
As he promised . . .

#Monetary Sovereignty – Mitchell
Economics, Money and Debt


TOADIES KNOW NO LIMITS
March 4, 2026, Florida Sun Sentinel:
Florida legislators are considering a bill that would designate a portion of Commercial Boulevard in Lauderdale-by-the-Sea as “President Donald J. Trump Boulevard.”
The House version of the bill was recently passed, clearing the way for the Senate to approve the measure.
The bill, HB 33, aims to add the honorary designation of “Trump Boulevard” to a beachside stretch of Commercial Boulevard, a major thoroughfare, not far from where a “Trump Drive” sign already exists, at the corner of Sea Grape Drive and Commercial.
Lauderdale-by-the-Sea had voted just last year to co-designate Sea Grape Drive after the president, declaring it “President Donald J. Trump Drive.”
It wasn’t an easy decision for the town. First came extensive debate, then a 3-2 vote in favor of adding Trump’s name to the Sea Grape Drive sign.
Left alone, the bill could lead to the town having a street crossing that features a Trump Boulevard in one direction and a Trump Drive in the other. The prospect of that may please the president’s strongest supporters, but it doesn’t sit well with everyone.
“Can we take it down?” asked Michael Smith, 75, who lives less than a mile from the intersection. Looking at the Trump Drive sign on a sunny afternoon, Smith said he found it difficult as a Democrat to separate his opinion about street names from his feelings about Trump’s habit of self-promotion.
“He just wants his name on everything,” he said.
Question: Will the signs stay up after he goes to jail?
Here is what Floridians scheduled themselves to pay for the unnecessary, cruel, and bigoted incarceration of valuable, honest, working, tax-paying immigrants — good men, women, and children who for years had helped the Florida economy grow.
Reprint of an article in the March 2, 2026, Florida Sun Sentinel:
By Kate Payne | The Florida Trib
PUBLISHED: March 2, 2026 at 11:19 AM EST | UPDATED: March 2, 2026 at 11:31 AM EST
This story was originally published by The Florida Trib.
In an application signed Aug. 7, 2025, the Florida Division of Emergency Management — the state agency that spearheaded the construction and operation of the site — formally requested a $1.49 billion grant from the federal government, underscoring the staggering scale of spending of taxpayer dollars on federal immigration enforcement — largely out of public view and with little oversight by state lawmakers.
The documents show the state was spending more than $1 million per day to run the facility, with the “daily burn” rate topping $3 million a day during its earliest weeks.
The figures were revealed in a trove of thousands of pages of internal emails, budget spreadsheets and vendor contracts that Second Judicial Circuit Judge Angela Dempsey ordered FDEM to produce in a lawsuit brought by the advocacy group Friends of the Everglades.
For months, FDEM had refused to hand over the documents in compliance with the state’s public records law, once considered a national model for open government but now routinely undermined by state agencies under the DeSantis administration.
The booklicking Florida Republican Party obediently closed its eyes to DeSantis’s money-wasting plans, then tried to hide what they were doing.
Soon, they will run for re-election.
The documents are being disclosed at a critical time, as state lawmakers are considering reauthorizing the multibillion-dollar emergency fund that allowed the governor’s office to spend profusely and rapidly to build and run the makeshift detention center made of tents and trailers — and as state officials and the federal government give conflicting accounts about whether Florida will ever be reimbursed for the costs.
Have you ever noticed that liars always keep changing their story as the questions become closer to home?
A Florida Senate panel in the state’s Republican-dominated Legislature is slated to consider a proposal reauthorizing the Emergency Preparedness & Response Fund on Monday.
They want to steal more, more, more money from Florida’s taxpayers’ pockets.
Last month, a key state official stood before a packed room in the Florida Capitol and for the first time answered substantive questions from state lawmakers about FDEM’s spending on the Everglades detention center, and another pop-up facility built at the Baker Correctional Institution, about 40 miles west of downtown Jacksonville.
FDEM Executive Director Kevin Guthrie acknowledged that the agency had spent $573 million on immigration enforcement since the creation of the emergency fund housed in the governor’s office in 2022, which empowered the executive to spend prodigiously without needing express approval by the Legislature.
But Guthrie didn’t tell lawmakers everything.
The newly released records detail just how much more the state intended to spend on the facilities, after quickly inking multimillion-dollar deals with vendors that included companies whose owners are major Republican donors to political committees for DeSantis, President Donald Trump and other GOP candidates.
At one point, the state estimated the Everglades facility’s “daily burn” rate — how much cash it cost on a daily basis to support 500 detainees — was more than $1.2 million a day.
State records show more than $92 million has been paid to just one vendor called Doodie Calls, a portable restroom company tasked with setting up temporary bathrooms and hauling away the estimated 45,000 gallons of wastewater the facility produces each day.
More than 92 million Florida taxpayer dollars literally went down the toilet.
Individual expenses across dozens of spreadsheets include $39,000 spent on pillows for the staff “village” at the facility, a section of the compound where hundreds of staffers live in on-site trailers.
The state doled out $169,900 for “boonie hats,” a kind of military-style cotton hat with a wide brim and a chin strap.
The documents also detail the scale of the personnel required to build and manage the temporary lock-up, from janitors to laundry workers to cooks, translators to legal case managers to IT staff. At one point, the “current staff” total was logged at 396 people,
And it all comes with a cost — the facility’s warden is listed as earningbelow what the state estimated it needed to support 500 detainees. $1,000 a day in regular pay, totaling $365,000 a year, with another $273,000 expected in annual overtime pay.
Corrections officers at the facility were projected to earn a base salary of more than $120,000 a year, almost three times the base pay of correctional officers in the state’s prisons, which have been plagued by chronic understaffing.
Who will ultimately pay for it all remains an open — and critical — question.
No, the state didn’t take any risk. It was the poor taxpayers who took the risk. DeSantis and his pals did just fine, thank you.
Almost as soon as DeSantis administration officials announced their plans for the sprawling tent camp in the Everglades — blindsiding other state and local leaders — they assured the public that the federal government would pick up the tab.
“Don’t worry, suckers, the Republicans won’t waste Florida’s money; they’ll waste America’s money.” But even that was a lie.
In October, DeSantis heralded an announcement by Department of Homeland Security officials that Florida had been awarded a $608 million reimbursement.
“We were right; media was wrong…” DeSantis posted on social media on Oct. 2, 2025, referencing previous news reports that questioned whether federal funds for the facility would come through.
Five months later, no federal reimbursement has materialized — and attorneys for the state are acknowledging in court filings that the money may never come.
“The State constructed and operated the facility, and the federal government had no say in whether or how the State proceeded. The State took the risk (and still does) that federal funding will not materialize,” reads a Feb. 24, 2026 filing on behalf of Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, credited as the architect behind the idea for the South Florida detention facility.
The question of funding is at issue in a federal lawsuit brought by Friends of the Everglades and other environmental groups, who allege that government officials violated federal law when they failed to conduct an environmental review before building the facility.
Destroying the crown jewel of Florida’s environment, the storied Everglades, is OK so long as the money goes to Republican toadies.
A federal district judge agreed, ordering the facility to wind down its operations, before an appeals court panel halted the order.
Attorneys for the federal government have argued that the facility is state-managed — and because it hasn’t received any federal funding, the federal environmental law should not apply.
In court documents, Trump administration attorneys have worked for months to cast doubt on the reimbursement, describing plans to provide federal funding as “unrealized” and “legally insufficient.”
DeSantis says the feds will pay. Trump says they won’t. Which liar do you believe?
The recently released records paint a different picture — the documents show that not only was the $608 million grant “awarded,” federal funds were “available” and state officials had requested payment.
According to documents, the Federal Emergency Management Agency awarded Florida the $608 million grant, effective Sept. 30, 2025.
What followed was many more weeks of back-and-forth negotiations between attorneys for FEMA and their state counterparts — with questions persisting about whether certain spending would trigger an environmental review required under federal law.
When has law made any difference to the Trumpian Republican Party? They break the law daily and with impunity. Think about them being ordered to return all the illegal tariff dollars they collected from the public. Do you believe you ever will see a penny of the dollars you, and consumer, paid?
One spreadsheet detailed the “allowability” of certain state expenses — whether FEMA would reimburse for them – with labels noting “Need more info” and “Will possibly trigger environmental review.”
They knew that what they were doing was illegal. They did it anyway.
Then on Nov. 26, 2025, FDEM got some good news — FEMA had approved an amendment to their application and federal funds were “now available” for the state to submit a request for reimbursement.
“The grant has been amended in the FEMA GO system, and $89,670,048.85 is now available for submission of payment request(s),” reads the FEMA confirmation email.
On Dec. 8, 2025, Florida submitted a more than $30 million payment request — only to have FEMA deny it two days later, citing a need to conduct an EHP or Environmental and Historic Preservation review.
Gee, we didn’t know we actually were expected to obey the law, so long as the money went to DeSantis’s Republican supporters.
“The EHP hold should not have been lifted as the EHP review was not yet finalized. FEMA will put the funds back on hold until the EHP review is finalized,” reads the denial email from FEMA.
All the while, pressure had been building on the state agency — which has been sued in the past for allegedly failing to pay contractors.
“Any opportunity to get funds to us by mid-December will go a very long way with our Stakeholders,” FDEM’s then-chief of staff wrote to FEMA officials on Nov. 20, 2025, “so we will work expeditiously to complete any outstanding items.”
Don’t worry. Florida’s zombie voters will obediently march to the polls and elect yet another crooked Republican administration, and then rationalize it by claiming that Democrats would be worse.
The suckers don’t understand that re-electing criminals is how criminality becomes entrenched.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;
MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;
……………………………………………………………………..
A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.
MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY
In case you can’t remember, here are three stories that will clarify everything:
Summary:
On May 8, 2018, President Donald Trump announced that the United States was ending its participation in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — the 2015 multinational nuclear agreement that capped Iran’s uranium enrichment and subjected its nuclear facilities to international inspections.
Trump called the deal “defective at its core” and said it failed to prevent Iran’s nuclear ambitions, while also arguing it did not adequately limit Iran’s missile program or regional proxy activities.
Following the U.S. exit, sanctions were re-imposed on Iran’s energy, petrochemical, and financial sectors, aiming to pressure Tehran into renegotiating a stricter deal.
European allies and other signatories criticized the withdrawal, warning it undermined diplomatic constraints on Iran’s nuclear work.
Summary:
In June 2025, the United States — alongside Israeli forces — carried out airstrikes on multiple Iranian nuclear sites, including the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, Natanz facility, and the Isfahan nuclear center, after diplomacy faltered.
President Trump publicly claimed these strikes effectively destroyed Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and said they had “totally obliterated” Iran’s capacity to enrich uranium at threat-level scales.
However, independent analysis and Iranian reports later indicated that while the facilities were damaged or abandoned, no complete destruction of underground infrastructure could be independently verified.
Following these strikes, Iran suspended cooperation with UN inspectors and negotiations stalled, contributing to heightened tensions.
Summary:
By early 2026, escalating U.S. military action against Iran — culminating in a major joint offensive with Israel — was justified publicly by the Trump administration primarily on national security grounds.
Officials cited Iran’s continued nuclear enrichment and alleged attempts to restart weapons-related capabilities as key threats, asserting that an Iranian nuclear arsenal would destabilize the Middle East and possibly endanger U.S. allies and interests.
They also pointed to Iran’s development of long-range missiles, support for militant groups (including Hezbollah and Hamas), past attacks on U.S. forces and regional sites, and human rights abuses as contributing to the decision to use force.
Critics, including foreign policy analysts, have questioned some of the intelligence assessments and the clarity of the rationale, noting the absence of imminent attack evidence and drawing parallels to prior disputed war rationales.
======================
In summary, we had a deal with Iran that allowed us to inspect all their facilities. Trump didn’t like the deal, so he cancelled it, but had nothing to replace it (This reminds us of his attempts to cancel Obamacare, and still has nothing to replace it.)
So, with no one to oversee Iran, it began again to create the materials for nuclear bombs.
So we bombed them, and Trump claimed we had obliterated their nuclear bomb-making facilities.
Less than a year later, Trump discovered that Iran had been doing what everyone but Trump knew it was doing. When he discovered this, he went to war — a war that could have been avoided had he not, in 2018, cancelled the agreement.
Everyone who is related to those who are wounded, maimed and/or killed in today’s war can lay the blame right at Trump’s feet, for his senseless actions in 2018 and thereafter.
Trump’s MAGAs and the billionaire suckups will not understand the shame of all this. Instead, they will cheer the deportations of innocent, hard-working, valuable-to-America immigrants and join draft-dodger Trump in shedding crocodile tears for the war dead.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Twitter: @rodgermitchell
Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;
MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;
……………………………………………………………………..
A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.
MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY