The Case for Trump’s fascism

Reader Roger Meier, commented on the previous post, Trump is forcing us into socialism, hatred and recession.

He makes a good case for Trump not being a socialist, but rather, a fascist. I agree with his comments and have included them below.

However, I stand by the “hatred and recession” claims, as there can be no doubt he is the ultimate hatemonger and that his incoherent use of tariffs will negatively impact our economy.

Roger Meier,  

I opt for Trumpism-Fascism as fascism is an authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology characterized by a dictatorial leader, the forcible suppression of opposition, and the regimentation of society and the economy.

Core features of fascist regimes, such as those that ruled Italy and Germany in the 20th century, include: 

  • Dictatorial leader: A single leader, often viewed with a personality cult, holds complete control over the government.
  • Ultranationalism: The nation and often race are exalted above the individual. The national community’s unity is prioritized over individual rights.
  • Militarism: The government actively builds up its military strength and prepares for—or engages in—aggressive warfare to expand its territory.
  • Suppression of opposition: All forms of political dissent are suppressed, often through violence. Free elections are eliminated or made fraudulent.
  • Rejection of other ideologies: Fascism stands in opposition to communism, liberal democracy, and traditional conservatism. 

While not based on state ownership of the means of production like communism, fascist economies tightly control private enterprise to serve the state’s nationalistic goals. This is achieved primarily through a corporatist system. 

Corporatism.

This system involves the government organizing the economy into a series of state-controlled “corporations,” or syndicates, that include representatives from government, industry, and labor. 

  • Controlled “collaboration”: In theory, this arrangement fosters “harmonious cooperation” between workers and employers for the national good. In practice, it destroys independent labor movements and solidifies state control.
  • State-directed production: Through these state-run bodies, the government dictates industrial policy, setting production levels, wages, and prices.
  • Benefit for favored elites: While claiming to represent all, corporatism protects powerful corporations and existing elites who align with the regime. The state’s power in this “partnership” is always dominant. 

Economic examples

  • Fascist Italy (1922–1943): Benito Mussolini’s regime implemented a system where private initiative was considered an instrument to protect national interests. By the late 1930s, the state controlled most of Italy’s economy after taking over failing banks that owned many businesses during the Great Depression.
  • Nazi Germany (1933–1945): Adolf Hitler’s regime forced businesses into cartels and eliminated independent labor unions. Private enterprise was heavily regulated and directed toward the goals of rearmament and autarky (economic self-sufficiency). 

Key takeaways on business control

  • Private ownership, public control: Fascism maintains the appearance of private property and private enterprise, but the state exerts total control over production and industry.
  • Hierarchy over class struggle: Instead of socialist class struggle, fascism imposes a strict national and social hierarchy where the individual serves the state and economic interests are subordinated to the national agenda.
  • Suppression of labor: Independent labor unions are banned and replaced with state-controlled syndicates, often resulting in lower wages and worse conditions for workers.
  • Economic self-sufficiency: Autarky, or national economic self-sufficiency, is a primary goal, often achieved through protectionist trade policies and militaristic expansion. Image

The comments look AI generated (That is not a negative. To my mind the comments are perfectly appropriate, regardless of the source. The format just seems “AI-ish.” As readers know, I often refer to AI.)

I thank Roger for reminding us how seemingly opposite philosophies can circle back and meet at their extremes. Socialism, in its extreme form, communism, and fascism inevitably are dictatorships.

Given absolute power, as the Supreme Court has done with Trump, a leader will use it. “Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

In communism, all property is publicly owned, which in reality means government owned and directed by a dictatorial leader. Fascism means a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy.

The two essentially are indistinguishable in practice.

Hitler and Stalin, fascist and communist, were cut from the same cloth. Hitler had his concentration camps. Stalin had his gulags. Trump has his Alligator Alcatraz (“Auschwitz”), and deportations to hellish locations.

In one, people were rounded up and gassed to death. In the other, people were rounded up and worked to death. In the third, people are rounded up, families separated, and deported.

Trump often uses Hitlerian phrases like “poisoning the blood” when referring to non-citizens.

Neither system countenances disagreement with the supreme leader, and both are brutal in their execution of laws as determined at the whim of the dictator.

Donald Trump encompasses all the traits of the fascist/communist leader. Watch a video of a Hitler speech and its translation and you easily can imagine Trump giving exactly the same speech — and receiving the same reactions from acolytes.

The Republican Party is as much an echo chamber for Trump as the Communist party was for Stalin and is for Putin. No difference.

It is no wonder that Trump has expressed admiration for Putin, Kim, Bolsonaro, and Orban. He wishes to be them.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

 

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

 

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Trump is forcing us into socialism, hatred and recession.

Socialism: Government ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership

Trump wants to install socialism. He already has taken the first steps.

The following article appeared in Newsweek online.

Trump admin wants to own patents of new inventions; Story by Theo Burman

Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick has said that his department has been in contact with top universities to create “deals” that would give the government patents for their research and inventions.

Poster socialism - communism poster – Wall Art | UkPostersLutnick informed President Donald Trump, along with the Cabinet and the press, that the government would receive the patents in return for the “tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars” spent on grants each year.

Why It Matters

The statement came shortly after Trump announced a deal with Intel that would give the federal government a 10 percent stake in the computer chip-producing company.

It marks another government intervention into private business practices, which is a shift from typical conservative economic orthodoxy, and could frustrate some of the government’s free-market proponents in the Republican Party.

The word for this is “socialism.” Not yet true communism, but the Trump method is to stick his nose into the tent, then wriggle in further and further.

The military intervention in Los Angeles is but one of many examples. Then came Washington, DC, soon to be followed by Chicago and other Democratic cities.

If the government can invest in Intel and take Harvard’s profitable patents under the pretext of “taxpayer-funded,” what will be next?

(No federal spending is “taxpayer funded.” All federal spending is funded by government money creation. The sole purposes of federal taxes are to control the economy and to assure demand for the U.S. dollar.

Unlike state and local taxes, federal tax dollars fund nothing. They are destroyed upon receipt.)

When officials say “taxpayer dollars” are being used for CHIPS Act grants (or for buying equity stakes), it’s political deception. In reality:
  • The U.S. government is Monetarily Sovereign. It creates dollars at will by crediting bank accounts — it does not need to collect taxes.
  • Taxes don’t fund federal spending. They remove dollars from the private sector, but the federal government can’t run out of dollars any more than a sports scorekeeper can run out of points.
  • Equity stakes or subsidies aren’t “paid for” by taxpayers. They’re keystroke operations at the Treasury/Fed level. The “taxpayer” framing is rhetorical, usually to make spending sound accountable.

So, if the government takes a 10% stake in Intel, it’s not with dollars taken from your paycheck. It’s because policymakers chose to use their sovereign power of money creation to exchange newly created dollars for stock.

The question isn’t “who’s paying for it?” (Answer: no one), but rather why the government is choosing equity stakes over grants, and what leverage or influence it hopes to buy with that keystroke-created money.

What To Know In the briefing on Tuesday, Lutnick informed the president and his colleagues in Cabinet that he was already in contact with Harvard over the implementation of the deals.

“We have given tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars to universities for them to do research, and they invent things, and you know who owns those patents? The universities,” he said, causing Trump to nod his head and smile.

That is the purpose of the federal government: To deficit spend for the benefit of the private sector. The federal government, being Monetarily Sovereign, neither needs nor uses tax dollars. Every dollar it spends is newly created, ad hoc.

Even if the government collected $0 taxes, that would not affect the government’s ability to spend. The government could stop taxing tomorrow, then spend a trillion dollars, and do it all by pressing computer keys.

“So we are going to make a deal with them all, which is: if we give them the money, don’t you think it’s fair that the United States of America, and the taxpayers who funded it, get a piece of that?”

Ah, yes: “Fairness.” Always at the top of Trump’s mind. In fact, fairness has nothing to do with it. The federal government is supposed to support the economy. That is the sole purpose of the government.

It’s ironic that Trump always refers to the government as “the deep state,” except when he’s pulling the strings. Then it’s “fairness.”

The briefing followed a Tuesday interview on CNBC, in which Lutnick defended the Trump administration’s approach to ownership. When asked by host Andrew Ross Sorkin about Boeing and Palantir, the secretary said that companies like these made large profits from the government already, so it made sense that the government should own a slice of them.

It only makes sense to someone who does not understand federal financing. The government has infinite dollars. The private sector does not. So why would it be “fair” for the infinitely rich government to take dollars from the private sector? That makes no sense.

Worse, every dollar in profits taken by the federal government is a dollar that comes out of the private sector, i.e. the economy.

“I mean, Lockheed Martin makes 97 percent of their revenue from the U.S. government. They are basically an arm of the U.S. government,” Lutnick said.

“There’s a lot of talking that needs to be had about how do we finance our munitions, acquisitions?…Now you have the right people in the jobs and Donald Trump at the head thinking about what is the right way to do it.

I’ll tell you the way it has been done has been a giveaway.”Trump has a "I FAILED AGAIN" sign hanging from his neck

Yes, that is exactly what we need: A guy who has bankrupt three gambling casinos — one of them twice. Isn’t that the last person we want running Lockheed Martin? It’s not easy to bankrupt a gambling casino, but this guy has done it four times!

  • Trump Taj Mahal: Opened in 1990, it filed for bankruptcy in 1991 and again in 2004.
  • Trump Plaza: Opened in 1984, it filed for bankruptcy in 1992.
  • Trump Castle: Opened in 1985, it filed for bankruptcy in 1992.

And let’s not even discuss Trump airlines, Trump steaks, Trump perfume, Trump water, GoTrump.com, Trump Mortgage, Trump vodka, Trump Magazine, the criminal Trump University, the fake Trump Foundation and all the other Trump failures.

White House spokesperson Kush Desai previously told Newsweek in reference to the Intel deal: “The previous administration pushed legislation to dole out billions in grants that prioritized DEI [diversity, equity and inclusion] over taxpayer return to some of the largest semiconductor companies in the world.

Utter, nonsense.

  1. No company prioritizes DEI over profits. That is just Trumpist scare-mongering.
  2. Intel was not formed to create taxpayer return (i.e., paying taxes). It was formed and run  to create shareholder returns, although it seemingly fell short. The “taxpayer return” line simply is a fake excuse for taking over a private company.
  3. Taxpayers will not receive anything from federal ownership of Intel stock. Please advise if ever a check from the government marked “Lockheed Martin profits” arrives in your mailbox.
  4. Only a convicted criminal and proven bigot like Trump could make DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) a bad thing. DEI promotes fair treatment of all people, including groups who have historically been subject to discrimination based on identity or disability.

A. Diversity refers to variety within a workforce regarding characteristics such as race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, age, culture, class, veteran status, or religion. (i.e., not employing only those of one race or one gender.)

B. Equity means decision-making authority to all groups, including those that have historically been disadvantaged. (i.e., allowing any races and genders to be executives and directors’ members.)

C. Inclusion refers to allowing all employees to know their voices will be heard. (i.e., taking seriously complaints and suggestions from all employees, regardless of race or gender.)

DEI does not mean giving unfair advantage to any group. Just the opposite. I means having the courage and honesty to tell the truth about American history, warts and all, and not turning a blind eye toward unfairness.

Every nation on earth has dark places in its history. To deny these is to repeat them. America does not need to hide the bad apples in our barrel. Rather, to expose them as examples of what not to do, demonstrates our strength and courage.

“We have done some things we are not proud of. They are wrong. We have learned. We shall not do them again.” That is the motto of a truly great nation.

Fundamentally, DEI is what Americans believe, whether or not we have been programed by the extremists. Everyone should be treated equally. We do it in our democracy, where each person’s vote counts the same.

DEI is the democratic way, though Trump has turned it into a threat to white Christians. Ironically, DEI is the basis for Jesus’s teachings, the very thing white Christians claim to believe in.

“Now the Trump administration is ensuring that taxpayers are able to reap the upside of the federal government’s investments into safeguarding our national and economic security—all while simultaneously pushing supply-side reforms like deregulation and The One Big Beautiful Bill’s tax cuts to let the free market restore America as the world’s most dynamic economy.”

Taxpayers reap nothing from government investments. Americans receive the benefits of all businesses, but not from government profits.

Now, comes the shift from DEI to “safeguarding security” (not accomplished by government ownership). “deregulation (the opposite of government control),” “tax cuts” (but only for the rich), and “free market” (the opposite of government ownership), and dynamic economy (government ownership takes dollars out of the economy).

There are certain things the government should own, but collecting profits is not one of them. The government never seek return on its investments. The economy benefits when the federal government loses money on its investments, because the lost dollars are gained by the private sector.

Remember: Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports. The more the government spends, the greater is GDP. When the government takes profits from the private sector, that reduces GDP.

Summary

Government ownership of industry never should be done to provide the government with profits. Any profits taken by the government reduce GDP. They do not reduce federal taxes, which are levied to control the economy and to assure demand for the dollar–not to fund federal spending.

Instead, federal ownership is warranted only where providing important services would be unprofitable for the private sector.

The government never should invest for profit. Federal losses actually benefit the economy by adding dollars to the economy.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Is This Trump Appointee Unfit for the Job? #2

Kash Patel

He definitely did not say that he would come after the people in the media who helped Joe Biden rig the presidential elections.

And his Kash’s Korner never promoted fake pills that claim to detoxify the coronavirus spike protein provided by COVID-19 vaccines on Truth Social.

And he never provided financial support to former FBI special agents for promoting misinformation about the January 6 Capitol attack.

And he never agreed with QAnon’s false rhetoric surrounding the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the January 6 Capitol attack, and the first and second impeachments of Trump.

And he never repeatedly pleaded the Fifth Amendment before a grand jury as part of the FBI investigation into Trump’s handling of government documents.

And he never lied Fox News that lawyers for Hillary Clinton had worked to infiltrate Trump Tower and White House servers.

And he never pushed the Russia investigation origins conspiracy theory.

And he never promoted Italygate, a conspiracy theory alleging Italian interference in the U.S. presidential election. 

So, he is qualified to head the FBI, because he never did any of those things.

If he had, of course, he would be unqualified, as so many other Trump appointees are.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

Is This Trump Appointee Unfit for the Job? #1

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Robert Kennedy, Jr. is a doctor. He is standing in a hospital hallway. He looks puzzled. He is talking to a nurse. The n...

“But Dr. Kennedy, research shows that vaccines have saved millions of lives, and their safety record is outstanding. If we convince people to stop vaccinating, millions of children and adults will sicken and die.”

“OK, nurse, so I’m not a doctor and I don’t know anything about medicine, vaccinations, research or stuff like that. But for some reason Trump appointed me, instead of a doctor, to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. By the way, I just popped into surgery, and I saw something that looked delicious. What was it?”

“It was a liver for transplantation, doctor.”

“They can do that now? I thought transplanting livers caused autism. I knew it tasted funny. Remind me for next time, where do they keep the microwave and the catsup?

 

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

;