whenever it wants to.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.”

But we don’t have the infinite ability to create stuff. So, trading dollars for stuff is a great deal for us. Sadly, when the U.S. government does it, the Libertarians wrongly complain about federal deficits and debt. I wonder whether Stossel will hear about this from his Libertarian pals. And now we come to the usual Libertarian BS:

Real problems are imbalances like next year’s $1 trillion federal government budget deficit. That will bankrupt us.

It hasn’t happened. It can’t happen. It won’t happen. It’s just that incredible fearmongering by people who know better and should stop now.

Trade deficits are trivial. You run one with your supermarket. Do you worry because you bought more from them than they buy from you? No. The free market sorts it out.

Trump makes commerce sound mysterious: “The action I’m taking today follows a nine-month investigation by the Department of Commerce, Secretary Ross.”

But Wilber Ross is a hustler who phoned Forbes Magazine to lie about how much money he has. Now he goes on TV and claims, “3 cents worth of tin plate steel in this can. So if it goes up 25 percent, that’s a tiny fraction of one penny. Not a noticeable thing.”

Not to him maybe, but Americans buy 2 billion cans of soup.

Political figures like Ross—and Trump—shouldn’t decide what we’re allowed to buy. If they understood markets, they’d know enough to stay out of the way.

Like so many of the people Trump hires, Ross was, shall we say, a questionable character, with many, many claims against his honesty. The combination of Libertarianism and its attendant economic ignorance, together with economic dishonesty leads to bad (for America) decisions. Cut federal spending and we’ll have the bankruptcy Stossel and the Libertarians predict. As for John Stossel, he still puzzles me. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Imagine you are a trillionaire and your mother can’t afford healthcare. What would you do?

Imagine you are several Trillion (not just billion or million) dollars rich, and your mother needs home healthcare she can’t afford. What would you do? Assuming you are a decent person who cares about your mother, you surely would pay for her health care.
How The Greenspan And Bernanke Fed Created Bubbles
Greenspan: Should we let them know that federal taxes don’t pay for anything? Bernanke: They already know. They don’t want the taxpayers to find out.
The sole purpose of government is to improve and protect the lives of the people. And the U.S. government, being Monetarily Sovereign, does not use tax dollars to pay its bills. The government is infinitely rich, far wealthier than any person who ever has lived. It creates dollars, ad hoc, every time it pays a bill. It is the federal government’s absolute duty to protect its citizens’ lives, especially the most vulnerable — the poor, the sick, and the aged. Unfortunately, our representatives in the U.S. government do not accept their sole purpose. They do not seem to recognize that we pay them to improve and protect our lives. They are failing at their job.

Aging America faces a senior care crisis; April Rubin,

As of 2021, A map of the U.S. shows the share of adults ages 75+ who cannot afford daily in-home care by metro area.

In all metro areas shown, the majority cannot afford in-home care.

The Northeast and Rust Belt have exceptionally high rates of adults unable to afford in-home care. Values range from 71% unable to afford care in D.C. to 94% in Springfield, Mass. 

If you were as wealthy as the federal government, you, being a good person, would support the poor, the sick, and the aged. Why don’t our representatives in the federal government? What is their excuse?

As America’s population of seniors grows, affordable long-term care is increasingly difficult. 

According to Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, nearly 70% of older adults will need long-term care services. Medicare doesn’t cover these services.

Why does Medicare not cover these services? The federal government has the infinite ability to create dollars. It has the infinite ability to afford whatever it wishes and do it without levying taxes. So why do our federal representatives pretend Medicare can’t afford to protect the lives of our poor, sick, and/or elderly?

Medicaid often has long wait lists for at-home support, said Samara Scheckler, a research associate. “The cost of daily assistance at home is out of reach for most,” Scheckler said, “and so is assisted living, which bundles housing and care together.”

The cost of daily assistance at home is not out of reach for the federal government. Why do our government representatives not do what we pay them to do?

By the numbers: 13% of adults 75+ in U.S. metro areas living alone can afford assisted living without diving into assets, per the Center. 14% can afford a daily visit from a home health aide along with their housing costs.

Those percentages are disgraceful. If you heard that only 13% of the parents of trillionaires were able to afford assisted living, you would be disgusted and outraged. Where is the disgust and outrage for our federal government representatives? Why do we allow them to still have their jobs?

For context, more than 40% of Americans 65 and older live alone. When considering seniors over 80, that share jumps to nearly 60%.

There’s also a growing shortage of care providers. While most people prefer in-home care — and it’s cheaper for states to fund — not everyone can receive care at home, said Priya Chidambaram of KFF.

Many seniors require the resources and medical equipment at more extensive facilities. This year, every U.S. state reported a shortage of care workers — and 43 of them saw permanent closures of care facilities, such as group homes and assisted living centers, according to a KFF survey.

You can be sure that the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the White House do not suffer from a shortage of assistants to do the multitude of errands our elected officials demand. Why does the federal government not fund care workers and care facilities? I’ll tell you why: You don’t demand it.  You have been suckered into believing the Big Lie that the federal government can’t afford to spend more. You have fallen for the right-wing lies that the government is running short of dollars or that spending causes inflation. The Big Truth: The government is capable of infinite spending without levying taxes, and government spending does not cause inflation. Inflation is caused by shortages of critical goods and services — usually oil and food — and government spending cures inflations by acquiring and supplying scarce goods and services.  
If federal spending caused inflation, the peaks and valleys of the red (federal spending) and blue (inflation) lines would line up.
 
Oil prices are sensitive to supply. Oil shortages cause inflations. The peaks and valleys of the green (oil) and blue (inflation) lines line up.

According to a recent Wall Street Journal analysis, the U.S. has at least 600 fewer nursing homes than it did six years ago.

Many facilities are struggling to stay afloat. 81% of them would need additional workers to meet nursing staff requirements from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed in September, KFF noted.

“Staffing shortages in nursing homes are hugely affecting those who need institutional care,” Chidambaram said.

Federally funded Medicare should support nursing homes and pay for the workers and nursing staff’s requirements.

U.S. life expectancy is on the rise. With that, care needs to last longer. A vast majority of older adults live in homes that they rent or own. According to the report, the need for services and support — like housework, bathing, or medicating — is expected to increase.

Baby boomers had fewer children than older generations, making family help increasingly limited for aging adults, Scheckler said.

Forcing families to fund elder care transfers a financial burden from the Monetarily Sovereign government (where it is no burden) to monetarily non-sovereign people, where it can be severe.

The bottom line is that the combined costs of housing and daily care are beyond most people’s means, said Jennifer Molinsky, project director for Harvard’s Housing and Aging Society program.

But it’s not beyond the federal government’s infinite means.

“It’s wonderful that the older population is growing overall, and people are living longer than a generation ago,” she said. “But the supports that people need to stay in the community, stay in their home are really expensive and hard to secure,”

The support that people need to stay in the community is well within the capabilities of the Monetarily Sovereign federal government.

Senior healthcare usage is up.

UnitedHealth says: Rising demand for behavioral care and Medicare outpatient procedures are squeezing some of UnitedHealth Group’s business segments but didn’t stop the industry giant from beating Wall Street’s expectations and posting earnings of $5.47 billion in Q2.

If the federal government, rather than the private sector, funded UnitedHealth Group’s business segments, $5.47 billion in growth dollars would enter the economy.

Why it matters: The parent of the biggest U.S. health insurer is a bellwether for broad industry trends. Reuters reported that despite higher-than-expected utilization and concern about how that could drive up health costs, the increases were less than some feared.

The insurer also revised its projected year-end earnings, soaring its share price. What they’re saying: “Outpatient care activity among seniors was a few hundred basis points above our expectations,” said John Rex, UnitedHealth’s chief financial officer.

Its “projected year-end earnings” came from people. If they had come from the federal government, the economy would have grown $5/47 billion more.

More Americans are also seeking behavioral care for anxiety, depression, and substance use disorder, reflecting an increasing ease with seeking help, executives said. But, Rex said: “Overall care activity among our Medicaid and commercial populations is consistent with our expectations.”

What to watch: How much premiums go up next year, particularly in the Medicare Advantage market.

Medicare Advantage has many requirements based on the profit motives of healthcare suppliers. If the federal government were doing its job, these requirements would disappear, and people would receive more complete care.

On its investor call Friday, UnitedHealth executives said their rate filings assume Medicare business will remain elevated and factor in added care costs.

In English, because they expect costs to rise, UnitedHealth will raise your prices on what the federal government could and should provide free.

At the same time, they stressed that they would “provide stability to the benefits that seniors value most,” such as zero co-pays for primary care visits and Tier 1 drugs and keeping level out-of-pocket maximums.

With federal funding, you would have co-pays, drug Tiers, or out-of-pocket maximums.

The intrigue: Insurers have been closely watching to see if deferred care during the pandemic results in more advanced cases in areas such as cancer or cardiovascular disease.

If there are more such cases, your insurance rates will rise. SUMMARY Unlike you, me, businesses, and state/local governments, the federal government is Monetarily Sovereign. It has the infinite ability to pay for anything and is not funded by taxes. Though all monetarily non-sovereign entities need income to pay their bills, the federal government needs no income. Because federal taxes do not fund federal spending, the only purposes of federal taxes are:
  1. To control the economy by taxing what the government wishes to discourage and giving tax breaks to what the government wishes to reward, mainly the rich
  2. To assure demand for the U.S. dollar by requiring that taxes be paid in dollars.
  3. To make you believe (falsely) that any federal benefits you receive must be paid for by your taxes.
The federal government could and should provide comprehensive, no-deductible Medicare for every man, woman, and child in America without collecting taxes. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY