–Where is the FDIC for insurance premium payers?

Mitchell’s laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor,
which leads to civil disorder.
●Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance of payments.
●Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics devolves to motivation.

=====================================================================

FDIC is an excellent program that protects bank depositors. Its limits are too low (in my opinion), but otherwise it does what it is supposed to do: Allow people to make deposits without the fear that these deposits will not exist when needed.

I, myself, have owned multi-year CDs in banks that closed several years prematurely, and in each case, I received my money, including interest, within a week.

Insurance companies have some resemblance to banks in that they accept “deposits” (premiums) and provide promises of specific, later payments. Like banks, insurance policies are supposed to provide risk-free investment with many (not all) of their policies. That is why they are called “insurance.” They insure against risk.

A fixed annuity resembles a CD in that it guarantees a specific payment, despite inflation, recession or any other economic uncertainty. And, similar to the situation with banks, the long-term, future finances of insurance companies are difficult, if not impossible, for the public to research or predict.

So where is the FDIC for insurance companies?

Accident victims are threatened with cuts in annuities
By Donna Gehrke-White, Sun Sentinel
February 13, 2013

Timothy Culhane was only 29 when he tripped on a high-rise conduit pipe and fell seven floors while working on a New York hotel construction site near the World Trade Center in 1980.

He survived, but since then he’s lived through decades of painkillers, surgery and physical therapy. Now totally disabled and living in Plantation, Culhane thought at least he had a regular check coming after he received a million-dollar settlement.

He wasn’t counting on a New York government agency going to court to liquidate an insurance firm that for decades has sent out his monthly checks.

Ironically, the agency that was supposed to protect Culhane has convinced a New York court that he and about 1,500 other annuity recipients must give up a substantial portion of their monthly income because the Executive Life Insurance Company of New York doesn’t have enough money to pay everyone. In fact, it is more than $1.5 billion short.

Last week, an appeals court upheld the cut in annuity payments.

The New York Superintendent of Financial Services is supposed to protect annuity beneficiaries and should help the victims keep what was promised them. The Superintendent’s office first took over Executive Life Insurance in 1991 when its California-based parent company couldn’t pay debts. The stressed ELNY was then given to the New York Liquidation Bureau to turn around.

But after more than two decades of overseeing, the liquidation bureau said that low interest rates and the 2008 stock market collapse had made matters worse and ELNY could no longer “support the payment of 100 percent of the benefits.”

If changes in interest rates and the stock market can affect the security of an insurance policy, it isn’t insurance. It’s speculation.

“I didn’t think that could happen,” Culhane said. He said had turned over his $1 million settlement from the accident in the 1980s to ELNY to ensure he would always have steady income.

“I still need surgeries,” he said.

In New York’s defense, it is a monetarily non-sovereign government. It does not have the unlimited ability to pay its bills. By contrast, the U.S. federal government is Monetarily Sovereign and never can run short of dollars.

Though FDIC arbitrarily limits the size of its guarantees, the federal government really could pay any claims of any amount. So the question is this:

Why does the federal government not guarantee fixed payout insurance, just as it guarantees my bank CDs?

The federal government already has demonstrated it will save large insurance companies and their highly paid executives and wealthy creditors, as AIG can testify.

So the question remains: “Where is the FDIC for insurance premium payers?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

====================================================================================================================================================

Nine Steps to Prosperity:
1. Eliminate FICA (Click here)
2. Medicare — parts A, B & D — for everyone
3. Send every American citizen an annual check for $5,000 or give every state $5,000 per capita (Click here)
4. Long-term nursing care for everyone
5. Free education (including post-grad) for everyone
6. Salary for attending school (Click here)
7. Eliminate corporate taxes
8. Increase the standard income tax deduction annually
9. Increase federal spending on the myriad initiatives that benefit America’s 99%

No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth. Monetary Sovereignty: Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia. Two key equations in economics:
Federal Deficits – Net Imports = Net Private Savings
Gross Domestic Product = Federal Spending + Private Investment and Consumption – Net Imports

#MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY

3 thoughts on “–Where is the FDIC for insurance premium payers?

  1. There’s reinsurance, which insurance companies use to spread the risk among various companies, even though your policy is with only one of them. But, when you buy an annuity, it’s just like putting money in the bank in excess of the amount covered by FDIC. Or like buying a corporate bond, or any other investment. You depend on the solvency of the company you gave your money to. Diversification is important, too. Sounds like Timothy put all his eggs in one basket. He probably got a higher annuity payment because of that, but that was because he also took some of the risk on himself.

    But I like your idea. My adviser bought GM bonds for me, because there was no WAY they could go bankrupt, and even if the stock went to 0 the bondholders were protected. Then Obama screwed us, and gave the bondholders’ money to the unions. Is there something in your plan for me, too?

    Like

  2. Spreading the risk is what fooled everyone in the mortgage debacle.

    There is a fundamental difference in expectations, between buying a corporate bond, which is nothing more than an at-risk investment vehicle vs. buying an insurance policy, the purpose of which is to defend against market risk.

    That’s what the word “insure” implies.

    An insurance fixed annuity comes closer to a bank CD. (By contrast, a variable annuity is more like a bond, or even a stock, in that the buyer understands market conditions will affect his investment.)

    Though insurance companies are regulated issuers (by the states), they have begun to issue riskier products, as they are able to obtain higher premiums by hiding the risk. So, today, there is a huge overlap between speculative and presumably “insured” products.

    I don’t believe stocks and bonds should be insured by the federal government, but I do believe true insurance products, not tied to market conditions, should be.

    I don’t think someone should pay for insured security, only later to discover there is no security.

    By the way, there is a growing attitude in America, “If the government doesn’t help me, it shouldn’t help you.” It’s this attitude that accounts for the sneering at the poor and needy, and the desire to cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, because they are what Mitt Romney considers “gifts” for sloths.

    Ironically, it’s the selfish, un-American, “me-only” attitude of the so-called “religious” right. It has caused much of what is wrong in America, today.

    Like

    1. Why not have the BEST insurance ever created-100% capitalization.
      If we the people had a brain, we could terminate FDIC, FICA (yes,FICA), and federal income taxes while at the same time increase non-deficit spending. As Einstein said, “Keep it simple”. Mandate the FIRE sector to be 100% capitalized and in order not to have a ‘total collapse of the monetary system’ , allow them to borrow the hundreds of trillions needed. Do you have any idea how much “increase in revenue for the people” instead of the PFPB would result from this -One Simple Program ?.
      Please explain, Why you would not wish prosperity for yourselves and your children?

      Like

Leave a comment