–There is one thing CNNMoney doesn’t appear to understand: Money

Mitchell’s laws: The more budgets are cut and taxes inceased, the weaker an economy becomes. To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments. Austerity = poverty and leads to civil disorder. Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
==========================================================================================================================================

They call themselves CNNMoney Perhaps they should change their name to CNNMyth.

National debt: Washington’s $5 trillion interest bill
By Jeanne Sahadi | CNNMoney.com – 4 hours ago

Interest rates on U.S. bonds may be ridiculously low, but that doesn’t mean the country’s future interest payments on the national debt will be. Uncle Sam will shell out more than $5 trillion in interest payments over the next decade, according to the latest projections from the Congressional Budget Office.

That’s more than half of the projected $11 trillion increase in debt held by the public during that period. Those figures assume that a host of expensive policies such as the Bush-era tax cuts are extended.

Over the decade, more than 14% of all revenue the government is projected to collect will be sucked up by interest payments. That’s a lot of money that can’t be used on the country’s other priorities.

Ms. Sahadi (of CNNMoney) doesn’t understand the difference between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty. She thinks the federal government is unable to continue creating unlimited dollars, as it has been doing for the 40 years since it became Monetarily Sovereign.

How discouraging that even a group with “Money” in its name, doesn’t understand money.

Indeed, between 2013 and 2022, estimated interest costs will be:
higher than Medicaid spending;
equal to half of Social Security spending;
close to what is spent on all of defense.

Translation: The interest payments by the federal government will stimulate the economy more than Medicaid, half of Social Security and close to what is spent on defense. This is a bad thing???

It’s unfortunate the rates are so low. With higher rates, we might be out of this economic slump, and unemployment would be lower.

The (CBO’s) estimated interest costs assume a fairly steady and moderate increase in rates over the decade. If it turns out that rates rise one percentage point higher than CBO projects, that could add roughly $1 trillion to interest costs over the decade.

That will put $1 trillion more dollars in the pockets of bond holders, who will spend those dollars. How else does Ms. Ms. Sahadi (of CNNMoney) think an economy grows?

However things turn out, a lot of the money paid in interest will go abroad, said Charles Konigsberg, president of the Federal Budget Group. That’s because more than 40% of the country’s public debt is owed to institutions and individuals outside the United States.

Agreed, that’s not as good as domestic dollars, but it’s still good. The U.S. federal government has the unlimited ability to create dollars, so those dollars go abroad at zero cost to us. But they do enrich other nations, who then become better trading/tourism partners. A wealthy world is a better world for America.

A recent analysis from the independent Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that three of the four GOP presidential candidates’ economic plans would increase deficits and interest costs, some substantially.

Newt Gingrich’s economic plan could raise interest costs by $900 billion over the next decade; Rick Santorum’s by $640 billion; and Mitt Romney’s by $40 billion. But that number could rise substantially if he doesn’t find enough measures to offset the costs of his latest tax cut proposals.

Hmmmm . . . Suddenly, I find the GOP more attractive. If only they weren’t hypnotized by the Tea/Limbaugh/religious fundamentalist groups, who seem to have little knowledge and even less concern about economics and the welfare of America.

Bottom line: Interest costs our Monetarily Sovereign U.S. government nothing, because the government pays interest at will, simply by pressing a computer key. But interest does enrich us monetarily non-sovereign people and monetarily non-sovereign businesses by adding dollars to the economy. That’s one of the reasons why, despite much of the interest going overseas, interest rate changes and domestic GDP growth tend to be parallel. .

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
http://www.rodgermitchell.com


==========================================================================================================================================
No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia. Two key equations in economics:
Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption + Net exports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–French lobster leaders debate best way to pull their economy down

Mitchell’s laws: The more budgets are cut and taxes inceased, the weaker an economy becomes. To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments. Austerity = poverty and leads to civil disorder. Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
==========================================================================================================================================

The following WSJ article brings to mind the old saw about why lobsters never can get out of a pail. As soon as one starts to climb up, the others pull it down.

Wall Street Journal, February 29, 2012
French Front-Runner Pledges 75% Tax Bracket
By Gabrielle Parussini

PARIS—French presidential front-runner François Hollande said taxpayers earning over €1 million ($1.35 million) a year would be subjected to a special 75% tax bracket should he be elected, underscoring heightened interest across Europe in raising taxes on the wealthiest individuals.

“It’s a message of social cohesion….It’s a matter of patriotism,” he told journalists on his way in to Paris’s annual agriculture fair.”

Across Europe, the idea of raising taxes on high-income earners began to burgeon three years ago, when the Continent started to descend into recession. In 2009, the U.K. government increased its top marginal income-tax rate to 50% from 40%. In the U.S., the top 1% of earners have been the target of widespread protests under the umbrella of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Mr. Sarkozy’s government has already slapped a 3% temporary levy on high revenue to be applied to those with a taxable income exceeding €500,000 a year.

Revenue disparity, which has been on the rise in most industrialized economies since the 1980s, has remained relatively contained in France, according to an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development study published in December. The top 1% taxpayers in France earn less than half the average earned by the top 1% in the U.S.

The Monetarily Sovereign U.S. destroys tax money upon receipt. The monetarily non-sovereign France spends tax money. French tax money flows through the government’s hands, back out into the economy.

While the U.S. government is a creator and destroyer of its sovereign currency, the dollar, the French government is only a conduit for its non-sovereign currency, the euro. Few people, including most economists, politicians and media writers understand this difference.

Hypothetically, raising the tax rate on the rich could be an effective way for a monetarily non-sovereign government to close the gap between the 1% and the 99%. (A Monetarily Sovereign goverenment could do it simply by giving money to the 99%.)

However, to the degree French debt is owned by outsiders, debt service reduces the nation’s total money supply, negatively affecting GDP growth. France cannot overcome this the way the U.S. does – by creating money ad hoc as it pays its bills.

When any government takes from its citizens to pay foreign debt, those taxes temporarily mask a serious problem: Domestic money loss. The government can appear to be prudent, while its economy suffers austerity.

Seemingly, this is what the EU leaders want: Support the public sector at the expense of the private sector. That is why they urge the PIIGS to reduce government debt by increasing private debt (i.e. raising taxes), while offering to lend more euros to the “offending” nations.

The combination of more taxes and more outside borrowing, leads to recessions, while giving the false appearance of a government being financially wise. Whether the euro nations’ leaders want this consciously – these leaders are, after all, creatures of the public sector – or do it out of ignorance, the effect is the same: Deeper and deeper recession, with the reason hidden, thus preventing positive efforts to cure the recession (“We already are doing everything we can.”)

If France is to remain monetarily non-sovereign (a terrible, but likely, path), it never should borrow from outsiders. If 100% of France’s debt were domestic, all tax increases to support debt service, merely would recirculate euros within France, thus delaying the inevitable bankruptcy all monetarly non-sovereign governments face, if their balance of payments is negative.

Of course, the above begs the question: Is it economically wise or morally fair to take away 75% of anyone’s marginal income? The rich are not stupid, you know.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
http://www.rodgermitchell.com


==========================================================================================================================================
No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia. Two key equations in economics:
Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption + Net exports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–The religious right loves Rush Limbaugh

Mitchell’s laws: The more budgets are cut and taxes inceased, the weaker an economy becomes. To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments. Austerity = poverty and leads to civil disorder. Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
==========================================================================================================================================

Need I say more?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
http://www.rodgermitchell.com


==========================================================================================================================================
No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia. Two key equations in economics:
Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption + Net exports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

–European Union keeps applying leeches to cure anemia. If Ireland refuses to starve, withhold food.

Mitchell’s laws: The more budgets are cut and taxes inceased, the weaker an economy becomes. To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments. Austerity = poverty and leads to civil disorder. Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
==========================================================================================================================================

The EU continues to demonstrate cluelessness about the differences between Monetarily Sovereign nations and monetarily non-sovereign nations. All the more remarkable: This ignorance is shared by most of the greatest economics minds in the world.

Yahoo Finance
European states sign new fiscal treaty, kicking off potentially difficult ratification process
By Gabriele Steinhauser, AP Business Writer

BRUSSELS (AP) — The leaders of 25 European countries on Friday signed a new treaty designed to prevent the 17 members of the eurozone from living beyond their means and avoid a repeat of the region’s crippling debt crisis.

Translation: Because austerity has accomplished nothing good, and has created poverty, misery and pain wherever it has been administered, the 17 euro nations, all monetarily non-sovereign, have agreed to force themselves into more severe austerity.

The leaders hope the rules for budget discipline set out in the accord, known as the fiscal compact, will also lead to closer political and economic integration in the eurozone.

Translation: The ship is sinking, so let’s all drown, together.

Only Britain and the Czech Republic decided not to sign the agreement, a move that triggered concern over a rift in the 27-country European Union.

Translation: Britain and the Czech Republic are Monetarily Sovereign. They use their own currency, so have no need for austerity. Yet, they are the only ones that can see the idiocy of the EU plan. Remarkable.

Many Europeans have grown weary of the EU and the euro. Two years of painful austerity in the poorer countries have taken their economic toll, while many in the richer countries are getting frustrated over funding the expensive bailouts for Greece, Ireland and Portugal.

Others fear that the tighter spending rules will limit governments’ room to maneuver in tough economic times and force German-style fiscal discipline on countries with vastly different economies and cultures. However, the new deficit limits make some exceptions, such as for severe recessions and other unexpected economic circumstances.

Translation: Austerity causes poverty, misery and pain. The people understand that; their leaders don’t. The recession we have is not “severe” enough and anyway, we “expected” all these horrifying economic circumstances. (Well, we really didn’t, because we don’t understand Monetary Sovereignty. But don’t tell anyone. We don’t want to look stupid.)

The economic outlook is darkening. Unemployment is at a record high and several countries are forecast to fall back into recession this year, yet the EU leaders were hesitant to back off the austerity policies that have dominated their response to the debt crisis and are now being blamed for the economic downturn.

Translation: You mean austerity doesn’t work, cannot work and never will work? O.K., let’s do more of it.

“We remain in a fragile situation,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned. “The crisis is far from over.”

Translation: We’re swimming in the middle of the ocean, without life jackets. The EU is pouring water on our heads, and sharks are circling. Yep, this crisis is far from over.

The biggest challenge may lie in Ireland . . . This time, EU leaders have ensured that Irish voters cannot block the fiscal pact. Unlike earlier treaties, this one does not require unanimous support to become law. It will come into force once 12 of the eurozone’s 17 members ratify it.

An Irish rejection would chiefly undermine Ireland’s own ability to keep paying its bills. The fiscal treaty proposes to prevent any abstaining eurozone countries from receiving loans from the eurozone’s future financial backstop, the European Stability Mechanism.

Translation: The nerve of those Irish, rejecting the poverty, misery and pain that our “solutions” always cause. We’ll show them. We’ll add to their poverty, misery and pain.

Economists believe Ireland may require a new round of loan aid in 2013 once its current flow of EU-International Monetary Fund bailout funds runs out.

Ireland in November 2010 negotiated a euro67.5 billion ($89.5 billion) EU-IMF credit line and has received euro48 billion ($63.5 billion) so far at an average interest rate of 3.3 percent. The current depressed value of Irish government bonds suggests that, were Ireland to return to normal long-term borrowing today, it would have to pay investors at least double that rate.

Translation: Ireland is starved for money. Being monetarily non-sovereign, plus having a negative balance of payments, they have no way to generate the money to save their economic lives. So let’s withhold money, then blame them for lack of fiscal prudence. So far, the world has been stupid enough to buy that idea.

=============================================================================================

Wait a minute. Before you smirk, that is exactly the idea our “balance-the-budget, cut-the-deficit” politicians and media have been foisting on the American public. They want us to function as though we were monetarily non-sovereign, institute austerity, and become Ireland.

Ah, faith and begorrah.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
http://www.rodgermitchell.com


==========================================================================================================================================
No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia. Two key equations in economics:
Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption + Net exports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY