Why (the fox) Bernanke is a genius

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke is an employee, and like any employee, he also must be a politician. His bosses are the President of the United States and Congress.

In his employee / politician role, he must produce expected results and he also must tell his bosses what they want to hear. But what does one do when producing results requires saying and doing the opposite of what his bosses want?

Have you ever been in that position?

If so, you may have found that one does both. You urge your bosses to do what really needs to be done now, while promising to do what the bosses want, later. You walk both sides of the fence, hoping no one notices.

In The National Memo article titled, “Fed Chair To Congress: It’s All Your Fault,” (May 22nd, 2013, by Jason Sattler), Bernanke is reported to have said:

“Most recently, the strengthening economy has improved the budgetary outlooks of most state and local governments, leading them to reduce their pace of fiscal tightening.

“At the same time, though, fiscal policy at the federal level has become significantly more restrictive.

“In particular, the expiration of the payroll tax cut, the enactment of tax increases, the effects of the budget caps on discretionary spending, the onset of the sequestration, and the declines in defense spending for overseas military operations are expected, collectively, to exert a substantial drag on the economy this year.

Exactly correct. Bernanke is well aware that deficit reduction is economic suicide. He knows Federal tax increases and spending cuts, together known as “austerity” or “deficit reduction,” always exert a drag on the economy. Period.

Those who claim otherwise fall into either of two classes: The economically ignorant or the dishonest.

In the economically ignorant category, you’ll find the vast majority of the American public, who over the years has been brainwashed into believing federal finances are like personal finances.

The American public has been lied to:

“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure.

It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills.

It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies.

Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally.

Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”

Whose lies were those? They came to America courtesy of then Senator Barack Obama, in a floor speech, on March 20, 2006. And he hasn’t changed his lies, since.

Here’s what he said in February, 2011:

” . . . it’s time Washington acted as responsibly as our families do. And on Monday, I’m proposing a new budget that will help us live within our means while investing in our future.

My budget freezes annual domestic spending for the next five years – even on programs I care deeply about – which will reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade.”

And, of course, Congress says the same things. So unless you believe that among the President of the United States, every member of Congress and all 400 economists in the Counsel of Economic Advisers, there is not one — NOT ONE — person who understands economic fact, you must know they are lying.

And as we repeatedly have said, they have been bribed to lie (via campaign contributions and promises of lucrative jobs later) by the upper .1% income group — bribed to cut benefits to the .99.9% and widen the gap between the rich and the rest.

The infamous Congressional “revolving door” is the notable example of this bribery. And watch carefully, as Barack Obama and family, become multi, multi-millionaires shortly after he leaves office (ala Bill Clinton).

(Obama’s latest nominee, billionaire Penny Pritzker, will help him along.)

So getting back to Bernanke: His bosses want to widen the gap, because that is what they have been bribed to do. But he knows, if he sinks the economy, history will judge him (unfairly) on his failure to grow the economy.

So what’s a guy to do? He straddles the fence. He says:

“Although near-term fiscal restraint has increased, much less has been done to address the federal government’s longer-term fiscal imbalances.

“Indeed, the [Congressional Budget Office] projects that, under current policies, the federal deficit and debt as a percentage of GDP will begin rising again in the latter part of this decade and move sharply upward thereafter.”

In short, Bernanke is saying, “I agree with my bosses, that we have to do something about those “fiscal imbalances.” But, fixing the economy requires more, not less deficit spending (and I can always say, ‘I told you so.’)

“Then later, (preferably after I’ve left office) you can slash spending and increase taxes, which of course will lead to the next depression, but by then it won’t be my fault, especially since I warned you.

“In fact, everyone will look back at the ‘Bernanke growth years’ and say what a genius I was, while my successor will be blasted as incompetent.

My predecessor Greenspan almost got away with this kind of double-talk, but he stayed on a little too long.”

Yes, Bernanke is a genius — a genius employee and a genius politician. He says that deficit cutting drags down the economy, but agrees with the President and Congress that deficit cutting is necessary — only later.

And there are some who think he’s dumb — right — like a fox.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Oklahomans: You wanted Republican; you got Republican

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

President Barack Obama (Democrat) said to disaster victims, “You face a long road ahead, but you will not travel it alone. Your country will travel it with you.”

Apparently, a Republican senator from Oklahoma doesn’t feel as compassionate:

Oklahoma Senator Demands Spending Cuts In Exchange For Disaster Relief
May 21st, 2013 Henry Decker

Just hours after the storm hit, Senator Tom Coburn(R) told CQ Roll Call that he would not support providing disaster aid to his own constituents unless it is offset by other federal spending cuts.

Translation: “Until we cut spending elsewhere, the people of Oklahoma will simply have to suffer. Serves them right for voting for me. Hey, my house is O.K.”

“It is crass for critics to play disaster aid politics when first responders are pulling victims from the rubble,” the statement reads, ignoring the fact that Coburn himself barely waited before announcing his preemptive opposition to the still-undefined aid package.

The vast majority of victims are poor and middle class. But, Coburn is bribed by the upper 1% income group to widen the gap between the rich and the rest.

For Republicans, this is not an extreme position. They consistently have opposed all spending that would benefit the lower 99%, being far more concerned about a non-existent “debt problem” than about the real problems of real people.

There was a time when the Republicans had a morality. But, in the past 10 years, money-mad, power-mad, people-hating politicians have take over the party. They have convinced their followers that the compassionate are weak, while to be righteous, one must be cruel.

So these followers, most of whom are part of the 99%, obediently embrace the self-destructive, “widen-the-gap” views taught to them by the rich. Now, as Oklahomans sadly are learning, the mad dog returns to eat its keeper..

Yes, I know. The Democrats obey the 1%, too. But the Republicans have become far worse, so extreme in their anti-people views as to be Nazi.

Oklahomans. You voted Republican; you got Republican.

Ah, the irony.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Student loans: The upper 1% goes nuts

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

In “Five reasons why we should eliminate school loans” (May 16, 2013), we quoted Senator Elizabeth Warren, who wants to set student loan rates at the same level the big banks borrow from the Fed: a measly .75% (versus a gigantic 6.8% on student loans.)

This caused immediate outrage among the rich, who want the poor and middle classes punished as much as possible. (Rich kids don’t need student loans; it’s the poor and middle who pay)

Here are some quotes from Jason Delisle, Director of the Federal Education Budget Project at the New America Foundation:

With that mix of populist rhetoric and subterfuge, Senator Warren stands to whip up a mob of angry students (and pundits) who will demand that the government drop the interest rate on student loans to 0.75 percent. Good luck reasoning with a mob.

See the panic and outrage? Mr. Delisle practically foams at the mouth: “Populist rhetoric.” “Subterfuge.” “Whip up a mob.” OMG! Suggesting that students pay the same rate as banks?! How absolutely outrageous it is for the government to lower interest rates on student loans to the poor and middle income groups. Well, of all the nerve!

Remember now, the the federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, doesn’t need to charge any interest on any lending. It has the unlimited ability to create dollars at will, so needs no income, and in fact, destroys the money upon receipt (i.e. all dollars paid to the federal government no longer are part of the money supply.)

Why then, does the federal government charge our college students any interest, much less a heartless 6.8%?

The 0.75 percent rate is actually a penalty rate, about three times higher than what banks charge each other in the market. Banks rarely use it, and lose money when they do.

Yes, if 0.75 is a penalty rate, how would one describe 6.7%?

. . . when the budget office “accounts more fully… for the cost of the risk the government takes on when issuing loans,” it reports that Subsidized Stafford loans – those made to low-income students – cost taxpayers $12 for every $100 lent out, or $3.5 billion per year. If the loans cost $3.5 billion a year when the government charges a 6.8 percent interest rate, cutting the rate to 0.75 percent would more than triple that cost.

Wrong on at least two counts:
1. In a Monetarily Sovereign nation, taxpayers do not pay for federal spending or for federal losses or for federal anything.
2. Anyway, how does the government lose 12% on every 6.8% loan? Simple. Default. The kids can’t afford to pay. Cutting the rate actually might cut the loss — but of course, that isn’t the point.

. . . the Department of Education estimates that 23 percent of the Subsidized Stafford loans it makes this year will default.

So the solution is to maintain high interest rates?? These kids, with no income, no jobs and little hope, are being squeezed by usurious rates, when in fact, they should not have to pay for college at all. Elementary school is free. High school is free. Why isn’t college free?

By their nature, students generally do not have collateral, earnings or credit histories. But when nearly a quarter of the loans are expected to default, charging a 6.8 percent interest rate is hardly the usury Senator Warren suggests. A non-profit credit union would charge at least double that rate.

Mr. Delisle is clueless about the purpose of student loans. It is to encourage and enable college education in America. Allowing more students the opportunity to attend college, benefits the nation.

This is not supposed to be a money-making scheme for the U.S. government. It is supposed to be a brainpower-building scheme for the United States.

But wait! Mr. Delisle does offer a solution, which I term, “Ruin Your Life”:

Let’s say Senator Warren is right that students are being crushed by debt.

“Let’s say”?? This is even a question?

Even so, lawmakers need not cut interest rates to alleviate that burden.

No, keep that rate high for the 99%.

A program available now, called Pay As You Earn, allows the same borrowers who would be eligible for Senator Warren’s proposal to have their annual loan payments set at between 0% and 10% of their incomes, depending on their earnings and family size.

That is, a borrower’s income – not the interest rate – dictates the payment, and it is always an affordable share of his income, never exceeding 10 percent annually. The program also guarantees that no one has to pay beyond 20 years. No matter how much a student borrows, or the interest rate, the loans are forgiven at that point.

Get it?. Pay for 20 years. Forget about buying a home. Forget about buying a car. Forget about investing in a business. Forget about paying for a family. Forget about your future. Your finances will be tied up for the next 20 years. What a plan! Guaranteed to widen the gap between the rich and the rest.

Senator Warren will not go away. But the mouthpieces for the 1%, will not go away, either. So expect the 1% to keep pounding at her. Heaven forbid the young people of the 99% are allowed a college education without the debilitation of massive debt.

The goal for the 1% is, as always, to widen the gap between the rich and the rest.

Thank you, Mr. Delisle, for the reminder.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–Monster scandal; massive confusion; when will taxes end?

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motive.

=====================================================================

The U.S. federal government originally passed the laws that created the U.S. dollar. Ever since, the government has passed laws that alternatively made the government Monetarily Sovereign and monetarily non-sovereign.

A Monetarily Sovereign government has the unlimited ability to create its sovereign currency. A monetarily non-sovereign government does not have this ability, either because it doesn’t have a sovereign currency (example: the euro nations), or its currency is pegged to the dollar:

As of 2008, there were at least 17 national currencies pegged to the U.S. currency, not counting other organizations that maintain a similar link. These include the Netherlands Antillean guilder, Aruban florin, Jordanian dinar, Bahrain’s dinar, Lebanon’s pound, Oman’s rial, Qatar’s rial, the Saudi riyal, Emirati dirham, Maldivian rufiyaa, Venezuelan bolivar, the Belize dollar, the Bahamian dollar, the Hong Kong dollar, the Barbados dollar, the Trinidad and Tobago dollar, and the Eastern Caribbean dollar, which is used by Antigua, Dominica, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, the Grenadines and Grenada.

Occasionally, a Monetarily Sovereign government may pass laws that restrict its ability to create its sovereign currency. Examples in the U.S.: The debt-limit laws and the current austerity laws, all of which have no economic purpose, but solely are in place to give the illusion of economic prudence.

Because the U.S. government controls its own laws, it has the unlimited ability to revise those laws at any moment, meaning it has the unlimited ability to create as many sovereign dollars as it wishes, at any time.

Given this ability, the U.S. does not need to ask anyone for dollars, not you, not me, not China. Thus, federal borrowing and federal taxing do not support federal spending. Whenever the U.S. government wishes to pay a bill denominated in dollars, it simply creates those dollars at the press of a computer key.

In summary, federal tax collection is a useless, time wasting, manpower wasting, ineffecient and unfair exercise, which is why the following article should be of interest:

New York Times
Confusion and Staff Troubles Rife at I.R.S. Office in Ohio
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE, DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI and MICHAEL LUO
Published: May 18, 2013

During the summer of 2010, the dozen or so accountants and tax agents of the Internal Revenue Service office in Cincinnati got a directive from their manager. A growing number of organizations identifying themselves as part of the Tea Party had begun applying for tax exemptions, the manager said, advising the workers to be on the lookout for them and other groups planning to get involved in elections.

Low-level employees in what many in the I.R.S. consider a backwater, they processed thousands of applications a year, mostly from charities like private schools or hospitals.

For months, the Tea Party cases sat on the desk of a lone specialist, who used “political sounding” criteria — words like “patriots,” “we the people” — as a way to search efficiently through the flood of applications for groups that might not qualify for exemptions.

Visualize it. Congress and the Supreme Court tweaked the law and some lone schnook had to interpret them and apply them to thousands of applications.

But it gets worse:

Overseen by a revolving cast of midlevel managers, stalled by miscommunication with I.R.S. lawyers and executives in Washington and confused about the rules they were enforcing, the Cincinnati specialists flagged virtually every application with Tea Party in its name.

But their review went beyond conservative groups: more than 400 organizations came under scrutiny, including at least two dozen liberal-leaning ones and some that were seemingly apolitical.

Do you remember the “I Love Lucy” show, the episode titled, “Lucy Goes to Work”? Lucy and Ethel find a job in a chocolate factory, where they stand at a production line, trying to wrap chocolates.

The chocolates come down the line faster and faster, overwhelming Lucy. You should stop now and look at it. It’s a scream — and is the perfect description of what was happening at the IRS.

Now, think of that production line and imagine that the chocolates had no value at all, and the whole process was unnecessary. That’s the IRS.

Over three years, as the office struggled with a growing caseload of advocacy groups seeking tax exemptions, responsibility for the cases moved from one group of specialists to another, and the Determinations Unit, which handles all nonprofit applications, was reorganized. One batch of cases sat ignored for months. Few if any of the employees were experts on tax law.

“The I.R.S. is pretty dysfunctional to begin with, and this case brought all those dysfunctions to their worst,” said Paul Streckfus, a former I.R.S. employee who runs a newsletter devoted to tax-exempt organizations. “People were coming and going, asking for advice and not getting it, and sometimes forgetting the cases existed.”

Administering the nearly four-million-word federal tax code involves so many arcane legalities, and is so fraught with potential to ignite Washington’s partisan skirmishes or infuriate taxpayers, that much of the I.R.S. is run by lawyers.

But the Exempt Organizations Division — concentrated in Cincinnati with fewer than 200 workers, according to I.R.S. officials — is staffed mostly with accountants, clerks and civil servants.

The article gets worse and worse; I don’t need to continue. You can read the entire article if you wish, but you get the picture. It’s “I Love Lucie” meets the Keystone Kops.

The point: Here is a giant organization, employing thousands of people, spending billions of dollars, causing millions of Americans to spend billions of hours (many of whom will be prosecuted for not spending those hours) — and all for naught.

The federal government has no use for the dollars collected, and in fact, the dollars sent to the government disappear and no longer are part of the money supply. It’s the classic having one team dig holes and a second team filling them up.

I have no objection to the federal government hiring people for useless work. This pumps dollars into the economy. It supports thousands of IRS employees’ families, plus thousand more businesses and their employees.

But I do object to having millions of Americans waste billions of person-hours, doing unpaid, useless work, and wasting more billions of dollars to prosecute those who do the work wrong. Those wasted hours never can be recovered.

And did I mention the waste of time by an “irate” (fake irate) Congress, investigating the scandal of their own making?

I wonder when America will come to its senses and simply do away with the federal tax, its collection and the related prosecutions. The whole process is nuts.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone. Click here
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

10 Steps to Economic Misery: (Click here:)
1. Maintain or increase the FICA tax..
2. Spread the myth Social Security, Medicare and the U.S. government are insolvent.
3. Cut federal employment in the military, post office, other federal agencies.
4. Broaden the income tax base so more lower income people will pay.
5. Cut financial assistance to the states.
6. Spread the myth federal taxes pay for federal spending.
7. Allow banks to trade for their own accounts; save them when their investments go sour.
8. Never prosecute any banker for criminal activity.
9. Nominate arch conservatives to the Supreme Court.
10. Reduce the federal deficit and debt

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.
Two key equations in economics:
1. Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
2. Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY