Thinking is a full body activity, problem, not just a brain activity

In earlier posts, we have discussed concepts like “self,” “qualia,” and “free will.” We claimed they are illusions created by our brain/body thinking mechanism — very convincing illusions, but scientifically invalid.

The March 14th issue of New Scientist Magazine contained an article that bears on this subject. The opening line of the article captures a major shift in thinking about Alzheimer’s disease:

Alzheimer’s may start outside the brain. Inflammation in organs like the skin, lungs, and gut during midlife may trigger Alzheimer’s disease in later years.

“Alzheimer’s disease has long been viewed as something that originates inside the brain. But an in-depth genomic analysis suggests it may initially be triggered by inflammation in distant organs such as the skin—perhaps decades before a person’s memory starts to decline.

This radical reframing of the condition may explain why Alzheimer’s drugs have been disappointing to date, because they act too late in the disease progression.”

Thinking Isn’t Only in Your Brain — It’s in Your Entire Body

One of our most basic assumptions about thinking is wrong. Thinking does not begin and end in the brain. The whole body thinks. We may imagine the brain as the command center. But the entire body is a vast network of continuous two-way communication.

Immune signals rise and fall; Hormones circulate and alter behavior; The gut communicates with the brain; The skin constantly senses and reports. Signals are always moving—back and forth, across the entire organism.

What we call “thinking” is not located in one organ. It is the ongoing pattern of responses across the whole system.

Instead of “the brain thinks,” consider: stimulus → organized response → integrated response → ongoing chain.

This thinking applies to the entire body. The brain is a major hub, yes—but it is not the origin of thought. It is part of a larger process.

An Alzheimer’s patient may not realize how deeply the disease has altered his thinking; his perceptions are distorted; his conclusions may be wrong. His memory is unreliable.

Yet he still feels: I am thinking. I am deciding.” From the inside, the process still feels like control. Like all of us, he believes he has free will.

We also do not perceive the mechanisms behind our thoughts, nor do we see the countless signals shaping every belief.
Do not experience the lifelong accumulation of stimuli driving our responses. 

Yet we too conclude: I am in control. I have free will.”

If inflammation in the skin can begin altering thought decades before symptoms appear, then the same principle applies more broadly: Our thoughts are the result of processes we neither see nor control.

Hit your thumb with a hammer. Eat an orange. Have a conversation. Experience a loss. Each event alters the system—chemically, electrically, structurally.

Years later, you may hold a belief, make a decision, or express a preference without the slightest awareness of the chain of events that produced it.

The illusion of self and free will

From this perspective, the “self” is not a controller. It is the ultimate illusion — the story the system tells about its own activity. It’s a useful story—but still just a story.

Just as an Alzheimer’s patient cannot see how inflammation has reshaped his thinking, a healthy person cannot see how a lifetime of stimuli has shaped his. The difference is not in kind, but in visibility.

In the same way, the feeling of control does not prove the existence of a controller. The bottom line: Everything responds to stimuli. In living systems, those responses become organized, integrated, and continuous over time.

What we call thought, belief, desire, and self are patterns within that process. The Alzheimer’s patient shows us what happens when the system breaks down. The rest of us experience how convincing the system is when it holds together. 

You may feel that you have free will, but consider these familiar stimuli, many of which you may have experienced.

Lack of sleep: One bad night and people become irritable, pessimistic, and impulsive. The same person, same “self,” produces different conclusions about life. A rested brain plans long-term. A tired brain seeks immediate relief.
Hunger: Low blood sugar leads to anger, impatience, and poor decisions. Eat a sandwich, and suddenly the world looks reasonable again.
Caffeine: A cup of coffee can increase focus, confidence, and even risk-taking. The “you” before and after caffeine is measurably different.
Gut bacteria can have a profound influence on your thinking. Certain gut bacteria are linked to depression and anxiety. Change the gut, and mood can change. Gut microbes influence what you want to eat — sugar, fat, and specific foods. You think you want it. Your gut may be nudging you. It’s one reason why dieting can be so difficult. Fecal transplant studies show that transferring gut bacteria from one animal to another can transfer anxiety levels, boldness vs. caution, and even social behavior. Same brain structure. Different gut → different behavior.
Pain: A headache or back pain narrows attention and reduces patience. Chronic pain sufferers often develop different outlooks on life.
Prescription drugs: Antidepressants, anti-anxiety meds, and even blood pressure drugs can alter mood, motivation, and decision-making.
Hormones: Testosterone, estrogen, and cortisol all affect aggression, attraction, stress response, and confidence.
Illness and inflammation
Even a mild infection can cause “brain fog,” fatigue, and pessimism. The immune system is quietly rewriting your thinking.
Noise: Your concentration drops, errors increase, and frustration rises.
Heat and cold: Extreme heat increases aggression and reduces cognitive performance. Cold slows thinking and reaction time.
Lighting: Dim light can reduce alertness; bright light can improve mood and focus. Brain states → different “selves.”
Time of day: Morning vs. late-night thinking can be radically different. Ideas that seem brilliant at 2 AM often look foolish at 8 AM.
Stress: Under stress, the brain shifts toward quick, survival-oriented thinking — less nuance, more certainty, more error.
Peer pressure: People say things they know are wrong just to fit in with a group.
Authority influence: If a “trusted expert” says it, people believe it — even when it conflicts with their own experience.
Repetition (the “illusion of truth” ): Hear something often enough, and it begins to feel true. Consider the thought processes of people who watch Fox News vs. people who listen to public radio.
Optical illusions: You see something that is not there — and you cannot “decide” to see correctly.
Advertising and framing: The same information, framed differently, leads to different decisions. Every salesperson knows this.
Childhood experiences: Early rewards and punishments shape adult beliefs and preferences.
Trauma: A single event can permanently alter risk perception, trust, and emotional reactions.
Habits: Repeated actions become automatic responses — what feels like “choice” is often just rehearsal.

Then, there are all the diseases that affect our thinking. In addition to the aforementioned Alzheimer’s, we have”

Other Neurological diseases affecting memory, judgment, and personality — all change progressively.
The person does not choose confusion. It is imposed.
Parkinson’s disease is known mainly for movement problems, but it also causes depression, apathy, and impaired decision-making.
Stroke: A small area of brain damage can eliminate speech, alter personality, and change emotional responses
Mental illnesses cause depression and anxiety disorders. (harmless situations feel dangerous, bipolar disorder (the same person cycles between grand certainty (“I can do anything”) and deep despair;
A urinary tract infection can cause confusion, hallucinations, and personality changes.
Encephalitis/brain infections can rapidly alter cognition, behavior, and identity.
Hormonal and metabolic diseases: Thyroid disorders (hypothyroidism leads to sluggish thinking, depression) (hyperthyroidism leads to anxiety, agitation)

Every one of these examples shows the same thing: Change the inputs, change the body, and you change the thoughts. If microbes in your intestines can alter your mood, influence your cravings, and change your stress response, then the idea of a self-contained, independent “thinker” is wrong.

You  often might say: “That wasn’t really me — it was the caffeine,” or “That wasn’t my belief — it was the lack of sleep.”

If alcohol can change judgment, hunger can change temperament, noise can change reasoning, hormones can change desire, and inflammation can change cognition, then what we call “free will” is simply the name we give to decisions whose real causes we don’t recognize.

You may think you have free will — we all experience that feeling — but it is just nature’s illusion.

What are commonly termed “consciousness” and “free will” are nothing more than stimuli that lead to responses, which in turn lead to more stimuli/responses, in an endless chain. There is no magic. It’s all physics. It’s all stimulus → organized response → integrated response → ongoing chain.

You aren’t “conscious.” You are responsive.

 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

7 thoughts on “Thinking is a full body activity, problem, not just a brain activity

  1. Good theory, but far from fact.
    I came to the conclusion that my body is involved in my being who I am, doing what I do, years ago, using only perceptions of my experiences. But just because our bodies work the way they do does not mean we do not have free will. So what if a process started years before it manifested, getting Alzheimers or any disease can affect our bodies and our minds to the point of losing our identities my (mother-in-common -law) has lost control of who she is and what she does, but that is only what we can see of her illness. Basically her self/ego has been damaged but that does not mean everything inside her is damaged, just that she is locked inside and cannot get out. Or maybe her consciousness has been kicked out, and her body is just running on emptiness — her inner being has done an Elvis. There are many possible reasons. Yours is just one of them.

    Like

  2. If I make different decisions and exhibit different behaviors (probably more optimistic for both) because I chose to believe I have free will than I would have if chose to believe I don’t have free will, doesn’t that prove I have exercised free will? You could say my belief that I execute different behaviors and make different decisions is just a result of vast stimuli that I mostly can’t even comprehend, except for one thing: the objective evidence that people really do make different decisions and exhibit different behaviors when they believe they have free will, than when they believe they are not the masters, or at least partial master, of their fate

    Of course we cannot prevent our own deaths, become billionaires etc. just by believing that, but the actions and words of long-lived people and billionaires indicates they believe in the power of their own actions more than other people and even more than objective reality would indicate they should. Some psychologist somewhere – I (chose to?) forget who – said that depressed people actually have a more accurate view of their control of their own lives…but, by definition, they are less successful at it. Like religion – itself a choice – a little delusion can get you through your day.

    Like

    1. You make good points, Scott.

      Let me see if I can state your question fairly.

      Essentially, I believe you are asking: “If I make a decision because I BELIEVE that my decision is not influenced by my past or present stimuli — does that show I am NOT influenced by past or present stimuli?”

      For instance, if I decide to drive while drunk, but I BELIEVE I am not drunk, does that show my decision was not influenced by my being drunk, and that I have free will?

      Or replace “drunk” with “angry,” “distracted,” “sick,” “in a hurry,” “worried,” “in pain,” “just had an argument with my wife,” “just got fired,” “sleepy,” etc., does that affect my judgment or my decisions? Do I make the same decisions no matter what has happened in my life, including the bacteria in my bowels?

      You be the judge of that.

      Like

      1. All of the things you list do not have a measurable effect on the quality of my decisions – in fact, the false belief that I can overcome biological inputs of being ‘“drunk,” “angry,” “distracted,” “sick,” “in a hurry,” “worried,” “in pain,” “just had an argument with my wife,” “just got fired,” “sleepy,” etc.’ would probably be WORSE if I disregarded them. I doubt there are any formalized studies about this because it is – as you imply – just “common sense” legally and morally.

        But choosing to believe I have free will and can exercise it DOES have a measurable effect on my behavior, same as for anyone else. Fatalists live shorter, more constrained lives. They don’t have “faith” in themselves – whether having faith in a higher power helps shape one’s destiny in a positive way is a hotly debated question too, even when in that case, there is objectively no basis for a person’s belief. It is even easier to prove an individual’s conception of God (or Gods) is inconsistent with anyone else’s, so somebody, most likely EVERYBODY, is wrong…except, most likely, atheists – the “null” belief. Still, the effects of positive thinking influence those around you, leading to better outcomes and more friends, which are essential connections.

        Someone described the highly successful Steve Jobs of having a “reality distortion field” around him. Elon Musk might fit that description too, regardless of what you think of his politics. I wonder if that would be possible if they didn’t believe they had free will and were just products of their outside environments.

        Like

  3. I agree with your comment: “. . . the false belief that I can overcome biological inputs . . . ” It indeed is a false belief.

    I do not argue with the “quality” of your decisions. Every day you make trillions of decisions, including standing up, sitting down, smiling, reading, skipping some words and reading others twice, what to wear, what to eat, how fast to eat, when to stop eating, when to go to bed and when to get up, — the list, even for one hour of your life, is nearly endless.

    As to which of those decisions is “good,” “bad,” or “inconsequential” is beside the point.

    The point is that ALL of your decisions are affected by your whole history of stimulus inputs. What feels like free will is, in reality, the net effect of all those inputs, even (especially??) those coming in the first five years of your life, when they are subject to juvenile amnesia.

    If your daddy spanked you for stealing a piece of candy, that seemingly forgotten experience might be having a lasting effect on your decisions today.

    Whether that is a “good” lasting effect or a “bad” lasting effect not only is debatable, but importantly, is the net result of all the other trillions of your stimulus inputs, both external and internal, you have had in your life.

    You have no little elf (self) that is immune to those trillions of inputs, and can stand outside your brain and make independent, logical decisions, unaffected by your history.

    Think of all the fears one may have: heights, darkness, public speaking, failure, rejection, traffic, fighting, loud noises, dogs, cold-calling, intimacy, embarrassment, clowns, crowds, blood, death, etc.

    Each of those fears, and others, is shared by some people and not by others, and each affects so-called “free will.”

    Why? Why can some people stand near the window of a high-rise apartment and feel only the wonder of the beautiful view, while others would refuse to go within twenty feet of that window? Is that “free will,” or decisions affected by history?

    Consider those who overcome fears. Is that “free will” or is that a perfect example of some stimuli overriding other stimuli?

    The answer: All your decisions result from prior experiences. Having those fears might be beneficial in some circumstances, harmful in others.

    Our history of stimuli determines our future survival. It’s called Darwinism.

    Like

Leave a comment