America’s Auschwitz

WITHIN TWO YEARS, THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP WILL DENY IT. BY THEN IT MAY BE TOO LATE.

First, he’ll deport the criminals. Then, the innocent but undocumented. Then, the birthright citizens and the Dreamers. Then, everyone who criticizes Trump. Hitler never stops.
DOD Working on Guantanamo (Trump’s Auschwitz) White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that the Department of Defense (DOD) is working on increasing the bed capacity at the U.S. Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba for housing illegal immigrants arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

train car filled with dying human children WHAT KIND OF NATION APPROVES OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN?

The action will allow the United States to use Guantanamo in its “full capacity to provide critical extra detention space for high-priority criminal illegals” because U.S. immigration officials continue to make more arrests across the country, she said. Earlier this week, Trump said in a memorandum that he is instructing the DOD to prepare Guantanamo to detain illegal immigrants with criminal records. In a speech at the White House, he said the facility at Guantanamo will hold 30,000 individuals, whom he described as the “worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people.”
The cost of finding, arresting, transporting, feeding, and housing the immigrants will be enormous, not to mention the economic cost of losing that many workers and consumers. Many are parents of young children. What will become of those children? WHAT WILL BECOME OF THOSE CHILDREN? Meanwhile, Trump is trying to cancel the student lunch program because of the cost. Plenty of money to catch, feed, and shelter Guantanamo, but not enough to feed innocent school children.
“This will double our capacity immediately,” he said, adding that Guantanamo is a “tough” place to escape from. The detention facility at Guantanamo Bay was set up in 2002 by President George W. Bush to detain foreign militant suspects following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks on the United States. There are 15 detainees left in the prison. Trump’s predecessors, Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, sought to shut down the Guantanamo prison and were only able to reduce its inmate population, but Trump has said he would keep it open. Leavitt said that 97 percent of people who were deported from the United States in recent days “had a removal order from the previous administration that the previous administration refused to act on” and that the Trump administration is “following the law.”
Absolute guarantee: Trump soon will begin removing all undocumented immigrants–not just criminals– and shipping them to Auschwitz. MAGAs laugh. Does America’s cruelty never end? Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell; MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell; https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

“It’s not tax money. We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.”

Ask the “man in the street” where money comes from, and he will describe a “circular economy”:

  1. We pay taxes to the federal government to fund federal spending.
  2. When there are not enough tax dollars, the federal government borrows dollars via Treasury bills, notes, and bonds.
  3. As employees of businesses, we receive payment, part of which goes to the federal government in taxes to fund government spending.

And around and around she goes: Federal spending — > federal taxing and borrowing —> more federal spending.

It’s widely believed, even by some economists, and may be what you were taught in school. But it is wrong.

The federal government creates dollars. It does not use tax dollars. It destroys tax dollars. And the federal government does not borrow dollars. Not ever.

Here are some facts to ponder: In 1940, the total M2 money supply  (M1 plus savings deposits, small-denomination time deposits, and other near-money assets like money market funds) was approximately $49.27 billion

As of December 2024, M2 was $21.53 trillion. 

Huh? If the entire U.S. economy had only $49 billion in 1940, how could it lend or pay taxes of $22 trillion in 2024?

Where did the additional $21 trillion come from?

Clearly, that amount couldn’t come from you and your taxes, and you surely would not be able to lend that amount to the government. It would be like asking an impoverished child to give or lend you a few trillion dollars.

You can’t get blood from a turnip, and you can’t get trillions and trillions from the American public that had $49 billion.

The answer, very simply, is that the money came from thin air, or more correctly, from federal money creation via deficit spending.

Ben Bernanke - Wikipedia
BEN BERNANKE, former Fed Chairman: “It’s not tax money. We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.”

The federal government merely pressed a few computer keys, and the dollars came into existence.

Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan: “There is nothing to prevent the federal government from creating as much money as it wants and paying it to somebody. The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print the money to do that.”

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke: “The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. It’s not tax money… We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.”

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell: “As a central bank, we have the ability to create money digitally.”

The St. Louis Fed: “As the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e., unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.”

“Not dependent on credit markets” is Fedspeak for “We don’t borrow money.”

Would you borrow money if you could create as much as you needed simply by pressing computer keys? Of course not.

And if you borrowed money, you’d have to pay it back, which would reduce your spending ability

So why would anyone think the federal government would borrow dollars and then pay them back? Yes, the government can do some stupid things, but not that stupid.

  • When anyone lends money, they create temporary money that increases the money supply. However, this borrowed money is destroyed when loans are paid back, resulting in no long-term increase in the money supply.

  • Long-term growth in the economy is driven by federal deficit spending. When the government spends more than it collects in taxes, it injects additional money into the economy. This spending is financed by creating new money — not by taxing or borrowing — which leads to a permanent increase in the money supply.

  • Rather than providing funds for federal spending, taxing destroys dollars and hinders economic growth.

In short, the U.S. economy cannot create the money for its economic growth, much less support the federal government’s growth. The economy relies on the federal government’s money creation ability to grow.

Think about that the next time you hear or read someone complaining about the federal deficit. Without federal deficit spending, the economy would be incapable of growth. The federal deficit and debt are not too high; they are too low.

Federal Tax Dollars Are Destroyed

Here is how federal tax dollars are destroyed: When individuals and businesses pay taxes, they use M2 money (which includes savings deposits and other near-money assets). Once these taxes are collected, they are credited to the Treasury’s account. Since the U.S. government issues its own currency, it doesn’t need to hold a finite amount of money.

Instead, it can create money as needed. Therefore, the concept of the government “having” a certain amount of money becomes irrelevant. The federal government has infinite dollars.

When tax dollars are collected, they are removed from the private sector, reducing the money supply (M2) in circulation. This aligns with the idea that these dollars are effectively “destroyed” in they are no longer part of any money supply.

Federal taxes do not fund government spending; rather, they ensure demand for the dollar and help the Fed control the economy. This is achieved by taxing activities that the government wants to discourage and providing tax breaks for those it wishes to reward.

The Federal Government Does Not Borrow

Federal Treasury accounts (T-bills, T-notes, and T-bonds) have names that sound like borrowing. That’s why the so-called federal “debt” confuses people into wrongly believing the federal government borrows dollars. It should be called “Treasury deposits,”not debt or borrowing.

Those Treasury accounts are similar to bank safe deposit boxes. The bank doesn’t owe those deposits; it never takes ownership of them. Similarly, the federal government never takes ownership of the T-security deposits. It takes possession but not ownership.

A loan requires a transfer of ownership. When you borrow dollars, you can spend them as you please. It never uses the funds in T-security accounts. It just holds them for safekeeping.

If it were a borrower, it would take ownership. Therefore, T-securities do not represent borrowing. They represent “holding.” Further, for every dollar the federal government would borrow, it would have to pay back a dollar plus interest. So how would borrowing ever finance federal spending. The math doesn’t work.

If you had a weak-willed friend who said, “I don’t want to go into this casino with so much money in my pocket, so would you hold this $500 for me?” that would not be lending or borrowing. It would just be “holding,” and is what a T-security is.

SUMMARY

1 The federal government cannot run short of dollars. It has the infinite ability to create dollars.

2 Federal taxes do not fund federal spending. The purpose of taxes is to assure demand for the dollar and to control the economy by taxing what is to be discouraged and by giving tax breaks to what is to be rewarded. All federal taxes are destroyed upon receipt by the Treasury.

3 No agency of the federal government is funded by taxes. FICA does not fund Social Security or Medicare. All federal agencies are funded by federal money creation. No agency of the federal government can run short of dollars unless that is what the government wishes.

4 Federal taxes destroy dollars by removing them from the economy, so rather than funding economic growth, federal taxes hinder growth.

5 The federal government never borrows dollars. The purpose of T-securities is to provide a safe storage place for unused dollars —safer than any bank. That is why China, for example, would not trust any bank with billions of U.S. dollars, but it trusts the U.S. Treasury.

5 Any borrowing creates temporary dollars. Loans must be repaid, which destroys dollars. Permanent growth dollars are created by federal deficit spending. The economy can grow only when the federal government deficit spends. To grow the economy, the federal deficit must be increased.

 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

 

Statistics on the dangers and costs of illegal immigrants

Many reasons are given for spending hundreds of millions of dollars to deport illegal aliens. Crime is one of those reasons.

As of 2022, there were approximately 11.0 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States. There undoubtedly are more, now.

President Trump has informed us that these people are rapists, robbers, drug dealers and murderers. Here are the statistics:

Hmmm. Twenty-nine homicides? Sixteen hundred drug possessions? Those are not exactly the huge numbers we’ve been told, especially for 11 million people.

OK, so maybe they aren’t the raging criminals we are made to believe. But they are a drain on the economy because they don’t pay taxes. 

No, actually, they pay a considerable amount of taxes. Undocumented immigrants paid nearly $100 billion in federal, state, and local taxes. Most of that amount, $59.4 billion, was paid to the federal government while the remaining $37.3 billion was paid to state and local governments.

Well, but they still get benefits.

No, undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Social Security retirement benefits or health insurance through Medicare, for example, even though they contribute billions of dollars to the federal payroll taxes that fund these benefits. 

So they aren’t criminals; they pay taxes and don’t receive the benefits their taxes supposedly pay for. But they take jobs away from citizens, right?

This paper presents evidence on the effect of legal status on workers’ labor market outcomes in the US and explores the impact of undocumented immigration in the labor market.

Firms receive applications from documented and undocumented workers and hire the worker they can extract the largest surplus from.

As undocumented workers have a lower reservation wage due to their ineligibility for unemployment benefits, lower wage bargaining power and risk of being detected and removed, their wages are lower and job finding rates higher, which is consistent with the empirical evidence.

In short, they don’t laze around. They work and even must accept the worst jobs at the lowest wages — jobs not wanted by American citizens. America needs people who will do those jobs. 

Immigrants are consumers. They spend money. And this creates more jobs.

An increase in the share of undocumented immigrants leads to the creation of additional jobs.

When calibrated to US data, the job creation effect dominates and undocumented immigration benefits documented workers.

An increase in the removal rate mutes job creation and thus lowers the job finding rate of all workers.

This detrimental effect is even larger if the removal rate increases more for employed workers (e.g. through worksite raids) because this leads to a risk premium in their wages.

Immigration raids have negative effects on businesses. Undocumented immigrants fear applying for most jobs because of the risk of deportation. This risk makes filling job openings difficult for many businesses.

Using the introduction of statewide omnibus immigration laws as a measure of increased removal risk, I find evidence for muted job creation and a risk premium in immigrants’ wages.

In summary, illegal immigrants:

    1. Are less likely to be criminals than are U.S. citizens: Less likely to be murderers, less likely to be drug pushers, less likely to be burglars or robbers.
    2. Pay the same taxes as citizens, but don’t receive the benefits their taxes supposedly buy.
    3. Are low-pay workers –on average, undocumented workers earn about 42% less than U.S.-born workers and legal immigrants with similar skills — so deporting them increases business costs, which causes inflation. 

    4. Are forced to accept the least desirable jobs, with the least desirable working conditions, akin to indentured servants. Are more likely to work in less regulated industries that offer lower wages, such as agriculture, construction, and certain service sectors. These jobs often come with fewer benefits and protections compared to jobs available to U.S. citizens.. 
    5. Finally, according to a report from the American Immigration Council, deporting 11 million undocumented immigrants could cost between $88 billion to $315 billion annually  

SUMMARY

Given the facts, why would we want to deport 11 million undocumented immigrants, especially knowing the terrible emotional and financial toll it will have not only on the deported but on our economy and on U.S. citizens?

The answer is that our leaders don’t care about the damage to our people. They only care about votes, power, and their own money. 

They understand their followers’ fears and motivations. They count on obedient voters who do not understand the facts or the lie that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of the nation” (whatever that is supposed to mean).  

Believe what I tell you. Immigrants and children born to immigrants poison our blood.

These obedient followers — working U.S. citizens — will be hurt most.

So, a combination of ignorance, fear, lies, and bigotry has led many American citizens to opt for laws that will boomerang on them.

They confuse strength with the sadism of a man who preys on women, used fake “heel spurs” to avoid military service, and denigrated the servicemen and women who died protecting America.

Economic suicide will be the first result of their ignorance, fear, and bigotry.

With immigrants gone, at great expense to middle- and lower-income Americans, the nation will be marked by inflation and unemployment, low pay, and harsh working conditions.

This, ironically, is what some Americans will foist on others.

Dare I say the backfire will be poetic justice, though we all will pay for the folly. 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

What are the purposes of the student loan program?

What are the purposes of the student loan program?
A street made out of dollars leads to a school
The road to school is paved with dollars.

1. It provides financial assistance to students who may not be able to pay for their education upfront. 2. Educated individuals tend to have higher earning potential and contribute more to the economy. 3. Education provides individuals with critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills that are valuable in both personal and professional life. 4. Education can be a pathway out of poverty for many individuals, providing them with the tools and opportunities to improve their socioeconomic status. 5. Student loans provide a significant source of revenue for educational institutions, helping them maintain and improve their programs and facilities.

Federal student loans account for about 92% of the total outstanding student loan debt in the United States, while private student loans account for approximately 8%. Federal loan rates range from 6.5% to 9%, and private loan rates range from 3.5% to 17%. Approximately 40% of the loans provided by the government to help students pay for their education are delinquent or in default. The federal government collected approximately $4.92 trillion in tax revenue for the most recent fiscal year (FY 2024). According to the Federal Reserve, the student loan debt balance in the U.S. has increased by 66% over the past decade and now totals more than $1.74 trillion.
Washington Post, January 18, 2025, By Danielle Douglas-Gabriel In his last week in office, President Joe Biden capped a tumultuous effort to deliver widespread student loan forgiveness by canceling another $600 million in education debt for longtime borrowers and those defrauded by their colleges. With Biden’s final round of student debt relief, he has approved a total of $189 billion in loan cancellation for 5.3 million borrowers — more than any other president. Yet higher education experts are split on whether his mission to ease the debt burden for millions of Americans did more harm than good. Many of Biden’s sweeping debt relief policies have either been struck down by the courts or tied up in litigation that has left the student loan repayment system in disarray.
Ironically, the lawsuits and court cases depend on Republican obstruction, the party of the wealthy. Millions of people who would have benefited from debt relief voted for Trump. Now, more than ever, the wealthy have control over America. They always wish to be more prosperous, which requires widening the income/wealth/power Gap between the rich and the rest. The children of the rich do not need to borrow for college, but the children of the rest do. Therefore, forcing the rest to be indebted widens the Gap, making the rich richer. It’s the same motivation for why the rich complain about the cost of Medicare and Social Security but never about the costs of special tax breaks available only to the rich.
college graduates are higher than the poor
College graduates see a successful future
The “federal spending causes inflation” trope is how the rich justify voting against spending that benefits the not-rich.
Still, the president’s relentless pursuit of debt forgiveness, primarily through long-existing federal programs, has helped millions of people. “Four years ago, President Biden made a promise to fix a broken student loan system. We rolled up our sleeves and, together, we fixed existing programs that had failed to deliver the relief they promised,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said Thursday. The Education Department announced three separate rounds of student loan forgiveness in Biden’s last week in office. On Monday, the department canceled loans for 150,000 borrowers mostly through a 1994 statute called “borrower defense to repayment,” which lets the agency cancel federal student loans when colleges violate students’ rights and state law. A majority of those cancellations were for students who attended defunct schools owned by the Center for Excellence in Higher Education, including Stevens-Henager College, Independence University and California College San Diego. “My Administration has taken historic action to reduce the burden of student debt, hold bad actors accountable, and fight on behalf of students across the country,” Biden said Monday. “For the first time in the history of the student loan system, we saw the federal loan program deliver on its promise to more than 5 million student loan borrowers,” said Persis Yu, deputy executive director at the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC), an advocacy group. Conservatives have also succeeded in stalling Biden’s Saving on a Valuable Education (Save) repayment plan, which ties monthly student loan payments to earnings and family size, and offers a shorter path to loan forgiveness.  A court injunction has halted Save and the Education Department has suspended payments for the 8 million people enrolled in the plan but denied them credit toward loan forgiveness during the forbearance period. While President-elect Donald Trump is likely to end the program, it is unclear what his administration will do with all of those borrowers.  Republicans have become hardened against what many have called a fiscally irresponsible giveaway to college graduates at the expense of taxpayers.
To the Trump right-wing, “fiscally irresponsible” means anything that benefits the middle and the poor. It does not include tax breaks for the rich. Think of :
  • Private foundations or charitable trusts
  • Real estate depreciation deductions, tax-deferred exchanges (like 1031 exchanges)
  • Family limited partnerships (FLPs)
  • Offshore accounts and trusts
  • Business owners can deduct expenses, including travel, entertainment, and even personal use of company assets.
  • Grantor-retained annuity trusts (GRATs) and dynasty trusts
  • Carried interest
  • Deferred compensation plans
  • Foreign tax credits
  • Opportunity zone investments
  • Grantor trusts
  • Conservation easements
  • Like-kind Exchanges (Section 1031)
a doctor overworked overburdened drowning in patients
The future of the poorly educated.
Have you taken advantage of any of the above? They all reduce federal taxes, thus taking dollars from the federal government. If they were used by middle—and lower-income taxpayers, the rich would complain that they are “fiscally irresponsible giveaways” or that programs (like Medicare and Social Security) are running short of money. But you will hear no complaints from the rich about the abovementioned tax breaks. The rich complain only when the rest of us receive something from the government.
House Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-Michigan) accused the Biden administration of giving “handouts with zero accountability.”
“Handouts with zero accountability” is how Donald Trump paid virtually no taxes during the years he made billions.
“Instead, the administration should have been working to address the fact that student loan debt is too high, completion rates are too low, and far too many students are left worse off after paying for college than if they had never enrolled in the first place,” Walberg said Monday. “
Which is precisely what Biden’s loan forgiveness does.
It is shameful that, in its final days, the Biden-Harris administration is doubling down on efforts to push as much forgiveness as possible through the door, once again ignoring the rule of law.”
Neither Walbert nor the rest of the Republican Party has solutions for reducing excessive student loan debt, low completion rates, and the financial strains students face after college. In fact, as the techies say about flawed programs, “Those aren’t bugs; they’re features.”
Congressional Republicans are likely to push wholesale changes to the federal lending system through the budget reconciliation process, including a proposal to eliminate Plus loan programs for graduate students and parents. For his part, Trump has derided Biden’s student loan forgiveness policies as “vile,” but has not put forth a plan of his own.
This is a common complaint by Trump, who routinely criticizes anything the Democrats do, then promises to come up with a better plan and, in the end, fails to do so. Who could forget the eight years of broken promises to develop an “improved” version of Obamacare?
Persis Yu, the Deputy Executive Director and Managing Counsel at the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) said, “The last Trump administration looked the other way when students’ and borrowers’ rights were denied — routinely siding with predatory schools and servicers. 
The fact that education benefits America was known to our first settlers,  whose first acts were to create schools. The first free public school in what is now the United States was established in 1635 in Boston, Massachusetts, funded by taxpayer dollars Today, grades K-12 are still funded by taxpayer dollars, without direct student cost, by monetarily non-sovereign governments. So surely, grades 13+ can be financed by our Monetarily Sovereign government without taxpayer dollars. These days, advanced education is more important than it was four centuries ago, so all the same reasons for free elementary and high school now exist for free college and advanced. The solution to educating everyone who wants it is federal funding of all education. Further, the federal government should fund student salaries to compensate for lost working hours. The “federal debt” excuse is meaningless for a Monetarily Sovereign government. The “inflation” excuse is false. Inflation is caused by shortages of oil, food, shipping, labor, etc., none of which is affected by federal spending on education. We seem to have plenty of money for the military, Congress, the White House, and SCOTUS, as well as tax breaks that benefit the rich. (There is no FICA for tax shelters.) Rich property and business owners receive massive tax breaks; renters and salaried employees get nothing. Trump famously stated, “I love the poorly educated.” It seems he is so enthusiastic about the poorly educated that he wants millions more to join that group. The federal government does not need to lend. Federal lending is a Mafia-like solution for students of modest means who are desperate to climb the social/financial ladder, but become trapped in future-destroying debt. The government should give benefits to the people rather than lend, which would not only help the individuals receiving benefits but, unlike lending, add growth dollars to the economy. We should end all student loan programs and start anew with comprehensive student support programs for grades K-16+, financed by the federal government at no cost to federal, state, or local taxpayers. “Comprehensive” should encompass tuition, books and materials, room and board, tutoring, transportation, and salaries to cover lost work time. This would decrease the number of poorly educated individuals, increase the number of well-educated individuals, and alleviate a significant financial burden on students, their families, and state or local governments. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell Monetary Sovereignty Twitter: @rodgermitchell Search #monetarysovereignty Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell; MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell; https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

The Sole Purpose of Government Is to Improve and Protect the Lives of the People.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY